Star with different internal driving force than the sun discovered

From the UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN – NIELS BOHR INSTITUTE

On our star, the Sun, the sunspots are seen in a belt around the equator. Sunspots are cool areas caused by the strong magnetic fields where the flow of heat is slowed. Credit: NASA
On our star, the Sun, the sunspots are seen in a belt around the equator. Sunspots are cool areas caused by the strong magnetic fields where the flow of heat is slowed. Credit: NASA

A star like the Sun has an internal driving in the form of a magnetic field that can be seen on the surface as sunspots. Now astrophysicists from the Niels Bohr Institute have observed a distant star in the constellation Andromeda with a different positioning of sunspots and this indicates a magnetic field that is driven by completely different internal dynamics. The results are published in the scientific journal, Nature.

Stars are glowing balls of gas that through atomic processes release energy that is emitted as light and heat. In the interior of the star are charged particles that swirl and spin and thereby create a magnetic field that can burst out onto the surface of the star, where it appears as sunspots. Sunspots are cool areas caused by the strong magnetic fields where the flow of heat is slowed. On our star, the Sun, the sunspots are seen in a belt around the equator, but now scientists have observed a large, distant star where sunspots are located near the poles.

Sunspots at the poles

“What we can observe on the star is that it has a large sunspot at its north pole. We cannot see the south pole, but we can see sunspots at latitudes near the poles and these sunspots are not there at the same time, they are seen alternately on the northern and southern hemispheres. This asymmetry of sunspots indicates that the star’s magnetic field is formed in a different way than the way it happens in the Sun,” explains astrophysicist Heidi Korhonen, Dark Cosmology Centre at the Niels Bohr Institute at the University of Copenhagen.

The star that has been observed is a massive star that is approximately 16 times the size of the Sun in diameter. It is located180 light years away in the constellation Andromeda. It is much too far away to be able to observe the details on the surface of a star that is only seen as a spot of light that is less than one pixel. Astronomers have previously seen sunspots on Zeta Andromeda using the Doppler method, which means that you observe that light wavelengths of the rotating star. Sunspots are cool areas and by studying the wavelengths you can construct a map of the surface temperature. So far this has been the best way to observe the surface structures of distant stars, but there may be misinterpretations, so there have been doubts about the accuracy concerning the existence of the polar sunspots.

But by using a method where you gather images from several different telescopes that you observe simultaneously, you can get far more details than you could achieve with even with the largest telescopes individually. But it was not easy. It is a method that has been used for decades in the radio waveband field and using the CHARA Array, consisting of six telescopes, it has now become possible to observe the visible and near-infrared light.

“With these new observations, we have many more details and extra high resolution. Our new measurements confirm that there are large sunspots at the poles. We see dark sunspots on the northern visible pole, while the observations reveal that the lower latitudes are areas with sunspots that do not last, but appear and disappear again with an asymmetrical distribution on the surface of the star and this was surprising,” says Heidi Korhonen, who is an expert on sunspots.

Powerful magnetic field

But why is the location of the sunspots different than those we know from the Sun?

Heidi Korhonen explains that it is a very different star than the Sun. It is a binary star, that is, two stars orbiting each other. This causes the stars to rotate more quickly. The Zeta Andromeda star, which is the larger of the two stars, rotates at 40 km per second. The Sun rotates at 2 km per second.

“It is the rapid rotation that creates a different and very strong magnetic field. The strong magnetic field gives a more complicated dynamo effect that resembles what you see at the stage where a new star is being created. Here we are seeing the same effect in an old active star that is in its final stage,” explains Heidi Korhonen.

On the Sun, the sunspots appear and disappear on a regular basis and the number increases periodically approximately every 11 years. The magnetic field that creates the sunspots can also trigger large, explosive discharges of plasma, causing solar storms to hit the Earth. These storms result in very strong northern lights and can also cause problems for orbiting satellites and the power grid on Earth.

###

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
128 Comments
Carla
May 9, 2016 5:51 pm

lsvalgaard
May 8, 2016 at 11:09 pm
For the zillionth time: ……..
—————————————————————————-
Apologee to you Dr. S. Your one of the ‘best’ going on, round these parts of the internet.
I’m only looking for an effect/affect of possible accretion.
The accretion reconnection regions of some stars are within 10 solar radii.
Possible corotating interaction regions generated by by currentsheet crossings of inner most planets (<1AU) magnetospheres and accelerated stuff back to the solar corona for heating.
Pressure, flow, crescent and cone. My hobby thingy.
Way outta there the solar wind becomes "sub-Alfv´enic."
Everything you always wanted to know about separatrices and null points, below…..
MHD flows at astropauses and in astrotails
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1501.05122v1.pdf
D.H.Nickeler1,T.Wiegelmann2,M.Karlick´ y1,andM.Kraus1
5 Discussion and Conclusions
…With respect to the heliosphere, the multiple decreases and increases in the magnetic field strength as well as in other physical parameters measured by Voyager 1 (Burlaga et al., 2013) indicates several crossings of either one or several individual separatrices. Such a scenario is in good qualitative agreement with the multiple separatrix structures due to more than one null point as proposed here and formerly by Nickeler et al. (2006). A similar scene considering multiple, nested separatrices and magnetic islands was recently suggested based on detailed numerical simulations by Swisdak et al. (2013). Interestingly, our results for the two null point scenarios also agree with the recently proposed presence of a heliocliff region inside the heliopause (FiskandGloeckler,2013).
In particular, the heliocliff might be interpreted as the separatrix resulting from the second null point (as shown in the middle left panel of Fig.1), and the streamlines originating from the monopole part, which bend into the heliotail, would represent the open heliosheath as introduced by Fisk and Gloeckler (2013). In the heliocliff region, the model of Fisk and Gloeckler (2013) turns out to produce a super-Alfv´enic field-aligned flow, while in our model the flow close to the heliopause and in the heliotail region is field-aligned but can also be sub-Alfv´enic. Furthermore, the presence of magnetic shear flows can produce vortex current sheets (Nickeler and Wiegelmann, 2012) leading to the generation of instabilities and magnetic reconnection close to separatrices. In the current work were strict our analysis to a maximum of two separatrices and we apply the mapping only to the heliotail with one symmetric separatrix (top panel of Fig.2) with two current sheets. As multiple separatrices can exist in the heliosphere, the presence of multiple current sheets in the vicinity of these separatrices can lead to fragmented structures (e.g., Nickeler et al., 2013;Swisdaketal.,2013).Introducing a non-collisional resistivity, strong electric (DC) fields parallel to the magnetic field can be generated, which can contribute to cosmic ray acceleration as suggested by Nickeler (2005).
Probably over 7 Dr. S. docs open on my computer now, along with others.
Thanks Dr. S.

Reply to  Carla
May 9, 2016 9:43 pm

I’m only looking for an effect/affect of possible accretion.
For the Sun, there is none. On the contrary, the Sun loses 4 million tons every second, carried away by the solar wind.

Carla
May 9, 2016 6:05 pm

Make that 10 …

Carla
May 10, 2016 7:18 pm

lsvalgaard
May 9, 2016 at 9:43 pm
I’m only looking for an effect/affect of possible accretion.
For the Sun, there is none. On the contrary, the Sun loses 4 million tons every second, carried away by the solar wind.
—————————————————————————————————————————-
Well there is plenty more..available…
Universe’s missing mass found in the cosmic web
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2015/dec/02/universes-missing-mass-found-in-the-cosmic-web
Dec 2, 2015
Trillions of solar masses
The researchers then established what fraction of the filaments’ total mass the gas represents. To do so, they studied images from the Hubble Space Telescope and ground-based telescopes of galaxies lying behind Abell 2744, and worked out how much the light from those galaxies is bent by the gravitational pull of the intervening matter. They concluded that the filaments each weigh in at a few tens of trillions of solar masses. In other words, the researchers say, gas makes up roughly 10% of each filament by mass, with most of the rest being dark matter.
According to Eckert, galaxy surveys and numerical simulations show that most of the universe’s galaxies and dark matter lie in the filaments of the cosmic web. As such, he says, if the filaments contain significant amounts of hot gas, then that gas would contain a sizeable proportion of all baryons – about half, he estimates. “Our findings strengthen evidence for a picture of the universe in which a large fraction of the missing baryons resides in the filaments of the cosmic web,” he and his colleagues wrote in a paper published in Nature.
—————————————–
Today I went off to look at the EEJ Equatorial Electrojet. All that NINO talk, prompted the look back at it.
Now have strong correlation to F10.7 for two solar cycles. Using the new EE index..
Today also discovered a CEJ, Counter Electrojet which develops over E. Africa at times..
Long-term EEJ variations by using the improved EE-index
Akiko Fujimoto, et.al.
http://newserver.stil.bas.bg/SUNGEO/00SGArhiv/SG_v11_No1_2016-pp-37-47.pdf
Abstract: In 2008, International Center for Space Weather Science and Education, Kyushu University (ICSWSE) proposed the EE-index, which is an index to monitor the equatorial geomagnetic phenomena. EE-index has been improved with the development of the MAGnetic Data Acquisition System and the Circum-pan Pacific Magnetometer Network (MAGDAS/CPMN) and the enormous archive of MAGDAS/CPMN data over 10 years since the initial article. Using the improved EE-index, we examined the solar cycle variation of equatorial electrojet (EEJ) by the time series analysis for EUEL (one part of EE-index) at Ancon in Peru and the solar activity from September 18, 1998 to March 31, 2015. We found that the long-term variation of daily EEJ peak intensity has a trend similar to that of F10.7 (the solar activity). The power spectrum of the daily EEJ peak has clearly two dominant peaks throughout the analysis interval: 14.5 days and 180 days (semi-annual). The solar cycle variation of daily EEJ peak correlates well with that of F10.7 (the correlation coefficient 0.99). We conclude that the daily EEJ peak intensity is roughly determined as the summation of the long-period trend of the solar activity resulting from the solar cycle and day-to-day variations caused by various sources such as lunar tides, geometric effects, magnetospheric phenomena and atmospheric phenomena. This work presents the primary evidence for solar cycle variations of EEJ on the long-term study of the EE-index.
Discussion The results of our analysis are as follows:
1. The long-term variation of daily EEJ peak intensity has a trend similar to that of F10.7 (the solar activity). 2. The dominant spectrum powers of daily EEJ peak occur at 14.5 days and 180 days throughout two solar cycles. In contrast, F10.7 has no dominant spectrum peaks throughout the analyzed interval.
3. The solar cycle variation of daily EEJ peak correlates well with that of F10.7 (the correlation coefficient 0.99).
Good night

Reply to  Carla
May 10, 2016 8:54 pm

Well there is plenty more..available
Could be, but not relevant for solar activity.