CFACT’s groundbreaking film Climate Hustle will be shown in movie theaters across the United States for a special one-night event, tonight, playing at hundreds of movie theaters across the country. As a service to readers, I’m posting up this reminder today. I’m in the film, but I’m not paid to be in the film nor to post this message.
Here is my review from one week ago (with trailers):
My review: Skeptic Film ‘Climate Hustle’ to appear in theaters Nationwide one week from tonight
Here’s what the Washington Times had to say about it, and the controversy surrounding it.
Even before the skeptical documentary “Climate Hustle” hits U.S. theaters Monday, it already has unsettled the climate change debate.
Weather Channel founder John Coleman rushed to the defense of the film, which challenges the catastrophic climate change narrative, after “science guy” Bill Nye slammed it in a clip released over the weekend as “not in our national interest and the world’s interest.”
“I have always been amazed that anyone would pay attention to Bill Nye, a pretend scientist in a bow tie,” Mr. Coleman said Saturday on the website Climate Depot.
“As a man who has studied the science of meteorology for over 60 years and received the [American Meteorological Society] Meteorologist of the Year award, I am totally offended that Nye gets the press and media attention he does,” Mr. Coleman said. “And I am rooting for the ‘Climate Hustle’ film to become a huge hit — bigger than ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ by Al Gore.”
Indeed, the documentary by Climate Depot’s Marc Morano bills itself as a response to the former vice president’s Academy Award-winning 2006 documentary, which sparked international alarm with its warnings of imminent environmental disaster fueled by rising greenhouse gas levels in the atmosphere.
…
“The film’s most effective moments come when left-of-center experts describe how they abandoned their previous climate change positions,” Mr. Toto says in his review. “Doing so opened them up to scathing critiques from their colleagues.”
More here
So, let’s head to the movies on tonight, ask the questions and learn the fa
cts the “climate hustlers” don’t want us to think about, and laugh them off the world stage together.
If you haven’t already, invite a friend who thinks the world is going to hell in a hand-basket due to climate change to sit back and take in the reality with some popcorn. Get a large bucket, you’ll need it.
http://www.climatehustlemovie.com/
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Would like to see the movie, but driving a 100 miles each way, no thanks. Hopefully it will be on NetFlix soon.
Over 2-1/2 hour drive for us. Do hope they make enough on their one-night-stand to soon pass it on to NetFlix.
Yet another inconvenient truth…
It is either 1hr & 20 minutes to Napa or 1 hr & 15 minutes to San Rafael. (too long of a drive that late at night on the return trip…Damned inconvenient)
I’ll support by buying the DVD when it comes available.
Hopefully it is SO well received that it gets a wider distribution soon afterwards.
And becomes required viewing in Social Studies Classes
Just gotta wait for torrentz
C’mon you guys! I travel 2 hours each way to do my shopping every month! You lot who have already decided it’s too far won’t change your minds – and I won’t try and make you – but for others, heck, make a day of it! I’d be there myself, except I’m in Australia – now that IS too far.
Both roads between my home town and where they are playing are somewhat treacherous during daylight hours and practically insane after sundown so Sorry Charlie but unless it were playing locally, no can do
Bryan, I am not criticizing you. I know what treacherous roads are like – I live in the mountains and have to contend with not just winding roads and cliff drops but huge logging trucks coming the other way as well.
Mainly I just want to see this film do really. No offense meant to anybody. 🙂
Oops – typo – “do really well” is what I meant.
No offense taken A.D.
The theater in Fairfax, VA was FULL. Got there at 6:55 and had to sit in the second row. Great film but could see the chroma key effects.
Playing in one Canadian theater too!
http://www.cineplex.com/Showtimes/climate-hustle/toronto-on?Date=5/2/2016
Looks like it is on for two days in Toronto. I see both the 2nd and 3rd as dates.
Matt
Planning to attend, it’s less than a mile from home.
I haven’t been out to a movie in at least five years.
We watch movies at home on our big screen TV with audiophile speakers.
I find “Hollywood” movies in recent years have too much violence, too much sex, too loud, and/or promote left-wing values, such as businessmen always being dishonest — all of that keeps my money away from “Hollywood”.
BUT I’M DRIVING A HALF HOUR WITH THE WIFE TO SEE CLIMATE HUSTLE TONIGHT !
I love comedies.
And the climate change cult is a comedy.
Left-wing scaremongering, trying to convince people that the current climate (probably the best climate in at least 500 years) is about to morph into the worst climate of all times … with NYC subways filled up with water … and all those new hotels on the Maldives atolls soon to be under the sea … is a comedy!
How can anyone take the climate scaremongering seriously?
I’m getting down to the Cinemax on Cheyenne Mntn Blvd . about 40 minutes down Ute Pass .
Happy Second of May :
http://cosy.com/images/y16/Happy0502.jpg
Bob Armstrong May 2, 2016 at 10:05 am
Please stop painting the dirt.
michael 🙂
and trees..
He’s just flocking around
Unless it can be rented or bought later I will not see it. Haven’t been to a theater in many decades.
Duly noted.
Are you a theater denier?
I was a Theater Denier for many years- until they opened a Cinema & Drafthouse nearby. While movies alone I can deny, I cannot deny movies and draft beer….
No, but I am disabled and it is extremely hard to get to a theater.
Got my ticket. Theater is twenty miles from home, so I will make a night of it. Of corse I can’t get that damned tune “The Hustle” out of my head.
Thanks a lot for mentioning the ‘Hustle’. Took a moment to remember it, now it is on a loop.
Great. Now I can’t, either. And I hate that song. (Re)Curse you, Red Baron!
May be too late. Rumor is that all shows are sold out in accordance to the Paris debut standard …
It would be of interest to know if any protestors showed up tonight at any sites. I don’t think there are enough on the payroll to cover 500 sites.
500 and all full. One night should gross more than DiCaprio’s 11th Hr.
If they are protesting I would love to show up with a cattle prod but my moral compass won’t let me. I “can” run the possible scenario though my mind though and the resulting mental picture does bring a smile to my face.
Cattle Prods are a bit too tech. Think axe handles, or even better, Louisville Sluggers.
(everyone’s entitled to their mind’s own private screening… in my movie, the protests shut down for a while, then the shirtless women show up with protest signs and their tits hangin’ out. The End.)
Wish I could see it. I would have to book a flight on very short notice. The only theater showing it in Hawaii is in Honolulu.
There is no way I’d pay to see this at movie theater prices, and that goes for any documentary. I’ll wait for for it to be on Youtube.
I’m looking forward to see what a modern theater looks like . I haven’t been in one for a couple of decades .
They don’t make ’em like they used to. My impression is they have all the ambience of a wal mart.
We have several local multiplexes. One, in Sebastopol, has 14 theaters. We went to see Holes there and the particular we sat in had 52 seats and an 128″ screen. Felt like I was sitting in my living room with a couple dozen strangers. Though I do remember 450 seat theaters with balconies and double features for 50cents
I have an important prior commitmenm so I can’t go tonight. I would like a copy of the video to show to my grandchildren who have been subject to an inconvenient truth through schools for too long.
Bought my ticket yesterday at a theater with multiple bill boards advertising every movie but Climate Hustle, Of course this IS Portland, Oregon. The young lady who sold me the ticket sort of gave me a pitying look.
Eugene WR Gallun
I should add that the theater I am going to is in the city. Another theater is showing it outside the city. where the more intelligent people live.
Eugene WR Gallun
At my local theater in Bradenton Florida there weren’t any signs or billboards that I could find that promoted the show either.
Maybe you can win the Sax Bill left behind at Cannes….
http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/jun/29/monica-lewinsky-blocked-from-sitting-near-al-gore-at-cannes-festival
You’d think he would have a spot all picked out for her.
Unfortunately it will involve crossing the Atlantic for me to see it. Hopefully this will be an even bigger turning point for climate science than “An Inconvenient Truth was for climate “science”. Will look forward to seeing it in the future though.
I saw a preview for it last night. I saw something about Sarah Palin being involved. Too bad politicians / former politicians or wanna be politicians were allowed anywhere near this film. Films like this should only have scientists, engineers and other credible professionals in them.
MMMM….. I think I see a problem for this film then.
Simon, you’re just chomping at the bit to deflect to Sarah Palin — an elected state Governor, and a more accomplished person than you could ever hope to be.
Go back in your corner and sit down, Simon. Yes, facing the wall. Your time out isn’t over. And keep that dunce cap on straight, young man!
Calm down dbs. Simon expresses what 99% of the people outside the US feel and 75% of those inside the US.
Chris Schoneveld May 2, 2016 at 12:36 pm
Chris, don’t confuse your personal views with those of the U.S. let alone the world. Palin has a good size following in the U.S. I don’t think she will detract from the film. Now about that 99% for the rest of the world.
Somehow I don’t think you could get 99% of these people to even recognize the name.
If Sarah Palin has that type of name recognition world wide then she is most definitely a plus. (Provided she does a good presentation.) Remember this film is about changing viewpoints and furnishing people with information which one side of the argument does not wish them to have. They may just reappraise their view of Sarah Palin, as well as of CAGW & its supporters.
Now Simon ,,,you would “see a problem for this film” irregardless as to whether or not Palin is in it. For you and all you believe and hold sacred, it is pure poison.
It could really, really, upset the old apple cart for you.
People getting to hear and see,,,make up their own mind with information from both sides of the discussion. Actually this is like a scene from the Wizard of Oz, CAGW is just hit with a cold bucket of water- screaming I’m melting. This being the only occasion of a CAGW prediction of “melting” being valid.
michael
Trump President, Palin vice-president now that would be a shake up I would love to see.
No she was NOT a problem for the film because she was never in it.She was part of a Discussion Panel AFTER the showing of the movie in Washington D.C.
Concur. Sarah Palin has no credentials and is a nit wit to boot.
[the same might potentially be said about you -mod]
[Not even ‘potentially’. ~another mod]
Nitwit? Seems to me as if she is pretty sharp-witted. She not only had 80% approval (down to 60% after a hatchet job like I’ve never seen — and even 60% approval was the highest in the country for a guv).
She managed to shoehorn a ton of money out of Big Oil for her constituents. Whether or not one approves or not, a nitwit is not how one describes someone who pulls that off.
I agree that Sara’s presence is a liability, at least in my humble opinion…
I see your bigotry making you appear foolish,as it is clear you have no idea what her background is or what she did before she became Governor.
I’m gonna have to agree somewhat. Al Gore has been a very polarizing figure in the US, and his movie and his involvement in “global warming” has continued the polarization.
Sarah Palin has very sharp eyes, too. Fancy being able to see Russia from her place. Sorry, but that’s the stuff most of the world knows about her.
Kevin,she never said she can see Russia from her house,that was done by a leftist in a Saturday Night Live skit.
From Snopes:
FALSE: ‘I Can See Russia from My House’
“Vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin did not say ‘I can see Russia from my house.’ That line originated with an SNL spoof.”
http://www.snopes.com/politics/palin/russia.asp
i.Sorry Kelvin, you just made yourself the idiot ! That is a false quote from Saturday Night Live ! Actual quote……. Interviewer Charles Gibson asked her what insight she had gained from living so close to Russia, and she responded: “They’re our next-door neighbors, and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska”: Which, by the way, is 100% true !
Did she not say ” They’re our next door neighbors. And you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska.” Now land in this context normally means mainland. If she meant “we have islands so close you can see Russia from them” she should have said so.
And she doesn’t know the meaning of the word “diva.”
Nor does she know that Africa is a continent and not an island.
And she seems to think that minerals are energy.
I could go on, but the one I love best is that “our neighbors are foreign states.” Duh. Unfortunately, the US does have foreign states as neighbours, by definition.
Australia had an Member of Parliament like Sarah too, but being sensible people they dumped her. (I’m not Australian.)
Kelvin Duncan,
Give it up, you lost the argument. You wrote:
Now land in this context normally means mainland.
And who elected you to decide the context? Land is land. No one ever specified “mainland”. The issue here is the head-nodders in the public, which apparently includes you, too.
You’re desperate to believe the worst about someone, especially since it’s been proven to be untrue. Why is that?
Kevin:
Kevin, I have yet to hear you apologize for spreading misinformation about Palin. You should well know by now, that you are confusing the actual Palin from a Saturday Night Live Skit. Never did Palin say she could see Russia from her house! Please repent from spreading misinformation. It will help in the healing process; if your quest is to seek truth rather than seek to win someone else’s misinformed arguments.
WUWT tries hard to seek truth, through argument and research. A few keystroke and a little bit of skepticism goes a long way! Nothing is holding you back from getting to the truth.
There I said it.
Mods:
I spelled Kelvin’s name wrong in the previous post! The text I intended to send is corrected below.
Kelvin:
I have yet to hear you apologize for spreading misinformation about Palin. You should well know by now, that you are confusing the actual Palin from a Saturday Night Live Skit. Never did Palin say she could see Russia from her house! Please repent from spreading misinformation. It will help in the healing process; if your quest is to seek truth rather than seek to win someone else’s misinformed arguments.
WUWT tries hard to seek truth, through argument and research. A few keystroke and a little bit of skepticism goes a long way! Nothing is holding you back from getting to the truth.
There I said it.
I left at the end of the movie as the panel discussion was starting. I had need to hear anything involving Sarah Palin. Poor choice to include her.
Errata, No need to hear her.
Me, too! She is so incoherent I couldn’t bear to listen anymore.
Sarah Palin is on a panel @ur momisugly the end. She didn’t really add anything, but she wasn’t really a detraction.
I agree, James. Sarah did not add value to the film. When she started talking at the end of the film during the panel discussion, I left.
Saying a movie is “not in our national interest” is a bizarre critique. I don’t know quite what that’s supposed to mean.
Getting between leftists and power is not in their national interests.
That’s exactly what they meant. They are afraid of losing political power. Anyone who might take that power from them is the Devil Incarnate, as far as they are concerned.
“I don’t know quite what that’s supposed to mean.”
It is the thinking of the business interests who sponsor him, give him money, supply his media reps, etc.
Michael Mann is tainted, and James Hansen voted himself out of their good graces with his denouncing carbon trading as the fraud that it is. Nye is the current “face” purchased for the movement’s video agitprop.
Since Nye’s funding is palpably corporate, there will be little interest here in uncovering it.
He actually means “international interest” (his definition).
the Climate Hustle film good or bad, I’d like to see it, if and when put on line.
The other day I was reading biography of Mr. Bill Nye and was suitably impressed, then I came across this statement:
“This year Greenland melted almost completely”
https://youtu.be/umVW9T-7j3U
I hope he is in the movie.
So you think he was saying the whole of Greenland melted away? Really. I can see why you don’t get Bill Nye.
Simon,
If your HE-RO Bill Nye is the best you can do, you’re out of your league here. The guy has been wrong so often it’s ridiculous. But I suppose if he’s the best you can find, then you’ve gotta use him…
Simon the statement “This year Greenland melted almost completely” doesn’t leave any room for interpretation.
Hey, he threw in the scientifically precise word “almost” … so he clearly did not mean “all” of Greenland … there are some rocks there after all … in the same vein Bill Nye is “almost” a scientist …
Boys, boys, boys. This is not an IQ test. I think you will find he meant the surface area. But you go on believing what you want. And the meting was no surprise, after all it was an exceptionally warm arctic this year… Or did you miss that too?
Simon, simon, simon, This is an IQ test, and you flunked it. You wrote:
“…it was an exceptionally warm arctic this year”
Caused by Global Warming™? The same global warming that causes cooling?
We keep telling you, you can’t have it both ways. Or did you miss that too?
You are absolutely fixated on Arctic ice. Relax, it’s just natural variability. There’s nothing to worry about… unless you’re a worrywart, and you worry about everything. In that case, my condolences.
Go find ‘seaice1’. He’ll say, “There, there…”
simon, “melted almost completely” doesn’t leave much room for interpretation.
I do love the way you try to protect your idols from themselves, even when the cause is hopeless.
I perceive much angst in your future. I hope you enjoy it as much as I’m going to.
The bubble head interviewer says “It shows nearly all of Greenland’s ice sheet melting, NASA was so stunned by these images, they thought they’d made a mistake”. When she asked him to explain why this was “so significant”, did he bother to correct her? No, he did not. Instead, he launched into his climate models speech.
This was pure Alarmism, meant to deceive. It was an unusual event which occurred last in 1889, caused by a heat dome over Greenland. In terms of climate, it was meaningless.
MarkW
If you seriously think Bill Nye is suggesting Greenland will melt away completely then good luck to you living in your little world. Some here, including you, are wishing to see him as the fool over this statement. Your inability to understand what he meant is a clear indication you are looking in the wrong direction.
Stop acting exasperated your dufus hero who thinks the law of thermodynamics for calculating temperature of gas is broken and you need magic to calculate temperature of air, said something as stupid as the temperature inversion movement you, and he, both belong to.
There is no GHGE. The law of chemistry for calculating the temperature of gas forbids it expressly by assigning every gas in the atmosphere, from nitrogen to argon to oxygen to methane to carbon dioxide they all get the same specific energy in atmospheric mix calculations.
If you knew how to calculate the temperature of air, you’d be smart enough to have known that.
And that pot isn’t heroin,
And that mankind didn’t create the ozone hole.
Those are called ”Federal Government created chemistry scams.”
You fell for at LEAST one. So – that leaves you with explaining maybe whether you fell for those other two, the one about the pot being heroin, and man creating the ozone hole.
Your leadership admitted to BBC in Feb 2010’s Phil Jones don’t-go-to-jail interview that – he faked temperatures rising specifically since 1998, till when he was suspended and demoted from his job when caught admitting to other scientists he/they’d been doing that in the climategate emails.
Your other leadership sued a man who called him a liar,
lying in the filing he’d won a Nobel Prize he didn’t win:
so the man who called him a liar,
was calling a Nobel laureate,
a liar.
Then your other leadership James Hansen told you the law of chemistry for calculating the temperature of air, can’t do that, because it broke, and there’s magic nobody understands in solving temperature of air.
No, he’s just a many times busted liar. The man who owns this site actually kinda started it after seeing your leadership’s dismal U.S. climate data gathering.
You aren’t really very smart. You fell for a federal government created chemistry scam a STUDENT
IN a HIGH SCHOOL – will point out patently defies multiple laws of thermodynamics.
He gets the KooK who is, Bill Nye. He’s the ”laws of thermodynamics work” denier.
Like you.
He’s a quack. Like your fake Nobel lawsuit scammer Angry Bird Mann.
Like your fake physical laws of thermodynamics are broken temp scam daddy Hansen.
Like your fraudulent tree data scammer Keith Briffa
Like your confessed dozen years + temps scammer Phil Jones.
Like your busted ”It’s not hot and we can’t explain it oh, noes, what to do!?” CERES data scammer Trenberth.
You’re here to bark at science from behind the ”Pot’s Like Heroin” and “Man created the Ozone Hole” chemstry fraud trademark: Federal Government.
More chemistry scams,
More public schoolers who can’t count, celebrating the court Jesters like the quack Nye.
J. Rodriguez
Oh dear I think you need a little rest…….
Simon sez:
If you seriously think Bill Nye is suggesting Greenland will melt away completely…
Simon, he’s already said that.
Simon,
“So you think he was saying the whole of Greenland melted away?”
Almost completely, yes, I’m sure that’s what he said.
Thanks for the live demonstration of what sort of people are pushing this climate shakedown . . Every little bit helps ; )
JohnKnight,
You understand what BowTie was saying. I understand it. Others understand it.
Only Simple simon doesn’t get it.
DBstealey
OH dear DB still struggling with the concept two possible meanings and inference.
Does “Greenland always melts a little every summer. But this year it melted almost completely” mean….
1. All of Greenland is melting. The whole kit a kaboodle. All 1,710,000 square kilometers. Major sea level rise, major global problem all at once? A senario that is not possible on any level short of the sun exploding and frying everything in the solar system?…. Or?
2. The whole surface is showing melting?
Be careful DB this is not a trick question. It just needs you to know a little about Greenland and the rate that ice could possibly melt at.
PS~ “Some here, including you, are wishing to see him as the fool over this statement.”
Not me, I’m wishing people to see him as the pathological liar I believe he is, slick ; )
No. ‘Lyin Bill Nye, the Alarmist Guy’ is just deliberately giving that impression while being careful not specifically saying it. Just as you are being deliberately obtuse, by pretending not to get that.
“1. All of Greenland is melting. The whole kit a kaboodle. All 1,710,000 square kilometers. Major sea level rise, major global problem all at once? A senario that is not possible on any level short of the sun exploding and frying everything in the solar system?…. Or?
2. The whole surface is showing melting?”
2. is what I’m sure NASA meant, and probably what BN meant. 1. Is what the TV interviewer and Bill Nye said. Their statements *can* be construed as “What they really meant to say was ” if you understand the context. But the plain ‘laymans terms’ sense of their statements is meaning 1. 99% of the people watching this do not know this context already and the interview does not provide it, so 99% of the viewers will come away from this interview with the picture created my meaning 1 in their heads.
Nice find vukcevic, truly tragic.
This puppy is also melting, is it #ClimateChange™’s fault?
I was staring at that picture for a while.
I wasn’t sure if it was a real puppy or stuffed animal.
Then I wasn’t sure if the puppy was face up or face down.
Then I wasn’t sure if I was looking at the front or back.
But I’m sure that puppy will be a chick magnet, because I just heard “That’s the cutest puppy I ever saw” from a girl looking over my shoulder.
Sort of looks like me when I’m drunk and passed out.
MarkW
If you seriously think Bill Nye is suggesting Greenland will melt away completely then good luck to you living in your little world. Some here, including you, are wishing to see him as the fool over this statement. Your inability to understand what he meant is a clear indication you are looking in the wrong direction.
So, are you going, or are you afraid you might learn something?
Bruce Cobb
Absolutely I will see it.
Simon May 2, 2016 at 1:30 pm
MarkW
“If you seriously think Bill Nye is suggesting Greenland will melt away completely then good luck to you living in your little world.”
Simon how do you arrive at the above statement
from what MarkW posted below
MarkW May 2, 2016 at 12:40 pm
simon, “melted almost completely”
MarkW was repeating what Bill Nye stated.
Mark’s statement was past tense – what Bill Nye was telling the public. There was no suggesting or future tense in his remark. Learn to read carefully, concentrate Learn not to confuse who states what.
Now apologize to MarkW for falsely accusing him of making a statement – prediction, that is the soul property of the 21st centuries Bozo the clown Bill Nye. (he is after all nothing more then a kids entertainer Like the old cartoon Ed Edd & Eddie, Hmm I think the old Bozo was more wholesome for kids.)
michael
Nike the Moorlock
“Simon how do you arrive at the above statement from what MarkW”
I watched the video…. did you?
Simon May 2, 2016 at 2:55 pm
I watched the video…. did you?
Off course. and since you state you did you had to hear what Bill Nye stated. So now what are you going to do?
michael
Context, Mike, context.
It is perfectly clear what Nye meant. Maybe you do not want to comprehend it, but that is up to you.
(Yeah I agree it could be expressed more unambiguously, but who cares. Unless you deliberately do not want to understand what he means given the question asked, it is clear enough. If you want to continue point scoring, be my guest :))
Wagen May 2, 2016 at 4:39 pm
Context, Mike, context.
No.
Wagen
The T.V. commentator’s key words, “It shows nearly all of Greenland’s ice sheet is melting.”
Bill Nye’s answer. “Greenland always melts a little every summer. But this year it melted almost completely.
As for scoring points, there are none to be had. There is no “glory” in it.
The only conciliation prize is this fool is on your side and in all likelihood will continue to make idiotic and indefensible statements like the one we are discussing here.
And you will probably have continue debasing and humiliating yourself in a never ending effort defending his stupidity here.
til later
michael
• At 0.40 the banner states –
“HISTORIC MELTING OF GREENLANDS ICE
97% of surface Ice melted in a week”
As seen on TV so it must be true !!
Wait, NASA says “this much ice hasn’t melted this fast since 1889”.
Wasn’t human CO2 emission caused then, so why is it now?
The climate models show tornado activity now?
They can’t model clouds properly, but they generate tornadoes in northern regions? Bill Nye seems to think so.
Is there anything they can’t do?
To all those going, have fun. Stay safe, bring your phones. Be ready to film climate ugliness. I do not expect the climate activists to allow anyone to view this film in peace and quiet. They can’t tolerate any other view, or their dogma being called into question.
I suggest, if confronted, don’t try to explain, justify, correct or clarify your knowledge and views on the subject. Just smile and wave and go enjoy the movie. Don’t be baited. If harassed, record it.
Again, stay safe have fun.
michael
With the tide turning against them in public opinion, they might not dare show their faces. I hope the evening goes smoothly.
Wish I could go!! Nationwide does not include the cities north of Milwaukee or Madison.. 🙁 2 hour drive 1 way for me to go see it tonight. It needs to hit Netflix, Amazon Prime or Hulu (or heck all 3 would be nice) soon!!!
Why just one night? I’d love to go, but heavy, perhaps dangerous, storms are expected tonight, and I have trouble with night driving even in good weather, so I plan not to risk it. When will it be shown on a regular schedule, and when will it be available as a rental?
Catastrophic ANTHROPOGENIC Climate Change theme.
There is an unmistakable correlation between the current carbon-based reduction, recycling, and sequestration theme and ongoing carbon-based control schemes, including selective-child policies in liberal societies, and formerly one-child policies in far left societies.
Hopefully they’ll release this on DVD and to streaming services like Hulu, Netflix, Amazon and iTunes. Assuming they’re not in a prison camp for speaking truth to power.
When asked whether criminalizing scientific skepticism was too extreme, Bill Nye responded “We’ll see what happens”. In the mean time, Obama is seriously working on this final solution, while the Republican Congress watch in silence.
I’m reminded of the yellow stars they affixed to people who were guilty of the crime of being Jewish and wonder what symbol they choose for criminal skeptics.
http://awards.ww2badges.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/J_1.jpg
Larry,
Ask this guy, he’s probably got the skeptic symbol designed already:
Well, okay, he’s British, and they never had the same sensitivity in this regard as, oh, say, the French. Even Prince Harry fell afoul of this (though he did get pranged a bit for it and should have known better).
(Although I will admit to having twitted JC on this a little in the past.)
..A Polar Bear of course !
Not a SINGLE theater in the state of Wyoming is scheduled to show this! What’s with the hard-to-get approach? Besides, haven’t been in a theater in years and would need CC or subtitles.
Climate hustle in real time….
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-florida-gov-jobs-minimum-wage-20160429-story.html
anything on hurricanes in the movie?
CAGW: More hurricanes caused by global warming
Science: hurricanes counteracting global warming.
The study was published online on April 20, 2016, in the Journal of Geophysical Research – Biogeosciences.
http://cdn.phys.org/newman/csz/news/800/2016/1-hurricaneske.jpg
This map shows the total increase of photosynthesis and carbon uptake by forests caused by all hurricanes in 2004. The dotted gray lines represent the paths of the individual storms. Credit: Lauren Lowman, Duke University
http://phys.org/news/2016-05-hurricanes-key-carbon-uptake-forests.html