
From NCAR/UCAR:
SEARING HEAT WAVES DETAILED IN STUDY OF FUTURE CLIMATE
Sweltering heat waves that typically strike once every 20 years could become yearly events across 60 percent of Earth’s land surface by 2075, if human-produced greenhouse gas emissions continue unchecked.
If stringent emissions-reduction measures are put in place, however, these extreme heat events could be reduced significantly. Even so, 18 percent of global land areas would still be subjected yearly to these intense heat waves, defined as three exceptionally hot days in a row.
These are among the findings of a new study by Claudia Tebaldi of the National Center for Atmospheric Research and Michael Wehner of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. The study, funded by the U.S. Department of Energy and published in the journal Climatic Change, quantifies the benefits society would reap, in terms of avoiding extreme heat events, if action is taken now to mitigate climate change.
“The study shows that aggressive cuts in greenhouse gas emissions will translate into sizable benefits, starting in the middle of the century, for both the number and intensity of extreme heat events,” Tebaldi said. “Even though heat waves are on the rise, we still have time to avoid a large portion of the impacts.”
MORE FREQUENT, MORE SEVERE
Tebaldi and Wehner used data generated by the NCAR-based Community Earth System Model to study 20-year extreme heat events—those intense enough to have just a 1-in-20 chance of occurring in any given year. The model was developed with support from the Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation, NCAR’s sponsor.
The researchers looked at two things: how frequently today’s typical 20-year heat wave may occur in the future, as well as how much more intense future 20-year heat waves will be.
For large portions of the world’s land surface, future heat waves with a 1-in-20 chance of occurring in any given year are projected to become more extreme than heat waves with the same chance of occurring today. Stringent efforts to mitigate human-produced carbon emissions would reduce the amount of land area at risk for these intense heat waves—defined as three days of exceptionally hot temperature. Click to enlarge. (This table is freely available for media & nonprofit use.)
Besides finding that today’s 20-year heat waves could become annual occurrences across more than half of the world’s land areas by 2075, the study also concluded that heat waves with a 1-in-20 chance of occurring during a future year will be much more extreme than heat waves with the same probability of occurring today.
For example, if emissions remain unabated, a heat wave with a 1-in-20 chance of occurring in 2050 would be at least 3 degrees Celsius (5.4 degrees Fahrenheit) hotter for 60 percent of the world’s land areas. For 10 percent of land areas, a 20-year heat wave in 2050 would be at least 5 degrees C (9 degrees F) hotter.
A few degrees may not seem like much on a mild day, but during extreme heat events, they can mean the difference between life and death for vulnerable populations, Wehner said.
“It’s the extreme weather that impacts human health; this week could be 2 degrees Celsius hotter than last week, and that doesn’t matter,” he said. “Now, imagine the hottest day that you can remember and instead of 42 degrees C (107.6 degrees F) it’s now 45 degrees C (113 degrees F). That’s going to have a dangerous impact on the poor, the old and the very young, who are typically the ones dying in heat waves.”
By 2075, the situation is likely to become much more dire if greenhouse gas emissions—produced largely by the burning of fossil fuels—are not reduced. The percent of land areas subject to 20-year events that are at least 5 degrees C hotter swells from 10 to 54 percent.
However, if emissions are aggressively cut, the severity of these 20-year events could be significantly reduced over the majority of the world’s land areas, though portions of the Earth would still face dangerous heat extremes. For example, in 2075, almost a quarter—instead of more than a half—of land areas could experience 20-year heat waves that are at least 5 degrees C hotter than today’s. “But even with such dramatic reductions in carbon dioxide emissions, future heat waves will be far more dangerous than they are now,” Wehner said.
The researchers also looked at single-day extreme heat events, as well as single-day and three-day blocks when the overnight low temperature remained exceptionally warm. Past research has shown that human health is especially endangered when temperatures do not cool off significantly at night. All of these events had similar increases in frequency and intensity.
A TOOL FOR COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
The fact that extreme heat events are expected to increase in the future as the climate changes—and the fact that emission reductions could ameliorate that increase—is not a surprise, Tebaldi said. But this study is important because it puts hard numbers to the problem.
“There is a cost attached to reducing emissions,” Tebaldi said. “Decision makers are interested in being able to quantify the expected benefits of reductions so they can do a cost-benefit analysis.”
Tebaldi and Wehner’s paper is part of a larger project based at NCAR called the Benefits of Reduced Anthropogenic Climate Change, or BRACE. For the project, researchers from across NCAR and partner organizations are working to quantify how emission reductions may affect health, agriculture, hurricanes, sea level rise, and drought.
About the article
Title: Benefits of mitigation for future heat extremes under RCP4.5 compared to RCP8.5
Authors: Claudia Tebaldi and Michael F. Wehner
Publication: Climatic Change
Again – isn’t the entire premise that all this ‘roasting heat’ is supposed to be coming from increased humidity – which by definition, would result in more tropical fauna? The lushest, healthiest biospheres on the planet?
So we should move to Labrador or Tierra del Fuego?
These guys should keep up better with the peer-reviewed literature.
Two relatively recent papers in Geophysical Research Letters cast doubt on their claims: http://www.cnrm.meteo.fr/IMG/pdf/douville_grl15a.pdf and http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015GL067189/abstract.
The first finds that models may be overestimating sensitivity to radiative forcings and the second that unreliable model simulations overestimate danger from extreme events. This paper doesn’t cite either of those. Why not?
All of this on 0 theoretical fundamental quantitative equations or experimental demonstration of “trapping” of energy by spectral phenomena in excess of the equilibrium temperature determined by the planet’s spectrum as seen from the outside .
Simple, concise and true.
Hmmm….just how many years ago did Hansen predict what would happen if CO2 reached the present level?
Have the temps reached what he predicted?
This isn’t trying to move the goal post. It’s trying to build a new one.
Coming to a broken climate model near you.
What a load of kick the can down the roadery.
Wait! Wait! I can do this, too! It’s fun! Ready?
A new climate forecast: by 2125, people will only be able to live above 45 degrees latitude, because Global Warming will roast and bake the lower latitudes. And, come visit me when it happens.
and
Ad hoc definition and model based study… Not one reference to the type of weather creating heatwaves.
I expect 100% of Earth surface will experience their next definition of a heatwave: day.
3 days seems like a very poor choice. I like to remember 1976 in London – 15 days of very hot weather in a row.
This kind of ‘paper’ really enrages me to the point of wanting to break something or hit somebody. But all your comments calm me down a little and make me realize I’m not the only one who who sees these tossers as money-grabbing, lying, wretches.
Thank you guys.
Here in Sydney, Australia, Peter Hannam, the resident alarmist environment editor at the Syndey Morning Herald, is claiming record heatwaves (40c + for the inner west. /sarc on Sheesh, that’s unusual for the inner west Peter /sarc off). Oh wait! It’s summer Peter!!!
The sky is falling ,the sky is falling get the little boy who cried wolf to safety right now .
But the IPCC predict the population to soar in the future so all this extra heat will increase fertility – good news !
http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/emission/index.php?idp=99
http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/
And now for the REAL problems: Pollution of soil, air, and water; extinction of flora and fauna; population growth (90 years ago there were fewer than 2 billion humans in the world, now on the way to 8 billion). These are REAL, present problems.
Therein lies my problem with this whole CAGW scam.
If the GovMint Bureaucrats would simple be honest with the citizenry they would explain that their real concerns are overpopulation, limited resources and the growing demand on natural resources. Then we could all share in an honest discussion on how immediate the problem is and how we go about dealing with it.
But no. They have been dumbing down the citizenry here in the U.S. so that they can peddle a fairy tale complete with cute fuzzy polar bears and lovable little penguins threatened by evil men, designed to scare and guilt a 50% + 1 majority into voting our GovMint the power over the people to restrict their energy use and degrade the quality of life for all but the powered elites including the bureaucrats. The best part? When pressed even they acknowledge that prescribed actions can’t stop their theorized doomsday scenario. They are just delaying tactics. A no win scenario for the citizenry oh and drop your pants and bend over you are not going to enjoy what comes next.
overpopulation, limited resources and the growing demand on natural resources.
Heck, I don’t think any of those things are real problems. Modernity cures all.
I agree.. The puppet masters have created this CAGW scam because they don’t agree and don’t want to share their real concerns since they have no basis to win the argument. CAGW gives them the angle they need.
If the CMIP projections come true, more heat waves, yes. But there is little to no indication that will actually happen in the first place.