Model claims: Future heat waves to roast 60% of the planetary surface by 2075

2015 was the warmest year since modern record keeping began in 1880, according to an analysis by NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies.
2015 was the warmest year since modern record keeping began in 1880, according to an analysis by NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies.

From NCAR/UCAR:

SEARING HEAT WAVES DETAILED IN STUDY OF FUTURE CLIMATE

February 23, 2016

Sweltering heat waves that typically strike once every 20 years could become yearly events across 60 percent of Earth’s land surface by 2075, if human-produced greenhouse gas emissions continue unchecked.

If stringent emissions-reduction measures are put in place, however, these extreme heat events could be reduced significantly. Even so, 18 percent of global land areas would still be subjected yearly to these intense heat waves, defined as three exceptionally hot days in a row.

These are among the findings of a new study by Claudia Tebaldi of the National Center for Atmospheric Research and Michael Wehner of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. The study, funded by the U.S. Department of Energy and published in the journal Climatic Change, quantifies the benefits society would reap, in terms of avoiding extreme heat events, if action is taken now to mitigate climate change.

“The study shows that aggressive cuts in greenhouse gas emissions will translate into sizable benefits, starting in the middle of the century, for both the number and intensity of extreme heat events,” Tebaldi said. “Even though heat waves are on the rise, we still have time to avoid a large portion of the impacts.”

MORE FREQUENT, MORE SEVERE

Tebaldi and Wehner used data generated by the NCAR-based Community Earth System Model to study 20-year extreme heat events—those intense enough to have just a 1-in-20 chance of occurring in any given year. The model was developed with support from the Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation, NCAR’s sponsor.

The researchers looked at two things: how frequently today’s typical 20-year heat wave may occur in the future, as well as how much more intense future 20-year heat waves will be.

Table detailing how heat waves will change in the future

For large portions of the world’s land surface, future heat waves with a 1-in-20 chance of occurring in any given year are projected to become more extreme than heat waves with the same chance of occurring today. Stringent efforts to mitigate human-produced carbon emissions would reduce the amount of land area at risk for these intense heat waves—defined as three days of exceptionally hot temperature. Click to enlarge. (This table is freely available for media & nonprofit use.)

Besides finding that today’s 20-year heat waves could become annual occurrences across more than half of the world’s land areas by 2075, the study also concluded that heat waves with a 1-in-20 chance of occurring during a future year will be much more extreme than heat waves with the same probability of occurring today.

For example, if emissions remain unabated, a heat wave with a 1-in-20 chance of occurring in 2050 would be at least 3 degrees Celsius (5.4 degrees Fahrenheit) hotter for 60 percent of the world’s land areas. For 10 percent of land areas, a 20-year heat wave in 2050 would be at least 5 degrees C (9 degrees F) hotter.

A few degrees may not seem like much on a mild day, but during extreme heat events, they can mean the difference between life and death for vulnerable populations, Wehner said.

“It’s the extreme weather that impacts human health; this week could be 2 degrees Celsius hotter than last week, and that doesn’t matter,” he said. “Now, imagine the hottest day that you can remember and instead of 42 degrees C (107.6 degrees F) it’s now 45 degrees C (113 degrees F). That’s going to have a dangerous impact on the poor, the old and the very young, who are typically the ones dying in heat waves.”

By 2075, the situation is likely to become much more dire if greenhouse gas emissions—produced largely by the burning of fossil fuels—are not reduced. The percent of land areas subject to 20-year events that are at least 5 degrees C hotter swells from 10 to 54 percent.

However, if emissions are aggressively cut, the severity of these 20-year events could be significantly reduced over the majority of the world’s land areas, though portions of the Earth would still face dangerous heat extremes. For example, in 2075, almost a quarter—instead of more than a half—of land areas could experience 20-year heat waves that are at least 5 degrees C hotter than today’s. “But even with such dramatic reductions in carbon dioxide emissions, future heat waves will be far more dangerous than they are now,” Wehner said.

The researchers also looked at single-day extreme heat events, as well as single-day and three-day blocks when the overnight low temperature remained exceptionally warm. Past research has shown that human health is especially endangered when temperatures do not cool off significantly at night. All of these events had similar increases in frequency and intensity.

A TOOL FOR COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS

The fact that extreme heat events are expected to increase in the future as the climate changes—and the fact that emission reductions could ameliorate that increase—is not a surprise, Tebaldi said. But this study is important because it puts hard numbers to the problem.

“There is a cost attached to reducing emissions,” Tebaldi said. “Decision makers are interested in being able to quantify the expected benefits of reductions so they can do a cost-benefit analysis.”

Tebaldi and Wehner’s paper is part of a larger project based at NCAR called the Benefits of Reduced Anthropogenic Climate Change, or BRACE. For the project, researchers from across NCAR and partner organizations are working to quantify how emission reductions may affect health, agriculture, hurricanes, sea level rise, and drought.

About the article

Title: Benefits of mitigation for future heat extremes under RCP4.5 compared to RCP8.5

Authors: Claudia Tebaldi and Michael F. Wehner

Publication: Climatic Change

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

106 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
3x2
February 23, 2016 9:08 am

I’ve just devised a model that clearly demonstrates that nothing out of the ordinary will happen so you can all relax now and plan for a ‘so so’ future (climate wise at any rate).

ossqss
February 23, 2016 9:10 am

One wonders if the authors are confident enough to move their retirement monies into HVAC futures?
Sarc/

ferdberple
February 23, 2016 9:10 am

From NCAR/UCAR:
==========
have they moved their headquarters to Alaska?
How is it that Alaska remain one of the least populated places on earth in terms of people per square mile?
Are we seeing flocks of retired people picking up and moving from Arizona and Florida up to Alaska?
Why is it that retired people move to Arizona and Florida from colder climates?
Why is it that billions of people live in the tropics, but almost no one lives at the poles?
Why is it that NCAR/UCAR scientists lack an ounce of common sense?

Marcus
February 23, 2016 9:13 am

..This would be funny …if it wasn’t so stupid !

Ryan S.
February 23, 2016 9:14 am

As a Canadian, this news has truly made my day.

Reply to  Ryan S.
February 23, 2016 10:50 am

Sorry to disappoint you, but it’s a climate model, so it’s the last thing that will happen.

Katherine
Reply to  Ryan S.
February 23, 2016 5:35 pm

Clearly they don’t view the opening of more land to agriculture due to warming in Canada, Greenland, and Russia to be a good thing. Nor extended growing seasons. Nor the shortening of shipping times by going through the Arctic. Nor fewer hurricanes due to less temperature contrast. Nor lower excess winter mortality.
Since they’re advocating against warmer temperatures.

MarkW
February 23, 2016 9:18 am

Aren’t heat waves defined based on what is normal for that place and time of year?
For example the same temperature that qualifies as a heat wave in Nome, Alaska, would not be a heat wave in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Ralph Kramden
February 23, 2016 9:28 am

It is my understanding that global warming has a much greater effect on nighttime low temperatures than on daytime high temperatures. I think mild winter nights are much more likely than hot summer days. Another possibility is that global warming will be minimal and no one will notice any difference.

george e. smith
Reply to  Ralph Kramden
February 23, 2016 11:41 am

Kevin Trenberth’s planetary model doe not permit ANY night time. Sun shines all day from 186 million miles altitude at the zenith.
g

Resourceguy
February 23, 2016 9:29 am

Model extremism is not to be outdone by extreme weather assertions, extreme psychology research, and extreme policy plays. It’s great for Hollywood scripts too.

Matt G
February 23, 2016 9:31 am

A definition based on Frich et al.’s Heat Wave Duration Index is that a heat wave occurs when the daily maximum temperature of more than five consecutive days exceeds the average maximum temperature by 5 °C (9 °F), the normal period being 1961–1990.

This does vary a little around different countries, but still 3 c or 4 c above normal for maximum temperatures have generally never been a heatwave and needs to last for around 5 days not 1 or 2.
Scientists expect future cooling over the next few decades so we need to get a rise of 5 c on average summer temperatures to increase the frequency of heat waves in just a 20 year period after it. We struggle to rise local temperatures over the past century by 1 c so how does 5 c sound over just 20 years? There is so much nonsense in this useless made up assumption of an article it is only worth laughing at it.
You can’t forecast weather next month and you certainly can’t forecast it in 2075, so please just drop the nonsense.

Reply to  Matt G
February 23, 2016 12:39 pm

Calgary, Alberta is in the middle of a “Heat Wave” as we speak. For the reasons you state. The “average high” (whatever that is) is stated as 0 to 1 C for this time of year (depending on which weather station you subscribe to) We have had a couple of weeks that have exceeded the highs by enough to be called a heat wave, but no records – it’s been warmer and it’s been close to 40 below as well – weather.
http://www.theweathernetwork.com/ca/14-day-weather-trend/alberta/calgary
I blame it on El Nino – similar weather pattern to last year and much as predicted by Joe Bastardi and group at the Weatherbell way back last spring and summer.
http://www.theweathernetwork.com/ca/monthly/alberta/calgary?year=2015&month=2&dispt=chart-container-monthly
http://www.theweathernetwork.com/ca/monthly/alberta/calgary?year=2016&month=2&dispt=chart-container-monthly

Matt G
Reply to  Matt G
February 23, 2016 1:32 pm

A heat wave also always refers to the human body maybe overheating causing danger to health, so any weather conditions that don’t cause this are also not considered one.

David Bidwell
February 23, 2016 9:35 am

Uncertainty bands? How about turn that model on the next 5 year period and see how accurate the prognostications are?

Trebla
February 23, 2016 9:47 am

It’s worse than we thought. Much, much worse. To borrow a phrase from the new car advertising industry, “Introducing the all-new climate scare!”

taxed
February 23, 2016 10:03 am

More rubbish from so called climate science.
Notice how there is never any details to these wild claims, beyond its down to CO2. l would take theses claims more seriously if they detailed just how exactly are we going reach this state of affairs.
Are they claiming that there will be a increase in blocking high pressure during the summer months to allow these heatwaves to happen.?
Are they claiming that there will be a large scale shutdown of the jet stream to allow the air to stagnate and grow hotter. ?
Are they saying that all the cold air at the poles will disappear so helping to shutdown the wind patterns across the globe. ?
These peoples claims need to be exposed by science rather then just resorting to insults.

TonyN
February 23, 2016 10:10 am

At last the UK Government is taking action on the misuse of government funds on lobbying, rather than on the actual science.
A certain Bob Ward is ‘communicating’ (aka squawking?) in the Guardian, as his funding is clearly under threat;
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/feb/22/new-funding-rules-bad-for-policy-public-interest-democracy-anti-lobbying
Not a scientist, ‘Bob’ is the Policy and Communications Director for the Grantham Research Institute for Climate Change Economics and Policy, at the London School of Economics.
We can hope that a metaphorical “pause” will affect them, too.
I suggest, before he finds other work to do, Bob spins this bad news as: “Communications on Climate-Change Economics and Policy will be entering a pause owing to the policy of tackling the economic climate change in the LSE caused by the anthropogenic emissions of Tory politicians”

Michael Carter
February 23, 2016 10:22 am

This prediction relies on an assumption that CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere has a lineal correlation with global temperature and hence heat waves. This assumption is looking increasingly flawed
Given the localised nature of weather patterns and LST thermometers, and our very sketchy historical record, there are always going to be ‘records broken’ (hot and cold) each year. Once such heat record (2015) broken in the UK was at Heathrow Airport. A good place to put a thermometer?
We can expect the barrage of media reports on heat waves to continue

E. Martin
February 23, 2016 10:22 am

Key words here are: “Funded by the U.S. Department of Energy”

Peter Miller
Reply to  E. Martin
February 23, 2016 10:48 am

They would not have funded this paper without its conclusion being guaranteed as Imminent Thermageddon.

February 23, 2016 10:45 am

This claim is produced by models. The patterns of actual recorded maximums and minimums is not so frightening.
https://rclutz.wordpress.com/2015/06/22/when-is-it-warming-the-real-reason-for-the-pause/

Kaye Green
February 23, 2016 11:15 am

Sixty years ago in Houston Texas I was out shopping,it was a very hot day, even for for Houston in the summer. I went into a Shop that was was pleasantly cool. A Thermometer on the wall showed the temp in the Shop to be 112 deg F. There was an overhead big blade fan, but no air conditioning. I never did find out what the outside Temp was.
I think about that shop with some nostalgia because I now live in New Zealand where ( to me ) cold to chilly is normal summer weather, 32 degrees Cent and considered REALLY WARM. A friend commented just recently that the day was a real scorcher when it was 38 deg C.I took my cotton sweater off. I don’t think the end of civilisation is imminent. KG

February 23, 2016 11:21 am

The insignificant effect of CO2 on climate is quantified at http://globalclimatedrivers.blogspot.com with a near-perfect explanation of annual average global temperatures since before 1900; R^2 = 0.97+. The two factors that have caused climate change for 300+ years are also identified.

Gamecock
February 23, 2016 11:35 am

By 2075? Well,
‘come and find the place where I am lying,
And kneel and say an Ave there for me.’ – Frederic Edward Weatherly 1910

Ivor Ward
February 23, 2016 11:43 am

Very few people die in heatwaves. Thousands die in cold snaps.

Reply to  Ivor Ward
February 23, 2016 1:39 pm

In France, 14,802 heat-related deaths (mostly among the elderly) occurred during the 2003 heat wave. That would be one example of more than “very few”.

Bill Powers
Reply to  Mark Onesky
February 23, 2016 2:29 pm

So what you are saying is they died from old age. That one gets all of us that live long enough.

Reply to  Mark Onesky
February 25, 2016 3:03 am

With less expensive energy (more prosperity), they might have had air conditioning.

taxed
February 23, 2016 11:58 am

Remember all the fuss made about the heatwave in the middle east last summer.
Well to get these conditions then the weather needs to “play ball”. Usually over the middle east in summer there is a jet stream flowing which helps to move the air along. But last summer during this heatwave for some reason this jet stream shutdown over the middle east. Which had allowed the blocking of the airflow
over the middle east. Which allowed the air to stagnate over a number of days and so allowed the heat to build up into the heat wave. So for these claims to come true. There really would have be a noticeable shutting down of the global jet stream. So where are the signs this is happening.?

February 23, 2016 12:06 pm

2075… well that’d get the young pseudo-scientists through their *cough* *cough* careers and into retirement. They have to plan ahead you know.

Bruce Cobb
February 23, 2016 12:10 pm

The good news is that with some curing, this study would make excellent fertilizer. So, at least it’s “green”.