#AGU15 New NASA satellite maps show humans have less of a fingerprint on global air quality compared to 10 years ago

From the NASA/GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER

Using new, high-resolution global satellite maps of air quality indicators, NASA scientists tracked air pollution trends over the last decade in various regions and 195 cities around the globe. The findings were presented Monday at the American Geophysical Union meeting in San Francisco and published in the Journal of Geophysical Research.

global_abs_2005_print
2005
global_abs_2014_print
2014
USA_avg_2005_print
CONUS 2005
USA_avg_2014_print
CONUS 2014

“These changes in air quality patterns aren’t random,” said Bryan Duncan, an atmospheric scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, who led the research. “When governments step in and say we’re going to build something here or we’re going to regulate this pollutant, you see the impact in the data.”

Duncan and his team examined observations made from 2005 to 2014 by the Dutch-Finnish Ozone Monitoring Instrument aboard NASA’s Aura satellite. One of the atmospheric gases the instrument detects is nitrogen dioxide, a yellow-brown gas that is a common emission from cars, power plants and industrial activity. Nitrogen dioxide can quickly transform into ground-level ozone, a major respiratory pollutant in urban smog. Nitrogen dioxide hotspots, used as an indicator of general air quality, occur over most major cities in developed and developing nations.

The science team analyzed year-to-year trends in nitrogen dioxide levels around the world. To look for possible explanations for the trends, the researchers compared the satellite record to information about emission controls regulations, national gross domestic product and urban growth.

“With the new high-resolution data, we are now able to zoom down to study pollution changes within cities, including from some individual sources, like large power plants,” said Duncan.

Previous work using satellites at lower resolution missed variations over short distances. This new space-based view offers consistent information on pollution for cities or countries that may have limited ground-based air monitoring stations. The resulting trend maps tell a unique story for each region.

The United States and Europe are among the largest emitters of nitrogen dioxide. Both regions also showed the most dramatic reductions between 2005 and 2014. Nitrogen dioxide has decreased from 20 to 50 percent in the United States, and by as much as 50 percent in Western Europe. Researchers concluded that the reductions are largely due to the effects of environmental regulations that require technological improvements to reduce pollution emissions from cars and power plants.

China, the world’s growing manufacturing hub, saw an increase of 20 to 50 percent in nitrogen dioxide, much of it occurring over the North China Plain. Three major Chinese metropolitan areas — Beijing, Shanghai, and the Pearl River Delta — saw nitrogen dioxide reductions of as much as 40 percent.

The South African region encompassing Johannesburg and Pretoria has the highest nitrogen dioxide levels in the Southern Hemisphere, but the high-resolution trend map shows a complex situation playing out between the two cities and neighboring power plants and industrial areas.

“We had seen seemingly contradictory trends over this area of industrial South Africa in previous studies,” said Anne Thompson, co-author and chief scientist for atmospheric chemistry at Goddard. “Until we had this new space view, it was a mystery.”

The Johannesburg-Pretoria metro area saw decreases after new cars were required in 2008 to have better emissions controls. The heavily industrialized area just east of the cities, however, shows both decreases and increases. The decreases may be associated with fewer emissions from eight large power plants east of the cities since the decrease occurs over their locations. However, emissions increases occur from various other mining and industrial activities to the south and further east.

In the Middle East, increased nitrogen dioxide levels since 2005 in Iraq, Kuwait and Iran likely correspond to economic growth in those countries. However, in Syria, nitrogen dioxide levels decreased since 2011, most likely because of the civil war, which has interrupted economic activity and displaced millions of people.

###

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
110 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
SAMURAI
December 16, 2015 7:17 am

What these comparative 2005/2015 US pollution graphs really show is the destruction of US’ industrial sector and the 10’s of millions industrial jobs that have moved to China….
US businesses waste almost $2 TRILLION/yr in government rules, regulation and mandate compliance costs, with a huge portion from excessive EPA regs that have no real tangible benefits.
To put $2 trillion/yr into perspective, the ENTIRE GDP of India, with a population of over 1 billion people, is about the $2 trillion/yr…. Think about that…. Jeez…
The solution is to shutdown the unconstitutional EPA and leave it to the individual states to set their own pollution standards. Any state pollution standards should also be based on objective cost/benefit analysis to assure real physical benefits are derived from any set pollution standards.
The US should also be replacing all power plants with thorium MSRs as soon as possible as it’s cheaper, cleaner and safer than natural gas/coal and will assure US power independence for 10’s of thousands years.
ALL grid-level wind/solar projects should be razed to the ground…

BusterBrown@hotmail.com
Reply to  SAMURAI
December 16, 2015 7:25 am

(Note: “Buster Brown” is the latest fake screen name for ‘David Socrates’, ‘Brian G Valentine’, ‘Joel D. Jackson’, ‘beckleybud’, ‘Edward Richardson’, ‘H Grouse’, and about twenty others. The same person is also an identity thief who has stolen legitimate commenters’ names. Therefore, all the time and effort he spent on writing 300 comments under the fake “BusterBrown” name, many of them quite long, are wasted because I am deleting them wholesale. ~mod.)

SAMURAI
Reply to  BusterBrown@hotmail.com
December 16, 2015 7:42 am

Buster– Under product liability law, if a third party can objectively prove actual physical harm is being inflicted from the perceived excessive pollution from a company in another state, then the court could issue a cease and desist order of the offending comoany in the other state.
Prior to the EPA, that’s how these types of issues were handled.

BusterBrown@hotmail.com
Reply to  BusterBrown@hotmail.com
December 16, 2015 7:49 am

(Note: “Buster Brown” is the latest fake screen name for ‘David Socrates’, ‘Brian G Valentine’, ‘Joel D. Jackson’, ‘beckleybud’, ‘Edward Richardson’, ‘H Grouse’, and about twenty others. The same person is also an identity thief who has stolen legitimate commenters’ names. Therefore, all the time and effort he spent on writing 300 comments under the fake “BusterBrown” name, many of them quite long, are wasted because I am deleting them wholesale. ~mod.)

BusterBrown@hotmail.com
Reply to  BusterBrown@hotmail.com
December 16, 2015 7:56 am

(Note: “Buster Brown” is the latest fake screen name for ‘David Socrates’, ‘Brian G Valentine’, ‘Joel D. Jackson’, ‘beckleybud’, ‘Edward Richardson’, ‘H Grouse’, and about twenty others. The same person is also an identity thief who has stolen legitimate commenters’ names. Therefore, all the time and effort he spent on writing 300 comments under the fake “BusterBrown” name, many of them quite long, are wasted because I am deleting them wholesale. ~mod.)

BusterBrown@hotmail.com
Reply to  BusterBrown@hotmail.com
December 16, 2015 7:58 am

(Note: “Buster Brown” is the latest fake screen name for ‘David Socrates’, ‘Brian G Valentine’, ‘Joel D. Jackson’, ‘beckleybud’, ‘Edward Richardson’, ‘H Grouse’, and about twenty others. The same person is also an identity thief who has stolen legitimate commenters’ names. Therefore, all the time and effort he spent on writing 300 comments under the fake “BusterBrown” name, many of them quite long, are wasted because I am deleting them wholesale. ~mod.)

SAMURAI
Reply to  BusterBrown@hotmail.com
December 16, 2015 9:00 am

Venue for “pollution” violations is complicated, as venue laws vary by state.
Again, if REAL damage can be proven, then the courts can work it out.
Most of the “pollution” cases can’t prove actual damages so they’re thrown out of court…
The current EPA overreach must end and the ONLY solution is what I proposed.
Regardless, The EPA is an unconstutional entity under the innumerated powers granted to the federal government in Article 1, Section 8. Pollution standards MUST be made by the individual states as granted in Amendmets 9 & 10.

BusterBrown@hotmail.com
Reply to  BusterBrown@hotmail.com
December 16, 2015 9:12 am

(Note: “Buster Brown” is the latest fake screen name for ‘David Socrates’, ‘Brian G Valentine’, ‘Joel D. Jackson’, ‘beckleybud’, ‘Edward Richardson’, ‘H Grouse’, and about twenty others. The same person is also an identity thief who has stolen legitimate commenters’ names. Therefore, all the time and effort he spent on writing 300 comments under the fake “BusterBrown” name, many of them quite long, are wasted because I am deleting them wholesale. ~mod.)

SAMURAI
Reply to  SAMURAI
December 16, 2015 10:18 am

Buster– That is correct.. There are no federal statues for product liability because constitutionally, the federal government doesn’t have the constitutional power to enact federal product liability laws…
All states have enacted product liability laws as they’ve been empowered by the Constitution to do so under Amendments 9 & 10….
Please point out the clause in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution where the federal government is granted the power to enact pollution standards….
I’ll wait…..

BusterBrown@hotmail.com
Reply to  SAMURAI
December 16, 2015 10:23 am

(Note: “Buster Brown” is the latest fake screen name for ‘David Socrates’, ‘Brian G Valentine’, ‘Joel D. Jackson’, ‘beckleybud’, ‘Edward Richardson’, ‘H Grouse’, and about twenty others. The same person is also an identity thief who has stolen legitimate commenters’ names. Therefore, all the time and effort he spent on writing 300 comments under the fake “BusterBrown” name, many of them quite long, are wasted because I am deleting them wholesale. ~mod.)

BusterBrown@hotmail.com
Reply to  SAMURAI
December 16, 2015 10:28 am

(Note: “Buster Brown” is the latest fake screen name for ‘David Socrates’, ‘Brian G Valentine’, ‘Joel D. Jackson’, ‘beckleybud’, ‘Edward Richardson’, ‘H Grouse’, and about twenty others. The same person is also an identity thief who has stolen legitimate commenters’ names. Therefore, all the time and effort he spent on writing 300 comments under the fake “BusterBrown” name, many of them quite long, are wasted because I am deleting them wholesale. ~mod.)

BusterBrown@hotmail.com
Reply to  SAMURAI
December 16, 2015 5:49 pm

(Note: “Buster Brown” is the latest fake screen name for ‘David Socrates’, ‘Brian G Valentine’, ‘Joel D. Jackson’, ‘beckleybud’, ‘Edward Richardson’, ‘H Grouse’, and about twenty others. The same person is also an identity thief who has stolen legitimate commenters’ names. Therefore, all the time and effort he spent on writing 300 comments under the fake “BusterBrown” name, many of them quite long, are wasted because I am deleting them wholesale. ~mod.)

SAMURAI
Reply to  SAMURAI
December 16, 2015 5:04 pm

Buster–
1) The commerce clause granted the Legislature the power to regulate international trade and interstate commerce, not the power to set pollution standards…
Before the Constitution, states were imposing protective tariffs on goods from other states. The Commerce Clause was made to address this problem.
2) LOL!! Here is the complete text of the clause you so hilariously edited…. “To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;”
Nice shredding of the Constitution, there, Buster….Jeez…..
Are you a lawyer for Lois Lerner or Hillary Clinton?
This clause 17 only refers to present-day DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (not exceeding 10 square MILES) where the “SEAT OF GOVERNMENT” resides….
If the seat of government was NOT located in a separate District under its own separate jurisdiction, any state where the SEAT OF GOVERNMENT resides could take it upon itself to arrest all federal employees and throw them in jail for treason…. (granted, an EXCELLENT idea… but, alas… this Article 1, Section 8, clause 17 does exist, so no state has jurisdiction over THE SEAT OF THE GOVERNMENT…. too bad…)
3) The “General Welfare clause” is in the Preamble of the Constitution…
Preambles don’t grant ANY powers. Preambles were formally used to show the intent of a contract. The specific terms and conditions are in the BODY of a contract or a Constitution…
Preambles were popular in 18th century contract law, but are no longer used because they often created legal problems (as you’re trying to do) by assuming preambles granted specific powers, which they do not; merely show intent…
Try again…

ScienceABC123
December 16, 2015 7:33 am

It appears to me that the only increase in air pollution is in China. I wonder if environmentalists will shift their efforts to China. Probably not, China has a very harsh way of discouraging those types of activity.

December 16, 2015 8:43 am

Looks like the major pollution nowadays in US/Europe isn’t from coal, but from automobiles.

Mervyn
December 19, 2015 5:02 am

I can’t wait for President Donald Trump. His plan to achieve energy security for America by exploiting America;s fossil fuel energy reserves will put all this green crap to bed. It will also mean putting the climate science concern back into a box and sealing it for the term of his presidency.