Al Gore and the media were wrong: U.S. Major Hurricane Drought Now One Decade and Counting

As of today, October 24th, it has been 3652 days (including leap years) or a decade (10 years) since the US has been hit by a Category 3 or greater hurricane.

The last such hurricane was Wilma on October 24th, 2005. Hurricane Wilma was the most intense tropical cyclone ever recorded in the Atlantic basin. Each day forward will be a new record in this decade long hurricane drought period.

679px-Wilma_2005_track[1]
Map plotting the track and intensity of the storm according to the Saffir–Simpson hurricane wind scale
Via Wikipedia’s article on Wilma:

Part of the record breaking 2005 Atlantic hurricane season, which included three of the six most intense Atlantic hurricanes ever (along with #4 Rita and #6 Katrina), Wilma was the twenty-second storm, thirteenth hurricane, sixth major hurricane, fourth Category 5 hurricane, and second-most destructive hurricane of the 2005 season. A tropical depression formed in the Caribbean Sea near Jamaica on October 15, and intensified into a tropical storm two days later, which was named Wilma. After heading westward as a tropical depression, Wilma turned abruptly southward after becoming a tropical storm. Wilma continued intensifying, and eventually became a hurricane on October 18. Shortly thereafter, rapid intensification occurred, and in only 24 hours, Wilma became a Category 5 hurricane with winds of 185 mph (295 km/h).

Intensity slowly leveled off after becoming a Category 5 hurricane, and winds had decreased to 150 mph (240 km/h) before reaching the Yucatán Peninsula on October 20 and 21. After crossing the Yucatán Peninsula, Wilma emerged into the Gulf of Mexico as a Category 2 hurricane. As Wilma began accelerating to the northeast, gradual re-intensification occurred, and the hurricane became a Category 3 hurricane on October 24. Shortly thereafter, Wilma made landfall in Cape Romano, Floridawith winds of 120 mph (190 km/h). As Wilma was crossing Florida, it had briefly weakened back to a Category 2 hurricane, but again re-intensified as it reached the Atlantic Ocean. The hurricane intensified into a Category 3 hurricane for the final occasion, but Wilma dropped below that intensity while accelerating northeastward. By October 26, Wilma transitioned into an extratropical cyclone southeast of Nova Scotia.

Wilma1315z-051019-1kg12
Hurricane Wilma nearing record strength southeast of the Yucatán Peninsula on October 19, 2005

 

But, to listen to Al Gore and the media, you’d think global warming has made more hurricanes hit the U.S. since then. In fact, there has been no Category three or stronger hurricane that has made U.S. landfall in a decade.

Dr. Roger Pielke Jr. wrote on his blog:

Above are some graphs for those of you interested in the remarkable, ongoing drought in intense hurricane landfalls in the US, which is stretching close to 10 years. The top graph shows the days in between intense (category 3+) landfalls in the US since 1900. The bottom graph shows the same information, but only for Florida landfalls.

You can see that for the US, the current “intense hurricane drought” is unprecedented in at least a century. For Florida, there have been other long stretches between intense hurricane landfalls. Over the past century the average time between intense landfalls in Florida has just about doubled, from about 3 years to 6 years.

Data, sources, discussion: Pielke (2014)

decade-of-hurricane-drought1

decade-of-hurricane-drought2

Note: the graphs have been updated by WUWT to reflect current date and values since Pielke wrote his analysis.

CommonDreams.org quoted Al Gore back in 2005:

… the science is extremely clear now, that warmer oceans make the average hurricane stronger, not only makes the winds stronger, but dramatically increases the moisture from the oceans evaporating into the storm – thus magnifying its destructive power – makes the duration, as well as the intensity of the hurricane, stronger.

Last year we had a lot of hurricanes. Last year, Japan set an all-time record for typhoons: ten, the previous record was seven. Last year the science textbooks had to be re-written. They said, “It’s impossible to have a hurricane in the south Atlantic.” We had the first one last year, in Brazil. We had an all-time record last year for tornadoes in the United States, 1,717 – largely because hurricanes spawned tornadoes.

Well, tornadoes aren’t doing any better, as these graphs from the Storm Prediction Center show. Eight of the last eleven years have been below average:

tornado-8-of-11

And 2015 threatens to tie the record low year of 1954 for U.S. Tornadooes:tornado-2015

Back to the hurricane drought, the mighty media was quoting the mighty scientists, and they have fallen flat on their face. Here’s a collection of failed predictions in the wake of Hurricane Katrina:

In 2006, CBS’s Hannah Storm Claims Katrina-like Storms Will Happen ‘All Along Our Atlantic and Gulf Coastlines.’ Just five days before Hurricane Katrina’s one year anniversary, CBS news anchor Hannah Storm featured climate alarmist Mike Tidwell on The Early Show to discuss his book, “The Ravaging Tide.” “I think the biggest lesson from Katrina a year later is that those same ingredients, you know, a city below sea level hit by a major hurricane, will be replicated by global warming all along our Atlantic and Gulf Coast lines,” Tidwell said on August 24, 2006. Tidwell then went on to claim that cities all along the coast would be underwater due to increased hurricane activity and intensity “unless we stop global warming.” In a 2009 Washington Post op-ed, Tidwell explained just how far he thought people should go to “stop global warming.” After comparing the current global warming problem to the civil rights movement of the 1960s, he insisted that “After years of delay and denial and green half-measures, we must legislate a stop to the burning of coal, oil and natural gas.”

‘No End In Sight’ For Big Hurricanes, CBS Says Less than a month after Katrina made landfall, CBS anchor Russ Mitchell predicted that there would be “continued high levels of hurricane activity and high levels of hurricane landfalls for the next decade or perhaps even longer.” “For years now, experts have been saying we’ve entered a period of increased hurricane activity that may last a long time.” Mitchell said on the Sept. 22, 2005 Early Show. Later in the broadcast he added, “since 1990, the number of big hurricanes in the Gulf is up again, and there’s no end in sight.” Now, a decade later that prediction looks laughable since there hasn’t been a major hurricane (Category 3 or higher) to make landfall since October of 2005, when Hurricane Wilma struck Florida.

NBC Blames Global Warming for Stronger Hurricanes, Says It’s ‘A Trend That’s Likely To Continue’ In the weeks following Katrina, NBC turned to global warming as the hurricane’s cause. On September 18, 2005, Nightly News anchor John Seigenthaler said, “scientists studying the earth’s climate say we are experiencing stronger hurricanes in this century, a trend that’s likely to continue.” NBC’s chief science correspondent Robert Bazell continued, asking: “Was Katrina a warning of more terrible hurricanes in the next few years?” Bazell admitted “one storm cannot prove anything about climate change,” but claimed the projected ocean temperature rise would cause more severe storms through the end of the century. That NBC report included climatologist Stephen Schneider who said, “humans won’t make the storms, but we can make them a little stronger than they otherwise would have been.”

From Newsbusters:

Looking back, it’s easy to see how wrong the networks were.

In 2008, The National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) responded to climate change assumptions about hurricanes saying, “There is nothing in the U.S. hurricane damage record that indicates global warming has caused a significant increase in destruction along our coasts.” As the years passed, the more obvious it was that fewer major hurricanes were hitting land. In April 2015, the American Geophysical Union reported that the United States has been in a nine year Atlantic hurricane landfall drought. A record low. AGU said, “Such a remarkable ‘hurricane drought’ has never been seen before – since records began in 1851 … the last major hurricane – of Category 3 or higher – to make landfall in the U.S. was Hurricane Wilma in 2005.” Research by meteorologists Anthony Watts and Ryan Maue, and environmental studies professor Roger Pielke, Jr. showed the same hurricane drought and an overall slump in tropical cyclone activity throughout the world. Chris Landsea, who is the Science and Operations Officer for the National Hurricane Center at NOAA, tweeted skeptically about a hurricane/climate change link in May 201

How long will it be before the media stops pushing the meme of “more hurricanes due to global warming”? Perhaps never, because as we all know the news cycle maxim: “if it bleeds, it leads

Note: shortly after publication, the first paragraph was updated to mention leap years

5 1 vote
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

193 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Michael Jankowski
October 24, 2015 10:03 am

Gore and the warmistas are not breathing a sigh of relief. They’re upset that Patricia wasn’t catastrophic.

George E. Conant
October 24, 2015 10:12 am

I was thinking hurricanes are effectively cooling the warm seas below them , releasing the stored energy to the air and out to space…so it stands to reason that 2005 saw record number of hurricane in the Atlantic during the peak of tropical Atlantic warmth, which appears to coincide with the step change in global temps after the 1998 el nino spike. The Atlantic appears to be in a cooling phase (from what I been reading here at WUWT) and the Pacific has a fine el nino going on, coincidentally we are seeing a high number of Pacific cyclones forming and thus venting heat to space…. with so many cyclones cooling the Pacific and low solar activity might the combined effect send the Pacific into a serious cooling trend? Any thoughts just how fast such a cooling will emerge? And what might colder Pacific and Atlantic oceans portend to the lower troposphere temps?

Alan Robertson
Reply to  George E. Conant
October 24, 2015 10:42 am

Those scenarios would mean climate change, you see. We’re doomed and it’s our fault. Pay up.

Rick
October 24, 2015 10:47 am

I do not understand the scale on the “Days Between Hurricanes” graph. The period is five years until 1976. Am I missing something?

Richard M
Reply to  Rick
October 24, 2015 10:52 am

The x-axis is a count of major hurricanes (not a year), the y-axis is the number of years till the next major hurricane.

Rick
Reply to  Richard M
October 24, 2015 12:26 pm

Of course – duh! Thanks very much.

Richard M
October 24, 2015 10:48 am

We may be seeing the El Nino peaking right now rather than the normal time (early in a year). The warmer waters have been fueling more Pacific storms while creating wind shear to prevent Atlantic storms. This also appeared to happen in 1987 which was another big year for storms in the Pacific. In 1988 we had a La Nina that started early in the year. It will be interesting to see if this pattern is repeated.

Richard M
Reply to  Richard M
October 24, 2015 10:59 am

I should also mention this appeared to cause less warming in the SH which would suppress the normal global jump we see during an El Nino.

Just Steve
October 24, 2015 11:41 am
Marcus
Reply to  Just Steve
October 24, 2015 12:19 pm

. .Hilarious !!!

AB
Reply to  Marcus
October 24, 2015 4:45 pm

A must read – the comments too!

AB
Reply to  Marcus
October 24, 2015 4:51 pm

comment image

Just Steve
October 24, 2015 11:44 am

A good question from Steve Milloy at Junk Science:
To any warmist… what would the max wind speed of #Patricia be if CO2 levels were at 0.035% instead of 0.04%? And how do you know?

richard verney
Reply to  Just Steve
October 24, 2015 12:33 pm

Obviously, there is s strong El Nino in progress, but since that is a natural event and not caused by CO2, it should be ignored for the purposes of answering your question.
I expect that Bob, in one of his monthly updates, may tell us how the ocean surface temperature under the path of the hurricane has changed these past 30 or so years, although personally, I give little credence to SST data prior to ARGO, so I suspect that there is no quality data available with which to even begin to answer the question posed by you.

Just Steve
Reply to  richard verney
October 24, 2015 3:29 pm

While we may enjoy the same first name, I am not Steve Milloy. And, while I have learned a great many things from your posts Richard, this question is not, I believe, intended to be answered .
Milloy is simply throwing the CO2 meme back in the warmunistas face…they say increased CO2 causes everything from harsher weather to hangnails, he asks for them to simply answer what any first year science student should know has NO answer.. I would call it using absurdity to illustrate absurdity.

NZ Willy
October 24, 2015 12:03 pm

I simply cannot believe that you are still putting that nonsensical red trend line on those “days between landfalls” bar charts. Truly, I despair sometimes.

Marcus
Reply to  NZ Willy
October 24, 2015 12:47 pm

Want some cheese to go with that whine ????

richard verney
October 24, 2015 12:25 pm

Whilst my heart goes out to those adversely caught up by Patricia, Steve Goddard has a good article on this and one that puts the hurricane into perspective. See:
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2015/10/24/1959-storm-was-much-more-powerful/
In the period prior to (alleged) manmade global warming, in 1959 (which was part of a decade that saw global cooling, well at least it did before the recent adjustments by warmists), a hurricane made landfall in approximately the same place killing 1,452 people. Such loss is tragic, but it shows that things have ever been.

Reply to  richard verney
October 24, 2015 12:50 pm

Typical BS by Goddard, compares winds at Puerto Vallarta where Patricia didn’t make landfall with those from 1959 where that hurricane made landfall. Also many of the deaths caused in 1959 were caused by a mudslide which buried a village under 10 feet of mud, killing those people not wind damage.

Mike the Morlock
Reply to  Phil.
October 24, 2015 2:10 pm

Phil, ever been in a “cane”?
michael.

Jimbo
Reply to  Phil.
October 24, 2015 3:04 pm

Do you know what caused the mudslide?
Now in completely unrelated news……

Abstract
Reconstruction of Prehistoric Landfall Frequencies of Catastrophic Hurricanes in Northwestern Florida from Lake Sediment Records
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/qres.2000.2166

Reply to  Phil.
October 24, 2015 7:17 pm

Phil.
Storm surge and flooding are the big risks from most hurricanes. That’s one reason home insurance typically covered wind but not water damage.

October 24, 2015 12:29 pm

This is proof of climate change.
There were a lot of big hurricanes.
Now there are not.
The climate has changed.
What will they walk about on the Weather Channel?

Steve Fraser
October 24, 2015 12:35 pm

Anyone know of a study of correlation between El Niño events and Mexican West coat hurricanes?

Chris Lynch
October 24, 2015 12:47 pm

The Irish broadcaster RTE has faithfully reporting Patricia as the strongest Hurricane in recorded history (Warmist code for Evah!). Hmmmmmm! If experience is anything to go by when the dust settles some more thorough investigation will ensue and lo and behold Patricia will turn out to be a lot less remarkable than the hype a la Pam. This, of course, will appear nowhere in Western mass media as usual. Unfortunately it has become far too easy for the unscrupulous to disseminate falsehoods and exaggerations thanks to the utterly disgraceful supine and unquestioning role of the media.

Chris Lynch
October 24, 2015 12:49 pm

Apologies for typo – should read “has been”

Richard Barnett
October 24, 2015 1:01 pm

Living in the coastal bend of the Texas gulf coast makes me hope for another 10 years of no major hurricanes. I have been thru the eye of the storm before. The eye wall is an unique experience with all of the vortexes spinning off but the best way to describe it is terrifing.

philincalifornia
October 24, 2015 1:10 pm

Al’s trying for a big comeback – on the “rotten ice” ticket:
http://features.aol.com/video/al-gore-weighs-troubling-rotten-ice-phenomenon?icid=aol|carousel|dl1

pat
October 24, 2015 1:34 pm

all I’ve heard on Australian media & BBC this morning makes the claim Patricia was “the strongest” when it actually hit Mexico, which doesn’t seem to be the case at all.
BBC “cleverly” inserts most powerful IN THE WORLD, by using a quote from AFP.
the Beeb then lists “most powerful storms” in RECENT years, which locates them all in the CAGW years!
24 Oct: BBC 1 hour ago: Storm Patricia weakens over Mexico but risks remain
Patricia was the strongest storm ever recorded in the Americas ***when it ploughed into Mexico but has since been downgraded to a tropical depression…”For being the most powerful hurricane ***in the world, I think we came out okay,” Cristian Arias, a seafood restaurant owner in Colima state told the AFP agency…Some of the most powerful storms in ***RECENT years
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-34627612

October 24, 2015 1:37 pm

Just saw a live CNN report on Patricia at Manzanillo, Mexico. The eye actually came ashore NW of Manzanillo. So far there are no reports by Mexico of any injuries or deaths. Lets hope and pray that that holds true. There are probably some areas that haven’t been surveyed yet.
Weatherbell’s, Saturday report has a good explanation/analysis of this by Joe Bastardi :
http://www.weatherbell.com/saturday-summary-october-24-2015
He claims that this storm will end up with 50-60 mph winds around the eastern Great Lakes later this week.
We’ll see about that…

Louis
October 24, 2015 1:41 pm

“…the science is extremely clear now, that warmer oceans make the average hurricane stronger…” – Al Gore
Does the evidence refute Gore’s ‘clear’ science? The charts above don’t show dates or temperature. We know that there have been fewer hurricanes making landfall now. But did we have fewer hurricanes in the 30s, too, when temperatures were similarly warm?

October 24, 2015 1:42 pm

Any thoughts just how fast such a cooling will emerge?

See:
ftp://www.jcommops.org/Argo/Instrumentation/Floats/Webb/Papers/EM1.pdf
“Historical oceanographic observations and satellite imagery show that an intense, slowly moving hurricane may cool the sea surface by 3–6ºC.”

George E. Conant
Reply to  Werner Brozek
October 25, 2015 5:25 am

Thank you Werner, that link was quite informative. Makes sense that cyclone induced currents would cause a lot of mixing of surface and sub-surface ocean layers. The idea of SST cooling evident is largely a result of mixing of colder more saline waters from the depths and the venting of ocean heat is a smaller contributor to the observed cooling of areas of ocean where a hurricane has just traversed. The cooler sea surface is evident pretty much immediately affected. Would be fair to note that heat stored in the oceans has quite the tempering effect, excellent read.

October 24, 2015 1:49 pm

Al Gore and the media were wrong: U.S. Major Hurricane Drought Now One Decade and Counting

So we have a drought of hurricanes since WUWT started and since Obama became president. Should we not have a suitable name for this effect such as the WATTS EFFECT or the OBAMA EFFECT?

NZ Willy
Reply to  Werner Brozek
October 24, 2015 3:52 pm

Nah, it’s another Gore effect because the film “Inconvenient Truth” came out in 2006 with a cover illustration of hurricanes besetting the USA from all directions, and so of course there hasn’t been a single one since. Gore appears to have mastered the solipsistic arts personified by Tengu’s “Everything is my Delusion!”

Gregg Hill
October 24, 2015 2:37 pm

What about Hurricane Ike in Sep 2008? The damage caused was severe enough for the World Meteorological Organization to retire the name.

Ter of Kona
Reply to  Gregg Hill
October 24, 2015 10:01 pm

Hurricane Ike was a very large storm in areal extent, and was a catagory 4 at one point while crossing the Atlantic Ocean. When it made landfall near Galveston, it was only a catagory 2, and therefore did not make the major hurricane list. Because it was large and slow-moving it built up a strong storm surge and did major damage to Galveston. It also did moderate damage in Houston, and continued through the central US, doing significant damage along the way.

High Treason
October 24, 2015 2:41 pm

When I saw “Biggest Hurricane in History” in the news, the BS meter started shaking most violently. Memories of several “extreme weather events” looming being big nothings and not looking like anything spectacular on the satellite images I would swear had that BS meter almost anticipating yet another insult of blatant catastrophism.
The satellite of Patricia did not look like anything spectacular, nor did cyclone Marcia in Australia last year. The “huge weather system” off New Zealand dumped only a modest amount of snow and once again did not look like anything spectacular on the charts. The “huge” typhoons hitting China- surely a major el-Nino event (wings flapping in indignation) were pretty standard for the season. The big rain event in the US- “one in a thousand years” – I did not know they kept records that long. Once again, big but not unprecedented.
The big snow storm that was supposed to hit New York around New Year- closed everything down- fizzer. We had people there on the scene. I monitored the “major weather event” from the comfort of my computer in Australia.
Look forward to more shrill cries of weather catastrophes in the leadup to Paris. Who will bet me that every reported huge weather event reported and getting the shrill cries up in the leadup to Paris will turn out to be nothing spectacular.

getitright
Reply to  High Treason
October 25, 2015 2:30 pm

So true.
Love when Enrique Peña Nieto commented he” would leave it to the scientists” to explain the hype away. A shot over the bow if there ever was one.

October 24, 2015 2:45 pm

Re Patricia.
Meteorologists on some stations clearly and accurately distinguished between Patricia’s intensity and it’s overall strength. It was a very small hurricane in terms of actual energy, with an eye of only 15 miles. Much larger storm systems, perhaps without the wind speeds, can be far more destructive.
In 1992, the anemometer at the Hawaii Air National Guard and the Pacific Missile Range monitoring station at Kokee, Kauai, broke down after measuring and recording wind speeds of 227mph as Hurricane Iniki passed over.

Alba
October 24, 2015 3:06 pm

Meanwhile snow has fallen in the north of Scotland:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-34626210

Marcus
Reply to  Alba
October 24, 2015 3:38 pm
Marcus
Reply to  Marcus
October 24, 2015 3:42 pm

Wrong video…never mind !!!!

David S
October 24, 2015 3:29 pm

It is so patently clear that there is major disappointment with warmists that Patricia caused so little damage and there were zero casualties. What they had wished for was thousands dead and billions of dollars damage. I know this intuitively because as a skeptic I hope and pray that every major climactic event is always so lame in part because I actually care about people. Despite the accumulation of empirical evidence that is published on skeptical web sites the only way we can overcome these evil forces is to continue to have Mother Nature on our side.Eventually the penny will drop and this crazy AGW scam will be properly discredited and it’s grand high priests and priestesses dealt with.

Marcus
October 24, 2015 3:43 pm

comment image?oh=b0d047d63066691411016c9b7e764eef&oe=562E7D3A

Verified by MonsterInsights