From the “bigger worries than global warming” department:
Guest essay by Eric Worrall
Yet another indication that Asteroids are a far more serious threat than climate change. NASA scientists have just in the last few weeks detected a previously unknown Asteroid, a quarter of a mile across, approaching at an unusually high speed of 35km / second, which is due to narrowly miss the Earth on 31st October this year. The asteroid will only approach within 1.3 lunar distances of Earth, so this particular body poses no threat – but in terms of the scale of the solar system, this upcomming event counts as a very near miss. This asteroid is a wakeup call, a reminder of just how vulnerable we are to catastrophic impacts, and how little warning we might receive if such a threat were detected.
According to NASA;
2015 TB145
2015 TB145 was discovered on 2015 Oct 10 by the Pan-STARRS I survey. The object will approach the Earth within 0.00326 au (1.3 Lunar distances or about 490 000 km) on 2015 Oct 31 at about 17:00 UT (10 AM PDT). The asteroid is in an extremely eccentric (~0.86) and high inclination (~40 deg) orbit. It has a Tisserand parameter of 2.937 hinting that it may be cometary in nature. Its absolute magnitude of 19.8 indicates that its diameter is probably within a factor of two of 320 meters. At closest approach the SNRs/run at DSS-14 are expected to be over 20000, so this should be one of the best radar targets of the year. We hope to obtain images with a range resolution as high as 2 m/pixel using DSS-13 to transmit and Green Bank (and possibly Arecibo) to receive. The flyby presents a truly outstanding scientific opportunity to study the physical properties of this object.
The encounter velocity is 35 km/s, which is unusually high.
This is the closest approach by a known object this large until 1999 AN10 approaches within 1 lunar distance in August 2027. The last approach closer than this by an object with H < 20 was by 2004 XP14 in July 2006 at 1.1 lunar distances.
2015 TB145 could reach 10th magnitude before sunrise on October 31 for observers in North America, but it will be close to the waning gibbous Moon and probably challenging to see with small telescopes. The asteroid will be in Ursa Major at the time of closest approach. After closest approch 2015 TB145 will be a daytime object and too close to the Sun to observe with optical telescopes.
Radar observations are planned at DSS-14, DSS-13, Arecibo, Green Bank, and elements of the VLBA. Observations may also occur with the UHF radar at Haystack.
Read more: http://echo.jpl.nasa.gov/asteroids/2009FD/2009FD_planning.html
If an unusually fast asteroid a quarter of a mile across struck an inhabited part of the world, the explosion would be many times larger than the half megaton Chelyabinsk meteor explosion, which was caused by a meteor with an estimated diameter of 55 ft. The explosion would be in the 10s of megatons, rivalling the largest atom bombs ever detonated – more than large enough to devastate an entire city.
How likely is such an impact? Thankfully really large impact events are very infrequent, though multi kiloton impact events are common – at least 26 such events have been detected since 2001, mostly in uninhabited regions. But there is no upper limit to the size of an impact event, and as this recent imminent near miss demonstrates, a serious threat could arise with very little warming.
What could be done to mitigate asteroid impact risk? At the very least better monitoring systems could be deployed, to try to provide at least some warning. Chelyabinsk received no warning when it was struck by a meteor. This asteroid was only detected a few weeks ago.
With enough warning people could be evacuated from likely impact zones. Even very large threats could potentially be addressed, if there was enough time to prepare.
In my opinion it is obscene that the world is spending countless billions chasing the imaginary perils of the climate dragon, while neglecting a far more serious threat to people’s lives.

I wounder if this weather altering technique will get a mention ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moruroa
The post above should end with “at the Paris meeting”
Yesterday evening, maybe 1905 hours +1 cet in sweden, i saw a bright, maybe two, flash/es in the sky. Veey shirt and very bright. Could this be scattered debris trailing the tb145. This was oct 23, 2015.
It’s The Rapture! Run away! Run away!
Reblogged this on Public Secrets and commented:
If climate cultists want to worry about a real threat, instead of their imaginary demon CO2 and anthropogenic climate change, then here is a candidate. If we had any sense, we’d be pouring a lot more money into asteroid tracking and technology for possibly diverting them. This is a real threat to man’s future on Earth.
Genetic evidence already seems to show Homo Sapiens has come very close to extinction at least once in the past …. really not interested in trying our luck again (and I’m talking about asteroids not global warming) …. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2975862.stm
You denounce the importance of climate change twice in this article.
“Imaginary perils of the climate dragon.”
“Asteroids are a far more serious threat than climate change.”
Just because you can SEE an asteroid physically coming NEAR our vicinity doesn’t make it a higher priority than greenhouse gases. These are issues we need to resolve in parallel.
There are several resources available that highlight the danger of increasing the amount of greenhouse gas in our atmosphere.
My favorite example of the effects of runaway greenhouse gas is the planet Venus.
James Coultas,
So the climate alarmist crowd has you scared. That’s what they are trying to do, but they’re only successful with:
1. Science illiterates, and
2. Irrational/illogical folks
Which are you? Or are you both? Your argument is certainly irrational and illogical, because Mars’ atmosphere is more than 95% CO2, and Mars is COLD.
If CO2 caused runaway global warming, then Mars would be hot, hot, hot!
Also, the Earth has had up to twenty times more atmospheric CO2 in the past, without ever causing runaway global warming. Or any global warming for that matter.
This is a science site. But if you like the misinformation that you posted, no doubt you get it from ‘skepticalscience’, or ‘realclimate’, or a similar pseudo-science blog.
Stick around here, if you keep an open mind you will learn a lot.
Tom Steyer? Science?? As one commenter said, Steyer’s greatest achievement was getting a job as a snowboard instructor, and as a substitute high school drama teacher.
He’s probably done real science as much as you. IOW, none. He has an opinion, and money to promote it to scientific illiterates. But that’s all.
Of course, you ignore the fact that the real science is posted by skeptics, not by Steyer.
Mods, please check on the “Alan Penn” screen name. I think it’s bogus. His endlessly argumentative style and lack of credible scientific facts make me think he’s the same sockpuppet / identity thief / anonymous coward who pesters serious commenters here.
I’m at the point now where I can spot this scientifically illiterate site pest after only a few comments.
TIA.
(“Alan Penn” comments deleted. ~mod.)
The real point is that you sir, are a sockpuppet, using screen names such as Alan Penn, Steve Jones, variants on Socrates, etc.
All further responses from you go to the bitbucket, per our site policy on sockpuppetry.
James
There are big differences between so-called climate change and an asteroid impact:
1. We know for 100% sure that we will be hit again by an asteroid at some point
2. We know for sure that we have been hit in the past by asteroids big enough to end human civilisation
3. We definitely have the technology to detect most, or all, of these asteroids a long time before impact
4. We could develop and launch technology to deflect them at reasonable cost
5. We do not have to shut down the economy to do any of the above
6. We do not have to make drastic changes to our lifestyle to combat asteroids
7. The science around climate is much, much more shaky than we are led to believe
8. The true real-world evidence for significant man-made climate change is getting weaker by the day. No sea-level rise, no melting ice caps, no temperature increases, no extreme weather spikes, nothing.
9. Asteroid prevention has not been hijacked by a bunch of loons openly talking about redistributing the wealth of the West to the developing world and ending capitalism
The reason there is so much attention on global warming rather than asteroids, is obvious. There’s no one to blame for asteroids, thus no money to be stolen from said perpetrators. If asteroids were caused by capitalism and hard working people there would be wall to wall coverage of how it should be taxed and thwarted. These people will not be happy until everyone it’s unhappy.
more money on protecting our civilization eg meteors, climate change , diseases, protecting animals and less on destroying it eg WAR , unhealthy food being mass produced , mind melting tv shows etc.