Google forecasts no interest in Paris COP21

Annotated Google Big Data Query showing past and forecast interest in climate related search terms.

Annotated Google Big Data Query showing past and forecast interest in climate related search terms.

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

Forbes reports that, according to Google search statistics, the world’s media climate blitz has failed to date to spark any interest in global warming.

According to Forbes;

The graph above shows relative web search interest in the two terms, demonstrating that interest in global warming decreased substantially in mid-2010 and by mid-2013 dropped equal with searches for climate change, exhibiting a more than ten-fold decrease in public interest. Searches for climate change increased from 2006-2010, but in the last three years have been stable at their early 2005 levels. Put simply, the public simply isn’t searching about the topic anymore, suggesting they either aren’t interested or they feel they already know what they would like to know about changing climatic conditions. Google News searches exhibit a nearly identical downward slope suggesting that the public isn’t searching for the latest breaking climate news either, indicating an overall decreasing interest in the topic.

On the other hand, even if public interest is waning, media coverage certainly isn’t.

Read more: http://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2015/09/26/what-data-tells-us-about-public-interest-in-climate-change-and-its-global-news-coverage/

Out of interest I modified the original Forbes search terms (see the Forbes article for the original), to produce the graph at the top of this page. The modifications were adding the terms “COP21”, “COP 21” and “Paris Climate Conference”, and ticking the box to include Google’s search forecast for the next few months. Click here to see the Google big data web page.

Forbes reports there are a few exceptions to this general complete lack of interest. Small impoverished island states and some third world countries, which have been blitzed with dubious predictions of imminent climate catastrophe, and bombarded with empty promises of climate cash, are showing strong interest in climate issues. I suspect interest will rapidly wane in the wake of the upcoming Paris conference, when they realise it has all been a load of hype.

Advertisements

128 thoughts on “Google forecasts no interest in Paris COP21

      • Life ends eventually for every human–is that how we’re doomed?
        The sun will eventually engulf the earth–is that how we’re doomed?
        More people have been lifted out of poverty because of capitalism than ever–is that how we’re doomed?
        You say “we’re doomed”, RoHa–would you mind explain just how we’re doomed?

      • @RoHa
        yr: “We’re doomed”
        Well RoHa, if “We’re doomed” then, just maybe, it’s because our betters, WHO REALLY UNDERSTAND THE URGENCY OF THE MATTER!!!, and who have been forever pushin’ their “world-has-a-fever”, scare-mongering hype, never chose, at the same time, to PRACTICE WHAT THEY PREACHED!!!NEVER CHOSE TO LEAD FROM THE FRONT BY INSPIRING PERSONAL EXAMPLE IN MATTERS OF CARBON REDUCTION!!!
        And so, RoHa, all the hive’s little-“sharpie”, wheedling, doom-butt, bogey-man, “greenwashed” flim-flam, rolled out as pretexts to pick the pockets of us coolie-trash, nobody hoi-polloi, came accross to us–“us” being, again, “us peons”, whom t the hive holds in such contempt, and is so anxious to fleece and boss-around and put through a Gaia-friendly mass-cull–as just the agit-prop, Gruber-tested, rip-off flackery of yet another of the hive’s never-ending, dystopian hustles. I mean, like, let’s be honest, RoHa, you hive-tools are such transparent bull-shitters, right, guy? And that’s the real problem, RoHa, as if you didn’t know.
        P. S. It seems you’ve got hive-connections, RoHa. So could you ask some of your brazen-hypocrite, carbon-piggie, good-comrade enablers, in on the deal, to lift their sucking snouts from their flunky-grade troughs long enough to calculate the “dead baby/dead polar bear equivalents” that the up-coming, COP 21, CO2-spew hive-swarm will cost humanity and the biosphere? And did you ever happen to consider, RoHa, as you stew in your “We’re doomed”, worry-wart juices, that all the hive’s incessant eco-confabs could have been and could be easily held as a zero-carbon (i. e., zero “dead babies” and zero “dead polar bears”) video-conferences? OH!!!THE HUMANITY!!!
        P. P. S. I get the impression from your very last comment that you may have been speaking ironically in your original comment, RoHa. If so, and if my comment, here, is a figurative “shoe” that doesn’t fit, then, please, my apologies, RoHa, for tryin’ to jam your out-size tootsies into such a dainty, glass slipper. Regardless, there are plenty of hive-hoofs that the “shoe” does fit and their owners know, only too well, who they are.

      • Talking of what the media have been whipping up in to doomsday scenario…they’ve been doing that since the 18th century. And people STILL fall for it!

      • @Hugs
        Yr: “Don’t get trolled by some simple sarcasm.”
        Two things Hugs:
        -There is nothing about RoHa’s original comment that is suggestive of “sarcastic trolling” (not even a “sarc” tag). Indeed, the comment reflects just exactly the mentality of your basic-issue, brainwashed, hive-abused true-believer (usually some socially-incompetent, snot-nosed, “dumb”-kid dork)–so it could very well have been a serious-minded, Gaia-freak comment (“kokoda”, “RockyRoad”, and “Patrick” also didn’t “get” that RoHa’s comment was just “sarcastic trolling”, I note).
        -On the other hand, RoHa’s second comment suggests the possibility that RoHa’s first comment was ironic in character–which I already considered in the “P. P. S” portion of my above comment. But I only viewed RoHa’s second comment just as I was about to hit the send button and launch my “rant”. And I didn’t want to waste my “rant”. So I just threw in that little, precautionary “P. P. S” business and let fly.
        Understand, Hugs, I like screwin’ with the hive and my vehicle to do so–my shtick, such as it is–is “rants”. And if some “sarcastic trolling” (as you term it), inspires me to a little, hive butt-kicking, in which I amuse myself, if no one else, then why should I not use “sarcastic trolling” as the take-off point for a self-indulgent riff, that rubs the good-comrades’ noses in some uncomfortable-truths?
        Not quite sure, Hugs, but is all that “friendly” advice, you offered-up in your above comment, really just you guilelessly helpin’ out an ol’ buddy, or is it, on the contrary, more along the lines of a weasley, little-sneak, passive-agressive smooth-move, on your part, designed to slip me a clever-lad, booger-flick “put-down”? If the latter, then “STUFF IT, HUGS!!!” And if not, then thank you for your lovely comment, Hugs, and its useless counsel, that is so very, very important to moi.

      • Well, I’m going to say it, even if no-one else will.
        We’re doomed.

        “We are doomed as doomed can be” ~ Pee-wee Herman
        We are not doomed by catastrophic anthropogenic global warming, but rather by the catastrophic, economy-killing actions of the western governments that come in reaction to the nonexistent, imaginary threat.

      • @RoHa
        Yr: “Mike, sit down and take…etc”
        Okay, it’s pretty clear that between you two, RoHa and “Hugs”, I’m dealin’ with some form of a tag team, as I suspected: One real and one a sock-puppet? Two electronic-fiction bots, with no independent identitiy, serving as sock-puppets to one another? A wanker and a doppel-wanker? Two “Paracas Skull” pea-people in an alien-DNA, mutant pod? So many possibilities.
        And since you seem to have the bigger mouth, RoHa, I take it that you’re the alpha-weenie and Hugs is your beta-weenie, “me-too” side-kick? Unless, of course, you’re just the “mouth-piece” for the RoHa & Hugs, dynamic-duo act, and it’s really the other way around.
        O. K., RoHa, so you’re actually encouragin’ me to have a “cup of tea”? Wild surmise: Are you Russell Seitz, by any chance? So I’m guessin’ here, RoHa, that you’re either a Brit–in which case you have an excuse, of sorts, I suppose–or you’re some sort of self-loathing, Anglophile American, driven by your status-anxiety pathologies to try and score points with the real-deal, Public-School, sneer-magnet “swells”, you’re so desperately tryin’ to impress, by using smarmy, kiss-butt language that subliminally lets-on that you’re no defender of the “Boston Tea Party”, even as those from whom you seek approval contemptuously regard your needy best efforts as the pesterings of an over-eager, tag-along, twit-wannabe, Yankee-Doodle phony.
        And may we finally imagine, RoHa, that your interest in proper breathing derives from a life-long passion for Yoga and that you’re a Yogi-master of the “Suppository-Head” pose? And don’t try to deny it, RoHa, because I have this photo of you, “in action”, taken from your Facebook page: “&”.

      • RoHa: I’m in my late sixties, I’ve lived in the UK for all of my life and the climate hasn’t changed. Maybe you should ask some older people for their recollections, and also look at some proper weather records!

      • mike,
        To me, nobody special, and a relative newbe on these threads, the original comment by RoHa did seem like sarcasm, I think because of the context, including the comment above it . . I can understand how it might be seen as serious, given what I have seen coming out of folks who might make that comment seriously, but on this site . . that’s a very rare bird. Just appearing to be such a critter caused me to think sarcasm.
        There is a pro-CAGW contingent, but it’s not made up of “true believers” as far as I can tell. It’s pysops stuff, cointelpro type insertions into the dialog. The arguments are typically convoluted attempts to blunt the slicing and dicing the folks here routinely do on any and all aspects of he CAWG Siants charade. I enjoyed your rant, with a bit of queasiness due to what I “knew” was prolly coming next, but around here you can just calmly state your case . . none of what you wrote is unusual here in terms of thoughts/ideas.
        If such a bird as you thought you saw does appear, it’s not going to have anymore impact that CO2 does on a hurricane . . so don’t scare it off, let it watch for awhile, who knows? it may learn a thing or two.

      • “RoHa September 26, 2015 at 6:47 pm
        Well, I’m going to say it, even if no-one else will.
        We’re doomed.”

        You’re not thinking in your normal manner, Mike.
        RoHa’s statement is obviously sarcastic. As in so many other posts here and elsewhere, RoHa and others are mocking the alarmists usual over-the-top run-for-your-lives doom screams.
        The whinging paragraph’s sum up as “RoHa should’ve used ‘/sarc’, because ‘Mike’ didn’t understand it was sarcasm.
        Take a nap, cool off and come back swinging on Google stats.

      • @ JohnKnight
        Yr last:
        A thought-provoking comment, JK. Will keep the good points you make in mind as a part of my future “to rant or not to rant” decision-making. Thank you.
        @ 1saveenergy
        Yr: “note for readers in USA, that was an example of a sarcastic comment.”
        I enjoyed your little “needle”, way down below, there.

      • RoHa:
        Couldn’t you have short circuited the whole line of honest responses aimed at you by the /sarc and/or immediately pointing out that you were sarcastic and mocking the alarmers?

      • @ATheoK
        I can see that you’re tryin’ to pick up the pieces, in the aftermath of an apparent “friendly fire” incident and I thank you kindly for shouldering that “thankless” task, ATheoK
        Nevertheless, I do want to make the point that I don’t “whinge”. And, with the single, national-embarrassment exception of David Appell, Americans, generally, don’t “whinge”. Rather, “whinging” is a primitive, behavioral abnormality, unique to the world’s “tea-drinker” nations (not to include the Far East), except as previously noted.

      • Most people tend to live in the moment and as such, and with the Paris COP-A-FEEL still 3 months away, interest will very likely increase come December.

      • Hi Alan. You and RoHa are right! We are all doomed! We are all gonna’ die! And, I’m not just talking about my sister, my older sister.
        You see, yesterday afternoon I was sitting at the local neighborhood bar (like that’s anything new). And, inward sultrified (that’s a sultry walk) this African woman. How did I know? Well, aside from her skin tone it was her manner of dress; a truly stunning combination of Western fashion and native garb highlighted by unique jewelry. Of course she was tall and slim. And, of course, that Western fashion had to include a rather deep neckline into which the necklace hung. (Try not to make it obvious you’re looking Tom – just try.)
        “That’s a really nice necklace you have there.” (Well, what other excuse could I use?)
        I found out she was from Zambia. (I guess I was right – she was from Africa. I mean, Zambia’s in Africa, isn’t it?) I mentioned to her that she must be a world traveler. She told me that I (this white suburban former boy) looked like one too. Since the extent of my world travels was limited to Appleton, Wisconsin; Gary, Indiana; and Danville, Illinois; I figured I better come clean and tell her I wasn’t. She talked about Victoria Falls and was impressed that I knew about it. She said, “Well, that just shows you’re a world traveler in your mind.”
        I’m dead I thought. I must be dead. I must’ve lived a good enough life because I must be in heaven. I must be dead and in heaven. But, I wasn’t; I was in hell. You see, just then, of course, of course, of course … the fiancé shows up.
        They have to leave for the airport. She introduces me and tells him she’ll have another drink and be right out. (In other words; ‘Get lost while I talk to this total stranger, Tom.) He leaves as if he’s been through this exercise a million times. And, he has. She says to me, “I like to mess with him.”
        Then she gives me her phone number. Forever more I will be tortured. Probably by him if I call. And, probably by my own mind; thinking about what joy, what fulfillment, what ecstasy; I might be missing in the waning days of my life if I don’t.
        We are all doomed. It’s true. Nobody can dispute it. In the end, everything else in life, or a bar, is just a dream. The only thing worth concentrating on is the alcohol content of the cold Guinness in front of you.

      • RoHa –
        If straight out of ‘Dad’s Army’ – I understand – and applaud.
        Perhaps try to understand those with marginally different cultural references.
        If they do not appreciate Private Walker, Pike, or Captain Mainwaring, or might not, add /sarc.
        Auto

      • Mike
        “nobody hoi-polloi, came accross to us–“us” being, again, “us peons”, whom t the hive holds in such contempt, ”
        Hoi polloi are the “working class” rather than the elite. Just thought I’d mention it…
        [On the other hand, “hoity-toity” is a demeaning term for the “mucky-mucks” who hold themselves above the rest… .mod]

      • @Margaret Smith,
        Thank you for your kind note, however, I was aware of the meaning of “hoi-polloi” you cited (except that I use the term in the more expanded sense of the “masses”). Although apparently unclear, my earlier comment sought to brandish, as a badge of honor, the dismissive terms applied to us “little guys” by our hive-“betters” (with a little hyperbole, maybe). In that regard, I employed the phrases, “us coolie-trash, nobody hoi-polloi” and “us peons”. So I think a careful reading of my comment will reveal that I used the term “hoi-polloi” correctly–but maybe not.
        Undoubtedly, my rant’s typical, noodling-around character contributed to the confusion I appear to have caused you, Margaret, and appreciate your good-sport efforts to wade through my previous comment, attempting to make heads or tails of the whole convoluted, perhaps even bewildering deal.

      • Sorry, Mike, misunderstood you. And I read all comments…fully understanding them is another matter, though.

  1. The only ones who are googling for UN Climate Change conference in Paris are AGW skeptics, and even few of those even care.

  2. I heard someone on NPR yesterday saying Paris was our “Last Chance” to get a Climate deal done. How many times have we heard that one, eh?
    It’s their own fault for billing Paris as “the BIG one” where a deal would get done. Now many are backpedaling like crazy trying to lower expectations.

    • So if they don’t get their big deal, do we think they’ll throw in the towel as having missed their “Last Chance”?
      No way! The next Shindig will be (yet again) their “Last Chance”…. The leftist agenda and the corrupt “science” industry will never let Agenda 21 and it’s cash flow go.

    • I’m with RoHa. We are doomed to even more of these ‘last chance to save the world’ conferences. Which we’ll pay for with our tax dollars. And wasted paper promoting and then reporting garbage. More pollutants from politicians flying to Paris in government/private/chartered jets. (Well, that last isn’t so much a threat as just the waste of perfectly good fuel I could have used in my ATV here in Kalifornia!)

  3. From my experience on news sites (Telegraph and Yahoo), years ago the warmists were engaging about 50%; this last full year, they are about 10%. It appears to me the general public has turned against the climate criminals – the cause seems to be related to those that pay attention to the ridiculous claims in the news AND they also know our Liar-in-Chief supports Global Warming.

  4. Nobody is searching for it, because it is bookmarked (in some cases anyway)??? We all have our regular sites, for what interests us.

  5. Global Warming/Climate Disruption/Climate Change/Warmageddon has become a joke among the general public. All the polls and Internet activity prove this.
    People realize the world’s climate is slowly changing as it always has over the past 4.5 billion years and the wild CAGE claims are completely bogus. The only real effects of the CAGW hoax has been skyrocketing electricity rates, higher unemployment, slower economic growth and more government rules, regulation and power….. Oh, goody…
    It’s amazing that Leftists don’t seem to appreciate the inevitable blowback against Statism once the CAGW hoax is finally disconfirmed within 5~7 years.

    • @ SAMURAI
      I certainly hope you are right, but I fear that what the public knows, understands, wants has precious little to do with what the state does. The evil leaders of the criminal gang writ large called the USA don’t give a rat’s rear about what the populous thinks. The common man is just a slave to be manipulated.
      The state has been in the economy killing business for generations. This is just more of the same.

    • Except we are in an Ice Age cycle and our Interglacial is more likely to end than not end. The earth’s climate is not ‘stable’ at all.

  6. Must be tough to discover that when
    you bore/lie to most of the people,
    most of the time, they start ignoring you.

  7. I guess that no one told Obama and the Pope! Of course they are both above the realities of the little people.

  8. “More people have been lifted out of poverty because of capitalism than ever–is that how we’re doomed?”
    what do you mean ?

  9. Paris is going to be a dartboard.
    I’m going to post facts everywhere, copy them and paste as often as I can on sites that delete comments with facts in them. I know I’m not alone.
    Saturate the f*ckwit mods of those sites – reach an equilibrium. People often ask how to f*ck up these vile climate liar cretins. This is going to be it.

      • It would be almost too wonderful to be true if Paris were to experience bitterly cold weather during COP 21. I can just see all those tropical country delegates trying to control their chattering teeth as they claimed the globe is warming too much.

  10. Interest peaked in 2009/2010, about the same time as the leaked CRU emails. Whether the CRU was exonerated or not, by a slightly biased auditor, people were smart enough to label the whole thing as a hoax. We are not as dumb as they think we are.

  11. …and ticking the box to include Google’s search forecast for the next few months.
    Google execs support President Obama and are warmists.
    Its a warmist model producing the forecast.
    Warmist models are all running high.
    Chances are there is even less interest than reported.
    /sarc

  12. It must be the suns solar cycle activity, because it’s dropping quicker than a paid off “man made” global warming bs artist… Or orbital… Just saying! 😉

  13. It is still more than likely they will have to put out last second scare campaigns-make mountains out of molehills and cry out this is our last chance. Mind you, the binding bids of suicide from Sovereign nations have already been taken. The UN is not about to cease in its quest to deceive the nations of the planet to sign away their sovereignty and freedom. Meanwhile, we all have to strive to expose the gigantic FRAUD that is the UN. It was a fraud from day one.

  14. One more interesting search term:
    “climate conference”
    (try with and without quotation marks)
    There’s been some rather small interest in the 2010 conference, and some very small interest in 2008, but that’s it.

  15. I think you are right about the interest shown by small impoverished nations. On TVNZ news tonight, there was an item saying that the big man in East Timor has offered a home to that “World’s First Climate Change refugee” recently deported from New Zealand. I suppose some idiotic Greenie will now say that this confirms him as a climate refugee!

  16. NGC will generate interest.
    The majority of the warming in the last 150 years was caused by solar cycle changes, rather than the increase in atmospheric CO2. An observation to support that assertion (prove that assertion) would be significant global cooling.
    This is one of the first NGC stories. Unfortunately the media interviewed the cult of CAGW so the entire story concerns zombie theories and manipulated data.
    The cult of CAGW did not mention the fact that there is a cold blob that has started in the Northern Pacific and there has been a cold blob in the southern hemisphere for almost three years. I am curious when the cult of CAGW will inform the public that the solar cycle has been interrupted and there was no AGW. AGW has the fraud of the millennium.
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2015/09/24/why-some-scientists-are-worried-about-a-cold-blob-in-the-north-atlantic-ocean/
    http://beta.dmi.dk/en/groenland/maalinger/greenland-ice-sheet-surface-mass-budget/

    Why some scientists are worried about a surprisingly cold ‘blob’ in the North Atlantic Ocean

    Greenland Ice sheet melt started two months late, last summer.
    http://beta.dmi.dk/uploads/tx_dmidatastore/webservice/e/n/i/b/m/Melt_combine.png
    The cult of CAGW neglected to mention that the Greenland Ice Sheet gained 200 Gt 2014/2015.
    http://beta.dmi.dk/en/groenland/maalinger/greenland-ice-sheet-surface-mass-budget/
    Big surprise, when there is an abrupt change to the solar cycle the planet cools.
    http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/440/1/012001/pdf/1742-6596_440_1_012001.pdf

    The peculiar solar cycle 24 – where do we stand?
    Solar cycle 24 has been very weak so far. It was preceded by an extremely quiet and long solar minimum. Data from the solar interior, the solar surface and the heliosphere all show that cycle 24 began from an unusual minimum and is unlike the cycles that preceded it. We begin this review of where solar cycle 24 stands today with a look at the antecedents of this cycle, and examine why the minimum preceding the cycle is considered peculiar (§ 2). We then examine in § 3 whether we missed early signs that the cycle could be unusual. § 4 describes where cycle 24 is at today.

    The red on this graph is caused by solar wind bursts which in turn are caused by coronal holes, not sunspots. When the coronal holes shrink and/or move to high latitude regions of the sun where they no longer affect planetary temperature NGW will end.
    http://www.ospo.noaa.gov/data/sst/anomaly/2015/anomnight.9.24.2015.gif
    http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/davis-and-taylor-wuwt-submission.pdf

    Davis and Taylor: “Does the current global warming signal reflect a natural cycle”
    …We found 342 natural warming events (NWEs) corresponding to this definition, distributed over the past 250,000 years …. …. The 342 NWEs contained in the Vostok ice core record are divided into low-rate warming events (LRWEs; < 0.74oC/century) and high rate warming events (HRWEs; ≥ 0.74oC /century) (Figure). … …. "Recent Antarctic Peninsula warming relative to Holocene climate and ice – shelf history" and authored by Robert Mulvaney and colleagues of the British Antarctic Survey ( Nature , 2012, doi:10.1038/nature11391),reports two recent natural warming cycles, one around 1500 AD and another around 400 AD, measured from isotope (deuterium) concentrations in ice cores bored adjacent to recent breaks in the ice shelf in northeast Antarctica. ….

    During Dansgaard-Oeschger cooling cycles and during the interglacial terminating Heinrich events the jet stream increases in speed which results increased dust deposited on the Greenland Ice sheet. (Factor of 10 for Heinrich events. The dust comes from China.) The increase in wind speed, the increase in low level cloud cover, and the reduction in cirrus cloud cover causes the roughly 10C drop in high latitude ocean temperatures.
    Greenland ice temperature, last 11,000 years determined from ice core analysis, Richard Alley’s paper. William: As this graph indicates the Greenland Ice data shows that have been 9 warming and cooling periods in the last 11,000 years.
    http://www.climate4you.com/images/GISP2%20TemperatureSince10700%20BP%20with%20CO2%20from%20EPICA%20DomeC.gif
    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-01-13/surging-jet-stream-winds-hinder-u-s-bound-flights-from-europe

    Surging Jet-Stream Winds Hinder U.S.-Bound Flights From Europe
    Stronger westerly headwinds for U.S.-bound flights are stretching out travel times, forcing some planes to stop for refueling. Trips such as London to New York, a busy business route, are running almost eight hours — 45 minutes longer than voyages in September.
    Two Philadelphia-bound American Airlines flights, one from Brussels and the other from Amsterdam, had to touch down on Jan. 11 to refuel in Bangor, Maine, said Scott Ramsay, the carrier’s managing director of its integrated operations center. The journey from Brussels took 9 hours and 16 minutes, about an hour more than three months earlier, according to industry data tracker FlightAware.
    Higher Costs
    Flights across the Atlantic to eastern U.S. cities in December 2013 averaged 19 minutes later than a year earlier, according to industry data tracker MasFlight.com. Travel times in December 2014 were similar to those in 2013, MasFlight’s data from more than 1,300 flights a year showed.
    With the threat of increasingly strong headwinds every winter, airlines face higher costs on those westbound flights with the use of extra fuel and the crew’s time.
    “When you were planning to fly non-stop, stopping for fuel costs money,” said George Hamlin, president of Hamlin Transportation Consulting, who has more than 40 years of experience in commercial aviation and aerospace.

  17. Forbes reports that, according to Google search statistics, the world’s media climate blitz has failed to date to spark any interest in global warming. The reason is simple … everyone knows that leading up to COP21 in Paris, the UN has gone about its business, patiently and skilfully, to ensure that the international agreement controlling fossil fuel energy will be signed in December by governments without the farce experienced in Copenhagen.
    One of the last obstacles was Tony Abbott, Australia’s Prime Minister, who was a climate change sceptic. Lord Christopher Moncton had previously warned about the toppling of Abbott before the Paris Summit in favour of a Malcolm Turnbull led government (Turnbull being a global warming alarmist). Now that that has just happened, it’s almost certain that virtually all countries that matter are locked in. The agreement will at last be signed, and the ‘FIFA style bribery’ amongst poorer nations will have succeeded as they get their share from the the redistribution of wealth from the wealthy countries.
    But what I anticipate, based on sound climate forecasting principles, is that as the world’s politicians and bureaucrats celebrate in Paris, Paris will experience one of the coldest winters for many years… and the UN will insult our intelligence by confirming the cold weather is due to dangerous man-made global warming.

  18. The more reason to fanatically oppose everything the COP21 is trying to achieve, in talks and blogs and what not.
    When they can act ‘unseen’ they might achieve things nobody wants.

  19. COP21 will achieve nothing because all the delegates are looking forward to COP22 in Marrakesh, Morocco, this time next year…

  20. The promoters of the AGW hype know there is little supportive interest in their apocalypse.
    They have instead focused on suppressing opposition and criticism of their claptrap.

  21. Well it seems that China has just blown COP21 out of the water. The money quote from Xi’s speech as follows:
    “””Looking around the world, the peace and development remain the two major themes of the times,” the Chinese leader said at the summit in New York.
    “To solve various global challenges, including the recent refugee crisis in Europe, the fundamental solutions lie in seeking peace and realising development.
    “Facing with various challenges and difficulties, we must keep hold of the key of the development. Only the development can eliminate the causes of the conflicts,” Mr Xi said.””
    DEVELOPMENT…repeat after me….DEVELOPMENT. No sustainable in there at all however the BBC spin it.

  22. It would interesting to know the ratio of skeptic interest searches to pro climate activism searches. That would be very telling especially considering the traffic this site gets.

  23. Most of my more intelligent friend realize that the Climate Change rhetoric is aimed at educing the entropy of living, so that the world might live a little longer. No t a bad thing in itself. However, population change, the real bug-a-boo, is best restricted by successful families who have little to fear and plenty to eat. Been proven over and over. Family size drops with prosperity. That’s one reason why the top 1% is only 1%.
    Share the wealth more evenly! The wealthy cannot own the earth, although they are working at it.

  24. By a curious twist of fate, Google is today celebrating its 17th Birthday on the search page they show me.
    So Google hasn’t seen any global warming in the satellite temperature records either.

  25. The recent change to the AP Style-Guide, dropping the use of the “D-Word” when writing about Climate Change, was probably a tactical marketing decision based on googlish feedback. The internet allows publishers to count the mouse-clicks to know if a word, slogan, title, etc. change is generating +/- volume for an individual story; 1/0. If a news consumer were to explore the issue of “climate change” they might have wondered why the people doing all the shrill name-calling are the good guys?
    The mainstream media has decided to hide their claws and fangs as they go after us “non-believers”. Is that what we are now? I was hoping the MSM would go all in, double down and start calling us sceptics things like demon or warlock. And we could call them climate necromancers, but no, cooler heads have prevailed.

  26. Why would the public be concerned about a non existing global warming threat?
    So what is really happening to global temperatures? (All data per NOAA CLIMATE AT A GLANCE)
    The trend of annual land temperature anomalies since 2005 or the last 10 years has been flat or in a pause
    Global -0.02C/decade
    Northern Hemisphere -0.05 C/decade
    Southern Hemisphere +0.06C/decade
    Global Land Winter temperature anomalies have been trending down since 1977 or 19 years
    GLOBAL -0.01 C/ decade
    NORHERN HEMISPHERE -0.09 C/decade
    NORTH AMERICA -0.54 C/decade
    ASIA -0.49 C/ decade
    EUROPE -0.05 C/ decade
    North America land temperature anomalies have also been trending down mostly since 1977 except summers
    WINTER -0.54C/ decade
    SPRING -0.08C/ decade
    SUMMER +0.23C / decade
    FALL -0.03C/ decade
    ANNUAL -0.10 C/ decade
    US temperature anomalies have also been trending down mostly since 1998 or 18 years except spring and summers
    ANNUAL -0.48 C/decade
    WINTER -1.44 C/decade
    SPRING +0.11C/decade
    SUMMER +0.23 C/decade
    FALL -0.50 C/ decade

  27. However, if we put that Google data into a multi-billion dollar model and make some predictions using a “novel statistical analysis”, we can see that the internet is actually ablaze with interest and will shortly eclipse all other topics. This is 97% certain. Anyone who says otherwise is just a cherry-picking denier and can’t face the facts!

  28. Our rulers do NOT want us interested in the Paris talks. They are going to steal money from us and it is all about hidden taxes which ARE going to be imposed on us due to CO2, plant food, our exhalations. We will pay through the nose and the rulers don’t care if the general public is snoozing during these negotiations on a gigantic tax on plant food.

    • That’s a very good point. Our so-called leaders are happy when the people ignore them and let them get on with wasting our money.

    • Sparks,
      As I understand it, yes in general, due to increased uptake by surface waters among other things. Cooler water can absorb more CO2, as the surface temps rise again, warming water releases part of it’s then “excess” CO2 load. With the oceans as vast an deep as they are that’s a big part of the complex cycling that’s always going on. Plants tend to take up more CO2 in warm weatther, less in cool, so that’s another factor . .

  29. When you are force fed, you don’t have to look for a meal. It doesn’t make a difference if people have stopped being interested, the news media keeps on failing to ask questions about why so much of tax payers money has been spent with nothing to show for it. When the number of searches for the pause or temperature adjustments go up, give me a call.

  30. emsnews, Joseph, DDP, etc,
    Of course you’re making valid points, the perps don’t want the public at at large to be too attentive to the details of the con, but when they pulled the ‘consensus’ rabbit out of their hat, so to speak, they set in motion forces that are not easily controlled by press releases and celebrity endorsements and such, it seems to me.
    They set a great many otherwise busy minds that were being swept along by the “show”, but know the basic nature of the scientific appraoch, to wondering (my own included), And as the years without continued warming continued to pass, the con became more and more difficult to conceal effectively, since consensus . They initiated a “shelf life” sort of aspect to the whole presentation which is growing rather long in the tooth, among other things.
    And now, the claims of consensus and the debate being over ring very hollow, which is to say the “cover” many knowing/wishful thinking participants in the overall charade once saw as warm and cozy, has become tattered and drafty. They know many people they must deal with to get anything done can see right through it, and will not feel so safe in “going along to get along”.
    In light of this circumstance, I believe this really is their last chance to seal this deal, so to speak. That they must do so without much public support, in tough and unpredictable economic times, means the entire edifice of the mass media “bully pulpit” the hyper-wealthy criminals on high have purchased, is at risk of crumbling. Just barging ahead with a great fanfare may not be Plan A anymore. We may yet live to fight another day . . and if you don’t lose, long enough, you win.
    Let’s stand our ground I say, and go down with honor, if we are really doomed.

  31. Hilarious example of internet plagiarism:
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/samie-alachrafi/cop21_2_b_8205670.html
    This silly fellow couldn’t bring himself to credit WUWT or Eric Worrall, let alone perform his own search. Nope, he just lifted the image from WUWT w/o attribution. Which of course is an admission that “Warmist Believers” consult “Denialist Sites” for their data. Not only brain-dead, but lazy. Own-goal.
    Precious irony, in a post lamenting the lack of public interest in alarmism, even as the author is crying tears, the size of which Henny Penny would be proud.
    Kurt in Switzerland

    • “Samie Al-Achrafi is a leading global culture change expert, recognised for creating high performance cultures underpinned by values. He is known for his progressive learning interventions that transform organisations and embed lasting change. Born and raised in the Middle East, Samie moved to the UK and USA before joining the Foreign and Commonwealth Office where he was posted to Romania. Samie has a double first class degree from the University of Durham, a Master’s from City University London and recently attended Harvard Business School. He has worked with leading organisations around the world such as Walt Disney World, Emirates Airline and HSBC to create alignment around purpose and deliver on their organisational ambitions.”

Comments are closed.