Guest essay by Jim Steele
Director emeritus Sierra Nevada Field Campus, San Francisco State University and author of Landscapes & Cycles: An Environmentalist’s Journey to Climate Skepticism
Pictures of this starving polar bear have been circulating throughout the worlds’ most trustworthy media outlets, providing undeniable proof that global warming is not just some theory conjured by soul‑less models that predict devastation a hundred years into the future. Global warming is here and now and this widespread starvation of animals across the globe is exactly what climate models and 97% of the scientists predicted. For further video proof compare these BBC videos.
One of the chief promoters of polar bear doom and gloom, Steve Amstrup, has used this new evidence to honestly promote starving bears but with the proper caveat saying, “Shrinking sea ice is causing polar bears to starve with higher frequency, but “you can’t say that any one individual is starving because of climate change”
Extrapolating back into history scientists assure us no bears ever died of natural causes until CO2 began rising. Although this polar bear has never been examined, (as was the case for the floating/drowned bears a few years ago) the most sophisticated models have determined there is a high confidence that there is a high probability that this polar bear is not sick, is not injured, and is not elderly. Obviously with a climate on steroids, the only plausible possibility is it’s a victim of rising CO2. Normally this area is covered by sea ice and carpeted with seals. But now in the dead of winter there are only small slivers of ice, so small it is forcing seals into the water to drown and bears can barely keep their balance while hunting. Science deniers and uncaring human chauvinists have scoffed that this is just one bear observed within one square kilometer. However given the Arctic covers 14 million square kilometers where no one has been taking pictures, models have extrapolated there are very likely 14 million other skinny bears. But scientists are a conservative lot and lowered their estimate to one million plus or minus 100. Still it is worse than we once thought. Global warming is also starving every species across the planet. And like this bear picture, there is abundant photographic proof of this human‑caused tragedy.
`
Global warming is increasing evaporation and that is drying our fields and pastures. The physics is well established: more CO2 means more evaporation. As a result, grass that once grew as high as a horses back, now barely reaches the bottom of their hooves. Without the normal lush pastures of the last Ice Ages, horses are starving. They are becoming so weak they are now incapable of carrying the smallest jockeys.
When CO2 concentrations were at pre-industrial levels during the Little Ice Age, horses remained thick and meaty throughout their lifetime. Meat from elderly horses was abundant and the main ingredient in dog food. But due to Big Oil and the selfish Koch brothers, CO2 rose and horses became increasingly emaciated and created a shortage of dog food. Only a pet hater, or anti-science Republican or denier Libertarian would ever deny that this epidemic of withering dogs is not real and requires immediate legislation.
When I was in graduate school, we would joke that if there was ever a nuclear holocaust, only insects and rats would ever survive. But according to reputable sources like Joe Romm, rising CO2 is like 400,000 Hiroshima bombs exploding every day. Unless you are a science denier, you can surely feel that heat. And like napalm these nuclear explosions are destroying our forests and prairies so that even the insects can no longer find refuge. Malnourished insects like the one below are the new normal. But there is still time to turn this global catastrophe around. But we must act now and elect every politician who tells a scary climate story!
I spent my career studying bird populations, analyzing how they adapt to changes in landscapes and natural weathers cycles. But the unprecedented 0.6°C global rise during the 20th century is happening faster than birds can evolve; faster than they can fly from a hot sunlit lawn into the cool shade of a tree. In what now appears to be a desperate bare bones approach, and a last ditch attempt to adapt to this unbearable heat not experienced in the last billion years, birds are shedding all their feathers. As the anthropocene heats up, fewer feathers are promoting life saving cross breezes to cool their internal organs. But as the world continues to warm and the last feather has been shed, they will certainly go extinct.
But it is not just wildlife that is suffering. During the last Ice Age humans never wanted for food and 5 course meals several times a day were not uncommon. But despite our technological achievements in agriculture, our best scientists are telling us global warming is increasingly taking food from out tables. The lastest proof in a press release from the journal Nature provided this startling photograph of the new normal in human dining. Furthermore a study by Naomi Klein reports every single scientist is warning against false beliefs that because the growing season has become longer than it was the during the Little Ice Age, more food can be grown. 99.9% of the scientist agree, global warming is due to humans and the apocalypse is real.
It is the poorer nations, especially on Pacific Islands that are unfairly taking the brunt of global warming. Rising sea levels have flooded this couple’s island farm. Food that might normally be salvaged after a tsunami, were so completely dissolved by unprecedented ocean acidity, there was nothing to scavenge. As a result this couple and their neighbors have been forced to survive on the occasional coconut husks that wash on to their shores. Like statistics and graphs, photographs never lie or ever mislead. So please send all your money to any organization that promises to cut CO2 and spare the world from starvation, or maybe you or your children, or grandchildren or your great grandchildren or their children and their pets will suffer a similar horrible fate.
Wet dogs and cats with normal weight also looks tiny when their fur is clinging to their body. You can see the water poring off the fur of the bear in the picture. Has anyone made a little bit of Photoshop added then this bear will look like size 0.
I am always thinking about what was the climate at the time of the Vikings on Greenland – it must have been a lot warmer than today. How about the ice then both at sea and the ice on land? And what about the ice bears? Where they better swimmers then than today?
A hate things that is not logical explained!
Haha, very funny.
And more evaporation means more precipitation. All that water does not remain in the sky forever.
Also, more CO2 means faster Calvin cycle, But it is well established that 98% of climate scientists don’t know what is the Calvin cycle.
Bzzzt! Wrong! Deduct 97 points for not using 97 as a percentage! Please report to climate punishment booth.
Perhaps Carnot cycle? The Calvin cycle is depicted in Calvin & Hobbes.
One of the problems is that there is a correlation between warmth and animal size. All life prefers warmth and that is not simply why one sees greater bio diversity in warm humid areas such as tropical rain forests, but the largest animals are all found in warm climes such as the elephant, hippo, rhino, giraffe etc.
In the past when it was very hot, we had even larger animals such as the dinosaurs.
A warming world would be a god send for life on planet earth. Obviously, there would be some losers, but many more winners.
I have never understood why on a water world inhabited by carbon life forms, anyone would object to the burning of fossil fuels given that the by product of which is CO2 and water. This is just what a water world inhabited by carbon life forms wants since they are two of the most essential ingredients for life on such a planet. Water and CO2 is the giver of life, and should be encouraged.
Very true. CO2 isn’t a greenhouse gas – greenhouses don’t work by trapping IR radiation.
It’s a green gas.
And yet idiots like David Attenborough demonise the very thing that makes the world green.
And CO2 is food for plants that turn sunlight and CO2 into wood and OXYGEN!!!
Richard v
Isn’t there a sort-of Law – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bergmann%27s_rule – that members of the same (or similar?) species are larger the nearer the Poles they live?
On average.
kind-of Mass Homoeothermy [Open to correction on my spelling . . . .]. Thanks.
Auto
Oh, I have Got to repost this to Deviantart! With all due credit and links back of course!
Haha! Very good!
Now the presidents should take action on this important and very dangerous thing. Global Warming.
Starving Icebears? For the first time in 11 years there has been a count of Icebears in Norwegien teritory, mostly Spitsbergen). The conclusion was ” The Icebears were fat as pigs”.
http://www.highnorthnews.com/isbjornene-var-feite-som-griser/
I cannot see a problem here. According to this article: OBESITY CAUSES GLOBAL WARMING, SAY “SCIENTISTS”. So therefore, starvation causes GLOBAL COOLING. Problem solved.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1172249/Being-fat-causes-global-warming-say-scientists.html
Ha Ha . I remember that study from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Hmmm what could it possibly mean if “science” blames both starvation and obesity on rising CO2?
It means of course that CO2 causes rising inequality – which is why we urgently need more climate justice.
When all the polie bears are gone, there won’t be any starving ones suffering!
There – problem solved.
I suppose when reality is against you with Arctic Ice continuing to recover and polar bear population in rude good health all you can do is resort to false sensationalism. Assisted as usual by an uncritical and fawning mass media.
I have ingrown toe nails caused buy global warming ? what will I do
Seek funding for a study of ingrown toenails caused by global warming.
And look for compensation – from someone. Big Wind; Big Oil; Big Hydro; Big Bull5h1#, etc.
When you have the hundreds of thousands [dollars, pounds, euros – matters not which] – say it’s worse than we thought.
And call for millions more . . . .
Repeat ‘ad nauseum’ . . . .
Auto – in career-advisor mode! [PS – /sarc, a bit]
while I DO see the humour
the abused horse n dog pics arent funny
and using that poor lass with the serious medical issue bottom left was a lot tasteless,
theres other goofy intentionally anorexics pics would be better used
OZ,
We see a lot of terminally skinny horses in the States since the animal rights people got the glue and dog food markets closed off here. You will see these toothless malnourished horses quite a bit and the owners are scared to have them put down due to the animal rights backlash. You have to wait for them to founder or collapse before the vet can intervene. Of course some people were sending perfectly serviceable horses to the butcher because they were inconvenient, but most really did wait until the horse was not going to do well on normal fodder. Now there are people dumping their older horses in the national parks because they don’t want to feed and provide vet care for a horse that can’t ride or pull. Thus we see the unintended consequence of do-gooders interfering with the market over a fairly small problem.
“You see, the numbers don’t matter any more and the science is irrelevant; it’s all about propaganda. While you may be arguing the science, the big green killing machine just concentrates on creating an impression in the public consciousness, even if the impression is totally contradicted by the facts. Facts are irrelevant too.
While you’re busy nailing them on points of scientific fact, they’re busy photoshopping Polar bears onto ice cubes floating in the Bering Sea. You’re aiming at them but they’re aiming at public opinion.”
https://thepointman.wordpress.com/2011/09/15/polar-bears-going-extinct-yawn/
Pointman
Information on the photo. .Which readers of WUWT will find interesting:
– Photo taken on Svalbard by Kerstin Langenberger
– Facebook, K. Langenberger: https://www.facebook.com/kerstin.langenberger.photography/photos/a.463697036975575.115901.429056113773001/1045109095501030/?type=1&permPage=1
– Article published yesterday. Icelandic news web site mbl.is: http://www.mbl.is/frettir/innlent/2015/09/16/al_gore_vildi_nota_ljosmyndina/
– – google translation from icelandic to english: https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=is&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mbl.is%2Ffrettir%2Finnlent%2F2015%2F09%2F16%2Fal_gore_vildi_nota_ljosmyndina%2F&edit-text=
Thanks for the link. Kerstin Langenberger is neither a scientist nor a polar biologist but has managed to link the health of polar bears in Svalbard to climate change.
She says there’s been no census but she doubts the population is stable.
She is cannon fodder to the green movement and no doubt will achieve lasting ignominy.
The photographer’s own words demonstrate just how irrational the Climate Change Fundamentalists have become:
“We were all stunned by the strange wound it had on its left foreleg: a long and seemingly clean cut. I cannot imagine another polar bear causing such a strange wound. I could think that it might have been cause by a walrus tusk, though, but I have never seen a wound like that and it is just a theory. If the wound was indeed caused by a walrus, then the animal (a rather small bear) must have been desperate (meaning: hungry) in order to take the risk of attacking a walrus and then gaining this fatal injury. So: even if the injury is the reason this bear is a mere skeleton, I think it is climate change that might be responsible for the animal to have that wound to start with. It’s a theory nobody can proof or disproof.
http://news.discovery.com/animals/endangered-species/photographing-skinny-polar-bears-first-person-150916.htm
Polar bears will attack walrus sometimes. It’s been going on for thousands of years so the photographer is guessing.
http://cdn1.arkive.org/media/06/0689B520-CA07-4494-A724-C812916DA246/Presentation.Small/Polar-bear-attacking-walrus-drags-off-walrus-pup.jpg
Really? I’m reading with my 5 year old, Mods?
[The photo shows the bear attacking (eating) its victim. nothing else needs be read into the image. .mod]
Apparently photos of inter-species mating, eg a photo of a polar bear attempting intercourse with a walrus is on topic and not too graphic for this thread.
cO2 causes most of the deviant behaviour in the world. This inter-species intercourse is just one. That’s why I’m seeking climate-funding to clothe these poor beasts with pants.
RD–I see a bear preparing to dine on a walrus, complete with fang and claws, not even remotely in a “mating” posture. Your imagination appears to be getting the better of you.
Well, this really is a new low, isn’t it. You use photos of a desperately ill person, whose illness has nothing to do with the topic, to illustrate your posting.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/7858664/The-girl-who-must-eat-every-15-minutes-to-stay-alive.html
Bob, It is known as ‘The Chinese Beggar’ Syndrome.
Quite – no wait a minute, I thought you were talking about the polar bear. . .
In a population of 25,000 and max longevity of 30 years (averages closer to 20 years), there’s going to be around a thousand deaths every year. It shouldn’t be hard to get a picture of an ailing polar bear for publicity/extortion purposes.
I am wondering if we could air-drop some food to these poor creatures. We could air-drop some climatologists. That way they could study the bears up close and personal — and not just imagine things in the comfort of their climate controlled university office. A win-win I think.
~Mark
Mark
Whilst I agree – the poor poleys do need feeding up – I believe the human rights – even of climatologists – need to be considered.
A bit.
Maybe give them parkas before the airdrop.
Like you, I have no doubt that they will find their [first?] field expedition enlightening.
Auto – with tongue, uvula, oesophagus, etc. well in cheek. Thanks.
* tears falling on keyboard* yes Mark, it would be the most compassionate thing to do! I’ll bet we could even get those kids (you know , the Google and the Facebook ones) that have all those extra private jets to take the climatologists and drop them off. Oh, but make sure their parkas are polyfill and not down (wouldn’t want to cause more suffering to innocent geese). Maybe the jetsters would also be willing to go back to pick up the clothing scraps.
That polar bear had a run in with my sister, my older sister. Can you imagine what I look like?
According to the Daily Express, this polar bear is is a bad way because of an injured after a fight with a walrus.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/nature/605290/The-world-s-SADDEST-polar-bear-Emaciated-animal-drags-her-injured-leg-in-search-for-food
sorry, should be “injured leg”.
Wasn’t this piece a satire? It read like one to me. I don’t understand most of the comments based on that.
Some commenters may have missed the satirical character of the post, I agree. However, some of the comments, not suggesting that you didn’t make the distinction yourself, Tim O, are directed, not to the post’s satire, but rather to the post’s point of departure–namely, the sorry, intellectually-corrupt hijacking of a compelling photo, featuring an emaciated polar bear, by some of the “world’s most trustworthy media outlets”, with the aim of using that picture’s visceral-punch as a propaganda-peg on which to hang non-sequitur, eco-flake scare-mongering of the crudest and most air-head friendly kind.
the ultragreenie photographer who took that photo could have, and should have offered himself as food to that bear to save its life. It would be a noble thing to do and would reduce the number of surplus CO2-generating ultragreenies by one which would probably be enough to save something or other. OTOH maybe the sacrifice by the photographer and its attendant GHG savings would be offset by Polar Bear flatulence due to the unusual change in its diet. Not to worry there are many more ultragreenies, they don’t all have to be photographers, and so many bears to be saved. We’ll beat this CO2 thing yet.
@dmh
you said: “I saw that photo on CNN and immediately thought…. why only one?
If polar bear starvation was wide spread, there ought to be dozens and dozens and dozens. The fact that they have come up with a photo of only a single polar bear tells the real story. Had there been large numbers of starving bears there would have been more than one to take a picture of, not to mention they’d be invading human habitats in droves to root through garbage.”
Reasonable questions, but I suspect the answer is not what you think. I think Polar Bear starvation IS widespread, and there ARE dozens and dozens and dozens, and that there are large numbers of starving bears invading human habitats in droves to root through garbage. This Globe and Mail article reports the fact of bear raids as of 2011, as well as the opinion it’s caused by Global Warming. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/the-flame-rocks-but-the-polar-bear-steals-the-show/article1204524/
So why did they take just one pic of one bear? Only they know for sure. We can speculate that it was because they sought an iconic photo, or a symbolic one, or they were pressed for time, or lazy, or unlucky, or picky to select the most photogenic. Maybe they were scared of bears and ran away after getting only one photo. Their motive doesn’t matter, though few of those possibilities reflect well on them.
But if it isn’t Global Warming starving the Bears, what is? Mother Nature, is my answer. Brad Rich’s post above covers some of the reason. But the fundamental fact is that Polar Bears are subject to Malthusian laws. A single breeding pair of Polar Bears will produce 8 offspring in their life. In an environment that sustains a fixed population, six of the offspring must die before reproducing, mostly from starvation. Some will die from intra-species violence, some from mischance, some from human hunting- but mostly from starvation. One of the fundamental features of our environment, that most predators starve, seems to be a perpetually closed book to soi-disant ‘environmentalists’, who treat it as a sign something’s gone wrong, rather than the natural functioning of the ecosystem. And they often ascribe that ‘wrongness’ to human activity. (This willful ignorance both angers and bewilders me.)
Of course the Arctic is not currently an environment that sustains a fixed population. As Øyvind Davidsen says above, Norway reports their bears are fat as pigs. And the numbers are ever larger than early estimates; many sub-populations are known to be growing. But if the population doubles every generation, that’s still four polar bear cubs for every two adults, dying mostly from starvation.
So yeah, I believe there’s thousands of starving polar bears. Evidence it’s anything unusual, let alone caused by Global Warming, hasn’t been provided. Why did they picture only the one? Who knows?
Well Steve is half right, one starving polar bear does not make an epidemic of starving polar bears.
Simply because Steve is able to easily pull assertions directly out of his arse is not adequate evidence supporting his other point of polar bears starving with higher frequency. Easily being able to pull assertions out of ones arse is only evidence of verbal flatulence.