CLAIM: Climate change reached into the past and collapsed Bronze Age civilizations

From the “is there anything climate change can’t do when models are involved?” department. On the plus side, this study illustrates how natural climate cycles were involved. – Anthony

Unravelling the climate behind the collapse of Bronze Age civilizations

Stockholm University

The most severe droughts in the ancient Eastern Mediterranean arose when multiple natural climate cycles coincided, according to a new study from Stockholm University published in Science Advances. The findings shed new light on the climate conditions surrounding the Late Bronze Age collapse and may help improve understanding of future drought risks in a warming world.

“Rather than being caused by a single climatic event, we found that the most extreme droughts emerged when natural climate cycles operating over different timescales coincided. This helps explain why the drought associated with the Late Bronze Age collapse were so severe”, says Katherine Power, PhD student, Department of Physical Geography, Stockholm University, and first author of the study.

Around 3,200 years ago, many of the great civilizations of the Eastern Mediterranean, including the Mycenaeans, Minoans and Hittite Empire, experienced widespread societal collapse. Although severe droughts have long been linked to this period, the climatic processes behind these events remain uncertain. To investigate this, Katherine Power and Qiong Zhang, professor in paleoclimate modelling, Department of Physical Geography, Stockholm University and co-author of the study, used a state-of-the-art climate model to reconstruct the evolution of the Mediterranean climate over the past 8,000 years.

The Eastern Mediterranean dried as part of a broader climate transition; weakening monsoons and shifting atmospheric circulation reduced moisture from Africa and rainfall across the region. Image: Katherine Power/Stockholm University

“Our results show that the region underwent a gradual drying trend over thousands of years, driven by slow changes in Earth’s orbit. Superimposed on this long-term trend we also found shorter-term fluctuations in the Atlantic Ocean and atmosphere”, says Katherine Power.

The researchers found that most severe droughts occurred when several natural climate cycles aligned, temporarily reinforcing one another and producing droughts far more intense than the long-term drying trend alone.

“The convergence of these processes pushed the Eastern Mediterranean beyond a critical hydroclimatic threshold, reducing water availability and increasing pressure on agriculture and food security within already vulnerable societies”, Katherine Power says.

These findings change how we think about past droughts, the researcher say, and understanding these processes is highly relevant today:

“The Mediterranean is one of the world’s climate change hotspots and the area is projected to become warmer and drier during the coming century. Our findings suggest that future drought risk may depend not only on long-term human-driven warming, but also on how natural variability in the Atlantic Ocean interacts with that background trend”, Katherine Power explains.

By revealing how different climate processes combine to amplify drought, this research can provide new insights into the risks of future hydroclimatic extremes in a warming world, the researchers say. 

The study “Holocene ocean-atmosphere coupling and Mediterranean sensitivity to Atlantic circulation: Lessons from the Late Bronze Age collapse” was published in Science Advances. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aed5439.
For this research the model EC-Earth was used.
 


Journal

Science Advances DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aed5439 

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Tony Cole
July 27, 2026 10:12 am

I wonder whether the 7 years of feast and 7 years of famine were actually cycles of El Nino and La Nina. if so Joseph must be the first climate scientist on record.

July 27, 2026 10:42 am

They ran a model. The author then exhibited a distinct lack of humility. Her discussion quotes given here lack words like may, might, or could. Of course, she worked under the tutelage of a professor and a doctoral committee, who should have reined in her confidence in the model findings. That said, various scholars and models suggest that climatic conditions of the era were likely a contributing factor among many.

Interestingly, the characterization of climate of that era as seen in Paleoclimate data (pollen, speleothems, tree rings, lake cores, sea-surface temperatures) point to a multi-decade to multi-century period of cooler, drier conditions and reduced rainfall. As in the little ice age, again we have the suggestion that cold was bad and was accompanied by dry conditions. The authors then tried to correlate stressful, cold, dry conditions of the past with current warm and wet conditions, just the opposite of the late bronze age collapse.

Gotta say something about projected climate change in the modern era in order to get their funding and get published.

Jeff Alberts
July 27, 2026 10:44 am

So, a climate model was used to model something about which they have no real details, only proxies. What could go wrong?

kwinterkorn
July 27, 2026 10:47 am

This study shows the typical fraud of science that is dependent on unproven models.

“Our results show….”

No. Your results “show” nothing. You have found nothing. They are not facts. Your model is a complex hypothesis. Your “results” are not measurements of the real world; your results are simply calculations, quantifications of your hypothesis. An hypothesis cannot prove itself.

Your best phrasing might be: “calculations based on our model suggest…..”

So test your model and its quantifications against real world measurements. Until you do, your study is somewhere among speculation, fantasy, and unproven theory.

Modern science where money and politics are involved is in trouble.