Antarctic Refrigerator Effect, Climate Sensitivity & Déformation professionnelle: Lessons from Past Climate Change – Part 2

Guest essay by Jim Steele

Reference link: Déformation professionnelle

Director emeritus Sierra Nevada Field Campus, San Francisco State University and author of Landscapes & Cycles: An Environmentalist’s Journey to Climate Skepticism

For the past 55 million years the global surface temperature has declined by more than 10°C from a “hot house” condition into an “ice house” with increasing temperature variability as depicted in Figure 1 (Mya = millions of years ago). During the Cretaceous and Early Cenozoic, glaciers and ice caps were absent from both Antarctica and Greenland. Antarctica was covered in para-tropical vegetation and Greenland was home to crocodiles. More importantly for millions of years the oceans had been storing enormous amounts of heat. In contrast to near freezing temperatures today, Antarctic bottom waters averaged about 11°C, suggesting Antarctic coastal temperatures never dropped below 11°C even during the long polar nights. Amazingly the equator to pole surface temperature difference averaged just 10°C compared to the 30°C gradient measured today. Of particular interest, changes in carbon dioxide fail to explain the greatest proportion of these ancient temperatures.

clip_image002

For decades the consensus had been that ocean heat transport had ultimately maintained the polar regions’ ancient tropical conditions. Models had demonstrated without heat transport from the tropics, the poles would be 110°C colder than the tropics (Gill 1982, Lozier 2012). It was commonly believed, and is still believed by most, that as plate tectonics rearranged the continents, the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) formed and strengthened. Models now simulate that as drifting continents opened “gateways” and allowed for uninterrupted circumpolar flow, surface temperatures began cooling significantly (Bijl 2013). A strengthening ACC created a barrier inhibiting intrusions of warm tropical waters and minimizing both oceanic and atmospheric heat transport resulting in the Refrigerator Effect. The Refrigeration Effect radically cooled the southern ocean and altered the vertical temperature structure of all the earth’s oceans. (As discussed here, the ACC barrier to ocean heat transport is a major reason why Antarctic sea ice has currently increased in contrast to decreasing Arctic sea ice.)

However a few climate modelers began arguing CO2, not heat transport, was the ultimate climate control knob. They argued that high CO2 concentrations explained the polar warmth and the decline in CO2 explained the advent of polar ice caps and the 55 million year trend towards our icehouse climate. This debate between heat transport and greenhouse effects not only reveals a lack of climate consensus; it also reveals the subjectivity that influences how climate sensitivity is estimated. Proxy evidence increasingly suggests that ancient CO2 levels were far lower than what climate models require to simulate ancient warmth. In stark contrast to current research that is increasingly suggesting lower climate sensitivity to CO2 (i.e. Lewis & Curry 2014, and a growing list here and here), paleoclimate researchers who argue CO2 controls climate change, are forced to suggest climate sensitivity must have been much, much greater than anyone currently believes.

In contrast, researchers examining the Paleocene‑Eocene maximum temperatures concluded, “At accepted values for the climate sensitivity to a doubling of the atmospheric CO2 concentration, this rise in CO2 can explain only between 1 and 3.5°C of the [5-9°C] warming inferred from proxy records. We conclude that in addition to direct CO2 forcing, other processes and/or feedbacks that are hitherto unknown must have caused a substantial portion of the warming during the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum. Once these processes have been identified, their potential effect on future climate change needs to be taken into account.” [Emphasis added] Zeebe (2009).

However if “unknown feedbacks” and other forcings can explain an even greater proportion of past temperature changes, then researchers would be forced to suggest climate sensitivity to CO2 is much lower. The Antarctic Refrigerator Effect is such an effect and parsimoniously explains Cenozoic global cooling without invoking a CO2 contribution.

The Case Against a CO2 Climate “Control Knob

 

By creating a well‑mixed global “blanket”, the carbon dioxide greenhouse effect should act on a global scale. However as illustrated in Figure 1, initiation of Antarctic glaciation happened 35 million years ago, more than 30 millions years before Arctic glaciation ever began. Clearly Antarctic glaciation was not part of a global event, but a regional one. Although this gross time difference does not rule out a limited contribution from diminishing CO2 concentrations, the evidence most assuredly demands a different and more regional explanation for the drivers of Antarctica’s observed climate change.

Furthermore, in order for a CO2 greenhouse effect to have created the near‑tropical conditions observed in Antarctica’s fossil evidence, it requires CO2 concentrations far greater than what the growing number of paleo‑proxies are suggesting. Huber (2011) argued that their models could simulate tropical warmth in polar regions if CO2 reached 4480 ppm, an 11‑fold increase above today’s concentrations. However Huber 2011 also admitted their estimate of CO2 concentrations should not be taken literally. Instead it was his approach “equivalent to “tuning” climate sensitivity to a higher value, but is much simpler in practice.” They argued that the “4480 ppm CO2 concentration used here should not be construed literally: it is merely a means to increase global mean warmth.”

Huber 2011 was wise to admit CO2 concentrations of 4480 are unrealistic. Based on growing proxy evidence, CO2 concentrations during the past 350 million years have not exceeded 1000 ppm (Franks 2014). However Huber 2011’s suggestion of greater CO2 climate sensitivity proves to be equally inappropriate and most likely a case of déformation professionnelle.

 

Deformation professionnelle is a French term referencing how one’s profession narrows and distorts one’s viewpoint and thus biases conclusions. For example if researchers whose funding and status has been driven by a paradigm that CO2 drives all climate change, any contrary evidence will be reinterpreted to maintain that viewpoint.

One major avenue of research strives to determine climate sensitivity by comparing varying CO2 concentrations with past climate change. Although Franks 2014 determined past CO2 variations only accounted for 20% of what Huber’s models required, they too felt obligated to suggest there must be a much greater climate sensitivity to the smaller changes in CO2. But they obviously ignore much more parsimonious inferences. Very simply, there are other dynamics that drive climate change, and current models driven by CO2 have failed to incorporate additional and alternative explanations. Similarly CO2 variations are insufficient to explain the Dansgaard‑Oeschger extreme warming events of the last Ice Age. But as discussed here, changes in ocean heat storage and ventilation offer a superior explanation. Likewise Antarctica’s Refrigerator Effect completely altered ocean heat storage and ventilation and can parsimoniously accounts for Cenozoic global cooling.

Unfortunately evaluations of CO2 climate sensitivity typically only compare varying CO2 concentrations with other estimated radiative effects to explain fluctuations in global mean surface temperatures (GMST). However there are other powerful non-radiative effects that also contribute to a varying GMST as well as the increasing equator to pole temperature gradient. For example examining changes in Cenozoic climate Thomas (2014) concluded, “Stronger vertical mixing within the oceans potentially reconciles several long-standing greenhouse paleoclimate problems. Stronger vertical mixing invigorates the MOC [Meridonal Overturning Circulation] by an order of magnitude, increases ocean heat transport by 50–100%, reduces the zonal mean equator-to-pole temperature gradients by up to 6°C, lowers tropical peak terrestrial temperatures by up to 6°C, and warms high-latitude oceans by up to 10°C.”

Given that just the upper 3.5 meters of the oceans hold more heat than our entire atmosphere. And that average depth of the oceans is an order of 3 magnitudes greater, about 3600 meters; changes in ocean heat storage and ventilation have humongous impacts on global climate. Research that ignores contributions to GMST from ocean heat storage, ventilation and vertical mixing, CO2, will greatly exaggerate climate sensitivity to CO2. Today we witness global warming from heat ventilation during an El Nino and global cooling due to increased upwelling of cooler waters during La Ninas. On time scales varying from a few years to millions of years, storage and ventilation of ocean heat has been the earth’s true climate control knob.

The Antarctic Refrigeration Effect

 

Our modern freezer and refrigerator appliances are all based on 2 simple principles. 1) A compressor‑refrigerant apparatus pumps heat out of the refrigerator’s interior. 2) The refrigerator is insulated to minimize any heat transfer into the refrigerator from the outside.

The Antarctic analogy to a refrigerant/compressor apparatus has been ever present. Due to the earth’s spherical shape and orbital effects, annual incoming solar radiation at the poles is so low, polar regions always radiate more heat back to space than is ever absorbed locally. Without a constant flow of heat from the tropics, polar regions would naturally descend into permanent ice house climates. Forcing by CO2 is not a significant factor, if a factor at all. Thus variations in Antarctica’s climate are governed by changes in heat transport versus the steady radiation of heat back to space. Although Antarctica sat over the South Pole for hundreds of millions of years, it remained ice free for most of the Mesozoic and early Cenozoic because the “refrigerator door” was left open. However as continents began to shift and opened “ocean gateways”, the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) formed and intensified. The ACC closed the refrigerator door and resisted poleward heat transport from the tropics. The ACC also generated more intense westerly winds and invigorated upwelling that increased vertical mixing. Most importantly as the ACC shut the refrigerator door, sea ice began forming in the southern seas. That initiated deep ocean cooling and a total reconfiguration of the global ocean’s vertical heat structure.

Before the ACC formed, Antarctic bottom waters were about 11°C. Bottom waters formed from competing regions. In shallow seas that dominated subtropical regions, warm salty water became dense enough to sink to the bottom. Elsewhere warm salty subtropical waters that were transported poleward cooled and sank. In contrast, once the Antarctic refrigerator was established, cold salty brine was now extruded during sea ice formation. The sinking of cold brine either penetrated to the abyss forming near freezing bottom water, or slowly cooled the subsurface waters as the brine was turbulently mixed with its surroundings. Thus global oceans began a 35 million year cooling trend starting from the ocean abyss and working its way to the surface.

In Figure 13 below (from Kennett 1990), the bottom frame labeled Proteus, illustrates a simplified vertical structure of the Atlantic Ocean around 60 million years ago. Warm Salty Deep Water (WSDW) dominated the ocean depths. Much of that warm bottom water is believed to have been generated in shallow equatorial seas, like the Tethys, where evaporation exceeded precipitation. Our modern Mediterranean Sea is a remnant of the Tethys, and still contributes warm salty water to the Atlantic.

The surface waters around Antarctica were much fresher because cooler polar regions experience greater precipitation relative to evaporation. Antarctic Intermediate Water (AAIW) forms as upwelling bottom waters mixed with fresher surface waters. Subsequently, climate change has been greatly affected as Antarctic Intermediate Water have cooled and exerted a tremendous effect on tropical sea surface temperatures for millions of years via “ocean tunneling”.

The middle frame of Figure 13, labeled Proto-Oceanus, illustrates how the ocean’s vertical structure evolved over the next 10+ million years after the formation of a strong Antarctic Circumpolar Current. Due to the refrigerator effect, cold saline Antarctic Bottom Water (proto‑AABW) began to dominate the ocean floor. Contributions of Warm Saline Deep Water (WSDW) diminished, and the influential Antarctic Intermediate Water (AAIW) was increasingly cooled by much colder Antarctic Bottom Water. As the colder AAIW flows back towards the equator it modulates the global temperature by cooling subsurface waters that would potentially reach tropical surfaces via upwelling.

clip_image004

The upper frame labeled Oceanus, represents a simplified illustration of the Atlantic’s modern vertical structure. Due to the Antarctic Refrigerator Effect, the deep oceans continued to cool, and the thermocline that separates warm surface water from cooler deep waters became increasingly more shallow.

Between 2 and 3 million years ago the cooling of the deep oceans reached a tipping point, and modern upwelling regions ogf cold deep water off the coast of Peru, California and the west coast of Africa were established. There had always been upwelling along those coasts along with the associated increases in marine productivity. But now upwelled subsurface waters were cooler by 4 to 9°C. (Dekens 2007), corresponding to the cooling by Antarctic Bottom waters and its effect on subsurface waters. Analogous to the drop in global temperatures during La Nina events caused by upwelling of colder waters, upwelling of colder waters 2 to 3 million years ago also cooled global temperature to the point it initiated Arctic ice cap and glacier formation. The cooler Arctic then promoted formation of North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW in the upper frame of Figure 13) as salty Atlantic waters transported poleward cooled and brine rejection increased as more Arctic sea ice formed.

Declining CO2: A Result Not A Cause.

The Cretaceous Period (145 to 65 million years ago) was named for huge widespread chalk deposits that developed during that time period, especially in the Tethys Sea. Those chalk deposits were the result of sinking plankton that produced calcium carbonate shells like foraminifera and coccolithophorids, As discussed in Natural Cycles of Ocean Acidification, the creation of calcium carbonate shells pumps alkalinity to depth but produces CO2 at the surface thus adding to higher concentrations of atmospheric CO2. More enlightening and contrary to catastrophic CO2 assertions that rising CO2 will decimate calcium carbonate shell producers, the greatest proliferation of calcium carbonate shell producers occurred during this period with the high temperatures and high concentrations of atmospheric CO2. Quite likely, high CO2 concentrations did not produce detrimental acidification, and were the result of coccolithophorids and foraminifera pumping CO2 to the surface.

The development of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current forever altered the carbon biological pump by increasing upwelling in the southern oceans, and later along continental west coasts by cooling upwelled waters. When the ACC caused upwelling in southern oceans to intensify, a more reliable supply of nutrients supported the evolution and proliferation of diatoms. As discussed in Natural Cycles of Ocean Acidification, diatoms are large, produce siliceous shells, and more rapidly shuttle CO2 from the surface to ocean depths. As evolving diatom populations expanded, a more efficient biological pump buried more CO2 at depth that is now detected as siliceous ooze or as biogenic opal deposits. In contrast CO2 emitting coccolithophorid populations and their chalk deposits dwindled. Changes in the biological pump contributed to observed declines in atmospheric CO2. Diatoms are also associated with explosive increases in ocean productivity, so it should be no surprise that the earliest appearance and evolution of whales also coincides with increased ACC upwelling and the evolution of diatoms.

In summary, due to continental drift, the formation of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current blocked intrusions of warm tropical waters that warmed Antarctic and initiated the Antarctic Refrigerator Effect. Cold polar regions are a natural result of inadequate solar radiation. Reduced forcing from diminished levels of CO2 is not required to explain global cooling. The resulting formation of Antarctic sea ice expelled colder, salty waters that filled the abyss and began cooling the deep oceans. After 30+ million years of cooling, 2 to 3 million years ago, colder ocean waters eventually upwelled in the mid latitudes along the west coasts of major continents as well as along the equator. The resulting global cooling, allowed the growth of Arctic ice caps, glaciers and sea ice. The Antarctic Circumpolar Current also increased global upwelling and the efficiency of the biological pump. Decreases in atmospheric CO2 are associated with reductions in populations of CO2 producing coccolithophorids along with increasing populations of diatoms that pumped CO2 to depth. If the Antarctic Refrigeration Effect can account for the changes in global temperatures, it suggests the global sensitivity to varying levels of CO2 is relatively insignificant.

Jim Steele is author of Landscapes & Cycles: An Environmentalist’s Journey to Climate Skepticism

clip_image006

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 2 votes
Article Rating
155 Comments
MCourtney
September 16, 2015 6:24 am

While I agree with this over the long-term,

If the Antarctic Refrigeration Effect can account for the changes in global temperatures, it suggests the global sensitivity to varying levels of CO2 is relatively insignificant.

It does rely on,

due to continental drift

Which isn’t operating on the timescales that anyone is worried about in the first place.

September 16, 2015 6:39 am

It only relies on continental drift as the trigger for the Cenozoic cooling trend. For current timescales the point is storage and ventilation of ocean heat are the control knobs driving climate change, and more ice in the Arctic is not dependent on CO2 forcing, but small changes in iinsolation and heat transport into the Arctic

September 16, 2015 6:44 am

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/09/16/antarctic-refrigerator-effect-climate-sensitivity-dformation-professionnelle-lessons-from-past-climate-change-part-2/
Thank you Jim.
You say in your above section “Declining CO2: A Result Not A Cause:”
“As discussed in Natural Cycles of Ocean Acidification, the creation of calcium carbonate shells pumps alkalinity to depth but produces CO2 at the surface thus adding to higher concentrations of atmospheric CO2.”
I demonstrated in 2008 that dCO2/dt varies almost contemporaneously with global temperature T (Surface Temperature ST and Lower Troposphere Temperature LT) and the integral atmospheric CO2 concentration lags temperature by about 9 months in the modern data record. I believe this short-term “CO2 lags T” relationship is primarily driven by terrestrial biological activity that is dominated by the larger Northern Hemispheric landmass.
http://icecap.us/index.php/go/joes-blog/carbon_dioxide_in_not_the_primary_cause_of_global_warming_the_future_can_no/
However, this relationship probably does not adequately explain the ~2ppm annual increase in atmospheric CO2. I suspect this 2ppm/year is caused by other sources, whether humanmade or natural (such as oceanic upwelling effects).
There is a reported ~800 year lag of CO2 after Temperature in the ice core record.
So my question for you is “What is your best guess as to the cause of the 2ppm/year upward trend in atmospheric CO2?”
Regards, Allan

MarkW
September 16, 2015 6:52 am

Both Antarctica and Greenland were further from there respective poles 55million years ago.
The circumpolar current around Antarctica didn’t exist 55 million years ago.
Panama was still underwater so ocean currents were dramatically different 55 million years ago.
There are many, many differences between the world of 55million years ago and today.

Gary Pearse
September 16, 2015 6:58 am

Interesting and plausible phenomenon. One thing: ‘coccolithophore(s)’ is the noun. Coccolithophorid is an adjective.
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/Coccolithophores/

MarkW
September 16, 2015 6:59 am

” there must be a much greater climate sensitivity to the smaller changes in CO2. ”
Isn’t this one of those Duhhh statements, given the fact that the effect of CO2 is logarithmic. By the time you reach say 1000ppm, some 98% of the warming CO2 is capable of producing is already being felt, all further increases are just chasing after that last 2%.

MarkW
September 16, 2015 7:00 am

“ventilation have humongous impacts on global climate. ”
Humongous? Is that a scientific term?

Peta in Cumbria
September 16, 2015 7:23 am

Meanwhile here and now in sunny (I kid ye not today) Cumbria, air temp is 15degC, soil temp at 60cm depth is 17degC and CO2 is reading 395
This morning just before sunrise, soil temp was (still) 17, air temp was 6 and CO2 was 505ppm.
2 hours after sunrise CO2 was 470ppm and temp was 10degC.
Great stuff this CO2 How’s the back-radiation coming on?
In other business, my 10 day old glass of Club Soda has reached a pH of exactly 7.0, despite starting at 4.5 and measured CO2 in its vicinity (on a shelf in my kitchen) has always been 600ppm+
The fresh clean 2 day old water in my bathtub is still 1 degC cooler than the air in there, it gets even cooler when I leave the window and door open.
Isn’t science great, shame more people don’t do it.

Robert of Ottawa
September 16, 2015 7:26 am

I am sure the closing of the American isthmus (great word for someone with a listhp), or Darian Cap, had something to do with it.

September 16, 2015 7:47 am

Jim, interesting article.
Richard Lindzen has suggested that the equator-pole gradient at higher altitudes at present is surprisingly similar to the corresponding gradient in the Eocene i.e. that the increase in gradients at surface is related to the development of polar inversions. This would be consistent with your viewpoint and might enhance it.
Also, William Kininmonth has similarly argued in the past that Eocene oceans were warm at depth. You might wish to correspond with him about your ideas.

RACookPE1978
Editor
September 16, 2015 7:51 am

Antarctic sea ice has about 1.7 times the effect on the earth’s heat budget than the Arctic sea ice does. This is because – although both have about the same area areas, the Antarctic sea ice is much closer to the equator (cycling between 58-59 degrees south latitude and 68 south latitude, vs the arctic’s 81-82 north latitude and 71-72 north latitude) at all times of the year.
Now the Arctic LAND ice is more important for exactly the same reason. Chicago, for example, at 45 north latitude, was covered by glacier ice several thousand feet thick. To get that far from the south pole, you’d have to have permanent, year-round sea ice as far north as Tasmania, New Zealand, and be halfway towards Buenos Aires.

Don K
September 16, 2015 7:52 am

Nice essay. I’ve long suspected that most of the proxies used in “climate science” — and especially CO2 proxies — are probably wildly inaccurate. One thing though. Your essay although well thought out and skillfully presented is every bit as speculative as the unending stream of Climate-Crap we are subjected to by climate alarmists. You don’t, I think, claim otherwise, but it might be interesting to include a statement of how much faith you have in your hypothesis.

emsnews
September 16, 2015 8:01 am

In general, the past was warmer than the present. The earth is pretty old. As time passes, the heat that was part of the creation of the earth is going down, not up. The interior of the planet isn’t anywhere near as hot as when the planet first formed.
The evolution of life has been towards creatures who have warm bodies and fur to keep the cold out, compared to say, all amphibians who once dominated the earth and grew to be as big as crocodiles, for example, while being amphibians.
Reptiles generally live today at only the warmer parts of the planet in great numbers. Once, they ruled the entire planet and were immense in size with no fur. We are on a cooling planet.

James at 48
September 16, 2015 8:21 am

Hyperbole and incorrect attribution to CO2 aside, “The Global Superstorm” / “The Day After Tomorrow” did get one thing right. Ocean circulation is the key to the puzzle.

September 16, 2015 9:25 am

Surface air temps changes regionally.
Regional Graphs
Regional annual averaged daily differences.
(Tmin day-1)-(Tmin d-0)=Daily Min Temp Anomaly= MnDiff
(Tmax day-1)-(Tmax d-0)=Daily Max Temp Anomaly= MxDiff
Global Averagecomment image
US +24.950 to +49.410 Lat: -67 to -124.8 Loncomment image
Tropics -23.433 to +23.433 Latcomment image
Southpole -66.562 to -90 Latcomment image
Southern Hemisphere -23.433 to -66.562 Latcomment image
South America -23.433 to -66.562 Lat: -30 to +180 Loncomment image
Northpole +66.562 to +90 Latcomment image
Northern Hemisphere +23.433 to +66.562 Latcomment image
Eurasia +24.950 to +49.410 Lat: -08 to +180 Loncomment image
Australia -23.433 to -66.562 Lat: -100 to -180 Loncomment image
Africa -23.433 to -66.562 Lat: -100 to -30 Loncomment image

philincalifornia
September 16, 2015 9:27 am

Serious question for the Antarctica experts – if climate sensitivity to carbon dioxide is greater than zero, then how is this possible?:comment image
What are the possible explanations, particularly given very little, if any, water vapor interference?

Tim
September 16, 2015 9:29 am
Salvatore Del Prete
September 16, 2015 9:46 am

Once again Jim I am in agreement with all the points you are making.

Salvatore Del Prete
September 16, 2015 9:54 am

Jim ,I think all of these factors going forward will lead to global cooling not warming.
I think Milankovich Cycles, the Initial State of the Climate or Mean State of the Climate , State of Earth’s Magnetic Field set the background for long run climate change and how effective given solar variability will be when it changes when combined with those items. Nevertheless I think solar variability within itself will always be able to exert some kind of an influence on the climate regardless if , and that is my hurdle IF the solar variability is great enough in magnitude and duration of time. Sometimes solar variability acting in concert with factors setting the long term climatic trend while at other times acting in opposition.
THE CRITERIA
Solar Flux avg. sub 90
Solar Wind avg. sub 350 km/sec
AP index avg. sub 5.0
Cosmic ray counts north of 6500 counts per minute
Total Solar Irradiance off .15% or more
EUV light average 0-105 nm sub 100 units (or off 100% or more) and longer UV light emissions around 300 nm off by several percent.
IMF around 4.0 nt or lower.
The above solar parameter averages following several years of sub solar activity in general which commenced in year 2005. The key is duration of time because although sunspot activity can diminish it takes a much longer time for coronal holes to dissipate which can keep the solar wind elevated which was the case during the recent solar lull of 2008-2010 ,which in turn keep solar climatic effects more at bay. Duration of time therefore being key.
If , these average solar parameters are the rule going forward for the remainder of this decade expect global average temperatures to fall by -.5C, with the largest global temperature declines occurring over the high latitudes of N.H. land areas.
The decline in temperatures should begin to start to take place within six months after the ending of the maximum of solar cycle 24,if sub- solar conditions have been in place for 10 years + which we have now had. Again the solar wind will be needed to get to an average of below 350km/sec. which takes time because not only do the sunspots have to dissipate but also the coronal holes. In other words a long period of very low sunspots will be need to accomplish this. It will be a gradual wind down..
Secondary Effects With Prolonged Minimum Solar Activity. A Brief Overview. Even if one or two should turn out to be true it would be enough to accomplish the solar /climatic connection.
A Greater Meridional Atmospheric Circulation- due to less UV Light Lower Ozone in Lower Stratosphere.
Increase In Low Clouds- due to an increase in Galactic Cosmic Rays.
Greater Snow-Ice Cover- associated with a Meridional Atmospheric Circulation/an Increase In Clouds.
Greater Snow-Ice Cover probably resulting over time to a more Zonal Atmospheric Circulation. This Circulation increasing the Aridity over the Ice Sheets eventually. Dust probably increasing into the atmosphere over time.
Increase in Volcanic Activity – Since 1600 AD, data shows 85 % approximately of all major Volcanic eruptions have been associated with Prolonged Solar Minimum Conditions. Data from the Space and Science Center headed by Dr. Casey.
Volcanic Activity -acting as a cooling agent for the climate,(SO2) and enhancing Aerosols possibly aiding in greater Cloud formation.
Decrease In Ocean Heat Content/Sea Surface Temperature -due to a decline in Visible Light and Near UV light.
This in turn should diminish the Greenhouse Gas Effect over time, while promoting a slow drying out of the atmosphere over time. This may be part of the reason why Aridity is very common with glacial periods.
In addition sea surface temperature distribution changes should come about ,which probably results in different oceanic current patterns.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/09/01/the-arctic-iris-effect-dansgaard-oeschger-events-and-climate-model-shortcomings-lesson-from-climate-past-part-1/
The above accounts for abrupt climatic changes within a glacial or inter- glacial period.

Sturgis Hooper
September 16, 2015 10:23 am

The Cretaceous has always been a problem for GCMs. Even when Cretaceous CO2 was thought to be around 2000 ppm or more, the models needed ECS of at least six degrees C to reproduce the great warmth of its climate and how equable it was from equator to poles, as shown by all proxies.
This failure may be due to the models’ ignoring the effect of clouds or lack thereof.

September 16, 2015 10:57 am

Please include a citation to the source of all text, and, especially, graphics used in articles and comments. If, of course, the graphic is of the author’s own creation, then reference the data source.
I find that when discussing “climate change” with friends, they just won’t accept WUWT as a reliable source. (Sorry, Anthony – you have a reputation. But living as you and I do, within a short distance of Sillywood, I guess any publicity is good publicity.)
Also, when I was in engineering school, failure to reference a source would result in mark-downs. Since we aspire to science here, let’s try to follow the discipline.

September 16, 2015 11:56 am

Continental disposition due to plate tectonics and corresponding oceanic currents disposition might explain why this Quaternary Ice Age is much colder than the previous one, but it does not explain why there is a Quaternary Ice Age in the first place, as ice ages are a feature of the Earth that take place every 150 million years. In about 10 million years our ice age should peter out, although Homo sapiens is not expected to last that long. As we are unlucky to be a species born in the 1% of the coldest times of Earth, we are all oh so lucky to have been born during the 10% of the warmest times of this ice age, and we are all going to die within that period also, so we shouldn’t be very concerned about the climate as individuals.
Primary CO2 production comes from the mantle through volcanic activity. As the Earth cools down volcanic activity is inexorably reducing despite important but occasional outbursts from volcanic traps. Thus CO2 levels, that have reached almost plant starvation levels prior to mankind release of fossil carbon, are expected to continue reducing in the future, reducing atmospheric density and ultimately oxygen levels, since oxygen proceeds mainly from CO2. Lower oxygen and atmospheric density has important biological consequences. Already we have nothing bigger than a condor capable of flying in our atmosphere, while Argentavis, with over 3 meters of wingspan, flew prior to current ice age and Quetzalcoatlus, with a wingspan of 11 meters flew in the CO2 rich Cretaceous. Also animal size has been going down with time, and very large mammals like Indricotherium, Deinotherium and Mammoth do no longer exist. The future belongs to mice.

ferd berple
September 16, 2015 12:05 pm

contrary to catastrophic CO2 assertions that rising CO2 will decimate calcium carbonate shell producers, the greatest proliferation of calcium carbonate shell producers occurred during this period with the high temperatures and high concentrations of atmospheric CO2.
=====================
O2 + 2Ca + 2CO2 === 2CaCO3
adding more CO2 on the left will not reduce the amount of CaCO3 (shell) on the right. this is basic chemistry.
The fallacy in “ocean acidification” comes from treating the oceans as acidic. Since acids dissolve CaCO3 , ocean acidification must reduce shell. But of course ocean acidification does not make the oceans acidic, which means adding CO2 will not reduce shell. it will increase the raw materials for building shell.

September 16, 2015 12:10 pm

Thanks, Dr. Steele.
This is a good article. Funny how nature is denying the warmista narrative.

Don K
September 16, 2015 12:13 pm

so it should be no surprise that the earliest appearance and evolution of whales also coincides with increased ACC upwelling …

Could be. But IIRC, prior to the KT extinction event mammals were small, terrestrial, and probably not very common. It was only after the disappearance of most terrestrial reptiles 64 million years ago that mammals started to expand in size and diversity. I think many (most?) vertebrate paleontologists might regard the development of diverse marine, mammalian carnivores starting in the Early Eocene as an expansion by mammals into largely empty ecological niches formerly occupied by mosasaurs.