Climate Crisis, Inc.

$1.5 trillion and Larry Bell book explain how profiteers of climate doom keep the money flowing

Guest Essay Paul Driessen

CrisisAhead

No warming in 18 years, no category 3-5 hurricane hitting the USA in ten years, seas rising at barely six inches a century: computer models and hysteria are consistently contradicted by Real World experiences.

So how do White House, EPA, UN, EU, Big Green, Big Wind, liberal media, and even Google, GE and Defense Department officials justify their fixation on climate change as the greatest crisis facing humanity? How do they excuse saying government must control our energy system, our economy and nearly every aspect of our lives – deciding which jobs will be protected and which ones destroyed, even who will live and who will die – in the name of saving the planet? What drives their intense ideology?

The answer is simple. The Climate Crisis & Renewable Energy Industry has become a $1.5-trillion-a-year business! That’s equal to the annual economic activity generated by the entire US nonprofit sector, or all savings over the past ten years from consumers switching to generic drugs. By comparison, annual revenues for much-vilified Koch Industries are about $115 billion, for ExxonMobil around $365 billion.

According to a 200-page analysis by the Climate Change Business Journal, this Climate Industrial Complex can be divided into nine segments: low carbon and renewable power; carbon capture and storage; energy storage, like batteries; energy efficiency; green buildings; transportation; carbon trading; climate change adaptation; and consulting and research. Consulting is a $27-billion-per-year industry that handles “reputation management” for companies and tries to link weather events, food shortages and other problems to climate change. Research includes engineering R&D and climate studies.

The $1.5-trillion price tag appears to exclude most of the Big Green environmentalism industry, a $13.4-billion-per-year business in the USA alone. The MacArthur Foundation just gave another $50 million to global warming alarmist groups. Ex-NY Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Chesapeake Energy gave the Sierra Club $105 million to wage war on coal (shortly before the Club began waging war on natural gas and Chesapeake Energy, in what some see as poetic justice). Warren Buffett, numerous “progressive” foundations, Vladimir Putin cronies and countless companies also give endless millions to Big Green.

Our hard-earned tax dollars are likewise only partially included in the CCBJ tally. As professor, author and columnist Larry Bell notes in his new book, Scared Witless: Prophets and profits of climate doom, the U.S. government spent over $185 billion between 2003 and 2010 on climate change items – and this wild spending spree has gotten even worse in the ensuing Obama years. We are paying for questionable to fraudulent global warming studies, climate-related technology research, loans and tax breaks for Solyndra and other companies that go bankrupt, “climate adaptation” foreign aid to poor countries, and much more.

Also not included: the salaries and pensions of thousands of EPA, NOAA, Interior, Energy and other federal bureaucrats who devote endless hours to devising and imposing regulations for Clean Power Plans, drilling and coal mining bans, renewable energy installations, and countless Climate Crisis, Inc. handouts. A significant part of the $1.9 trillion per year that American businesses and families pay to comply with mountains of federal regulations is also based on climate chaos claims.

Add in the state and local equivalents of these federal programs, bureaucrats, regulations and restrictions, and we’re talking serious money. There are also consumer costs, including the far higher electricity prices families and businesses must pay, especially in states that want to prove their climate credentials.

The impacts on companies and jobs outside the Climate Crisis Industry are enormous, and growing. For every job created in the climate and renewable sectors, two to four jobs are eliminated in other parts of the economy, studies in Spain, Scotland and other countries have found. The effects on people’s health and welfare, and on overall environmental quality, are likewise huge and widespread.

But all these adverse effects are studiously ignored by Climate Crisis profiteers – and by the false prophets of planetary doom who manipulate data, exaggerate and fabricate looming catastrophes, and create the pseudo-scientific basis for regulating carbon-based energy and industries into oblivion. Meanwhile, the regulators blatantly ignore laws that might penalize their favored constituencies.

In one glaring example, a person who merely possesses a single bald eagle feather can be fined up to $100,000 and jailed for a year. But operators of the wind turbine that killed the eagle get off scot-free. Even worse, the US Fish & Wildlife Service actively helps Big Wind hide and minimize its slaughter of millions of raptors, other birds and bats every year. It has given industrial wind operators a five-year blanket exemption from the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, Migratory Birds Treaty Act and Endangered Species Act. The FWS even proposed giving Big Wind a 30-year exemption.

Thankfully, the US District Court in San Jose, CA recently ruled that the FWS and Interior Department violated the National Environmental Policy Act and other laws, when they issued regulations granting these companies a 30-year license to kill bald and golden eagles. But the death tolls continue to climb.

Professor Bell’s perceptive, provocative, extensively researched book reviews the attempted power grab by Big Green, Big Government and Climate Crisis, Inc. In 19 short chapters, he examines the phony scientific consensus on global warming, the secretive and speculative science and computer models used to “prove” we face a cataclysm, ongoing collusion and deceit by regulators and activists, carbon tax mania, and many of the most prominent but phony climate crises: melting glaciers, rising sea levels, ocean acidification, disappearing species and declining biodiversity. His articles and essays do likewise.

Scared Witless also lays bare the real reasons for climate fanaticism, aside from lining pockets. As one prominent politician and UN or EPA bureaucrat after another has proudly and openly said, their “true ambition” is to institute “a new global order” … “ global governance” … “redistribution of the world’s resources” … an end to “hegemonic” capitalism … and “a profound transformation” of “attitudes and lifestyles,” energy systems and “the global economic development model.”

In other words, these unelected, unaccountable US, EU and UN bureaucrats want complete control over our industries; over everything we make, grow, ship, eat and do; and over every aspect of our lives, livelihoods, living standards and liberties. And they intend to “ride the global warming issue” all the way to this complete control, “even if the theory of global warming is wrong” … “even if there is no scientific evidence to back the greenhouse effect” … “even if the science of global warming is all phony.”

If millions of people lose their jobs in the process, if millions of retirees die from hypothermia because they cannot afford to heat their homes properly, if millions of Africans and Asians die because they are denied access to reliable, affordable carbon-based electricity – so be it. Climate Crisis, Inc. doesn’t care.

Free market principles do not apply, and free marketers need not apply. The global warming industry survives and thrives only because of secretive, fraudulent climate science; constant collusion between regulators and pressure groups; and a steady stream of government policies, regulations, preferences, subsidies and mandates – plus taxes and penalties on its competitors. CCI gives lavishly to politicians who keep the gravy train on track, while its attack dogs respond quickly, aggressively and viciously to anyone who dares to challenge its orthodoxies, perks, power and funding.

Climate change has been “real” throughout Earth and human history – periodically significant, sometimes sudden, sometimes destructive. It is driven by the sun and other powerful, complex, interacting natural forces that we still do not fully understand … and certainly cannot control. It has little or nothing to do with the carbon dioxide that makes plants grow faster and better, and is emitted as a result of using fossil fuels that have brought countless, wondrous improvements to our environment and human condition.

Climate Crisis, Inc. is a wealthy, nasty behemoth. But it is a house of cards. Become informed. Get involved. Fight back. And elect representatives – and a president – who also have the backbone to do so.


­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­Paul Driessen is senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow, author of Eco-Imperialism: Green power – Black death, and coauthor of Cracking Big Green: Saving the world from the Save-the-Earth money machine.

Scared Witless: Prophets and profits of climate doom is available on Amazon here

3 1 vote
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

71 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ken
August 23, 2015 7:41 am

This is what 1 trillion dollars in hundred dollar bills looks like. It’s truly mind boggling:
http://www.pagetutor.com/trillion/index.html

herkimer
August 23, 2015 8:30 am

As long as people get unlimited free money to twist the truth about global climate and public is asleep at the switch being more interested in watching football and baseball every night rather than monitoring how their tax dollars are spent , this nonsense will continue. .

Mike M. (period)
August 23, 2015 8:39 am

Believing numbers like this $1.5 trillion requires the same credulity as believing that we are going to get 10 C of warming this century. Strange how readily all the “skeptics” here accept it.

herkimer
Reply to  Mike M. (period)
August 23, 2015 9:42 am

MIKE M
Suggest that you do your homework better before making a negative comment like yours. There was by 2013, 500 GW of installed wind and solar world wide . If you cost this out it will come to about $1 trillion . Add to this 2013-2015 installations and those for the future under construction plus all cost not associated with construction ,$ 1.5 trillion is not out of line at all. .

Mike M.
Reply to  herkimer
August 23, 2015 5:16 pm

herkimer,
I can believe $1.5 trillion total. But the article said that is per year.

Pamela Gray
August 23, 2015 9:08 am

The ultimate in pyramid schemes. And at the bottom, sending their dollars up the chain, are tax payers. Who sits at the top? Political candidates who have promised to continue the ruse.
I would love to see the side by side comparison between, on the one hand, the budget used to fight terrorism, and on the other hand, the money spent on the CO2 ruse to lift the people of their hard earned cash and freedoms. It seems the left hand is fighting one kind of terrorism (and not very well in my opinion), and the right hand is creating another kind of terrorism.
Sometimes, the enemy is us, based on the observation that we the people are continuing to allow this malevolent, masked as benevolent, domestic CO2 terrorism to continue, while not calling to task the current administration’s milk toast attempt to stop foreign terrorism.
I have an idea, bring those young men back here (the ones that went after the train shooter and took him down), and vote them into office.

Mike M. (period)
Reply to  Pamela Gray
August 23, 2015 5:19 pm

Pamela Gray,
“Who sits at the top? Political candidates who have promised to continue the ruse.”
Right idea, but it is the crony capitalists with their snouts in the trough at the top. The candidates serve them in exchange for crumbs.
“Sometimes, the enemy is us, based on the observation that we the people are continuing to allow this ”
So true. So sad.

herkimer
August 23, 2015 9:08 am

One of the key tools that the alarmists use is to present to the public misinformation about the levelized cost of electricity that show that renewable energies like wind turbines are now at par with fossil fuels or even lower. This is false. as the study by IER below shows
The INSTITUTE FOR ENERGY RESEARCH in their report called HARD FACTS state
The American Tradition Institute conducted a study
to calculate wind’s “hidden costs” They found
that when the hidden costs were taken into account,
including
• the cost of fossil fuel power as back-up
when the wind is dormant,
• the additional cost of transmission that frequently occurs with wind farms
due to the inaccessibility of the best wind resources,
• the cost of wind’s favorable tax benefits in
‘accelerated depreciation’,
• and a shorter estimated life of a wind turbine of 20 years (versus 30 years
assumed in most cost estimates)
• the cost of wind power is if natural gas is used to back-up the wind
energy or 19.2 cents per kilowatt hour if coal is used as the back-up fuel
then the costs are 1.7 to 2.2 times the 8.66 cents per kilowatt hour estimate the
EIA is using for generating electricity from wind in its models
http://instituteforenergyresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Hard-Facts-May-2014-Final.pdf

Mike M. (period)
Reply to  herkimer
August 23, 2015 5:23 pm

herkimer,
Wow. Someone who likes facts and backs them up. I like it.
When I see a title like “American Tradition Institute” I suspect an agenda. But the report you cite seems very fair, even bending over backwards at times.

August 24, 2015 2:51 am

All this is invented, and is related to climate change and global warming, as a consequence of human factors, it is nothing more than idiottajkunizam those people, world powers and scientists who have no idea about science and natural laws.
Use unawareness of the broad masses and on the basis that impose various theories that scare people and it needs to pay for the ignorance of those who know it well and convincingly lie and deceive people. More and more of those who raise their standard of killing the innocent and unconscious. One of močih method of this kind of mass genocide and modern Holocaust is a fabrication and that people are themselves to blame for the climate like change, but they themselves have no idea that this could not be the human factor. The figures listed above are evidence of who those who want to destroy almost all of humanity to make them any better. But they’re so poor, they are not aware of what they and their offspring are waiting in the near future. They are aware of these mistakes, they all gotten their fair share money threatened, rather than lead people to death and they enjoy it.
Let them be what they deserve.

herkimer
August 24, 2015 7:07 am

Obama said about his CLEAN AIR PLAN which is supposed to raise the renewable electricity levels to 28% from their current 13 % level in United States
“Save the average American family nearly $85 on their annual energy bill in 2030, reducing enough energy to power 30 million homes, and save consumers a total of $155 billion from 2020-2030; “
If one reads the IER report called WHAT IS THE TRUE COST OF ELECTRICITY( see source below)
Electricity from New Wind Three Times More Costly than Existing Coal
WASHINGTON – Today, the Institute for Energy Research released a first-of-its-kind study calculating the levelized cost of electricity from existing generation sources. Our study shows that on average, electricity from new wind resources is nearly four times more expensive than from existing nuclear and nearly three times more expensive than from existing coal. These are dramatic increases in the cost of generating electricity. This means that the premature closures of existing plants will unavoidably increase electricity rates for American families.
http://instituteforenergyresearch.org/analysis/what-is-the-true-cost-of-electricity/
The conclusions of this study are borne out by the German , Danish and Spanish experience where the electricity rates did not show savings but where the rates went up to $ 0.30 to $ 0.40 /kwh or three times those of United States

August 25, 2015 3:32 pm

One of the things that impresses me about renewable energy systems is: THEY DO SEEM TO BREAK DOWN A LOT. The energy may be renewable, but the hardware is expensive, uses a lot of resources to build, and I suspect that at least part of the high price of renewable electricity is due to maintenance and replacement costs.
When you drive by a wind farm, count the number of turbines that aren’t turning. Last weekend I drove by a solar farm, and at least half of the panels were lying flat, i.e. either the orienting machinery wasn’t working or the whole panel was idle.
(this is in Ontario where we still get moderately priced electricity thanks to three big nukes and lots of hydro, to offset the renewable experiments supposed to replace the coal-burners that our government has promised to close in the name of fighting AGW).
One forms the impression that these things were thrown together to earn either direct subsidies, or subsidised prices for their power output, rather than being carefully planned, designed and costed projects; and that serious engineering has been skipped along the way.
You don’t often see thermal (coal/oil/gas/nuclear) or hydro-electric power stations broken down, though.
Maybe renewables will get more reliable and more efficient with time? Perhaps if they had to compete on a level playing field basis? After all, the first fossil fuel machines (Newcomen steam engines) were so colossally inefficient that they could only be used to dewater coal mines, where the fuel was readily available. Then they got to the point that they could dewater tin mines and run small factories, and the then they evolved to a much higher energy flux and higher efficiency and so mobile steam engines became the basis of transportation systems that allowed ordinary people and ordinary goods to travel across countries and ultimately oceans, for business or pleasure. Then came internal combustion, and so on and so on. This is how technology evolves in a free world.
Face it, regardless of spurious concerns about AGW, fossil fuels are finite, they will not last for ever, and ultimately, alternative energy sources will have to appear. They won’t be nuclear as we know it, because there’s barely enough uranium to feed existing reactors (unless they change the once-through rule, allow fast breeders reactors and start developing thorium reactors), and there just isn’t enough hydro power to make a difference. Maybe it will be nuclear fusion, maybe some new variety of wind and/or solar based on sound design and sound economics. When a genuine need arises (as opposed to an artificially created and taxpayer-nurtured need) technology WILL provide the solution.

August 27, 2015 10:47 am

“Climate Industrial Complex” – You stole my term!

Verified by MonsterInsights