Musk, Schmidt, Simons and billionaire buddies build empire based on climate and energy alarmism
Guest essay by Paul Driessen and Tom Tamarkin
Elon Musk and his fellow barons of Climate Crisis, Inc. recently got a huge boost from Pope Francis. Musk et al. say fossil fuels are causing unprecedented warming and weather disasters. The Pope agrees and says Catholics must “ask God for a positive outcome” to negotiations over another UN climate treaty.
It matters not that the predicted calamities are not happening. There has been no warming in 19 years, no category 3-5 hurricanes making US landfall for a record 9-1/2 years, indeed none of the over-hyped climate disasters occurring in the real world outside the alarmists’ windows. In fact, poor nations support the treaty mostly because it promises some $100 billion per year in adaptation, mitigation and compensation money from FRCs: Formerly Rich Countries that have shackled their own job creation, economic growth and living standards in the name of stabilizing Earth’s perpetually fluctuating climate.
Any money that is transferred will end up in the pockets of governing elites. Poor families will get little or no cash – and will be told their dreams of better lives must be limited to jobs and living standards that can be supported by solar panels on their huts and a few wind turbines near their villages.
Simply put, the Musk-Obama-Pope-Climate Crisis schemes will save humanity from exaggerated and fabricated climate disasters decades from now – by impoverishing billions and killing millions tomorrow.
For the catechism of climate cataclysm coalition, the essential thing is that we believe the hysterical assertions and computer models – and support endless renewable energy mandates and subsidies.
Musk and his Tesla and SolarCity companies have already pocketed $4.9 billion in taxpayer-financed subsidies, and even long-elusive profitability has not ended the handouts. Now he claims a small “blue square” on a map represents the “very little” land required to “get rid of all fossil fuel electricity generation” in the USA and prevent a non-existent climate cataclysm. We just need rooftop solar panels linked to wall-mounted battery packs – a mere 160 million Tesla Powerwalls – to eliminate the need for all coal and natural gas electricity generation in the United States, he insists.
Hogwash (from pork barrel political pig farms). As this careful and extensive analysis demonstrates, even without considering the monumental electricity demand required to convert America’s vehicles to electric-battery versions, providing today’s baseload and peak demand electricity would require 29.3 billion one-square-meter solar panels. Assuming adequate yearlong daily sunlight, that’s 29,333 square kilometers of active solar panel surface area: 7.2 million acres – or nearly all of Maryland and Delaware!
The analysis is technical, beyond the ability of most voters, journalists, politicians and regulators to comprehend fully. Read it anyway, if only to understand the enormity of financing, raw materials, mining, manufacturing and electricity required to make and ship the panels (some 40 million per year), battery packs and inverters (to convert low-voltage solar electricity to 120 or 240 Volt alternating current).
We are clearly dealing with an unprecedented green mirage and con job. It will drive average retail electricity prices from the 8-9 cents per kilowatt-hour in coal and gas-reliant states, to the 15-17 cents per kWh in California, Connecticut and New York – or even the 36-40 cents in Germany and Denmark, where unsubsidized rates are 70-80 cents per kWh! The impact of such prices on people’s jobs, living standards, health and welfare would be devastating. But Musk and his “clean” energy friends ignore this.
Musk has a BS in physics – and obviously holds advanced BS degrees in lobbying and con-artistry about climate disasters and renewable energy solutions, mandated by government decrees and financed by endless billions in subsidies. He has made numerous personal visits to legislative offices in Sacramento and Washington, to promote more such schemes, and aligns his efforts with those of Eric Schmidt, Nat Simons, Tom Steyer, Al Gore and members of the Clean Tech Syndicate: eleven secretive families with total wealth of over $60 billion, who want to get even richer off taxpayers and consumers.
They assume (demand) that bogus climate cataclysms will continue to bring them billions in climate cash payouts from Washington and state capitals, along with more exemptions from endangered species and environmental cleanup laws and regulations that are applied with a vengeance to fossil fuel projects.
Google scientists finally admitted that existing and near-term renewable energy technologies simply do not work as advertised and cannot meet their political or climate promises. The technologies are all hat, no cattle. However, the Climate Crisis and Clean Tech industries are determined to push ahead – using our money, risking little of their own, and getting reimbursed by us when their investments turn sour.
Google and NRG now want a $539-million federal grant to bail them out of $1.6 billion in taxpayer loans for the bird-roasting Ivanpah concentrated solar power project in California, because it does not work and needs so much natural gas to keep its water hot that it doesn’t meet state renewable energy standards. Other Obama “greenbacks” energy “investments” have also drowned in red ink, leaving taxpayers to pay the tab: Solyndra, Abound Solar, Solar Trust, Ener1, Beacon Power, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
Musk is nevertheless lobbying for SB-350, which would require that 50% of California’s electricity be produced via “renewable” sources, such as wind, solar, biofuels and politicians’ hot air. Meanwhile, Google Chairman Eric Schmidt’s family and corporate foundations give millions to alarmist climate scientists, the ultra-green Energy Foundation, and rabid anti-fracking groups like the World Wildlife Fund and Natural Resources Defense Council. NRDC also gets millions from EPA, to promote the agency’s anti-fossil fuel agenda and place 33 of its employees on 21 EPA “advisory” committees.
Schmidt and Warren Buffett also support the secretive far-left Tides Foundation, which has given millions to groups opposed to coal and hydraulic fracturing, the Keystone XL and Sandpiper pipeline projects, and countless other job-creating hydrocarbon programs. Canadian researcher Cory Morningstar accurately describes Tides as a “magical, money-funneling machine of epic proportions.”
Billionaire Nat Simons and his Sea Change Foundation spend tens of millions annually promoting and lobbying for “renewable” energy policies, mandates and subsidies; investing in wind, solar and biofuel companies; supporting environmentalist pressure groups; and contributing to Democrat politicians who perpetuate the crony corporatist arrangements. Simons, his wife and various Vladimir Putin cronies (via Klein, Ltd. and the shadowy Bermuda Wakefield Quin law firm) are the only contributors to Sea Change.
We often rail against Third World corruption. Our American (and European) environmental corruption is simply more subtle and sophisticated. It is legalized deception and theft – a massive wealth transfer from poor and middle class consumers and taxpayers to billionaires who are raking in still more billions, thanks to brilliantly crafted alarmist campaigns. And let’s not forget Al Gore, Mike Mann, Tom Steyer, James Hansen and all the others who likewise profit immensely from these arrangements – and the constant vilification of scientists who question climate catastrophe mantras.
Pressure groups and governing elites used to argue that we are running out of oil and natural gas. That ploy no longer works. While fossil fuels may eventually prove finite, fracking has given us vast new supplies of petroleum – and huge coal, oil and gas deposits have been placed off limits by government decree. We have at least a century to develop alternative energy sources that actually work – that create real jobs, actual revenues, lower energy prices and true prosperity – without the mandates, subsidies, deception, fraud and corruption that are the hallmark of “green” energy schemes.
No wonder the “clean tech” crowd is financing anti-hydrocarbon and climate chaos campaigns. But despite the Pope’s belated rescue attempt, the pseudo-science of “dangerous manmade global warming” is slowly succumbing to climate reality. And any new UN climate treaty will founder once poor nations realize the promised hundreds of billions a year will not materialize.
Those still impoverished nations should not do what rich countries are doing now that they are rich. They should do what rich countries did to become rich.
___________
Paul Driessen is senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org), author of Eco-Imperialism: Green power – Black death, and coauthor of Cracking Big Green: Saving the world from the Save-the-Earth money machine.
Tom Tamarkin is founder and CEO of USCL Corporation and of the fusion energy advocacy groups http://www.fusion4freedom.us and http://www.fuelRfuture.com. He is widely credited with inventing the utility industry smart meter and holds granted and pending patents in the field.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
At the recent 10th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLIMATE CHANGE, one of the speakers , Wolfgang Muller, reported on the German experience with wind turbines and solar panels . They have 72,000 MW of installed renewable energy. The combined performance is that 75% of the time the output is less than 20% of the nameplate capacity, 90 % of the time the wind turbine out put is below 30% of the name plate capacity. The output of the solar panels is just as poor , with 55% of the time the output is below 10% of capacity. Fortunately they have coal or nuclear backup and access to an international grid , otherwise blackouts and brown outs would be a frequent occurrence . Alarmists who propose to eliminate all fossil fuel usage and go entirely to renewables are misleading the public about what is practical or feasible even with batteries . If you cannot produce the power because of lack of wind or sun , batteries are of little help.
For those who asked, a useful link on trends in extreme weather:
http://nca2014.globalchange.gov/highlights/report-findings/extreme-weather
Reading garbage like that will rot your brain. Oops, too late.
Bah. See Pielke Fils.
==============
Not to mention Ryan Maue.
Pssst, your government is here to help you, Flash.
=================
Elon Musk showed up on my radar about 13 years ago when he started SpaceX. I have to admit I like electric cars and solar power too. However I’m a skeptical person and don’t believe CO2 is dangerous or causing global warming. I’d be dumb if I said man has no effect on the environment. I’m not ready to call Elon a con man or say his motivation is to get rich off from the tax payers. Tesla and SpaceX almost bankrupted him. He believes in the technologies he is invested in. As far as the monies he gets from the government I can think of worse places to spend it.
I suppose it’s better than government run lotteries, for example, but I’m actually better at spending and saving my money than the government. I would be most appreciative if they let me keep a larger fraction. But wait, it’s worse than that. For every tax payer dollar they spend, they borrow more.
If you had to be evacuated which vehicle would rather use? An EV or a fossil fueled vehicle with a couple of full extra fuel containers with you.
@Barbara: Fossil fuel for sure. 😉 Where are we evacuating too? and why? @R.Shearer: no doubt there is a war on the middle class right now. #nationaldebt #TPP #TPA #NAFTA and Man-Made global warming is a weapon being used on us.
Simply google Elon Musk rent seeker.
I just read the Bloomberg rent seeker article. I’m not on board with it. Tesla paid back their government loans. Yes, they still make money on emissions credits. I’m fine with that because its an incentive to a new technology that otherwise might never happen. Musk had skin in the game so he also had risk. Tesla is investing heavily in two more vehicles and a battery factory. When they come online than lets talk about cutting the government money. SpaceX is changing the launch business. A ULA (United Launch Alliance) has held a monopoly on government launches costing $200,000,000 to $400,000,000 per launch depending on who you ask. SpaceX is $100,000,000 per launch. SpaceX has also brought commercial launches back to the USA. Everyone is now looking at reuse. ULA is going to develop a new Vulcan rocket and Ariane Space (French) are developing Ariane 6 to compete. I’m sticking with ” visionary genius” for now but I’ll keep my eyes open. @earwig42 if I missed the point you were trying to make please address what part of the article you were referring too. Thanks Dave
Ah, so you think the ends justify the means. Interesting.
” Yes, they still make money on emissions credits. I’m fine with that because its an incentive to a new technology”
Could you please expand on the ‘new technology’ that musk has brought to market?
Ah, so you think the ends justify the means. Interesting.
Question is old. Answer is easy.
Yes and no. Depends entirely upon the means. And the ends.
The new solar minimum is real climate change and just what the CO2 alarmists need. With the mayhem of extreme weather and the near certainty of lack of food worldwide due to this new paradigm they will take full advantage.
Cold, ice and snow with copious amounts of rain are all things they claim to be caused by too much CO2.
We don’t know how much of a minimum yet. We will have to wait and see.
Great piece gentlemen and potentially libellous as hell. Except WUWT and the authors won’t receive a retraction demand, won’t be threatened with litigation and won’t be litigated against. That tells us all we need to know about the legitimacy of the claims made: they’re absolutely spot-on. A 10/10 piece and credit to Anthony for publishing it.
Launch platforms are off topic?, But for sure musk is free to compete along with the rest in the business. However,in my observation, too many faulty launches do not impress the prospects or underwriters.
It won’t let me reply to your comment above about which “new technology”. So I’ll do it here. Tesla released all (249) of their patents for open source for the advancement of electric vehicles. http://www.teslamotors.com/blog/all-our-patent-are-belong-you here’s the list http://stks.freshpatents.com/Tesla-Motors-Inc-nm1.php As far as the launch platforms being off topic I was addressing the comment about “rent seeker”.
Pick one you like and post it here.
Patents are generated from an oversupply of lawyers they do not depend on real innovation , just wording clever enough to slide past the US Patent Office.
But happy to take a close look at your favourite.
My comment on topic was to do with your patently obvious musk fanboi status.
by impoverishing billions and killing millions tomorrow.
Today.
The biggest con is the world bank’s plan to bilk wealthy nations out of $100 Billion/yr. They will then use our money to bribe 3rd world dictators into allowing them to exploit the resources of those counties without benefit to the people who live there.
Do we forget where the base energy comes from to manufacture the clean- green, renewable, save-the-planet, solar technologies? Just to make the silicon used to trap the sun’s rays on manufactured wafers requires the melting of silica rock at 3,000 Fahrenheit (1,649 Celsius). And the electricity of coal-fired plants or ultrapurified hydrogen obtained from fossil sources provide the heat to do that. It also takes a fantastic amount of oil to make concrete, glass and steel for solar modules.
I do not think greenies understand the first thing to go without fossil fuels are their iPhones and iPads.
I’d like to see signs at fossil fuel protests that say, “Stop the oil dependency , throw way your iPhone!”
“catechism of climate cataclysm coalition”
You turn my head, sir!
Just watched the movie “A.I. Artificial Intelligence”. The movie has some great performances but suffers from poorly mixing fairy tale and science fiction. Anyways (SPOILER AHEAD) the premise of the movie is that green house gases caused melting of the ice caps and flooding of major cities and other issues requiring a smaller population. This is an example of how deep climate alarmism stupidity runs. In this world they can make incredibly sophisticated robots with amazing processing powers and even reaching to the point of gaining human emotions and consciousness. These robots also seem to have enormous energy storage capacity. All this technology but they can’t figure out how to protect New York from rising waters that occurred over centuries or make use of the millions of acres of unused land even if coastal flooding occurred.
That movie was elegant but required an ENORMOUS suspension of disbelief.
SPOILER ALERT!
Did you realized that the alien-looking creatures at the end were actually robots and the descendants of the A.I. child?
I watched it because of the epic reputation of the author and director, but that was one of the most discombobulated movies ever made.
Why, every time I hear/read the phrase “Artificial Intelligence”, I think of politicians? Things that make me go hmmmm.
Thanks, Dr. Driessen. A very good article.
Yes, follow the money, the trail will lead to the crooks, on both ends of the trail.
“How much area do you think you could clean by hand in a day?”
And what would you use to clean it? Water that California doesn’t have?
You can’t get degrees in lobbying and con-artistry, they are best mastered by practicing daily.
One might wonder, though, if it’s part of the science post doctorate continuing ed program.
Very good article. Well said.
Sorry, now I remember the other reason I stopped coming. Too much wrong to respond to without making it a full time job. NIght, guys!
Here’s your hat, here’s your coat, there’s the door what’s your hurry? 🙂
Buffett opposes more pipelines because he wants his trains carrying the oil.
Don’t let his carefully crafted “grandfather” image fool you.
The global warming boogeyman was ALWAYS about money and power — the climate change cult is a secular religion that controls people by predicting a catastrophe unless people do what they are told without question.
Meanwhile, the smartest green con men skim off millions of dollars for themselves, with governments giving them permission (and tax credits), as they tell everyone they are trying to save the Earth.
Predicting a catastrophe in the future to control people is politics, not science.
The climate modelers are just props for politicians and crony green businessmen to help sell the climate fantasy.
Who’s going to believe Al Gore without a lot of scientists standing behind him?