Full copy of the Pope's expected "climate encyclical" leaked, with translated sections

A copy of the Pope’s expected “climate encyclical” (in Italian) was leaked to the Italian press today.

climate-pope-coverOur friend Maurizio Morabito (who speaks Italian) translates and advises via email that his impression is that this is going to be seen as a “damp squib”.

He points to this paragraph in particular (translated mostly by Google Translate so there may be inaccuracy):

For poor countries, the priority should be the eradication of poverty and social development of their inhabitants; at the same time the scandalous level of consumption of certain privileged sectors of their population must be considered and better counter corruption. Of course, they must also develop less polluting forms energy production, but for this they have need to rely on help from countries that are grown much at the expense of pollution today the planet. The direct exploitation of abundant solar energy requires that you establish mechanisms and subsidies so that developing countries can have access to technology transfer, for technical assistance and financial resources, but always paying attention to concrete conditions, since the compatibility of the systems with the context for which they are proposed is not always properly assessed. The costs would be low when compared to risk of climate change. In any case, it is above all an ethical choice, based on solidarity of all peoples.

E. Calvin Beisner sends this translation of some other sections:

Here is a rough translation of the climate change portion of the Pope’s encyclical, Laudato Si, based on the L’Espresso published leak this morning in Rome (numbers followed by periods are presumably section numbers; other numbers are presumably page numbers):

 

The climate as a common good

  1. The climate is a common good of all and for all. It, globally, is a complex system in relation to many conditions essential for human life. Scientific consensus exists that indicates that we are very firm in

20

presence of a worrisome warming of the climate system. In recent decades, that the heating was accompanied by the constant rise in the sea level, and is also hard not to relate it to the increase in extreme weather events, regardless of the fact that we can not attribute a cause scientifically determined at each particular phenomenon. Humanity is called to become aware of the need to change lifestyles, production and consumption, to combat this heating or, at least, the human causes that produce or accentuate. It is true that there are other factors (such as volcanism, and the variations of the orbit of the Earth, the solar cycle), but numerous scientific studies indicate that most of the global warming of recent decades is due to the large concentration of greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide and other) issued mainly because of human activity. Their concentrations in the atmosphere prevents the heat of sunlight reflected by the earth being dispersed in space. This is especially enhanced by the development model based on the intensive use of fossil fuels, which is at the center of the world energy system. It has also affected the increase in the practice of land-use change, mainly deforestation for agricultural purposes.

  1. In turn, the heating has effects on the carbon cycle. It creates a vicious cycle that exacerbates the situation even more and that will affect

21

on the availability of essential resources such as drinking water, energy and agricultural production of the hottest areas, and will result in the extinction of the planet’s biodiversity. The melting of polar ice and high altitude threat of those escaping at high risk of methane gas, and the decomposition of organic matter frozen could further accentuate the emission of carbon dioxide. In turn, the loss of tropical forests makes things worse, since they help to mitigate climate change. The pollution produced by carbon dioxide increase the acidity of the oceans and impairs the marine food chain. If the current trend continues, this century could be witnessed climate change inau- fingers and unprecedented destruction of ecosystems, with serious consequences for all of us. Rising sea levels, for example, can create situations of extreme gravity when we consider that a quarter of the world population lives by the sea or very close to it, and most of the megacities are located in coastal areas.

  1. Climate change is a global problem with serious environmental implications, social, economic, and political distribution, area and are one of the main current challenges for humanity. Impacts heavier probably will fall in the coming decades on developing countries. Many poor people living in particularly

22

affected by phenomena related to heating, and their livelihoods depend heavily from nature reserves and by so-called ecosystem services, such as agriculture, fisheries and forestry. They have no other financial resources and other resources that enable them to adapt to climate impacts or deal with catastrophic situations, and have little access to social services and protection. For example, climate change give rise to migration of animals and plants that can not always adapt themselves, and this in turn affects the productive resources of the poor, and they also see ob- bligati to migrate great uncertainty about the future of their lives and their children. Tragically, the increase of migrants fleeing poverty exacerbated by environmental degradation, which are not recognized as refugees will in international conventions and carry the burden of their lives abandoned without any protection legislation. Unfortunately there is a general indifference to these tragedies, which still occur in different parts of the world. The lack of responses to these dramaturgical me of our brothers and sisters is a sign of the loss of the sense of responsibility for our fellow men that underpin any civilized society.

  1. Many of those who hold more resources and economic or political power seem to concentrate mainly in the mask problems and hide the symptoms, just trying to reduce some of the negative impacts of climate change.

23

But many signs indicate that these effects Po- tranno always be worse if we continue with current patterns of production and consumption. Therefore it has become urgent and compelling policy development in the coming years so that the emission of carbon dioxide and other heavily polluting gas is reduced drastically, for example, by replacing fossil fuels and by developing renewable energy sources. In the world there is a small level of access to clean and renewable energy. There is still a need to develop appropriate technologies for accumulation. However, in some countries there have been advances that are beginning to be significant, although they are far from reaching a significant proportion. There were also some investments in modali- ty of production and transportation that use less energy and require fewer raw materials, as well as mode of construction or renovation of buildings which do best- no energy efficiency. But these good practices are far from becoming general.

 

A full copy of the “climate encyclical” (in Italian) can be seen here (PDF)

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

300 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Walt D.
June 15, 2015 10:03 pm

If you believe climate change, then you will have no difficulty believing, virgin births, Jesus Christ rising from the dead, changing water into wine, walking on water, feeding the 5000, or anything else in the bible.

Reply to  Walt D.
June 16, 2015 3:04 am

How about that. We have an ACTUAL climate denier in our midst. Good thing we skeptics know that the climate Does exist and Does change.
Say, walt, what was your point again? I pretty much missed it after the first word you wrote.

Steve
Reply to  Walt D.
June 16, 2015 11:32 am

Walt,
As a Christian (non-Catholic), I have no difficulty believing, virgin births, Jesus Christ rising from the dead, changing water into wine, walking on water, feeding the 5000, or anything else in the bible.
I have no difficulty believing that there may have been someone else involved with JFK’s assassination.
I have no difficulty believing that not all UFO sightings are swamp gas, weather balloons, or hallucinations (I don’t know what they are but it’s a possibility of something real yet unexplained. After all , the world would be a boring place indeed if we have discovered, quantified, and qualified everything that exists)
However, believing in CAGW, never!!! Nor do I know a single Christian who unwaveringly believes the entire CAGW mantra.
Any rational human being (theist or atheist) should “be a good steward” of Creation. It is in defining what “be a good steward” means and living life accordingly that differentiates the Climate Change alarmist from the skeptic.

June 15, 2015 10:09 pm

noaaprogrammer
June 15, 2015 at 9:54 pm
said:
… Does the pope have an explanation why God is now allowing man to destroy the Earth with CO2? /sacrilege off
—-
sarcrilege
🙂

mojo
June 15, 2015 10:20 pm

Il Papa can go soak his infallible head, if you ask me.

Moose from the EU
June 15, 2015 10:34 pm

This is final proof that climate science has left the scientific community and has become a religion. It can not be taken seriously anymore.
Let the believers pray to their climate God and leave the rest of us alone.

dmh
June 15, 2015 10:41 pm

The Lord said to go forth upon the face of the earth and multiply.
This commandment not (to the best of my knowledge) having been rescinded, and it not referring to scratching out 6×7=42 in the dirt (again, to the best of my knowledge), it is incumbent upon us to continue to fight disease, starvation, poverty and so on with all the tools at our disposal. It would be a sin against the word of G_d to stop using the resources he granted us to fulfill his commandment.
Gotta love the bible. You can make it mean anything you want it to mean, and you can read into it anything you want to read into it. The pope is only human.

Theo Goodwin
June 15, 2015 11:04 pm

It is time for Roman Catholics to rethink this whole Pope thing. If your Pope cannot be prevented from issuing encyclicals that promote a totalitarian UN regime then the position should be abolished. If you belong to a Protestant church and a minister or bishop promotes something like this then they have to answer to the local congregation. Same for the Orthodox churches.

Reply to  Theo Goodwin
June 15, 2015 11:26 pm

Yes… since he’s “in charge” of 1/7 of the world’s population… he should start with himself and all his congregants – which run from the top to the bottom of the global socio-economic ladder to search out the truth of how best to bring about solutions. The reason we don’t see this, is because he & the Catholic Church is run from the top-down, as a monstrous governmental bureaucracy – not much like the U.S. government & the UN. They have all this power (and people) at their command, and they point to everybody else. A leader for this age will not squander all this resource, this money, and this opportunity. On all fronts, we are seeing the absolute failure of true leadership – in a monumental way. For the moment, all these horrible leaders (who are largely focused on themselves, rather than those they are supposed to serve) are getting away with soundbites & “selfy” pics via media & press… because they are all playing the same game. But it does remain a house of cards – that’s the truth. A lie always remains a lie.

Alba
Reply to  John Klug
June 16, 2015 2:42 am

It is a simplistic error to think that the Catholic Church is run from the top down. It is just another of those erroneous ideas put about by people who can’t be bothered to do any actual reading on the subject but prefer to rely on perception or what other people tell them. When it comes to administration within the Church enormous power lies in the hands of the Bishops, not the Pope. What happens in your area is far more a matter of what your local Bishop decides rather than what the Pope decides. And anybody who is familiar with the internal workings of the Catholic Church will know full well how often those Bishops have used their power in ways which the Pope is unlikely to approve. (Try looking at Germany for a start.) Every so often the Bishops of a particular country have to report to the Pope. At the end of the meetings he gives them a lecture in which he can be quite direct in telling the Bishops what they should be doing. But how often do the Bishops pay much attention?

Reply to  John Klug
June 16, 2015 3:25 pm

Alba, he’s the one on top (of the Catholic Church) – did I say that right? “The One On Top.” (referencing below)

Paul Westhaver
Reply to  Theo Goodwin
June 15, 2015 11:32 pm

It doesn’t work that way. 1) Jesus Christ established the Church and its administration, 2) The encyclical is an opinion letter so…Catholics don’t absolutely have to listen to it if the know it is in error, 3) The Pope is just repeating what the UN has been carping for 20 years, what schools have been pumping into students for at least 15 years and what our governments have been implementing for 10 years.

Reply to  Paul Westhaver
June 16, 2015 1:07 am

True. This is fun…

Theo Goodwin
Reply to  Paul Westhaver
June 16, 2015 4:00 pm

John, Alba, and Paul missed my point. If a Pat Robertson goes on television and pontificates then Christians, including his own flock, will get in his face. I mean “get in his face” literally. Cause him difficulty in his duties. But there is no one to get in the Pope’s face.

Rob
June 16, 2015 12:12 am

The problem with all “organized
religions” is that they are man made
(Obviously God is not). Unfortunately,
the Catholic Church, particularly before
Luther, was hopelessly corrupt. Whatever his good intentions, this Pope
is extremely controversial. But the
Churches “scientific advisors” are
obviously the source of this.

June 16, 2015 12:38 am

“The Catholic Church
Now enters the fray,
The UN dictating
What the Pope has to say;
God pushed aside,
Left in the wings,
As the UN puppet masters
Pull the Pope’s strings….
From: http://rhymeafterrhyme.net/global-warming-and-the-catholic-church/

Reply to  rhymeafterrhyme
June 16, 2015 1:06 am

True, but I think the pope sees it has him gaining power. It’s not about truth right now, and there are many who are willing to give him an assist, to advance their own mis-aligned pursuits and thinking (but all on the same gravy-train).

Bob
June 16, 2015 12:45 am

Best news I’ve heard all year 🙂
One religion (AGW) is the same as another (schristians). FInally the sheep are seeing the wolves. About time a bunch of people woke up to the fact the whole religion thing is a cage.

William Astley
June 16, 2015 1:52 am

I spent ‘earth’ (energy) hour thinking about the billions of people in developing countries that do not have access to electricity and must cook with biomass as well the hundreds of millions of people who must struggle daily with rolling blackouts.
http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/resources/energydevelopment/

It is an alarming fact that today billions of people lack access to the most basic energy services: as World Energy Outlook 2014 shows nearly 1.3 billion people are without access to electricity and 2.7 billion people rely on the traditional use of biomass for cooking, which causes harmful indoor air pollution

http://www.economist.com/news/middle-east-and-africa/21637396-rolling-power-cuts-are-fraying-tempers-unplugged

South Africa’s electricity crisis
Rolling power cuts are fraying tempers
The people of South Africa are learning to live in the dark. Their beleaguered power utility, Eskom, is unable to meet electricity demand and in November reintroduced a tortuous schedule of rolling blackouts known as “load shedding”. South Africans now check electricity reports that read like weather forecasts: “There is a medium probability of load shedding today and tomorrow, with a higher probability on Thursday and Friday,” said a recent Eskom tweet.
Newspapers print survival tips and “load shedder recipes” for food you can prepare without electricity. And there are bleak jokes aplenty. “Q: What did South Africa use before candles? A: Electricity.”
South Africa has been here before. In 2008 it suffered a rash of blackouts that cost the country billions of rand. Little has changed. …

http://skimon.com/load-shedding-pakistan

Rolling Blackout in Pakistan
by Affifa Mariam on July 16, 2014
http://skimon.com/load-shedding-pakistan
This year has become very unlucky for Pakistanis as prevailing energy crisis has shown its worst implications. The electricity shortfall (the load shedding blackout) is now 7600 MW, which is worst in Pakistan’s history. … ….Water shortages also arise when there is so massive load shedding. Recently, Khawaja Asif, Federal Minister for Water and Power of Pakistan, apologized from the nation for unscheduled load shedding for about 16-20 hours in rural and urban areas.

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/34bcbe66-3821-11e4-b69d-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3V6bHUuQl

Concern grows as power crisis looms for India
On the campaign trail earlier this year, Narendra Modi often promised to bring power to the 400m Indians who lack basic access to electricity.
Coal remains India’s most important energy source, supplying more than half of all power stations. It is also increasingly scarce: stocks are at their lowest level since 2008, with plants responsible for around a third of national capacity holding supplies of just one week or less.
Alarm over these dwindling fuel piles this weekend forced Piyush Goyal, power minister, to deny that the country faced a repeat of the disastrous rolling blackouts that left some 600m people without electricity back in 2012, badly denting India’s global image.

http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2003/2003GL017115.shtml

Timing of abrupt climate change: A precise clock by Stefan Rahmstorf
Many paleoclimatic data reveal a approx. 1,500 year cyclicity of unknown origin. A crucial question is how stable and regular this cycle is. An analysis of the GISP2 ice core record from Greenland reveals that abrupt climate events appear to be paced by a 1,470-year cycle with a period that is probably stable to within a few percent; with 95% confidence the period is maintained to better than 12% over at least 23 cycles. This highly precise clock points to an origin outside the Earth system (William: Solar cycle changes correlate with the warming and cooling cycles as solar cycle changes are the cause of the cycles including abrupt cyclic cooling); oscillatory modes within the Earth system can be expected to be far more irregular in period.

Greenland ice temperature, last 11,000 years determined from ice core analysis, Richard Alley’s paper. William: The Greenland Ice data shows that have been 9 warming and cooling periods in the last 11,000 years.
http://www.climate4you.com/images/GISP2%20TemperatureSince10700%20BP%20with%20CO2%20from%20EPICA%20DomeC.gif

waterside4
June 16, 2015 2:09 am

Like the top post from Eliza above, I am in a hiatus in my Catholic duties.
I penned the following ditty some weeks ago in anticipation of the Encyclical,which I hope to read soon, and am glad it does not appear to be as dire as I anticipated from this Red Pope.
PAPAL BULL
God does not control the weather any more
It’s the Pagans, Club of Rome and Albert Gore,
Will our head honcho in a poncho see fit
To declare Global Warming Holy Writ
Is he about to demonise CO2
By ending black smoke emissions from his flue,
Must we now pray to the pagan Goddess Gaia
Ignore Christmas – feast with Saturnalia.
I once learned the Ten Commandments at the knee
Of a Mother who explained the Didache,
Prior to the miracle of electric light
She could not teach her children reading in the night,
So if this Pontiff says Africans must stay
In fuel poverty – its their Auto-da-fe,
All those fossil fuels are theirs and bountiful
Not to exploit them is just more Papal Bull.
His Holiness should stick to promoting God
Instead of embracing scientific fraud,
How can the poor gain a title to this earth
When denied the means by energetic dearth,
Since Global Warming stopped in ninety seven
Voodoo climate scientists appeal to Heaven,
Their unending swill of money in the trough
Should not the shorn sheep finally switch off?
Will Pope Francis instruct every Catholic
To believe the new creed of the Hockey Stick,
Reprinting our Bibles in a shade of green
Ignoring the teachings of the Nazarene,
Deifying Mother Nature and the occult,
For our sins of Emissions and the Indult,
I’ll stick to my faith in the God of Passion
Ignore the Un-sustainable fashion.
We are told – ignore the warming of the sun
George Orwell foresaw Agenda twenty one,
The Master Plan – control the population
For Climate Realists – excommunication?
Papal dabbling in this science of ill repute
Will turn Mother Church into a prostitute,
So we await the next Encyclical
Ignore junk – make it Ecclesiastical

Dawtgtomis
Reply to  waterside4
June 16, 2015 7:19 am

Very well put! You are a vessel of wisdom like so many here.

June 16, 2015 2:14 am

Since he’s “in charge” of 1/7 of the world’s population… he should start with himself and all his congregants – which run from the top to the bottom of the global socio-economic ladder to search out the truth of how best to bring about solutions. The reason we don’t see this, is because he & the Catholic Church is run from the top-down, as a monstrous governmental bureaucracy – not much like the U.S. government & the UN. They have all this power (and people) at their command, and they point to everybody else. A leader for this age will not squander all this resource, this money, and this opportunity. On all fronts, we are seeing the absolute failure of true leadership – in a monumental way. For the moment, all these horrible leaders (who are largely focused on themselves, rather than those they are supposed to serve) are getting away with soundbites & “selfy” pics via media & press… because they are all playing the same game. But it does remain a house of cards – that’s the truth. A lie always remains a lie.

June 16, 2015 2:16 am

Sorry – not much UN-like the U.S. government & the UN… 🙂

thomam
June 16, 2015 2:18 am

I note the church have described the leaking of the encyclical as a “heinous act”. One might have thought that description better fitted, for example, repeated child abuse by priests that was well known by church authorities and the extraordinary steps the church went to to suppress that information and protect its employees.
After all, they kept that secret for decades and now they can’t even keep an opinion piece under wraps for 72 hours. Standards are clearly slipping.

Reply to  thomam
June 16, 2015 3:29 am

Amazing point – well taken.

simon
Reply to  thomam
June 16, 2015 12:39 pm

Yep they both are and this bloke s looking to sort both issues.

June 16, 2015 2:29 am

If the Church hasn’t acknowledged the genocidal effect of environmental neo-colonialism on the third world for the last two decades, why do people hold out the hope it’ll suddenly start to do so now?
https://thepointman.wordpress.com/2014/10/02/tell-me-why/
Pointman

Alba
June 16, 2015 2:46 am

Just a reminder in case anybody hasn’t noticed what was said above: the leaked document is a leak of a draft of the Encyclical. So all the good people who have commented above AFTER having read the whole leaked document are going to have to read the whole final version to see how far it agrees with the leaked draft. You do read the whole thing before commenting on it, don’t you?

LarryFine
Reply to  Alba
June 16, 2015 2:58 am

I don’t read Italian. Can you tell us whether the document characterized Climate Change using the words “hoax” or “fraud”? Because if it didn’t, no amount of sanctimony is warranted on anyone’s part in defense of it.

Reply to  Alba
June 16, 2015 2:59 am

Do you expect to be better or worse?

Reply to  Alba
June 16, 2015 3:14 am

Yes, we’ll be looking for the new, globally relevant revelation, that will not be forthcoming. My garbage man will have newer, more relevant ideas… I mean, really – what new will be forthcoming!? (It’s easier to go to God than deal with this crap). 🙂 KLUG

LarryFine
June 16, 2015 2:53 am

Another superstar with a GIGANTIC carbon footprint who would laugh at the mere suggestion of doing without one of his round-the-clock staff of fanny pillow fluffers and ring kissers wants poor third-world children to die without ever having tasted clean water or seeing a lightbulb. And why? Because that’s what’s popular with those who control political power.
I’m sorry, but this is just pure evil.

June 16, 2015 2:57 am

Has anyone asked The Church Of The Flying Spaghetti Monster what its position is?

Reply to  Joe Public
June 16, 2015 4:48 am

I have talked with members of that Church on many occasions for decades. 97% of them buy the alarmist consensus and call we non-believers heretics and d*niers.

June 16, 2015 3:21 am

Obviously, it’s time for a new oracle (regardless how it comes out). You think draft 1-17 will matter – IN TRUTH!? Something being presented that everybody here doesn’t already know? We’re only here because a few major players are given open manipulation of the media, that’s all. We don’t need a draft, WE DON’T NEED A FINAL – WE NEED TO KEEP PUSHING & CREATING THE RIGHT, RELEVANT CONVERSATION… this chaff will fall. The Pope’s a man… we have 7 billion people – let’s find & do what’s right for all – FOR REAL – plain & simple. Don’t elevate the false / LET’S EMPOWER THE REAL. 🙂

Chris Wright
June 16, 2015 3:25 am

“the heating was accompanied by the constant rise in the sea level,”
Yes, the sea level has been quite constant – since 1850, that is. This was at the end of the Little Ice Age and was completely natural.
I’m not religious but I am sickened to see how the world’s top religious leader can be so deluded by green propaganda.
In today’s printed Daily Telegraph there is a letter by a group of religious leaders who are equally deluded on climate change. I shot off this email, though the chances of it being printed are probably zero, the Daily Telegraph is decidedly warmist:
“Some religious leaders wrote: “it is the world’s poorest people who are already suffering the impact of a changing climate”. The scientific data shows this to be nonsense: globally, there has been no increase in storms, hurricanes, wild fires, droughts or floods, and there has been no global warming in this century, or any increase in the rate of sea level rise since 1850. Indeed, the overall intensity of hurricanes has been falling for decades. It’s the climate change hysteria that has increased. There is one global effect of increased carbon dioxide: since 2000 the world has become about ten percent greener, due to its fertilising effects. The extra CO2, and also the small warming, have helped the world to produce more food per head of population than ever before. Shouldn’t we be celebrating this, instead of demonising the very thing that is making the world greener and feeding empty stomachs?
The developing world desperately needs cheap and abundant fossil fuels. To deny this to the world’s poorest is a crime against humanity. On the same page the piece by Leonie Greene is a perfect example of how climate change hysteria is driven by vested interests, particularly green subsidies. The world’s poorest are not threatened by global warming, quite the reverse. But they are threatened by climate change hysteria, of which their letter is a perfect example. I’m sure they mean well, but the empirical scientific data shows they and Ban Ki-moon are catastrophically wrong. Truly, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.”
I did have a letter printed in the printed edition of the Sunday Telegraph last Sunday. It was about the proposed Swansea Bay tidal project. As Christopher Booker pointed out, this billion pound white elephant will on average generate just 57 megawatts. A perfect example of how the real catastrophe is the climate change delusion.
Chris

June 16, 2015 3:26 am

MY FACEBOOK POST THIS MORNING:
I will fight manipulative leaders who believe they have global privilege to manipulate media & influence the weak and unaware (predominantly USA) public at this time of extreme non-awareness – of both truth & reality.
They’re stealing (from the public trust – your resources, opportunities & solutions) – and I’m going to show you.
I’m just saying… it’s where we’re going. If you stand in truth, you can fight all day.

Scott M
Reply to  John Klug
June 16, 2015 7:16 am

Its mostly impossible to say things like that without coming off as a raving lunatic….even if its true…
“Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.”
Reagan said it best

Reply to  Scott M
June 16, 2015 3:33 pm

It’s what I do, Scott. It’s what I’ve been prepared to do. It’s what I have the tools, resources, and knowledge to do. This is who I am. JK

Patrick
Reply to  Scott M
June 17, 2015 3:31 am

That is irony at it’s best.

Village Idiot
June 16, 2015 3:31 am

A test of ‘faith’ for Catholic Villagers and visitors to the Village – especially of they happen to be a Knight in a Catholic Order

Patrick
June 16, 2015 3:37 am

I am a christened, baptised and confirmed Catholic (All without my consent) and I “left” the church long ago when I realised they were just a bunch of abusive bully boys. The largest money making gang on earth. So, whatever is spouted out from the Vatican City is point blankly ignored by me.

cedarhill
June 16, 2015 3:58 am

My favoriite part is how “heat blocks heat which increases heat” in “a viscous cycle”.
The Brits need to remember that when they’re freezing this winter. Maybe just burn another solar panel in the heat pump and the viscous cycle will warm their flat.
While some, rightly so, are hailing this as “helping the poor”, it really is a full throated shout out to the warmists that the Vatican is marching with them, in solidarity, See the Catechism paragraph 1938ff. The simple headline would be “Help the poor by imposing fully support of the IPCC in Paris.”
Pope Paul V sent a note about Galileo in 1633 that has echoed through the centuries. You deniers now have Pope Francis sending you the equivalent in 2015.

Scottish Sceptic
June 16, 2015 4:22 am