
From Imperial College, London:
Large magnetic storms from the Sun, which affect technologies such as GPS and utility grids, could soon be predicted more than 24 hours in advance.
Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are eruptions of gas and magnetised material from the Sun that have the potential to wreak havoc on satellites and Earth-bound technologies, disrupting radio transmissions and causing transformer blowouts and blackouts.
These mass ejections can cause problems with GPS technology – used by all kinds of vehicles, from cars to oil tankers to tractors. For example, they can affect the ability of aircraft systems to judge precisely a plane’s distance from the ground for landing, leading to planes being unable to land for up to an hour.
However, not every mass ejection from the Sun that travels past the Earth causes this much disturbance; the power depends on the orientation of magnetic fields within the mass ejection. Currently, satellites can only tell the orientation of a mass ejection’s magnetic field with any certainty when it is relatively close to the Earth, giving just 30-60 minutes’ notice. This is not enough time to mitigate the impacts on utility grids and systems operating on GPS.
Video: On Jan. 7, 2014, the Sun’s surface erupted with an unusually large explosion, called coronal mass ejection (CME), with NOAA releasing a significant false alarm geomagnetic storm at Earth. This initial structure seen as magnetic loops just south of centre on the solar disc reached out above the solar surface.
These field loops are seen using 3 overlaid wavelength channels from the SDO spacecraft (171, 193, 211 AIA instrument). The loop structures can be seen to be anchored to concentrated magnetic structures on the solar surface (blue and green highlights seen using SDO’s HMI instrument). CreditDr Neel Savani, Imperial College London
Now, a new measurement and modelling tool could give more than 24 hours’ notice of mass ejections that could be harmful to systems on Earth. Details of the technique, developed by a team led by Dr Neel Savani, an alumnus and Visiting Researcher at Imperial College London and a space scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, were published today in a paper in Space Weather.
“As we become more entwined with technology, disruption from large space weather events affects our daily lives more and more,” said Dr Savani. “Breaking through that 24 hour barrier to prediction is crucial for dealing efficiently with any potential problems before they arise.”
The orientations of magnetic fields within coronal mass ejections depend on two things: their initial form as they are erupted from the Sun, and their evolution as they travel towards Earth. Mass ejections originate from two points on the Sun’s surface, forming a croissant-shaped cloud in between that discharges into space.
This cloud is full of twisted magnetic fields that shift as they travel. If one of these magnetic fields meets the Earth’s magnetic field at a certain orientation, the two will connect, ‘opening a door’ that allows material to enter and cause a geomagnetic storm.
Previously, predictions had relied on measuring the initial CME eruption, but were not efficient modelling what happened between this and the cloud’s arrival at Earth. The new technique takes a closer look at where mass ejections originate from on the Sun and makes use of a range of observatories to track and model the evolution of the cloud.
Dr Savani and colleagues have tested the model on eight previous mass ejections, with the results showing great promise at improving the current forecasting system for large Earth-directed Solar storms. If further testing at NASA supports these initial results, the system could soon be used by NOAA in the US and the Met Office in the UK for geomagnetic storm predictions.
###
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
http://icecap.us/index.php/go/experts
A little background on Joe D’ Aleo who I am in 100% agreement with and will send over a study on my next post.
Make sure your next post in On Topic, that is: concerned with the tools for predicting CMEs, and not just your usual rehash of your wishful thinking [which we have seen more than enough of].
Leif have a good day.
All my days are good. Especially this one. It is raining.
http://www.icecap.us/images/uploads/Solar_Changes_and_the_Climate.pdf
I am 100% in agreement with Joe D’ Aleo , who can not be beat when it come to earth’s climatic system and how it works. The most knowledgeable person I have come across by far in this area.
One might hope that Joe is also in 100% agreement with you. The two of you will then make quite a team 😀
It’s all Pluto’s fault. It should never have been demoted. Or is it Jupiter’s fault?? Never the Sun’s……..What has the Sun got to do with anything, Leif? It’s just a big ball in the sky, but that’s not important just now.
didn’t see a date on the paper but it appears to be 7-8 years old.
If your comment is in reference to the Joe D’ Aleo study like so many of us his opinion today is the same as it was then.
Thanks for the link, Salvatore. Cheers!
Meaning what? I know we both do not know what we are talking about. Cheers, is that the expression?
Speak for yourself. I know perfectly well what I’m talking about. To quote Wittgenstein “what can be said at all can be said clearly, and what we cannot talk about we must pass over in silence”, something for you to ponder [in silence…]
Talk about being big headed! If you were made of chocolate, you’d have eaten yourself by now……hee hee.
It seems the comment applies to you as well…
Meaning, thanks for the link to the article written by Joe!
By that I meant Joe D’ Aleo and myself , not you.
Nevertheless when it comes to the climate and the solar relationships I disagree with your opinion 100%.
Still when it comes to the sun itself your opinions are valuable.
You must make a distinction between ‘opinion’ and a well-founded and considered conclusion drawn from the best data available by a knowledgeable researcher.
Let us see what happens going forward. There is just to much ambiguity in this field to draw any definitive conclusions. Even the sources for the data are not in agreement and on top of that they are always adjusted. Then add to that theories about climate change are a dime a dozen and I think it leaves us in a wait and see mode. That is the only way to go and with that said having a theory in play makes it much more interesting going forward.
With that said to be honest the best approach is to rule everything in and nothing out, even AGW theory which I strongly oppose, but I can not say 100 % it is wrong. I do not really know to be truthfully honest although I strongly doubt the theory..
What? Bob Tisdale isn’t new!