Greenland darkening to continue, predicts CCNY expert Marco Tedesco
Darkening of the Greenland Ice Sheet is projected to continue as a consequence of continued climate warming, Dr. Marco Tedesco, a City College of New York scientist, said at the European Geosciences Union (EGU) General Assembly in Vienna today.
Tedesco told a press conference in the Austrian capital that the projection is based on a model that only accounts for the effects of warming on snow grain size and melting.
An associate professor in City College’s Division of Science and head of its Cryospheric Processes Laboratory that he founded, Tedesco is an authority on the Greenland Ice Sheet where he has conducted annual research.
He noted that a darkening of the Greenland Ice Sheet associated with increasing temperatures and enhanced melting occurred between 1996 and 2012. It was promoted by:
- Extensively and persistently increased surface snow grain size;
- The expansion and persistency of the areas of exposed bare ice and by the increased surface impurities concentration associated with the appearance of dirty ice;
- Increased impurities concentrations due to consolidation with snowmelt.
Tedesco, however, added that his research had not found any evidence that points to either increased atmospheric deposition of impurities or to the number of fires over Eurasia and North America as being factors.
The EGU General Assembly 2015 brings together some 12,000 geoscientists from all over the world into one meeting covering all disciplines of the Earth, planetary and space sciences.
Maybe Tedesco lives in a cocoon and missed the “Dark Snow Project” which took this video last year:
Published on Oct 29, 2014
video taken during a 23 August 2014 maintenance tour of promice.org climate stations on the southern Greenland ice sheet. Higher on the ice sheet, the surface is not this dark. But down low, where the highest melt rates happen, this darkness amplifies absorbed sunlight, the dominant energy source for melt.
Tedesco must be either incompetent, blind, an activist or all three, because the data on northern hemisphere fires contradicts his claim of “his research had not found any evidence that points to either increased atmospheric deposition of impurities or to the number of fires over Eurasia and North America as being factors.“
I’m sorry, but I think Tedesco’s claim amounts to nothing more than “
science climate activism by press release”.