Claim from Phil Jones and company: 'extreme temperature anomalies are warming faster than Earth's average'

From Indiana University and the University of East Anglia, this looks like another paper timed for release coinciding with COP20. What is even odder though, is the graphic provided with the press release, which shows global temperature anomaly for 1998, which was a super El Niño event year, the other odd thing is that the graphic (below right) is dated Nov 1tth, 2011. So it’s possible the press officer put it in and it isn’t part of the paper. I can’t tell since it is paywalled. I’ll purchase it, read it, and do a follow up report later.

One thing I can say for certain: bias in Tmin due to encroachment by infrastructure causes a warm bias in the overnight temperatures, and thus the propensity for record lows is diminished in those stations which have been encroached upon in that way. That’s not anything to do with the posited AGW signal, but the simple physics of heat sinks.

Study finds extreme temperature anomalies are warming faster than Earth’s average

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

BLOOMINGTON, Ind. — It’s widely known that the Earth’s average temperature has been rising. But research by an Indiana University geographer and colleagues finds that spatial patterns of extreme temperature anomalies — readings well above or below the mean — are warming even faster than the overall average.

Slide 1
The middle panel illustrates spatial patterns of temperature anomalies for April 1998. The top panel shows locations that are below the 25th percentile, and the bottom panel shows locations that are above the 75th percentile.

And trends in extreme heat and cold are important, said Scott M. Robeson, professor of geography in the College of Arts and Sciences at IU Bloomington. They have an outsized impact on water supplies, agricultural productivity and other factors related to human health and well-being.

“Average temperatures don’t tell us everything we need to know about climate change,” he said. “Arguably, these cold extremes and warm extremes are the most important factors for human society.”

Robeson is the lead author of the article “Trends in hemispheric warm and cold anomalies,” which will be published in the journal Geophysical Review Letters and is available online. Co-authors are Cort J. Willmott of the University of Delaware and Phil D. Jones of the University of East Anglia.

The researchers analyzed temperature records for the years 1881 to 2013 from HadCRUT4, a widely used data set for land and sea locations compiled by the University of East Anglia and the U.K. Met Office. Using monthly average temperatures at points across the globe, they sorted them into “spatial percentiles,” which represent how unusual they are by their geographic size.

Their findings include:

  • Temperatures at the cold and warm “tails” of the spatial distribution — the 5th and 95th percentiles — increased more than the overall average Earth temperature.
  • Over the 130-year record, cold anomalies increased more than warm anomalies, resulting in an overall narrowing of the range of Earth’s temperatures.
  • In the past 30 years, however, that pattern reversed, with warm anomalies increasing at a faster rate than cold anomalies. “Earth’s temperature was becoming more homogenous with time,” Robeson said, “but now it’s not.”

The study records separate results for the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. Temperatures are considerably more volatile in the Northern Hemisphere, an expected result because there’s considerably less land mass in the South to add complexity to weather systems.

The study also examined anomalies during the “pause” in global warming that scientists have observed since 1998. While a 16-year-period is too short a time to draw conclusions about trends, the researchers found that warming continued at most locations on the planet and during much of the year, but that warming was offset by strong cooling during winter months in the Northern Hemisphere.

“There really hasn’t been a pause in global warming,” Robeson said. “There’s been a pause in Northern Hemisphere winter warming.”

Co-author Jones of the University of East Anglia said the study provides scientists with better knowledge about what’s taking place with the Earth’s climate. “Improved understanding of the spatial patterns of change over the three periods studied are vital for understanding the causes of recent events,” he said.

It may seem counterintuitive that global warming would be accompanied by colder winter weather at some locales. But Robeson said the observation aligns with theories about climate change, which hold that amplified warming in the Arctic region produces changes in the jet stream, which can result in extended periods of cold weather at some locations in the mid-northern latitudes.

And while the rate of planetary warming has slowed in the past 16 years, it hasn’t stopped. The World Meteorological Organization announced this month that 2014 is on track to be one of the warmest, if not the warmest, years on record as measured by global average temperatures.

In the U.S., the East has been unusually cold and snowy in recent years, but much of the West has been unusually warm and has experienced drought. And what happens here doesn’t necessarily reflect conditions on the rest of the planet. Robeson points out that the United States, including Alaska, makes up only 2 percent of the Earth’s surface.


Trends in hemispheric warm and cold anomalies

  1. Scott M. Robeson1,*,
  2. Cort J. Willmott2 and
  3. Phil D. Jones3

doi: 10.1002/2014GL062323

Abstract at:  http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2014GL062323/abstract

Using a spatial percentile approach, we explore the magnitude of temperature anomalies across the northern and southern hemispheres. Linear trends in spatial percentile series are estimated for 1881-2013, the most recent 30-year period (1984-2013), and 1998-2013. All spatial percentiles in both hemispheres show increases from 1881-2013, but warming occurred unevenly via modification of cold anomalies, producing a reduction in spatial dispersion. In the most recent 30-year period, trends also were consistently positive, with warm anomalies having much larger warming rates than those of cold anomalies in both hemispheres. This recent trend has largely reversed the decrease in spatial dispersion that occurred during the 20th century. While the period associated with the recent slowdown of global warming, 1998-2013, is too brief to estimate trends reliably, cooling was evident in NH warm and cold anomalies during January and February while other months in the NH continued to warm.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
154 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Robert B
December 9, 2014 12:37 pm

This has always bugged me.
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/crutem3vnh/mean:60/plot/crutem3vsh/mean:60/offset:0.1
Surely changing ocean currents mean that the NH and SH (land) differ much more widely than the maximum of 0.3°C that has been observed. Now the weirdos* think that that global warming will make this difference huge?
*Apparently ‘warmist’ is snarky so I’m using ‘weirdo’ instead, as in ‘climate weirding’.
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-opinion/climate-change-proving-a-persistent-biter-of-prime-ministerial-bottoms-20141208-122p91.html

Steve Reddish
December 9, 2014 12:38 pm

“Temperatures at the cold and warm “tails” of the spatial distribution — the 5th and 95th percentiles — increased more than the overall average Earth temperature.”
Doesn’t “spatial” refer to geographic areas? Then this is saying both equatorial and polar regions warmed more than the temperate zones. Has there been an increase in equatorial temperatures over the last 130 years?
But wait: ” — the 5th and 95th percentiles — ” must be referring to temperatures. For the overall average to increase less than the cold and warm anomalies increased in temperature, the less cold cold anomalies must have become more frequent while the warmer warm anomalies became less frequent, otherwise they would have raised the average commensurately.
But wait: Isn’t it normal for an average to vary less than the extremes?
I doubt if they know what they are saying, or if they are saying anything at all.
“Over the 130-year record, cold anomalies increased more than warm anomalies, resulting in an overall narrowing of the range of Earth’s temperatures.”
If they mean cold anomalies became less cold to a greater degree than warm anomalies became warmer, then this is the actual mild global warming that has been observed over the full 130 year record. Nothing for them to be complaining about.
“In the past 30 years, however, that pattern reversed, with warm anomalies increasing at a faster rate than cold anomalies. “Earth’s temperature was becoming more homogenous with time,” Robeson said, “but now it’s not.”
Clearly, this time period was chosen to include the warming period of the late 20th century. If they were to address anomalies of this century, wouldn’t they have to say cold anomalies equal, or perhaps outweigh warm anomalies?
Is there anything worth reporting in this study?
SR

Genghis
December 9, 2014 12:43 pm

It is entirely possible to have global warming simultaneously with Northern Hemisphere cooling, It all depends on what and where measurements are being taken and their weighting.
The problem the warmers are having is that they weighted the northernmost regions too high, since they have started cooling. Of course they will fix that problem by adjusting the weighting to produce more warming. That is why we keep seeing adjustments going back to the 1800’s.

Stephen Richards
December 9, 2014 12:48 pm

Jones has decided that now is a good time to come out of hiding again. He got himself interviewed by the envir-rabid BBC the other day.

December 9, 2014 1:02 pm

It is meaningless what matters is what is going to happen going forward which will be a trend toward lower global temperatures in response to prolonged minimum solar conditions.

4 eyes
December 9, 2014 1:23 pm

“There really hasn’t been a pause in global warming,” Robeson said. “There’s been a pause in Northern Hemisphere winter warming.” For me this says it all. Just playing with statistics – make the statistics tell you what you want to hear. I haven’t read any other comments – sorry if others have said this.

Dawtgtomis
Reply to  4 eyes
December 9, 2014 1:52 pm

My neighbor says; “Figures can lie, liars can figure.

Alan Robertson
December 9, 2014 2:10 pm

“What is even odder, though… the other odd thing is…”
—————————
Nothing odd at all when you just consider that it’s all BS from known BS artists.

michael hart
December 9, 2014 2:37 pm

How much, I wonder, of the data examined was measured directly, as opposed to krigged/guestimated ?

trafamadore
December 9, 2014 2:52 pm

You know, I don’t know how much you upload the graphics in the paper (copyright issues?) but some the figs are beautiful, esp the last three. Really nice way to present complicated data.
From what I can tell, Robeson did a sabbatical in Jones Lab, and this is what he did when he was there. I was surprised to see that Jones is on a US grant. It is interesting because I think it is pretty rare for the US to fund stuff in the in UK, you need to be really good.
For those of you dissing the paper on “1st principles” before reading, it’s a nice read. They went through a huge amt of data, and their presentation all that work is simple and elegant.

jolly farmer
Reply to  trafamadore
December 9, 2014 7:04 pm

Did Phil Jones do all the Excel work himself?
Paper in public domain, and data archived for all to see?
Thought not.

trafamadore
Reply to  jolly farmer
December 9, 2014 10:06 pm

You try to get a paper into the best journal, you idiot, not one with public assess. If it’s funded by NIH or NSF, it eventually becomes public, just not right away.

knr
Reply to  jolly farmer
December 10, 2014 9:28 am

But if they do that someone may try to find something wrong with it , and Phil cannot have yet and given his dog is ona diet he cannot go down the ‘dog eat my data ‘ route either .

Perry
December 9, 2014 3:03 pm

What’s the weather like over in the USA from North Dakota to Maine? Piers Corbyn forecast the present conditions nearly a month ago.
Most dangerous 5 days of snow and storms in 100 years, warns astrophysicist.
http://iceagenow.info/2014/12/dangerous-5-days-snow-storms-100-years-warns-astrophysicist/
http://www.weatheraction.com/resource/data/wact1/docs/USA1412DEC30dprod10-40dSLAT11circ30Nov.pdf
H/T to Robert Felix.

Mike the Morlock
Reply to  Perry
December 9, 2014 4:54 pm

http://iceagenow.info/2014/12/europe-ice-storms-widespread-winter-chaos-photos/
more from Robert Felix
http://iceagenow.info/2014/12/austria-ice-storm-bad-authorities-tanks-move-supplies/
Jingle treads jingle treads laughing all the way,,, sorry couldn’t help it.
H/T Robert Felix
michael

asybot
Reply to  Mike the Morlock
December 9, 2014 10:05 pm

As things are today with all the BS coming from Peru, I think I am going to shut down reading , listening and following all this bs until after Christmas, it is starting to be really be a downer and most of us do not need it. The insane rhetoric from the warmists is unbelievable. Calling Australia, Canada, the USA the worst countries regarding our records as far as environmental issues is appalling and coming from this UN so called “leader” is totally irresponsible and then to turn around and asking us for more funding is so maddening I need to take a break, so MERRY CHRISTMAS and A HAPPY NEW YEAR and thanks AW for this sane site!

En Passant
December 9, 2014 3:23 pm

I would not believe Phil Jones on anything even after triple verification. You only lose your integrity once per life.

asybot
Reply to  En Passant
December 9, 2014 9:52 pm

+10, but then think about Clinton!

Evan Jones
Editor
December 9, 2014 4:15 pm

The World Meteorological Organization announced this month that 2014 is on track to be one of the warmest, if not the warmest, years on record as measured by global average temperatures.
D-uh.

hunter
December 9, 2014 4:53 pm

Lying liars dressed up as climatologists.

December 9, 2014 5:50 pm

My studies have shown that Anthropogenic Global Warming directly causes serious anomalies in goal post stability. Something has to be done.

Pamela Gray
December 9, 2014 6:05 pm

This is beginning to look just like the solar search. Slice and dice the data enough and you can get it to do and say anything you want, including make your coffee in the morning and tuck you in bed at night.
Sweating bullets and burning the midnight oil to tease out the only data trend you are motivated by grant money to find is exactly one of the major bias causes of type 1 errors in research. A false positive result, which I think invades the conclusion of this research, has led many a scientist down the primrose path. What is troubling is that this time, entire nations are being led down that path.

trafamadore
Reply to  Pamela Gray
December 9, 2014 9:21 pm

This is no slice and dice. It is simple the top and bottom 5%. Grow up.

Sleepalot
Reply to  trafamadore
December 10, 2014 9:26 pm

Irony: the name-calling child telling the adult to “grow up” – while having no understanding of the meaning of that phrase.

jolly farmer
December 9, 2014 6:40 pm

Dear “Phil D. Jones of the University of East Anglia.”,
Are you not embarrassed?

vounaki
December 9, 2014 6:41 pm

I’ve reached the conclusion that Phil Jones et al are using rectal thermometers, and pulling these anomalies from a fundamental source.

Walt D.
Reply to  vounaki
December 10, 2014 6:37 am

I don’t think so. A rectal thermometer can measure to 1/10th of a degree Fahrenheit. The temperatures that they measures are probably to the nearest degree. However, a bigger problem is that they don’t know the sensitivity of their measurements with respect to the location of the thermometer – how much would it change if you moved it to locations 10 yards away, 100 yards away, 1 mile away, 10 miles away etc.

george e. smith
Reply to  Walt D.
December 10, 2014 11:26 am

Well Dr. James Hansen says you can move the thermometer 1200 km away and get the same reading.
I can see how that would work if you were actually using the rectal thermometer for its intended purpose.

Grant
December 9, 2014 7:03 pm

Well it’s warming, if you disregard that cooling caused by the warming. that clears it up.

Ursus Augustus
December 9, 2014 7:13 pm

Using a reflective surface technique I examined my navel and found that it has over the years become surrounded by an increasing amount of non abdominal muscular tissue and the ‘six pack’ of my twenties has become a ’20 litre tub’ in my sixties. A statistical association with atmospheric CO2 levels since the mid seventies gives a 97% confidence level and strongly suggestive of a causal relationship. It may in part be due to the CO2 in all that beer I drank back in the day being statistically associated with my abdominal deformation and then directly associated with and a contributor to CO2 pollution.
A paper has been submitted to a bunch of my old mates from university for peer review and the latest stable mate magazine ‘Nature Narcissism’ advise they hope to publish in the new year.
I am seeking funding for a follow up study which will focus on the effect of red wine in a post beer stage of life as a potential bio-engineering remedy to abdominal deformation.

Richard G
Reply to  Ursus Augustus
December 9, 2014 7:23 pm

I would suggest to have your old university mates meet at the pub to review the paper. That way they could confirm the research through observation.

Ursus Augustus
Reply to  Richard G
December 10, 2014 1:00 am

Excellent suggestion. A true ‘team’ approach. I believe funding can be readily obtained for such an innovative collaborative methodology.

Ken L.
December 9, 2014 7:52 pm

And while the rate of planetary warming has slowed in the past 16 years, it hasn’t stopped. The World Meteorological Organization announced this month that 2014 is on track to be one of the warmest, if not the warmest, years on record as measured by global average temperatures.

Do they think that everyone who reads their releases is mathematically challenged and doesn’t know the difference between year to year noise and a statistically significant trend? Science with that kind of bias can’t be science at all!

Richard M
December 9, 2014 8:27 pm

Consider a standing wave that circles the Earth about every ~60 years. The wave influences the jet streams and gives them kind of a default position. 1) Every 30 years or so this leads to more cold Arctic air flowing over the land surfaces of the US/Canada and Russia. 2) At the other extreme the wave pushes more Arctic Air over the north Pacific and Atlantic.
When the cold air is pushed down primarily over land surfaces it leads to more cooling of the NH. The land is much more influenced by these incursions. When the cold air flows over oceans surfaces it is quickly warmed. In addition, when the cold air is pushed down over the oceans it means the land stays much warmer.
In situation 1) the land will strongly cool and the ocean will weakly warm with average GASTA cooling. In situation 2) the land will moderately warm and ocean will weakly cool with average GASTA warming.
This may be the explanation for the PDO cycles. There really isn’t any change in total energy, it just appears that way because of the differences in the way oceans and land surfaces behave.
The wave itself may also be influenced by planetary structures which cause the wave to sync up in specific configurations as we see with the PDO.
How does this relate to this paper? Well, we would see more extreme anomalies with the strong cooling over land. However, they would primarily be cold extremes.
If this is actually happening then it explains quite a bit but it still wouldn’t explain the millennial cycle that appears to be driving the current warming.

Louis
December 9, 2014 10:44 pm

How can cold extremes be “warming faster than the Earth’s average”? If cold temperatures are getting warmer, how could they possibly be setting new records. And if they are not setting new records, how could they possibly be considered “extreme”?

D.J. Hawkins
Reply to  Louis
December 10, 2014 10:06 am

It would mean that everything between 5% and 95% would have to be cooling. On average.

Admad
December 10, 2014 12:36 am

Poor old Prof Jones will never live Climategate down…

Latimer Alder
December 10, 2014 12:43 am

Dear Old Phil
Still trying to get a last big hit before well-deserved obscurity swallows him up…..
Bless him…….

Chris Schoneveld
December 10, 2014 4:21 am

extreme temperature anomalies are warming faster than Earth’s average

Since when can an anomaly be warmed?