A new professional society for meteorology and climatology is announced

The Open Atmospheric Society takes a new approach to atmospheric science, becoming the first international society of its kind to be a cloud-based online organization

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


oas_logo_with_URL

September 16, 2014 – The Open Atmospheric Society, known as “The OAS” for short, announces its formation, and readiness to accept charter members. The purpose of The OAS is to provide a paperless and entirely online professional organization that will represent individuals who have been unrepresented by existing professional organizations that have become more activist than science based in their outlook. It also aims to provide a professional peer reviewed publication platform to produce an online journal with a unique and important requirement placed up-front for any paper submitted; it must be replicable, with all data, software, formulas, and methods submitted with the paper. Without those elements, the paper will be rejected. This focus on replicability up front is not found in other similar organizations that publish scientific results.

John Coleman, Founder of The Weather Channel had this to say

It is very gratifying to hear of the formation of The Open Atmospheric Society. A new Meteorological organization and scientific publication have been greatly needed for more than a decade. It is unfortunate that the American Meteorological Society has become totally politicized and conducts itself in total violation of the basic scientific principle of open debate; encouraging competing points of view to be presented and published.

I allowed my Professional Membership in the AMS expire many years ago after being an active member, attending National Conferences and reading The Bulletin of the AMS for many years. Several events occurred that made it clear to me that the society was in the control of people who were using it to complete their personal agendas and the Society would was becoming closed and dogmatic. I look forward to membership in the OAS.

Joseph D’Aleo AMS Fellow, and Certified Consulting Meteorologist adds:

The AMS, AGU and other professional society editors have slow-walked and thrown up obstacles to papers that challenge the “consensus” position, usually forcing authors to go elsewhere to publish their work. They have fast tracked other papers when issues arose that threatened that position. The AMS had policy advocacy as one of the top organizational goals. A professional scientific society should only advocate for good science and leave the policymaking to those elected to determine the policies based on the very best science.

 

The OAS, whose motto: verum in luce means “truth in the light”, offers not only a place for a free exchange of ideas, but a unique Internet cloud-based journal publishing platform providing emphasis on open review and reproducibility requirements up-front. Here are a few points of interest:

  • Open membership— Associate members, anyone who has an interest in atmospheric science, can join at a basic rate, providing interdisciplinary membership. Professional full voting members, will require a degree in atmospheric sciences or related earth or physical science disciplines, or three published papers in these subjects. Student members get a reduced rate, similar to associate members with option to full member elevation. More details at The OAS Charter.
  • Open journal— The Journal of the OAS will be free to read by the public. Open science— a transparent online peer review process
  • No other journal asks this upfront: strict OAS Journal submission requirements—technical submissions to the Journal by members must include all source data, software/code, procedures, and documentation to ensure reproducibility of the paper’s experiment or analysis by external reviewers.
  • Author account—each author and co-author will have accounts for collaboration, submitting papers, making edits, and responding to reviewers.
  • Emphasis on reasonable publication turnaround, 3 months or less.
  • DOI’s will be assigned and provided with each publication.
  • The OAS will offer press releases and web video assistance for authors to explain papers clearly and effectively to the general public. It will also occasionally offer statements and positions regarding atmospheric science as it relates to current news.
  • Organizational activity will be conducted entirely online – This means no costly brick and mortar infrastructure, no costly postal mailings journals, and no need for warehousing paper files and publications.

The formation of The OAS represents a new way of conducting the scientific method, and welcomes those who feel their professional interests are not being served with the current collection of professional societies who focus on meteorology and climatology. The upcoming Journal of the Open Atmospheric Society has been assigned an official ISSN publication number by the Library of Congress (ISSN 2373-5953) and is registered with CrossRef, the world’s leading scientific publication identifier providing Digital Object Identifiers (DOI) for publications.

If you would like more information about this new society, please e-mail us at contact (at) theoas dot org or visit online at http://theoas.org to learn more or to become a member.

# # #

Follow The OAS on Twitter, here: https://twitter.com/The_OAS


Personal Note:

This is a project that has been two years in the making and was borne out of feedback in this WUWT poll in May 2012:

Many, many, people have provided input that helped shape the concept, and a full launch had been planned for June of this year, but as Murphy’s Law would have it, the Annotum publishing platform used for the Journal became non-functional due to a major software upgrade introduced by WordPress in May. We had to wait for the issue to sort itself out, and now that it has, we have the final green light for the official launch. Here is what the workflow looks like:

OAS_workflow_mapDr. Roy Spencer once said to me that trying to organize climate skeptics would be like “trying to herd cats”. While this Society is not trying to “herd” anyone, nor is it specifically focused on climate skepticism, it will serve to represent a group of people and ideas that up until now has been essentially ostracized because the ideas and viewpoints are counter to “consensus”. Until now, there has not been an organization that represented those people who feel that the other organizations have lost their way. Now, there is.

Feedback from members is going to be our most important asset. Participation will be the engine that drives change. Asking for replication up front will also drive change. While a replication requirement by itself does not guarantee that a scientific paper will be unfalsifiable (all the math and data could be valid, but the premise and/or conclusion can still be wrong), it is a step in the right direction that other atmospheric science journals have yet to demand. Imagine if Cook’s 97% paper or Mann’s Hockey sticks had replicability requirements before publishing.

Further announcements, calls for papers, and organizational notices will be posted in the coming days and weeks. In the meantime, you can get familiar with the charter, the goals, and the publishing platform.

Right now, membership is the most important goal. I encourage everyone who reads WUWT to become a member, or an associate member . Like any organization, it starts out small with an idea, and grows as momentum builds. As the momentum builds, so will the organization. My role is to put all the pieces in place, and help it grow.

For the inevitable naysayers, here is one of my favorite quotes from Winston Churchill:

“You will never reach your destination if you stop and throw stones at every dog that barks.” ― Winston Churchill

Thank you for your consideration. – Anthony Watts

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
216 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Zeke
September 16, 2014 9:45 pm

“Section 4. Committees and the Board of Directors shall conduct meetings according to Robert’s Rules of Order, Newly Revised in all points not expressly provided for in this charter.”
We actually had to use this for homeschooling this year. Two teenagers. (:
Congratulations. A toast to the Open Atmospheric Society, long may it “be true in its methods, its publications, and to its members.”

September 16, 2014 10:55 pm

Recommendations:
1. Get reputable members of the scientific community on the editorial board and as editors. The better people you get here the less criticism in the future. *Do not fall into the trap of getting anyone on the editorial board that does not have scientific credentials.
2. Get a fairly diverse editorial board (including mathematics and statistics) and utilize them to screen papers for the editor(s).
3. The Journal needs a no BS peer-review policy of 2 or more anonymous reviewers (always credentialed).
4. Utilize reviewers of a mathematics and statistics background when relevant.
5. Be careful and do not allow commenting outside of the reviewers and author(s) online during the review process as this can quickly spiral out of control.
6. Get one or more copy-editors (English majors preferred) to review final submissions for grammar and formatting. *This cannot be stressed enough.
7. Establish strict formatting rules for article types so the journal has a standard look and feel (word length, citations methods etc…) *You can copy the policy of any well known journal and tweak it.
8. Once the first issue is published, get the journal indexed in Scopus.

climatereason
Editor
Reply to  Poptech
September 17, 2014 12:00 pm

8 good points. To that I would add try to get a mix of people on the board from all sides of the debate but I suspect that will be impossible
tonyb

Bloke down the pub
Reply to  Poptech
September 20, 2014 9:17 am

Anthony, there is scope within this new organisation to overcome another criticism of the peer review system. When starting out to write a new paper, the authors should lodge with OAS a brief synopsis of their aims and intended method. This would be given a reference, to which only they have access, and filed in the cloud. When the paper is published they can use that reference number to recover the date stamped synopsis which would then become part of the abstract. Any variation between the intended methodology and what was actually done would be open for all to see and would deter most data mining exercises.

Marlow Metcalf
September 16, 2014 11:26 pm

Professionalism in Peer review
http://www.gocomics.com/comic/explore/1583573/22#mutable_1208425
September 17, 2014

Michael Wassil
September 16, 2014 11:38 pm

Great idea, I’ve joined the pride. Thanks much, Anthony.

Greg
September 17, 2014 2:12 am

Joined as full member. Thanks Anthony!

Carin
September 17, 2014 3:00 am

Joined as member.
There are a different in Scientific truth, Political truth and Religious truth. Scientific truth usually wins in the long run and this is something I want to happen soon.

September 17, 2014 3:51 am

This is a very welcome development. My thanks to all of the people who worked on putting it together. I’ll be joining.
Pointman

September 17, 2014 4:25 am

In Vino Veritas …Cheers!

Evan Jones
Editor
Reply to  Andy Hurley
September 18, 2014 8:51 am

Vini Veni Vidi Vici

September 17, 2014 4:39 am

On the bottom of the membership page you have an item “to mange your membership” = manage.

Tim
September 17, 2014 5:55 am

I was relieved to hear the journal is cloud-based. More attention should definitely be given to water vapor!

Coach Springer
September 17, 2014 7:26 am

It will be interesting. The transparency will discourage agenda driven scientists, but we’ll have to wait and see. It would be hard for the usual suspects to subvert the organization. They will need government help and will get some.

dmacleo
September 17, 2014 8:23 am

boy I really wish I could afford the associate/non-scientist level membership.
would be cool to say I had a hand helping support it.
hopefully I can do it before the time limit expires.

beng
September 17, 2014 8:31 am

Congrats — wish I could afford membership.
Expect alot of dissing and poo-pooing from the establishment comrades — this is intruding into their real “expertise” — communication (propaganda/history revision in their case).

September 17, 2014 10:53 am

A most welcome development! I’ve joined as a full member.

Mark
September 17, 2014 4:41 pm

I joined and am looking forward to the first issue of the journal.

September 18, 2014 8:53 am

Ever hear of the Organization of American States, otherwise known as OAS? You should have researched your name first.

Reply to  Pamela Parsons Heath
September 18, 2014 12:44 pm

Ever hear of ATM?
Which one?

dbuck
September 18, 2014 12:37 pm

[Snip. “Denial”, “denialist”, etc. are not allowed per site Policy. ~mod.]

adr
September 18, 2014 3:34 pm

Congrats!
Small issue: to French speakers, OAS means “Organisation armée secrète” (Secret Armed Organization), the one that tried to make a coup against former President Charles de Gaulle when he agreed to Algeria becoming a independent country. The French always complain, we say… 😉

Catcracking
September 19, 2014 5:59 pm

Many thanks Anthony for this endeavor. As an engineer with two degrees, I have joined as a full member especially since I believe in this case I should put my money where my mouth is; and I firmly believe such an organization is needed to counteract the propaganda machine of the government and the questionable CAGW believers. Unfortunately the agenda driven machine has a lot of media exposure and government support.
I used the option to send a check since I happen to be very cautious about using my credit card on line.
I suspect that I might need to wait longer to get confirmation.
Thanks again for all your effort.

1 3 4 5