A new professional society for meteorology and climatology is announced

The Open Atmospheric Society takes a new approach to atmospheric science, becoming the first international society of its kind to be a cloud-based online organization

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


oas_logo_with_URL

September 16, 2014 – The Open Atmospheric Society, known as “The OAS” for short, announces its formation, and readiness to accept charter members. The purpose of The OAS is to provide a paperless and entirely online professional organization that will represent individuals who have been unrepresented by existing professional organizations that have become more activist than science based in their outlook. It also aims to provide a professional peer reviewed publication platform to produce an online journal with a unique and important requirement placed up-front for any paper submitted; it must be replicable, with all data, software, formulas, and methods submitted with the paper. Without those elements, the paper will be rejected. This focus on replicability up front is not found in other similar organizations that publish scientific results.

John Coleman, Founder of The Weather Channel had this to say

It is very gratifying to hear of the formation of The Open Atmospheric Society. A new Meteorological organization and scientific publication have been greatly needed for more than a decade. It is unfortunate that the American Meteorological Society has become totally politicized and conducts itself in total violation of the basic scientific principle of open debate; encouraging competing points of view to be presented and published.

I allowed my Professional Membership in the AMS expire many years ago after being an active member, attending National Conferences and reading The Bulletin of the AMS for many years. Several events occurred that made it clear to me that the society was in the control of people who were using it to complete their personal agendas and the Society would was becoming closed and dogmatic. I look forward to membership in the OAS.

Joseph D’Aleo AMS Fellow, and Certified Consulting Meteorologist adds:

The AMS, AGU and other professional society editors have slow-walked and thrown up obstacles to papers that challenge the “consensus” position, usually forcing authors to go elsewhere to publish their work. They have fast tracked other papers when issues arose that threatened that position. The AMS had policy advocacy as one of the top organizational goals. A professional scientific society should only advocate for good science and leave the policymaking to those elected to determine the policies based on the very best science.

 

The OAS, whose motto: verum in luce means “truth in the light”, offers not only a place for a free exchange of ideas, but a unique Internet cloud-based journal publishing platform providing emphasis on open review and reproducibility requirements up-front. Here are a few points of interest:

  • Open membership— Associate members, anyone who has an interest in atmospheric science, can join at a basic rate, providing interdisciplinary membership. Professional full voting members, will require a degree in atmospheric sciences or related earth or physical science disciplines, or three published papers in these subjects. Student members get a reduced rate, similar to associate members with option to full member elevation. More details at The OAS Charter.
  • Open journal— The Journal of the OAS will be free to read by the public. Open science— a transparent online peer review process
  • No other journal asks this upfront: strict OAS Journal submission requirements—technical submissions to the Journal by members must include all source data, software/code, procedures, and documentation to ensure reproducibility of the paper’s experiment or analysis by external reviewers.
  • Author account—each author and co-author will have accounts for collaboration, submitting papers, making edits, and responding to reviewers.
  • Emphasis on reasonable publication turnaround, 3 months or less.
  • DOI’s will be assigned and provided with each publication.
  • The OAS will offer press releases and web video assistance for authors to explain papers clearly and effectively to the general public. It will also occasionally offer statements and positions regarding atmospheric science as it relates to current news.
  • Organizational activity will be conducted entirely online – This means no costly brick and mortar infrastructure, no costly postal mailings journals, and no need for warehousing paper files and publications.

The formation of The OAS represents a new way of conducting the scientific method, and welcomes those who feel their professional interests are not being served with the current collection of professional societies who focus on meteorology and climatology. The upcoming Journal of the Open Atmospheric Society has been assigned an official ISSN publication number by the Library of Congress (ISSN 2373-5953) and is registered with CrossRef, the world’s leading scientific publication identifier providing Digital Object Identifiers (DOI) for publications.

If you would like more information about this new society, please e-mail us at contact (at) theoas dot org or visit online at http://theoas.org to learn more or to become a member.

# # #

Follow The OAS on Twitter, here: https://twitter.com/The_OAS


Personal Note:

This is a project that has been two years in the making and was borne out of feedback in this WUWT poll in May 2012:

Many, many, people have provided input that helped shape the concept, and a full launch had been planned for June of this year, but as Murphy’s Law would have it, the Annotum publishing platform used for the Journal became non-functional due to a major software upgrade introduced by WordPress in May. We had to wait for the issue to sort itself out, and now that it has, we have the final green light for the official launch. Here is what the workflow looks like:

OAS_workflow_mapDr. Roy Spencer once said to me that trying to organize climate skeptics would be like “trying to herd cats”. While this Society is not trying to “herd” anyone, nor is it specifically focused on climate skepticism, it will serve to represent a group of people and ideas that up until now has been essentially ostracized because the ideas and viewpoints are counter to “consensus”. Until now, there has not been an organization that represented those people who feel that the other organizations have lost their way. Now, there is.

Feedback from members is going to be our most important asset. Participation will be the engine that drives change. Asking for replication up front will also drive change. While a replication requirement by itself does not guarantee that a scientific paper will be unfalsifiable (all the math and data could be valid, but the premise and/or conclusion can still be wrong), it is a step in the right direction that other atmospheric science journals have yet to demand. Imagine if Cook’s 97% paper or Mann’s Hockey sticks had replicability requirements before publishing.

Further announcements, calls for papers, and organizational notices will be posted in the coming days and weeks. In the meantime, you can get familiar with the charter, the goals, and the publishing platform.

Right now, membership is the most important goal. I encourage everyone who reads WUWT to become a member, or an associate member . Like any organization, it starts out small with an idea, and grows as momentum builds. As the momentum builds, so will the organization. My role is to put all the pieces in place, and help it grow.

For the inevitable naysayers, here is one of my favorite quotes from Winston Churchill:

“You will never reach your destination if you stop and throw stones at every dog that barks.” ― Winston Churchill

Thank you for your consideration. – Anthony Watts

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
216 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
September 16, 2014 3:41 pm

I am very happy with this development. Anthony, wow. I am seeing more and more news feeds that are reporting the flatlined ,even cooling, temps now calling attention to the fact that the climate models are failed. I am very very hopeful truth will out sooner than later!

September 16, 2014 3:42 pm

would love to join, sadly cannot afford it.
however will do whatever I can to spread the word to support it, hope that helps some.

September 16, 2014 3:45 pm

The OAS Member Portal second paragraph reads: “It offers not only a place for a free exchange ideas, ”
Should be “a free exchange of ideas” ??
Aside from that nitpick, great effort.

EternalOptimist
September 16, 2014 3:53 pm

‘I’ve found the antidote Captain’ – first officer Spock

Paul Coppin
September 16, 2014 3:53 pm

Anth*ny, the link in the logo needs fixing…

Tom
September 16, 2014 4:02 pm

Anthony, this seems like a welcome initiative, with open peer review. Who could sla y that idea? Could you just make it clear to the community if you have any financial interest, whatsoever, in The Open Atmospheric Society, OAS.org, or any derivative thereof?
Thanks.

September 16, 2014 4:06 pm

This is exciting!

CD
September 16, 2014 4:24 pm

The hope and change crowd just cannot seem to accept that our environment changes every hour of every day. It takes large amounts of hubris to think man can control the climate. Just as a question to ponder, how accurate was your weather forecast today?

Eamon Butler
September 16, 2014 4:27 pm

just brilliant. Let the OAS be the beacon that illuminates the truth in Climate science. I look forward to it’s success.
Eamon.

September 16, 2014 5:08 pm

You cannot herd cats, but you can lead with juicy delicious treats and they will follow.

Greg
Reply to  StuL
September 16, 2014 5:15 pm

Isn’t that how govt funded science works? Or am I confusing with prat herding.

Reply to  StuL
September 17, 2014 8:17 am

Until they get bored with those treats.

Greg
September 16, 2014 5:13 pm

Interesting choice of acronym,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organisation_de_l%27arm%C3%A9e_secr%C3%A8te
secret army huh?

Greg
September 16, 2014 5:24 pm

[snip – keep your insults to yourself -mod]

David L. Hagen
Reply to  Greg
September 16, 2014 5:37 pm

Fact trumps Consensus
The Nazi’s tried consensus against Einstein

Einstein’s fame and the great success of his theories created a backlash. The rising Nazimovement found a convenient target in relativity, branding it “Jewish physics” and sponsoring conferences and book burnings to denounce Einstein and his theories. The Nazis enlisted other physicists, including Nobel laureates Philipp Lenard and Johannes Stark, to denounce Einstein. One Hundred Authors Against Einstein was published in 1931. When asked to comment on this denunciation of relativity by so many scientists, Einstein replied that to defeat relativity one did not need the word of 100 scientists, just one fact.

May TheOAS clearly lay out the facts on climate with its high standard requiring data and programs to be posted.

Greg
Reply to  Greg
September 16, 2014 5:48 pm

It was a humoristic comment , you know satire. Hence the LOL at the end.
I though we ought to get there first and mock it. If you prefer we can wait until Sturmbandfuehrer Cook thinks of it and claims it as his own.

September 16, 2014 5:25 pm

just because people submit code and data doesnt mean its replicateable.
just a nit.. otherwise, nice idea. wish you well!

ossqss
Reply to  Steven Mosher
September 16, 2014 5:39 pm

If it is going to set any type of policy, it needs to be replicatable. Don’t ya think?

Reply to  ossqss
September 17, 2014 6:25 am

Yes.
Now read what I wrote.

John another
Reply to  Steven Mosher
September 16, 2014 6:28 pm

As opposed to destroying data, declaring code proprietary? Who would do that in the name of science?

dp
Reply to  Steven Mosher
September 17, 2014 10:54 am

The condition that it be replicable covers that. If it cannot be replicated it cannot be published. The fact that it must be replicable puts unspoken requirements on the submission that also covers unknown unknowns and esoterica that cannot be anticipated in a requirements document. Requiring a submission be replicable does not imply it shall be. It is a bold statement that the author should not expect the editors to take him at his word. Simply that and nothing more. That does not exist to a great degree in other publications, hence wide spread pal review. The OAS will exist as a constant reminder of that embarrassing absence and that may be its greatest contribution to science.

Reply to  dp
September 17, 2014 11:42 am

Though replicability is an excellent requirement it is not a substitute for falsifiability. For satisfaction of of the latter the events in the statistical population underlying the model must exist.

TRG
September 16, 2014 5:27 pm

This could be big, and I predict it will not be well received by the establishment.

September 16, 2014 5:43 pm

The OAS logo of the Earth seems just a tad North America-centric.
Suggestion: Maybe make the OAS logo one of those animated GIF’s with the entire globe rotating (in the proper direction of course). Since The OAS is entirely online -electronic, should be cool. Even make a cyclone or two over an ocean basin.

Greg
Reply to  Joel O'Bryan
September 16, 2014 5:55 pm

Well since it seems to be mainly an alternative to AMS, it probably will be North America-centric.
But emphasising a global perspective is a good idea. Since it is intended to be non-paper, the idea of an animated logo would be cool.

SIGINT EX
Reply to  Joel O'Bryan
September 16, 2014 7:33 pm

That I agree.
Using Polar Stereographic projections of the North and South Hemispheres together would look very forward.
🙂

September 16, 2014 5:48 pm

I’m in!! I’ve been calling for something like this for years. Let truth shine!!

Steve from Rockwood
September 16, 2014 5:56 pm

Have you selected an Executive Director yet? Good luck on what could become a great new direction for science.

Laurence (Tom) O'Donnell
September 16, 2014 6:16 pm

Anthony,
Treamebdous endeavor! My Founding Associate Membership application has been submitted and paid for.

Mike T
September 16, 2014 6:42 pm

Fantastic initiative, congratulations to all involved. Maybe now the sullied reputation of science in general, and climate science in particular, can be regained.

September 16, 2014 7:11 pm

This is inspiring news.
I will not renew my AGU membership when it comes time for renewal after next month. I will apply what I would have spent on AGU renewal toward OAS membership. I have attended the past few AGU Annual Fall (December) Meetings in San Francisco but no more. I will apply the money I would have spent on the AGU Fall meeting toward OAS membership / participation.
I’ve very often said in the past on threads at WUWT that I will not join any scientifically skeptical org that has even the slightest possibility of political context, while saying that I would join an org with a focus on climate science with scientifically skeptical principles and with independent openness.
I will join OAS forthwith.
John

Reply to  John Whitman
September 16, 2014 7:27 pm

I am strongly considering dropping my AAAS membership when it comes for renewal in January. The AAAS has become the AAAPS, the Am. Assoc. for the Advancement of Politicized Science with its publication in Spring 2014 of “What We Know” alarmism. “What We Know” was really “What we thought we knew” that was relevant to 2005-2006, but no longer. It was so sad to see that from AAAS, and I realize how corrupted Alan Leshner and Marcia McNutt allowed that august organization to become.

Reply to  John Whitman
September 16, 2014 7:44 pm

I am a member now.
John

Reply to  John Whitman
September 16, 2014 8:01 pm

Clarification. My membership application is submitted, but pending review and approval.
John

Evan Jones
Editor
September 16, 2014 7:16 pm

Well, I don’t qualify, I’m sure, but I want to wish those who do all the luck.

Reply to  Evan Jones
September 16, 2014 7:44 pm

You don’t even qualify to be an Associate Member?

Evan Jones
Editor
Reply to  JohnWho
September 17, 2014 3:00 am

I don’t have any of the funky papers.

Reply to  Evan Jones
September 17, 2014 8:24 am

if I read it all correctly don’t need any papers/degrees for the lowest level membership

SIGINT EX
September 16, 2014 7:40 pm

[snip -over the top -mod]

Reply to  SIGINT EX
September 16, 2014 8:46 pm

Not even funny. Not in the least.

September 16, 2014 8:06 pm

When Shaun Marcott published his infamous paper extending the global temperature record back 11M years and claimed we where in the warmest period in that entire history, 10 pages of web search results showed the entire MSM frenzied to report it. The day can’t come soon enough when OAS will be cited as the authoritative source to counter this junk science.

September 16, 2014 9:04 pm

Ok I am a drinking member now 🙂

jimmi_the_dalek
September 16, 2014 9:19 pm

“Submissions must include all data, code, algorithms, software, and other necessary materials to be able to independently replicate the submission. Without these materials, submissions will not even be considered.”
That condition rules out anyone using commercial licensed software. Even duplicating something as straightforward as using MATLAB or Mathematica to solve a few simple equations would be impossible, unless the reader had already bought their own copies. Basically this limits papers to those you can do without maths!

garymount
Reply to  jimmi_the_dalek
September 16, 2014 9:24 pm

Many file formats have free readers for such files, such as for Power Point, Word, Excel, Adobe Acrobat etc.

jimmi_the_dalek
Reply to  garymount
September 16, 2014 10:23 pm

It is not reading the files that is the problem – it is generating the results from the data. If it takes anything more than an Excel spreadsheet, then checking the calculation would not be possible for the average reader, and if you limit publications to those that only use free software, you are not going to get any in depth analyses at all.

steveta_uk
Reply to  jimmi_the_dalek
September 17, 2014 2:20 am

Although the language itself may be proprietary and/or copyright, any programs written for that system are copyright of the author, not the language owner.
For example, while Excel is itself a proprietary platform, any spreadsheets developed for it can freely distributed, and indeed may be run on other platforms (Libre Office, etc).

Reply to  steveta_uk
September 17, 2014 8:25 am

and libre usually works better than openoffice with MS office files. something not many remember.