I figured that I should give people a heads-up, rather than just dump changes unannounced like wordpress.com did with their recent beep boop editor bomb.
Two changes – comment filtering and format. Two notes: editing for guest authors and a personal note about the future of WUWT.
1. Comment filtering has become stricter
This change is already in place this week and has been necessitated by the rising amount of spam comments not just at WUWT, but all blogs seem to be getting. Steve McIntyre laments his trouble with recent spam increases here.
WUWT gets about 3 times the amount of spam that Climate Audit does, most of it commercial link-back spam disguised as a comment. I too have seen the increase, and clearing out the spam filter has become quite a chore on some days. As a result, I’ve turned on this setting in my wordpress.com dashboard:
Strict: silently discard the worst and most pervasive spam.
What this means is that occasionally, some legitimate comments that meet this criteria might get thrown out with the bathwater. Some comments that are on the fence may also go to the spam holding que for review.
So, if you make a comment and it immediately disappears, it may go straight to either of these places. But, that doesn’t mean it is lost forever, it may be in the holding queue. Give it some time to see if it is retrieved by a moderator. For overnight, typically 11PM-6AM PDT, some comments may take awhile before they are rescued.
For a few people who have no manners and have been warned and finally banned (for example, Doug Cotton and his variety of shapeshifting sock puppets, and NASA GISS scientist Jan Perlwitz who made a death threat) those comments will straight to the bit bucket. Words with the usual variety of cuss words, profanity, and banned topics, etc. will also go straight to the bit bucket.
If your comment doesn’t fit any of these categories, and you don’t see it rescued within a few hours, it may have been a victim of the new stricter spam policy. I wish this wasn’t the case, but the enormity of the spam increase requires it. There just isn’t enough time in the day as it is and we shouldn’t be wasting it wading through dreck comments to decide which require permanent deletion and which don’t. Due to WUWT being a high traffic blog and in the top 10 of wordpress.com blogs worldwide on a daily basis, it is a prime target for spammers.
Also, some comments may be held for moderation, as we’ve recently added some words to that filter. Some people who have been known to post wildly off-topic, long rants, hateful, or otherwise inappropriate comments will get the inspection of a moderator. Also, first time commenters will be held in moderation, and after the first comment is approved, you are whitelisted.
The vast majority of regular commenters are also whitelisted, but occasionally somebody may trigger moderation. One of the surest ways for your comment to be held is to put a whole bunch of links in it, which mimic commercial spam. Right now we have it set to 4 links as the maximum. If you have a comment that requires more than that, try to break it up into two comments, or just accept that your comment will be held for moderation.
Also, moderator, please step up in removing off topic comments, we have a handful of people who think that “anything goes” when it comes to posting these sorts of comments on threads. Likewise, feel free to snip and warn purveyors of abusive comments.
The WUWT comment policy page is here.
2. New format
One of the biggest problems that WUWT (and many blogs like it) is that given the linear scrolling format, stories often get shuttled to the bottom of the stack pretty quickly, especially on busy news days. This means that some topics die a premature discussion death.
WUWT readers may have noted that I’ve been trying some experiments to keep stories of interest at the top, trying for awhile a “top stories” sticky post for a few weeks. While it helped, the amount of work to keep up with it was large, and some people didn’t like it. Of course in any change, there will be those that don’t like it.
The last major format change I made to the WUWT format was in early 2010, a couple of months after Climategate broke. I found the old Freshy theme we were using then was too narrow, and restrictive (it didn’t support mobile devices well) so I opted for the new (at the time) 2010 theme, which has served us well for over 4 and half years. But, it too is now showing signs of age, especially with so many topics and so much traffic.
After months of trying out new ideas offline, I believe I’ve found a new theme that will solve the problems mentioned above, while still retaining much of the look and feel of WUWT along with being able to keep all posts in a linear scrolling format as we have before.
The new theme is called “Expound” and you can read about it here. WordPress describes it as:
Expound offers a fresh, clean magazine-styled look for any type of blog. With a responsive design that looks great on any device, its support of post formats and featured posts will help your content shine.
Here is what it will look like. I still have not included the header image. This is a scaled version to show what the scrolled areas below the main headlines look like. It will be full width on any browser, and will properly adapt to tablets and phones as well.
The five most recent stories are at the top, you can see other stories directly below by scrolling down.
The only thing that will significantly change is the front page of WUWT and some sidebar elements will be removed that are no longer relevant. Posts themselves will pretty much look the same and commenting will work as before.
One big improvement to this theme is that it will allow bigger images, 720 pixels wide, up from the previous width of 640. We’ll be able to do HD! This is important for graphs with a lot of details and some videos in HD.
Here is a full-on view of the main page before scrolling:
The change will start on Monday morning, August 25th.
The good news is that if it doesn’t work for some reason, it can be changed back.
UPDATES
UPDATE: As you can see by now, the new format is live. Like with any new format, there may be some hiccups or some things that aren’t quite right. I’ve spent the evening doing some font tuning, and I hope the body font for posts is OK now for most people. If not, you can magnify/shrink in your browser using CTRL and + keys simultaneously as well as CTRL and – keys. CTRL and 0 (zero) puts you back at default magnification.
There are a couple of missing elements, such as comment count, and “leave a comment” on main page entries, along with some other small tweaks that will be put back in over the coming days with the CSS editor. BTW, if anyone is a WordPress CSS specialist, and can help me with such tasks, please leave a note in comments – thanks, Anthony
UPDATE2: Some things that I expected to retain got broken, such as the mobile theme, which I believe is fixed now. Some other things that we are used to got broken or removed because the default theme setting didn’t support them.
The good news is that most everything can be fixed with CSS tweaks over the next few days, though I have a bit of a learning curve on these items. Anybody out there a wordpress CSS specialist?
Some things already fixed are:
- Mobile theme
- Header font and body of story font sizes
- Making body font more readable by making it sans serif
- Put back “latest posts” on sidebar since some users still need it
- Background image restored
Things I’m working on:
- Putting back real time stamps
- Putting back comment counts
- Getting comment body fonts and comment name headers sized properly
- Less white space
- About a half dozen other small tweaks
Your patience is appreciated while these things are dealt with. – Anthony
Note: editing for guest authors.
For guest authors who can post on WUWT, to get an image to appear in the top five, you’ll have to select it as a “featured image” (on the lower right sidebar) during editing, otherwise it will appear as text only. Putting a short summary in the first sentence or two is more important now, since that is what readers will see at the top of the main page.
Also, to get around invoking the horrid beep boop editor that wordpress.com refuses to dump, here is a workaround. In the dashboard, simply click on the “Posts” item but NOT on the drop down menu where it says “Add New”:
To edit a post, click on “all posts”, select the post needed to edit, and edit from there.
Personal note:
After this change settles in, I will make the decision as to whether to stick with wordpress.com any longer. They assure me they are trying to polish this beep boop editor turd fix the beep boop editor, but I’m not sure they are going to be successful. They’ve pretty well ignored users concerns in this thread, and then decided to close it.
Closing threads where users are sounding off angrily sounds like the tactics some newspapers and magazines we know that simply choose to ignore overwhelming reader input when it comes to the many climate science faux pas that grace their pages.
Bad move, WordPress. I’m not sure your free hosting is worth the hassle anymore. Many other users feel the same with this “jumped the shark” moment with the “beep boop” editor debacle. Being able to control one’s own destiny has its advantages, and I’m beginning to feel abused by wordpress.com.
BTW, the video ads that appear at the bottoms of posts give the highest payback to WUWT, should you be inclined to watch them.




Your post tells us also how much work you and the moderators and contributors put into this important site. Thanks Anthony. Too the tip jar!
Anthony, the new look, looks good!
Only one third of the screen used in 2560×1440 computer screen (27″). UX quite the same when using a tablet but I prefer writing with a keyboard.
Finding the latest comments in thread that I follow is the thing, The short list for them is well hidden.
Solomon Green
August 25, 2014 at 4:35 am
Jim Jelinski wrote
August 24, 2014 at 11:26 am
“THANK YOU Anthony for all the work you put in to this site!
Never forget, as you are picking through some irritating issue (whether it is a scrap between article authors or between people making comments, or cleaning out spam, dealing with your website service, or whatever) that there are a BUNCH of people like me who really value and enjoy the information, the stories, the back-and-forth discussions that you make possible.
An informative, highly readable website on issues that affects us all.
Again, THANK YOU Anthony!”
May I second that.
=========================
I’ll third that.
See UPDATE2 above on fixing missing items and tweaks to the new theme.
I have not read all comments so I am not sure if I am the only one, but I follow WUWT mainly on my iphone and the new format sucks. On the PC all is fine with me, but via the phone all text shows up in long narrow strips and is a pain to read through or scroll through.
B.
You are in the best position to see and hear what the prevailing thoughts are on the changes, but please reconsider, if possible, the loss of the posting date at the higher level. If I’ve missed a day or two, finding where I am may be very confusing and I do like to know who has posted an article.
Thanks for everything and keep up the good work.
SteveT
Good luck.
I like clean formats, but your new one could be tightened up for space utilization.
IIRC you had a problem with WonkyPress recently, not the first. Dot_com types “just don’t get it” as far as quality is concerned. At the time of your earlier problem it seemed WordPress was altering code without testing.
Don’t know if other services would be better, I heard a horror story about eblah or such not notifying their customer when there was a problem, and being very difficult to get ahold of (that’s a key criteria for your list of requirements). Mind, while I know there was a problem, the teller of the story is whacko – praised my posts on climate, locked me out when I presented facts on those visible things behind airliners, then swore at me when I nailed him in a competing blog. (He was smart enough to read between the lines of my post there.)
Disqus (not used here) is bad for me. It requires logging in via social media, which means Disqus has your social media parameters. As I have no social media accounts (other than Linkedin which doesn’t count and I wouldn’t use it on Disqus anyway) that leaves me without Disqus access.
Furthermore, it is not clear that anything written on Disqus ever reaches the author of the article. It is just a place for readers to argue in a futile way among themselves while Disqus harvests your interests, schedule and other useful data.
@Michael 2 – re: discus. Actually it does give you a choice. It allows you to use Gmail, Yahoo as well as facebook and twitter. I use a throw away account in gmail.
Oh, and another excellent addition (the reply). At least for quick answers. Thanks guys!
Dang, I just wanted to leave a URL, not actually grab a screenshot that isn’t very helpful. Let’s try this again.
http://www.meetup.com/Data-Mining/messages/boards/thread/20495372
“Alan Watt, Climate Denialist Level 7 says:
If you decide WUWT can no longer be accommodated on a free hosting service, I will happily join with many other regular readers in pledging a regular contribution to meet your costs.”
Dunno if I will ever be a regular financial contributor, but if Anthony wants to take a combined business/vacation trip overseas every year for the next few, I think I’d be up for contributing a few shekels for that. I’ll only contribute if it’s not business only and Anthony also plans on having fun though, otherwise – no. Maybe some conference in Australia next year?
For newer posters/readers, I think we have a plane ticket covered for an overseas conference, but I bet Anthony could use some more $ for the associated pub tour – it can’t be for food cause that’s awful in England – he might starve to death.
love the new look, ctrl + to 175% zoom and it fills a 24 monitor nicely,also looks great on my android, with the phone rotated to horizontal of course ;0)
Comment #225ish: Very nice format update.
I like the old blog look better and am not happy about the censorship so i hopefully assume you’ll eventually leave wordpress behind as they won’t change their stripes, ever.
As one who often checks the site on my iPhone, I’m incredibly pleased with the improvement in the mobile experience. I haven’t seen the full site on my computer yet, but this loaded so much quicker and cleaner than the past layout. Nice!
Looks great on my PC and works fast and clean.
On the subject of long posts, not on the topic being discussed (you know who I’m looking at ;), can they be shuffled off to tips and notes. Sometimes there is something of value in them…
Should, perhaps, have mentioned my PC is windows 8.1 and I use IE. Looks good on my Android phone but I can’t post there. Maybe I need to login on the phone.
At first glance, I admit to rather liking the `new’ look. I’m going to have to explore again
and give it some time to see what `wrinkles’ and irks I discover.
Thanks for your efforts, Anthony. It must be an unbelievable amount of work now, given
how much WUWT has grown. It’s still one of the most informative sites I’ve come across
so, if that was your target, you’ve more than met it!
Cheers.
A few minutes ago, I made a CSS change to increase the body font size slightly and to make the font fully black instead of the dark gray. Please advise how this looks now to those that said the readability was low.
Is there any way to donate to WUWT other than PayPal? I’d like to say “thanks” for your years of hard work.
@AW
I think I see a change in the body of the post. It is very readable now. High contrast, serif, fonts. Nice and tight line spacing, too.
I think I caught a quick change to the commenter name font a few minutes ago. It was non-bold? Maybe a Serif font? I thought it was pretty good.
I see a different, slightly smaller font for the comments. I can live with that font. Reducing the spacing between comments that I think needs the attention.
Anthony, WUWT is great but we need to be able to to reply to comments, the fact tat WUWT is so popular is amazing considering how other forums, eg the Gruniard, gett the to and fro that would be just fantastic here
Anthony,
It looks good to me. Like most regulars, I am disturbed by change even when that change is for the right reasons.
Can I persuade you to start a campaign to get Steve McIntyre to change the theme of ClimateAudit? I mean, that theme is more than seven years old and now looks horribly dated…
Anthony, I can help with CSS and I know WordPress very well. I’ve built a few sites, including some highly custom CSS. Let me know how I can help.