I figured that I should give people a heads-up, rather than just dump changes unannounced like wordpress.com did with their recent beep boop editor bomb.
Two changes – comment filtering and format. Two notes: editing for guest authors and a personal note about the future of WUWT.
1. Comment filtering has become stricter
This change is already in place this week and has been necessitated by the rising amount of spam comments not just at WUWT, but all blogs seem to be getting. Steve McIntyre laments his trouble with recent spam increases here.
WUWT gets about 3 times the amount of spam that Climate Audit does, most of it commercial link-back spam disguised as a comment. I too have seen the increase, and clearing out the spam filter has become quite a chore on some days. As a result, I’ve turned on this setting in my wordpress.com dashboard:
Strict: silently discard the worst and most pervasive spam.
What this means is that occasionally, some legitimate comments that meet this criteria might get thrown out with the bathwater. Some comments that are on the fence may also go to the spam holding que for review.
So, if you make a comment and it immediately disappears, it may go straight to either of these places. But, that doesn’t mean it is lost forever, it may be in the holding queue. Give it some time to see if it is retrieved by a moderator. For overnight, typically 11PM-6AM PDT, some comments may take awhile before they are rescued.
For a few people who have no manners and have been warned and finally banned (for example, Doug Cotton and his variety of shapeshifting sock puppets, and NASA GISS scientist Jan Perlwitz who made a death threat) those comments will straight to the bit bucket. Words with the usual variety of cuss words, profanity, and banned topics, etc. will also go straight to the bit bucket.
If your comment doesn’t fit any of these categories, and you don’t see it rescued within a few hours, it may have been a victim of the new stricter spam policy. I wish this wasn’t the case, but the enormity of the spam increase requires it. There just isn’t enough time in the day as it is and we shouldn’t be wasting it wading through dreck comments to decide which require permanent deletion and which don’t. Due to WUWT being a high traffic blog and in the top 10 of wordpress.com blogs worldwide on a daily basis, it is a prime target for spammers.
Also, some comments may be held for moderation, as we’ve recently added some words to that filter. Some people who have been known to post wildly off-topic, long rants, hateful, or otherwise inappropriate comments will get the inspection of a moderator. Also, first time commenters will be held in moderation, and after the first comment is approved, you are whitelisted.
The vast majority of regular commenters are also whitelisted, but occasionally somebody may trigger moderation. One of the surest ways for your comment to be held is to put a whole bunch of links in it, which mimic commercial spam. Right now we have it set to 4 links as the maximum. If you have a comment that requires more than that, try to break it up into two comments, or just accept that your comment will be held for moderation.
Also, moderator, please step up in removing off topic comments, we have a handful of people who think that “anything goes” when it comes to posting these sorts of comments on threads. Likewise, feel free to snip and warn purveyors of abusive comments.
The WUWT comment policy page is here.
2. New format
One of the biggest problems that WUWT (and many blogs like it) is that given the linear scrolling format, stories often get shuttled to the bottom of the stack pretty quickly, especially on busy news days. This means that some topics die a premature discussion death.
WUWT readers may have noted that I’ve been trying some experiments to keep stories of interest at the top, trying for awhile a “top stories” sticky post for a few weeks. While it helped, the amount of work to keep up with it was large, and some people didn’t like it. Of course in any change, there will be those that don’t like it.
The last major format change I made to the WUWT format was in early 2010, a couple of months after Climategate broke. I found the old Freshy theme we were using then was too narrow, and restrictive (it didn’t support mobile devices well) so I opted for the new (at the time) 2010 theme, which has served us well for over 4 and half years. But, it too is now showing signs of age, especially with so many topics and so much traffic.
After months of trying out new ideas offline, I believe I’ve found a new theme that will solve the problems mentioned above, while still retaining much of the look and feel of WUWT along with being able to keep all posts in a linear scrolling format as we have before.
The new theme is called “Expound” and you can read about it here. WordPress describes it as:
Expound offers a fresh, clean magazine-styled look for any type of blog. With a responsive design that looks great on any device, its support of post formats and featured posts will help your content shine.
Here is what it will look like. I still have not included the header image. This is a scaled version to show what the scrolled areas below the main headlines look like. It will be full width on any browser, and will properly adapt to tablets and phones as well.
The five most recent stories are at the top, you can see other stories directly below by scrolling down.
The only thing that will significantly change is the front page of WUWT and some sidebar elements will be removed that are no longer relevant. Posts themselves will pretty much look the same and commenting will work as before.
One big improvement to this theme is that it will allow bigger images, 720 pixels wide, up from the previous width of 640. We’ll be able to do HD! This is important for graphs with a lot of details and some videos in HD.
Here is a full-on view of the main page before scrolling:
The change will start on Monday morning, August 25th.
The good news is that if it doesn’t work for some reason, it can be changed back.
UPDATES
UPDATE: As you can see by now, the new format is live. Like with any new format, there may be some hiccups or some things that aren’t quite right. I’ve spent the evening doing some font tuning, and I hope the body font for posts is OK now for most people. If not, you can magnify/shrink in your browser using CTRL and + keys simultaneously as well as CTRL and – keys. CTRL and 0 (zero) puts you back at default magnification.
There are a couple of missing elements, such as comment count, and “leave a comment” on main page entries, along with some other small tweaks that will be put back in over the coming days with the CSS editor. BTW, if anyone is a WordPress CSS specialist, and can help me with such tasks, please leave a note in comments – thanks, Anthony
UPDATE2: Some things that I expected to retain got broken, such as the mobile theme, which I believe is fixed now. Some other things that we are used to got broken or removed because the default theme setting didn’t support them.
The good news is that most everything can be fixed with CSS tweaks over the next few days, though I have a bit of a learning curve on these items. Anybody out there a wordpress CSS specialist?
Some things already fixed are:
- Mobile theme
- Header font and body of story font sizes
- Making body font more readable by making it sans serif
- Put back “latest posts” on sidebar since some users still need it
- Background image restored
Things I’m working on:
- Putting back real time stamps
- Putting back comment counts
- Getting comment body fonts and comment name headers sized properly
- Less white space
- About a half dozen other small tweaks
Your patience is appreciated while these things are dealt with. – Anthony
Note: editing for guest authors.
For guest authors who can post on WUWT, to get an image to appear in the top five, you’ll have to select it as a “featured image” (on the lower right sidebar) during editing, otherwise it will appear as text only. Putting a short summary in the first sentence or two is more important now, since that is what readers will see at the top of the main page.
Also, to get around invoking the horrid beep boop editor that wordpress.com refuses to dump, here is a workaround. In the dashboard, simply click on the “Posts” item but NOT on the drop down menu where it says “Add New”:
To edit a post, click on “all posts”, select the post needed to edit, and edit from there.
Personal note:
After this change settles in, I will make the decision as to whether to stick with wordpress.com any longer. They assure me they are trying to polish this beep boop editor turd fix the beep boop editor, but I’m not sure they are going to be successful. They’ve pretty well ignored users concerns in this thread, and then decided to close it.
Closing threads where users are sounding off angrily sounds like the tactics some newspapers and magazines we know that simply choose to ignore overwhelming reader input when it comes to the many climate science faux pas that grace their pages.
Bad move, WordPress. I’m not sure your free hosting is worth the hassle anymore. Many other users feel the same with this “jumped the shark” moment with the “beep boop” editor debacle. Being able to control one’s own destiny has its advantages, and I’m beginning to feel abused by wordpress.com.
BTW, the video ads that appear at the bottoms of posts give the highest payback to WUWT, should you be inclined to watch them.




Stephen Rasey;
I miss the next and previous article links at the top of the post. You now must scroll to the bottom of the post to find these.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Seconded.
I’ll be adding CSS tweaks to restore many of the small missing items.
Comment count, etc. will return.
The change will start on Monday morning, August 25th.
Reloaded this page on 11:55AM EDT, changes already here.
Very stylish, with the varying formatting. Blogroll longer, spaced out, more scrolling.
Where is the “Recent Posts” list? I can go months without looking at the front page. Also next/last story arrows are missing at top, that was a quick indicator of new stories and navigation aid.
Oh, that’s why the blogroll is now so spread out, previously was a list, now has extra line feed spacing.
“Important Person” comments have lost the blue background highlighting, guest author and management ones will be harder to spot.
Actually entire right toolbar is much more spaced out, more scrolling. Why arent’t titles right above graphics? The donation section is a mess, might have to redo as a widget. Why so many extra <br> codes?
Handle website linkage is no longer highlighted, have to mouseover. There goes publicizing a site by posting here. Also prevents detecting questionable links.
Hey, when did the “load last” smiley go away?
That’s the “first look” list. And CA Assistant still works, at least the all-important Preview button.
As dictated by internet evolution, I will adapt. Heck, at this point I no longer even remember the old site theme. This is not me responding to change:
http://www.autostraddle.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/sad-kitten.jpg
Just testing.
Global cooling
August 24, 2014 at 3:17 pm
================================================
I frequent sites that use Disqus for most of my commentary. One point which I like in using it, is that the entire page does not have to refresh when posting a comment. But I am not crazy about having to open up ‘more comments’ to read through on a thread. Although, to get away from that, I can go to my Disqus page and see all comments there and replies. So there are pluses and minuses with their system. Overall I like using Disqus and the ease with which I can scroll through to see my all of my older comments.
I like the changes so far.
Love the new top banner/logo BTW.
Anthony, looks good – only comment i would make is that the links to next/previous article are no longer at the top of the current article, only at the bottom. Any chance of getting those back please ?
Keep up the good work…
New layout a lot better
Anthony Watts
August 24, 2014 at 10:41 pm.
The tweaks sound good.
My previous comment about the refresh issue on comments was just a function of the format change over. I was reading comments in the old format and when I refreshed, it changed over to the new format. All is good now.
It seems to be okay. No problems, so far. Looks good.
From Anthony Watts on August 24, 2014 at 10:41 pm:
http://theme.wordpress.com/themes/expound/
Uh-oh, that lead to a “Learn More and Purchase” link, quoting $30/yr, reoccurring charge.
Okay, I kicked in for the first four months. Who’s next?
(PS: Here’s the source link for the kitten pic, http://www.petbucket.com/blog/63157/5-reasons-why-your-kitten-is-crying-at-night.html)
Looking good so far … I see y’all still busy tweaking … the look’s sharp and clean.
I too would like to add to the ‘thank you’s, Anthony. Do what makes it easiest for you.
Wow, that’s a neat trick. This post came off of being a sticky top post and went from being posted about 13 hours ago to 13 minutes ago.
Time to play with adjusting the posting time?
Anthony, is it possible to get reduce or get rid of the gap at the top of the page? I notice it in Firefox and Explorer.
what ever they do will not stop WUWT
I like the look of the new format.
The default font is small (I know this as been mentioned before) and appears slightly grey so that it lacks contrast to the background.Full stops are about one pixel.
I can enlarge it but generally don’t fiddle as sites vary and I accept the default size.
The smaller greyish font and the large amount of white area has the effect (on me) of making the conversation less important.
Ok, the new format is out.
I HATE IT. I feel less of a connection to it. I know that I am going to be less inclined to come here. And where’s the number of comments? But, I guess the change is done. And the wuwt logo.. kind of superficial or something. But it’s like they’re trying to stuff less information in more space. So I’m just not getting the same feeling, the same depth. This is just my impression though. So who knows?
@Eric Simpson.
Gosh, so fickle? I’m disappointed.
I’ll be working on tweaks over the next couple of days to make improvements based on user input. Of course if you don’t want to wait, you can leave now with no hard feelings.
Anthony
@Anthony – Free ice Cream. Basically you are providing a service. What makes it easier for YOU is what is best as we want the service, not the frills. If it is not up to our ideal, that does not negate the content which is the service. So as long as it IS readable, I will read your content. And appreciate the free ice cream.
ALTHOUGH.. I’m looking at the home page as far as not liking it. But the comments, with the new font or whatever, seem to look good. Do you believe in climate change? In WUWT change? The old font was fine though.
It looks pretty. Let’s find out if it is easy to use.
The company I work for changed it’s benefits site last week. It looks prettier, but I still haven’t found the logical way to find what I look at most often. With the old and inferior site, it took 1 click.
New is not necessarily bad. But change for change sake is not necessarily good.
Possibly already commented on above (I didn’t read through them all), but it looks like the latest posts section on the right sidebar has been eliminated. I liked this feature to quickly see if there was something I wanted to read and it also helped to identify those articles that I had already clicked so I didn’t have to remember them. Can this be brought back?
Yeah, sorry, except me to be fickle sometimes. Just kind of the shock of the new maybe. I don’t really want to leave. Thanks for accepting the user input. The “number of comments” is something I’d like to see, but if it can’t be fit in to the format, I understand. As well as Likes. But I think that issue has already been debated.
The new main story layout is fantastic since unlike the original version, it has pictures to remind readers with an icon that the story is the same one as last time, so they might check in again to read comments. The text only version was awful since I just skimmed over it and it could not be understood in a single glance, even in peripheral vision.
I like it… but:
It doesn’t use the full width of the browser, it’s about the same as the old style using 2/3 with the rest gray.
It doesn’t show the number of comments before reading an article like the old style did.