Life found below Antarctica's ice sheet

Confirmed: 800 meters beneath Antarctic ice sheet, subglacial lake holds viable microbial ecosystems

Cutting-edge technology and science of the NSF-funded WISSARD project make discovery possible

In a finding that has implications for life in other extreme environments, both on Earth and elsewhere in the solar system, researchers funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) this week published a paper confirming that the waters and sediments of a lake that lies 800 meters (2,600 feet) beneath the surface of the West Antarctic ice sheet support “viable microbial ecosystems.”

Given that more than 400 subglacial lakes and numerous rivers and streams are thought to exist beneath the Antarctic ice sheet, such ecosystems may be widespread and may influence the chemical and biological composition of the Southern Ocean, the vast and biologically productive sea that encircles the continent.

According to Brent C. Christner, the paper’s lead author and a researcher with the NSF-funded Whillans Ice Stream Subglacial Access Research Drilling (WISSARD) project, “Hidden beneath a half-mile of ice in Antarctica is an unexplored part of our biosphere. WISSARD has provided a glimpse of the nature of microbial life that may lurk under more than 5 million square miles of ice sheet.”

Analysis of the samples taken from subglacial Lake Whillans, the researchers indicate, show that the water contains a diverse microbial community, many members of which can mine rocks for energy and use carbon dioxide as their source of carbon.

Added John Priscu, a WISSARD scientist at Montana State University, Bozeman and a co-author on the paper,  the Antarctic subglacial environment is our planet’s largest wetland, one dominated completely by microorganisms.

The WISSARD findings are published in the Aug. 21 issue of the journal Nature by scientists and students affiliated with WISSARD, which is a collaboration involving researchers at numerous institutions across the United States.

Christner is a professor of biology at Louisiana State University (LSU). Other co-authors on the paper include students and researchers from LSU; the University of Venice in Italy; New York University; the Scripps Institution of Oceanography; St. Olaf College in Minnesota; the University of Tennessee; and Aberystwyth University in the United Kingdom.

NSF, which manages the U.S. Antarctic Program through its Division of Polar Programs, provided more than $10 million in grants as part of NSF’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 portfolio to support the WISSARD science and development of related technologies.

NASA’s Cryospheric Sciences Program, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the private Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation also provided support for the project.

The WISSARD team made scientific and engineering history in late January of 2013 when they used clean hot-water drilling technology to access subglacial Lake Whillans. This permitted the retrieval of pristine water and sediment samples that had been isolated from direct contact with the atmosphere for many thousands of years.

The interdisciplinary WISSARD research team included groups of experts in the following areas of science: life in icy environments, led by Priscu; glacial geology, led by Ross Powell, of Northern Illinois University; and glacial hydrology, led by Slawek Tulaczyk, of the University of California, Santa Cruz.

Definitive evidence of life in subglacial lakes

The realization that a vast aquatic system of rivers and lakes exists beneath the ice in Antarctica has spurred investigations to examine the effect on ice-sheet stability and the habitability of environments at the bed. The latest WISSARD announcement is the first to provide definitive evidence that a functional microbial ecosystem exists beneath the Antarctic ice sheet, confirming more than a decade of speculation about life in this environment.

Using various methods, including airborne radar surveys, scientists have built a knowledge base about Antarctica’s subglacial hydrological system over the past 40 years. The largest of the subglacial lakes, subglacial Lake Vostok in East Antarctica, is one of the largest lakes on our planet in terms of volume and depth and has been isolated beneath the ice sheet for more than 10 million years.

Samples of microbes from Lake Vostok have been collected indirectly by examining ice collected above the liquid part of the Lake- ice that refroze–accreted–on the bottom of the ice sheet.

These samples, which were described in 1999 by Priscu, the chief scientist of the WISSARD project, and David Karl of the University of Hawaii, presented the first evidence for life beneath the huge Antarctic ice sheet.

However, the drilling techniques used to retrieve the Vostok samples and the low amount of microbial biomass present in the samples had called into question previous studies that concluded the lake supports a living ecosystem.

The WISSARD team drilled into subglacial Lake Whillans using a clean hot-water drill and incorporated rigorous measures to avoid the introduction of foreign material into the lake.

The approach to drilling was guided by recommendations in the 2007 National Research Council-sponsored report, “Exploration of Antarctic Subglacial Aquatic Environments: Environmental and Scientific Stewardship,” aimed to protect these unique environments from contamination.

A team of engineers and technicians directed by Frank Rack of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, designed and fabricated the specialized hot-water drill that was fitted with a filtration and germicidal UV system to prevent contamination of the subglacial environment and to recover clean samples for microbial analyses. In addition, the numerous customized scientific samplers and instruments used for this project were also carefully cleaned before being lowered into the borehole through the ice and into the lake.

A major concern that drove the clean-drilling techniques and protocols is that it is still unclear how interconnected the subglacial aquatic system is. Researchers did not want to risk contaminating the entire system through their sampling of one body of water.

The newly published paper also raises a separate issue of the connectivity of Lake Whillans to the wider global ecosystem, noting that the lake is part of network of three major reservoirs beneath the Whillans Ice Stream that regulate the transportation of water to a subglacial estuary–an area where fresh and salt water mix–which links the subglacial aquatic system to the ocean beneath the Ross Ice Shelf.

“Given the prevalence of subglacial water in Antarctica,” the researchers write, “our data…lead us to contend that aquatic microbial systems are common features of the subsurface environment that exists beneath the … Antarctic ice sheet.”

-NSF-

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
61 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
tty
August 22, 2014 1:23 am

“The latest WISSARD announcement is the first to provide definitive evidence that a functional microbial ecosystem exists beneath the Antarctic ice sheet, confirming more than a decade of speculation about life in this environment”
Sorry, but no, that was shown by Shtarkman et al. last year:
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0067221

August 22, 2014 1:35 am

Very cool!
Maybe we will find life on Titan some day. It has a large methane sea.
Lots of energy there for creatures to live on.
Look, there’s one! There’s another one!

Admin
August 22, 2014 1:48 am

I wonder whether the microbial life might be more complex than assumed. Microbes often form macroscopic structures, biological films, even mobile structures such as slime molds. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slime_mold . In an eco-system dominated by microbes, co-operation and interaction between microbes might follow patterns very strange to our normal experience.

jones
August 22, 2014 1:48 am

db,
I though methane was a fossil fuel?

August 22, 2014 1:59 am

According to the Telegraph they have found life in the even more inhospitable realm of outer space.
Plankton growing on the outside of the International Space Station windows.
Colour me sceptical. But it’s interesting.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/11049504/Sea-plankton-found-living-outside-International-Space-Station.html

Khwarizmi
August 22, 2014 2:49 am

mine rocks for energy and use carbon dioxide as their source of carbon
= = = = = = =
I read a more simplified version in the DailyMail a few days ago, but with the same simple story about the source of energy: “the microbes eat rocks.”
But from what compounds within the rock do they get their energy? What kind of rock is it?
Does “rock” power all the autotrophs in the system?
Is there an abundant source of energy available from rocks that we have somehow overlooked?

johnmarshall
August 22, 2014 3:01 am

I presume that the microbes gain energy by using exothermic chemical reactions. This can provide a lot of heat.

August 22, 2014 3:02 am

On a related theme, search for biota in the Russian superdeep drill hole (to 12.2 km) at Kola, done a while back now.
Biota found at quite deep locations underground.
Likewise around black smokers in ocean trenches. Life abounds.
One should anticipate such biota to be present, rather than absent, in remote locations.
That is a lesson from history.

August 22, 2014 3:07 am
August 22, 2014 3:11 am

Sorry, I see M Courtney has already posted that story…feel free to delete my post mods.

Bloke down the pub
August 22, 2014 3:15 am

M Courtney says:
August 22, 2014 at 1:59 am
‘According to the Telegraph they have found life in the even more inhospitable realm of outer space.’
A possible source for this life that they give is sea spray splashed onto boosters prior to launch. A possibly more likely source is the sample of rock taken from the cliffs of Beer in East Devon which was fixed to the outside of the space station in order to test the resilience of extremophiles to life in space.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-11039206

August 22, 2014 3:25 am

Well if life can live on the outside of the space statin have we contaminated Mars with our rovers?
And are about to launch a biological weapon on that poor defenceless comet we just harpooned?
I still doubt this news story.

Gamecock
August 22, 2014 3:28 am

“implications for life in other extreme environments, both on Earth and elsewhere in the solar system”
It is interesting. But “life . . . elsewhere in the solar system” assumes facts not in evidence.
“such ecosystems may be widespread and may influence the chemical and biological composition of the Southern Ocean, the vast and biologically productive sea that encircles the continent.”
More hype. From unknown to influential in one fell swoop.
These are grant seeking statements, not science.

Khwarizmi
August 22, 2014 3:33 am

johnmarshall says:
August 22, 2014 at 3:01 am
I presume that the microbes gain energy by using exothermic chemical reactions. This can provide a lot of heat.
=============
Exothermic food is the only way to live. But what are the redox reactions in metabolism? What compounds do they burn, exactly? Rock oil? (Petra+Oleum?)

August 22, 2014 3:41 am

Khwarizimi, NOAA has a useful article on microbes around low temperature hydrothermal vents.
It can be found here:
http://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/explorations/12fire/background/microbio/microbio.html
It would seem plausible that the grinding of ice on the rock bottom would slowly release metal ions in much the same way.

August 22, 2014 4:27 am

Given the news from a couple of days ago that they found plankton on the ISS, this really comes as no surprise. But it is fascinating!

August 22, 2014 4:50 am

If this is true, where are the photos? Should be a simple process…

Editor
August 22, 2014 5:21 am

Bloke down the pub says:
August 22, 2014 at 3:15 am

M Courtney says:
August 22, 2014 at 1:59 am
‘According to the Telegraph they have found life in the even more inhospitable realm of outer space.’
A possible source for this life that they give is sea spray splashed onto boosters prior to launch. A possibly more likely source is the sample of rock taken from the cliffs of Beer in East Devon which was fixed to the outside of the space station in order to test the resilience of extremophiles to life in space.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-11039206

Maybe, but there’s one little catch. From the spacedaily article (much better than the Telegraphs’s), the plankton was found on the Russian side – there’s no plankton at Baikonur:

The results of the recent experiments prove that that some organisms are capable of living on the outer surface of the International Space Station (ISS), Vladimir Solovyev, head of the Russian segment of the ISS, has revealed.
Some studies suggest that these organisms may even develop in the hostile conditions of spaceflight, which include vacuum, low temperatures, radiation and others, he added.

“[Plankton in] such phases of development is found on the surface of the ocean. It isn’t characteristic to Baikonur,”he explained, referring to Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan from where crew and cargo deliveries to ISS are launched. [Well, not quite true these days. minor Russian propaganda, but let’s let NASA and Congress defend themselves.]
“It turns out that there are some rising air currents, which settle on the surface of the station,” Solovyev added. [I move the experiment be replicated and other old LEO satellites be visited and tested. Where’s Skylab when you need it?]
The former cosmonaut, who spent nearly a year in orbit back in the 1980s, said that outer surface of ISS is “heavily contaminated” by the waste products from engines of the arriving spacecraft, atmospheric discharges from the station during spacewalks by the crew and other factors.

charles nelson
August 22, 2014 5:22 am

Why anyone finds this in the least bit surprising is a complete mystery to me.
The idea of somewhere on the surface of the planet that is ‘sterile’…now that would be shocking.
You guys should do more cleaning!

LogosWrench
August 22, 2014 5:23 am

Interesting but where’s the inevitable threat to said life by AGW? Maybe that will be part 2.

David
August 22, 2014 5:45 am

Let me guess these microbes are endangered due to the imminent collapse of the Antarctic ice sheet. Please give me 20 billion dollars to study this vital link in the food chain.

Claude Harvey
August 22, 2014 5:58 am

Back in the day, one of my power plants ate some rocks. But it couldn’t digest them. Baaad case of indigestion!

August 22, 2014 6:16 am

what does “viable microbial ecosystem” mean? It’s obviously been surviving for many thousands of years, so “viable” seems like one of those ecological feel-good throw-away terms…like “fragile”.

Squints
August 22, 2014 6:24 am

Folks, there’s a larger picture here we’re missing.
Alien.
Vs.
Predator.
You been told. 8^)

ferdberple
August 22, 2014 6:27 am

I though methane was a fossil fuel?
============
there you have it. Proof that dinosaurs once roamed the surface of Titan.
The notion that earth’s methane supply is primarily a result of decay of plants and animals is very helpful if you are trying to promote scarcity of supply to drive up prices. No doubt you could find many scientists will to back you in return for funding.
However, once you accept that methane is formed by the reduction of limestone and water in the presence of iron, at high pressure and temperature, an entirely different picture emerges. Especially given plate tectonics. Methane suddenly becomes plentiful, with large supplies within the earth and at the ocean floor.
Which explanation best fits observations?

1 2 3