Guest essay by Don Easterbrook
A crater in northern Siberia, spotted by a passing helicopter, has received worldwide attention and continues to be a top news story. Since then, two more mysterious holes have been discovered elsewhere in the region. Now the new holes, smaller in diameter but similar in shape – are posing a fresh challenge for Russian scientists, according to the The Siberian Times. Theories range from meteorites to an explosion of methane due to global warming.
Figure 1. Yamal ‘mystery crater.’ (Siberian Times)
Anna Kurchatova of the Sub-Arctic Scientific Research Centre said the crater was formed by a mixture of water, salt, and gas igniting an underground explosion as result of global warming. Kurchatova suggests that global warming may have caused an ‘alarming’ melt in the under-soil ice and released gas, causing an effect like the popping of a champagne bottle cork. ‘The version about melting permafrost due to climate change, causing a release of methane gas, which then forces an eruption is the current favorite, though scientists are reluctant to offer a firm conclusion without more study.’
Scientists with the Russian Academy of Sciences Institute of the Earth Cryosphere, which is leading the investigation, suggested that the holes formed when melting permafrost triggered an explosion of methane gas. That theory was bolstered when an icy lake was found at the bottom of the hole. Andrei Plekhanov from Scientific Research Center of the Arctic said the crater appears to be made up of 80 percent ice, which adds to the theory that it was caused by the effects of global warming.
Dr. Plekhanov said: “I’ve never seen anything like this, even though I have been to Yamal many times.”
WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON HERE?
Actually, these craters are not mysterious at all—there are hundreds of them all over the Yamal Peninsula and their origin has been well known for many years.
Figure 2. Craters of the Yamal Peninsula. The ice cores have completely melted out, leaving lakes. The surrounding ridges are still visible. (Google Earth)
As you can see from the images in Figure 2, there are hundreds of these craters, mostly not as fresh as the recent ones, but showing the same features—a depression surrounded by a ring of raised ground. These are pingos!!
Pingo is an Inuit term for an isolated, dome shaped hill, used to describe large ice-cored mounds found in the permafrost regions of Siberia and various other places in the Arctic. Pingos range in height from a few meters to more than 40 m (130 ft) and from a few meters to 1,000 m (3,300 ft) in diameter. Small pingos typically have rounded tops, but larger ones are commonly broken open at the top where melting of the ice core forms a crater resembling a volcanic cone Where they occur in stratified silt or sand, the beds commonly dip outward from the center, much like those adjacent to an intrusive body. The ice in the core of a pingo is typically massive and of segregation/injection origin. Tension fractures are common at the summit of the mound, but expansion of pingo ice is rare and short-lived. Ice up to 7 m (23 ft) thick has been found in pingos of Sweden. As the ice core melts, a small freshwater lake may occupy the summit crater that forms.
Open system pingos
Open system pingos form where groundwater under artesian pressure beneath thin permafrost forces its way upward and freezes as it approaches the surface where it forms an ice core that heaves the surface upward. Although the initial growth of these types of pingos may occur where ice lenses lie above the water table, their continued growth requires a particular combination of hydrostatic pressure and soil permeability. Thin, discontinuous permafrost and artesian water pressure play important roles in the development of open system pingos. The role of artesian pressure is not to force the overlying sediments upwards but rather to provide a slow, regular supply of groundwater to the growing ice core.
Most open-system pingos are oval or oblong in shape and typically occur as isolated mounds or in small groups developed in either soil or bedrock. Rupturing near their top is common. Concentrations of open-system pingos occur in Siberia, the northern interior of the Yukon, Alaska, Spitsbergen, and Norway.
Closed system pingos
When a lake in a permafrost environment is progressively drained and covered by encroachment of vegetation from the margins, the permafrost table progressively rises to the level of the former lake floor. The rising permafrost table expels pore water ahead of the freezing front, and when the pore water pressure exceeds the overburden strength, upward heaving of the frozen ground occurs as the ice core progressively grows. The size and shape of the resulting pingo typically reflects that of the original body of water.
Closed system pingos vary in height from a few meters to over 60 m (~200 ft) and up to 300 m (~1000 ft) in diameter, ranging from symmetrical conical domes to asymmetric and elongate hills. The top of the pingos are commonly ruptured to form small, star like craters that eventually form shallow-rimmed depressions as the ice core melts.
The mechanism of pingo formation in a closed system starts with a deep, ice-covered lake, surrounded by permafrost. The lake inhibits the development of permafrost beneath it, and the ground remains unfrozen. As the lake is slowly drains or is filled with sediment, at some point the lake ice freezes to the bottom, and the bottom sediments begin to freeze. As the layer of ice and permafrost covers former lake floor, a closed system is set up in the still-unfrozen ground beneath because the permafrost cap prevents the escape of groundwater. As permafrost continues inward growth around the unfrozen core, water pressure increases. Pore water is expelled from the unfrozen sediment by the advancing permafrost, and to relieve the pressure, the surface bulges upward. Eventually, all of the water in the enclosed system groundwater mass becomes frozen and the excess water forms a core of clear ice under the bulge.
Growth rate of pingos:
The birth and growth of a small pingo studied by Mackay (1988) is representative of more than 2,000 closed system pingos of the western Canadian Arctic and Alaska. The pingo appeared on the former floor of a lake that drained suddenly about 1900. Small frost mounds began appearing between 1920 and 1930. The pingo grew steadily until 1976, but the growth rate decreased after that. Mackay also monitored the growth of other small pingos in a lake in the Mackenzie Delta region that drained between 1935 and 1950. The pingos grew rapidly in the initial years, commonly 1.5 m/year (5 ft/yr), then decreased. Mackay suggests that about 15 new pingos per century appear in the Mackenzie Delta region, and only about 50 seem to be actively growing. Similar conclusions have been reached by Russian investigators in Siberia.
ossqss says: August 1, 2014 at 5:08 am
Sandworms!
GOOD Point!! Will have to review one of my all time favorite cult monster movies: “Tremors”. Perhaps “graboids” made the holes.
Ha! In Russia it is the craters that make the global warming!
I thought Global warming WAS the end times 🙂
I wonder how many holes it takes to fill the Albert Hall?
I take from this that pingo formation requires a lot of freezing. Add a new talent to the miracle molecule CO2 – global warming increases pressure from freezing ground water and shazam you have a pingo.
There’s a dog like animal indigenous to Australia. I may not get all these facts right but, similar to the typical climate scientist, I don’t really care. And, for a simple comment I’m not going to research it. I’m lazy. Anyway, these dog like animals are bred with genuine dogs so as to impart certain desirable (depending on one’s point of view) characteristics into them. One of the dog breeds thus produced is called the Australian Blue Healer. Thus, we can conclude from these breeding efforts that this indigenous Australian dog like animal is increasing in numbers and range due to the activities of man. The Earth is claimed to be warming due to the activities of man. Thus these two phenomenons must be related.
What is the name of this indigenous Australian dog like animal that must be increasing in range and numbers in lockstep with global warming? Well, by golly, it’s called a Dingo!
Now, I know, just like with the pingo phenomenon, that anybody with any familiarity whatsoever with either of them really knows that any relationship with either the dingo or the pingo to global warming is no more likely than a relationship of intelligence to stupidity.
But, the dingo and the pingo have an excellent relationship to rhyming. They, therefore give us the ability to write a poem. One can write a jingle about a dingo and a pingo. See how easy it is?
Jim Clarke says:
“If the round lakes of Yamal are often hundreds of feet deep, then I will consider the case closed, but if they are not, then something else seems to be going on with this one. Any one have any information on the typical depths of pingo lakes or water tables in Yamal?”
The depth of pingo lakes really doesn’t tell you that much. More to the point is the morphology–take a close look at the Yamal pingos on Google Earth or Microsoft’s World Wide Telescope and you will see that virtually all of the lakes have a rim around the periphery. Compare these to the fresh ones (which are classic pingos) that show the classic encircling ridge of uplifted material. The older ones, where the ice core has melted out, still show this rim, but they have less relief because the underlying ice has melted. There are hundreds of these of various ages in Yamal so you can easily see the transformation of the crisp new ones to the older rimmed lakes.
You’re all wrong. Those holes were made by . . . .
THE MOLE PEOPLE!
Open system pingos form where groundwater under artesian pressure beneath thin permafrost forces its way upward and freezes as it approaches the surface where it forms an ice core that heaves the surface upward.
Could the small pond (see 1st picture Upper Rght) have supplied the water. From the extensive photo listing in the 1st posting on this, it looked like a shallow rock crust around 8′ deep. Could it be that water from the pond got under the frost depth and following the slope of the hill drained and refilled, then winter freezing popped the hole?
Also from the erosion on the inside face of the dirt mound around the hole, I think this happened years ago.
It’s unprecedented.
“Don Easterbrook says:
August 1, 2014 at 6:30 am
What does Nature use for peer review these days–any competent geologist could have told them how these craters form. ”
When dealing geological phenomena, they are obviously using climate experts in the review process…using geological experts is so 20th century.
They are obviously ‘Graboid’ holes.With all this Glow-bull warming they grow huge.
Andy Revkin covered this a few days ago at Dot Earth at the NY Times.:
http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/07/25/fresh-focus-on-siberian-permafrost-as-second-hole-is-reported/
The post includes a fifteen minute YouTube interview with Marina Leibman, a top Russian permafrost expert who had just returned from examining the unusual crater spotted on the Yamal Peninsula in Siberia late last week.
Science reporting at its best — talking to a real expert who has first-hand, contemporary data — someone who went there, investigated that, and tells us what she found.
Ebeni says:
August 1, 2014 at 8:24 am
———————————
Try the book/movie “Dune”
It is amazing what one can find on the internet nowadays 😉
Here is a classic example, whodathunkit, dunepedia? LOL!
http://dunepedia.wikifoundry-mobile.com/m/page/Sandworm
OT, but when do we get Mr Keating’s part 3?
If you like your hysteria dialled up to 11, check out the Climate Progress piece on this. This stuff is apparently “existentially daunting”:
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/08/01/3466466/siberian-craters-permafrost-climate-change/
So Kip Hansen please share with us and tell us what she found, if you can.
Let’s not toss the baby out with the bath water. To be fair, as pingos go, these are somewhat odd. The rim of the only example I’ve seen a photograph of is composed very rough clumps of soil that suggests a fairly abrupt origin, but there is no sign of “thrown” earth meaning the action was not as energetic as an explosion. So, a displacement action with a time scale probably more in line with heavy equipment moving earth say, than an explosion, but not as slow as many pingos form where the rim tends to be smoothed from seasonal snow melt, which erodes the soil, filling in pockets and evening the surface to a hill-like, rounded appearance. Probably formation time could be measured in minutes to days rather than months to years like a normal pingo, or seconds like an explosion.
Also, unlike many of the neighboring features, the ice isn’t there, nor is there an obvious pool or lake. So, where is the water? There doesn’t seem to be any reason to invoke non-measurable global warming. It is far more likely that the detailed formation processes and variations in the formation of pingos simply isn’t as well understood as we would prefer. The “new equals AGW” thinking is silly, faddist thinking.
So, here’s a thought. Could there be masses of methane ice or more likely clathrates under Yamal that also cause pingo formation?
http://earth-pages.co.uk/tag/clathrate-bomb/
The use of “bomb” is just journalistic sensationalism.
In Alaska we called those “Road Blisters”; the permafrost would melt below a dirt road and then erupt; typically about two feet high and twenty feet in diameter.
This article describes how you can grow your own pingo with a home freezer and a washbasin filled with sand and some rubber. Starting on page 15.
https://nwtresearch.com/sites/default/files/geological-features-of-the-mackenzie-delta-region.pdf
Their “working hypothesis” is seriously that soil methane is spontaneously combusting? Have they ruled out crab people?
From DotEarth interview
It looks pretty dark inside.
Could it be a black hole?
I take it that more than one of all AWG-belivers never ever studied Geology nor have a clue of facts (instead of their fictions) regarding our world…. bad case
@jim Clarke 7:21am
If the Yamal hole is an open system pingo created with artesian water pressure, where did the water go? Why is it not filled, at least partially, with water? Is the water table of this area typically hundreds of feet below the surface?
The appearance of more open hole Pingos in the area I think adds credence to a hypothesis that the development of the super-giant Bovanenkovo gas field within 30 km has lowered the water table in the area of these pingos. This is a Gazprom project: Where have they been getting fresh water for their operations. How much of it?
What is unusual here is the rapid lowering of a water table in what used to be an artesian system. Water tables drop because more water is leaves the system than enters. Either some downslope pingos are springing huge amounts of water, or there are some human operations pumping water out of it. Given the development of a colossal gas field near by, I’d look at human operations.
Either way, it seems a given than many more pingo-holes are going to appear.