Newly Discovered Siberian Craters Signify End Times (or Maybe Just Global Warming); Mystery of the Siberian crater deepens: Scientists left baffled after two NEW holes appear in Russia's icy wilderness

clip_image002Guest essay by Don Easterbrook

A crater in northern Siberia, spotted by a passing helicopter, has received worldwide attention and continues to be a top news story. Since then, two more mysterious holes have been discovered elsewhere in the region. Now the new holes, smaller in diameter but similar in shape – are posing a fresh challenge for Russian scientists, according to the The Siberian Times. Theories range from meteorites to an explosion of methane due to global warming.

clip_image004

Figure 1. Yamal ‘mystery crater.’ (Siberian Times)

Anna Kurchatova of the Sub-Arctic Scientific Research Centre said the crater was formed by a mixture of water, salt, and gas igniting an underground explosion as result of global warming. Kurchatova suggests that global warming may have caused an ‘alarming’ melt in the under-soil ice and released gas, causing an effect like the popping of a champagne bottle cork. ‘The version about melting permafrost due to climate change, causing a release of methane gas, which then forces an eruption is the current favorite, though scientists are reluctant to offer a firm conclusion without more study.’

Scientists with the Russian Academy of Sciences Institute of the Earth Cryosphere, which is leading the investigation, suggested that the holes formed when melting permafrost triggered an explosion of methane gas. That theory was bolstered when an icy lake was found at the bottom of the hole. Andrei Plekhanov from Scientific Research Center of the Arctic said the crater appears to be made up of 80 percent ice, which adds to the theory that it was caused by the effects of global warming.

Dr. Plekhanov said: “I’ve never seen anything like this, even though I have been to Yamal many times.”

WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON HERE?

Actually, these craters are not mysterious at all—there are hundreds of them all over the Yamal Peninsula and their origin has been well known for many years.

clip_image006 clip_image008

clip_image010 clip_image012

Figure 2. Craters of the Yamal Peninsula. The ice cores have completely melted out, leaving lakes. The surrounding ridges are still visible. (Google Earth)

As you can see from the images in Figure 2, there are hundreds of these craters, mostly not as fresh as the recent ones, but showing the same features—a depression surrounded by a ring of raised ground. These are pingos!!

Pingo is an Inuit term for an isolated, dome shaped hill, used to describe large ice-cored mounds found in the permafrost regions of Siberia and various other places in the Arctic. Pingos range in height from a few meters to more than 40 m (130 ft) and from a few meters to 1,000 m (3,300 ft) in diameter. Small pingos typically have rounded tops, but larger ones are commonly broken open at the top where melting of the ice core forms a crater resembling a volcanic cone Where they occur in stratified silt or sand, the beds commonly dip outward from the center, much like those adjacent to an intrusive body. The ice in the core of a pingo is typically massive and of segregation/injection origin. Tension fractures are common at the summit of the mound, but expansion of pingo ice is rare and short-lived. Ice up to 7 m (23 ft) thick has been found in pingos of Sweden. As the ice core melts, a small freshwater lake may occupy the summit crater that forms.

Open system pingos

Open system pingos form where groundwater under artesian pressure beneath thin permafrost forces its way upward and freezes as it approaches the surface where it forms an ice core that heaves the surface upward. Although the initial growth of these types of pingos may occur where ice lenses lie above the water table, their continued growth requires a particular combination of hydrostatic pressure and soil permeability. Thin, discontinuous permafrost and artesian water pressure play important roles in the development of open system pingos. The role of artesian pressure is not to force the overlying sediments upwards but rather to provide a slow, regular supply of groundwater to the growing ice core.

Most open-system pingos are oval or oblong in shape and typically occur as isolated mounds or in small groups developed in either soil or bedrock. Rupturing near their top is common. Concentrations of open-system pingos occur in Siberia, the northern interior of the Yukon, Alaska, Spitsbergen, and Norway.

Closed system pingos

When a lake in a permafrost environment is progressively drained and covered by encroachment of vegetation from the margins, the permafrost table progressively rises to the level of the former lake floor. The rising permafrost table expels pore water ahead of the freezing front, and when the pore water pressure exceeds the overburden strength, upward heaving of the frozen ground occurs as the ice core progressively grows. The size and shape of the resulting pingo typically reflects that of the original body of water.

Closed system pingos vary in height from a few meters to over 60 m (~200 ft) and up to 300 m (~1000 ft) in diameter, ranging from symmetrical conical domes to asymmetric and elongate hills. The top of the pingos are commonly ruptured to form small, star like craters that eventually form shallow-rimmed depressions as the ice core melts.

The mechanism of pingo formation in a closed system starts with a deep, ice-covered lake, surrounded by permafrost. The lake inhibits the development of permafrost beneath it, and the ground remains unfrozen. As the lake is slowly drains or is filled with sediment, at some point the lake ice freezes to the bottom, and the bottom sediments begin to freeze. As the layer of ice and permafrost covers former lake floor, a closed system is set up in the still-unfrozen ground beneath because the permafrost cap prevents the escape of groundwater. As permafrost continues inward growth around the unfrozen core, water pressure increases. Pore water is expelled from the unfrozen sediment by the advancing permafrost, and to relieve the pressure, the surface bulges upward. Eventually, all of the water in the enclosed system groundwater mass becomes frozen and the excess water forms a core of clear ice under the bulge.

Growth rate of pingos:

The birth and growth of a small pingo studied by Mackay (1988) is representative of more than 2,000 closed system pingos of the western Canadian Arctic and Alaska. The pingo appeared on the former floor of a lake that drained suddenly about 1900. Small frost mounds began appearing between 1920 and 1930. The pingo grew steadily until 1976, but the growth rate decreased after that. Mackay also monitored the growth of other small pingos in a lake in the Mackenzie Delta region that drained between 1935 and 1950. The pingos grew rapidly in the initial years, commonly 1.5 m/year (5 ft/yr), then decreased. Mackay suggests that about 15 new pingos per century appear in the Mackenzie Delta region, and only about 50 seem to be actively growing. Similar conclusions have been reached by Russian investigators in Siberia.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
152 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Unmentionable
August 1, 2014 5:51 am

Just wait until the hordes of ebola infested zombies start pouring out of them … it’s the end I tell you … snigger and jeer all you want … it won’t matter … they’re coming ang no one can stop it now!
OK … maybe that was a touch pessimistic … it could be a prosaic natural phenomena after all … but don’t act like you weren’t thinking the worst sort of B-Grade the day after scenarios too.

Chris B
August 1, 2014 5:52 am

Old news. The National Enquirer reported it years ago.

kenw
August 1, 2014 5:52 am

Tim says:
August 1, 2014 at 5:30 am
Whatever happened to good old ‘Subsidence’?
[Subsidence] is where the land goes DOWN. This would be reverse-subsidence. to coin a term. or Earth-zit.

Gary
August 1, 2014 5:53 am

Similar structures were left scattered over the northeast US after the deglaciation 10,000 years ago. We call them kettle hole ponds.

kenw
August 1, 2014 5:53 am

^”Subsidence”

Gin@joltmail.net
August 1, 2014 5:58 am

http://www.le.ac.uk/gl/ads/SiberianTraps/Introduction.html
[Please explain (1) what is in your numerous links, and (2) why some one should blindly click on the links you provide. .mod]

Gin@joltmail.net
August 1, 2014 6:07 am
Gin@joltmail.net
August 1, 2014 6:10 am
Dr. William Crafton
August 1, 2014 6:12 am

Alien “honey pots”, We will have to put up signs to tell them to cover after they are finished.

beng
August 1, 2014 6:16 am

Don, you seem to know more about this than the Russian “scientists”.

JimS
August 1, 2014 6:22 am

Russians invented the pingo first, just so you know.

GregK
August 1, 2014 6:24 am

Prefer Spingo ,though after a few you feel like you are in a pingo
http://www.spingoales.com

ConTrari
August 1, 2014 6:28 am

Yamal? That’s where the Tree of Global Warming grows, right? On Hockey Stick Hill?

Nylo
August 1, 2014 6:29 am

Look for the Silver Surfer, convince him to go against his master, and problem solved…

Don Easterbrook
August 1, 2014 6:30 am

Bill Illis says:
“Even Nature magazine bandwagoned this yesterday. Talk about about a major scientific journal losing any sense of being scientific.”
http://www.nature.com/news/mysterious-siberian-crater-attributed-to-methane-1.15649
Thanks for calling this to our attention, Bill–I hadn’t seen it yet. Siberian pingos have been known for many decades and a large literature on their formation exists. What does Nature use for peer review these days–any competent geologist could have told them how these craters form. Methane in the crater doesn’t mean anything–most all permafrost is full of it.

michael hart
August 1, 2014 6:52 am

It looks a bit like where the soup-dragon lives, to me.

August 1, 2014 6:54 am

The climate’s been shot again. Round up all the usual suspects…again.

Jimbo
August 1, 2014 6:59 am

Pingo mentioned (not in abstract) from 1942. Google Scholar search snippet.

Ground-ice mounds in tundra
RP Sharp – Geographical Review, 1942 – JSTOR
… which freezes in the opening so formed. Porsild’s4 second type of mound or “pingo”
is larger than the Wolf Creek features but closely analogous in other respects,
including mode of origin. Peat knobs in swamps and bogs and …
http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/210383?uid=2&uid=4&sid=21104025227881

August 1, 2014 7:07 am

“Scientists left baffled after two NEW holes appear in Russia’s icy wilderness”
Obviously far too much time spent reading instead of looking. In other words they should get out more often!

Jim Clarke
August 1, 2014 7:21 am

“Andrei Plekhanov from Scientific Research Center of the Arctic said the crater appears to be made up of 80 percent ice, which adds to the theory that it was caused by the effects of global warming.”
Aside from being a non sequitur (something made of ice is caused be warming?), this statement reminds me of the old joke about how much dirt is in a hole that measures 3 feet wide, 4 feet long and 5 feet deep? Answer: None…its a hole!
So what does it mean when a scientist says that the crater is made up of 80% ice? Does he mean the the crater is in a slab of ice that is hundreds of feet thick, or is the crater in the ground and 80% of the walls are covered with ice? I have no idea!
I very much appreciate Don Easterbrook’s article on pingos, and agree that it is the best explanation so far, but I still have some questions, mainly because this Yamal hole is so deep! Are pingo lakes typically this deep? From the descriptions given, most of them are relatively shallow. If the Yamal hole is an open system pingo created with artesian water pressure, where did the water go? Why is it not filled, at least partially, with water? Is the water table of this area typically hundreds of feet below the surface?
If the round lakes of Yamal are often hundreds of feet deep, then I will consider the case closed, but if they are not, then something else seems to be going on with this one. Any one have any information on the typical depths of pingo lakes or water tables in Yamal?

Dreadnought
August 1, 2014 7:21 am

If they estimated the age of a large number of these so-called pingo features they would be able to determine whether there is a trend of increasing frequency of their appearance in response to the regional warming they’re bashing on about (obviously, it can’t be attributed to global warming because we haven’t had any for nearly 18 years).
Throwing their hands up in the air and saying that they’re “baffled” and “they’ve never seen anything like it before” seems a bit.., ahem, puzzling, to say the least. I mean, if these pingo’s are all over the place then that is a bit like a skiing instructor being surprised at seeing a mogul “for the first time”. There’s something fishy going on here…

mpainter
August 1, 2014 7:35 am

The most obvious explanation for Plekhanov’s obtuseness is that Russian scientists are on the grab too and that those who control the purse there are the same as elsewhere- none too well informed about the subject. In other words, Plekhanov is putting one over.

MikeN
August 1, 2014 7:42 am

Perhaps Russia buried missiles there?

Taphonomic
August 1, 2014 7:49 am

Gary says:
August 1, 2014 at 5:53 am
“Similar structures were left scattered over the northeast US after the deglaciation 10,000 years ago. We call them kettle hole ponds.”
Kettles form by a different process. As you note it’s a deglaciation process. A block of ice breaks off the retreating glacier and the sediment washing out from the melting glacier fills in around the block. When the block melts, you have a kettle lake.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kettle_(landform)
So they are actually from Holocene global warming/climate change. Any day now a climate scientist will find one and call it “unprecedented” and claim “never seen anything like it”. These guys need to get out more.

FrankK
August 1, 2014 8:14 am

When describing artesian pressure then the term ‘potentiometric surface’ is a more apt description than ‘water table’.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potentiometric_surface