Uncertainty in the dirt: another climate feedback loop

From the Carnegie Institution  Climate change and the soil

Climate warming may not drive net losses of soil carbon from tropical forests

Washington, DC — The planet’s soil releases about 60 billion tons of carbon into the atmosphere each year, which is far more than that released by burning fossil fuels. This happens through a process called soil respiration. This enormous release of carbon is balanced by carbon coming into the soil system from falling leaves and other plant matter, as well as by the underground activities of plant roots.

Short-term warming studies have documented that rising temperatures increase the rate of soil respiration. As a result, scientists have worried that global warming would accelerate the decomposition of carbon in the soil, and decrease the amount of carbon stored there. If true, this would release even more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, where it would accelerate global warming.

New work by a team of scientists including Carnegie’s Greg Asner and Christian Giardina of the U.S. Forest Service used an expansive whole-ecosystem study, the first of its kind, on tropical montane wet forests in Hawaii to sort through the many processes that control soil carbon stocks with changing temperature. Their work is published in Nature Climate Change.

The team revealed that higher temperatures increased the amount of leaf litter falling onto the soil, as well as other underground sources of carbon such as roots. Surprisingly, long-term warming had little effect on the overall storage of carbon in the tropical forest soil or the rate at which that carbon is processed into carbon dioxide.

“If these findings hold true in other tropical regions, then warmer temperatures may not necessarily cause tropical soils to release their carbon to the atmosphere at a faster rate,” remarked Asner. “On the other hand, we cannot expect that the soil will soak up more carbon in places where vegetation is stimulated by warmer temperatures. Unlike tropical trees, the soil seems to be on the sidelines in the climate adaptation game.”

This means the observed increase in the rate of soil respiration accompanying rising temperatures is due to carbon dioxide released by the an uptick in the amount of litter falling on the forest floor and an increase in carbon from underground sources. It is not from a decrease in the overall amount of carbon stored in the soil.

Giardina noted “While we found that carbon stored in the mineral soil was insensitive to long-term warming, the loss of unprotected carbon responded strongly to temperature. This tells us that the sensitivity of each source of soil respiration needs to be quantified, and the aggregate response examined, before an understanding of ecosystem carbon balance in a warmer world can be achieved.”

###

This work was funded by the National Science Foundation, the College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources at the University of Hawaii at Manoa, the USDA Forest Service, and the Carnegie Institution for Science.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
55 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Janice Moore
July 26, 2014 11:15 am

Ferdinand E.
P.S. Should I take your silence on Tommy Emmanuel (and “Classical Gas” — posted by me at 8:44pm yesterday) as a polite way of DISAGREEING??!! Rats. I thought for SURE we could agree about that fine artist and beautiful music… . Oh, well.
Hm.
An-tho-ny Watts is fine fellow! We can AGREE about THAT, no?
(chuckling)
Janice

July 27, 2014 9:58 am

Janice Moore says:
July 26, 2014 at 11:15 am
Sorry Janice, while I can appreciate the skill of Tommy Emmanuel, I have a more classical taste for music: Beethoven, Berlioz, Tchaikovsky,…
But indeed I do admire the enormous amount of work by Anthony and co-moderators, so we do agree on that…

Jerry Henson
Reply to  Ferdinand Engelbeen
July 29, 2014 9:47 am

CO2 Lag: The Carbon Cycle
Carbon is neither created nor destroyed excepting a small amount in nuclear reactions.
The oceans remove CO2 from the atmosphere and at great depth deposit it on the ocean floor. The colder the water the more CO2 the oceans can absorb.
For carbon to return to the atmosphere the carbonaceous layers must be recycled. At great depth the layers are forced down by the layering process, tectonic plate and convection action, and are then converted in a chemical reaction to hydrocarbons, mostly methane. These hydrocarbons make their way back to the surface. As the hydrocarbon molecules rise toward the earth’s surface, depending upon the permeability of the rock layers they hit, and the size of the molecule, they are trapped beneath impermeable layers as in the Saudi Arabian oil fields or they rise through the porous layers as those in Kansas, in the form of natural gas.
In the Kansas soil, in the presence of adequate oxygen, water, and heat, most of the natural gas is oxidized by aerobic methanatropes, enriching the soil and putting CO2 back into the atmosphere.
The portion of natural gas, not oxidized because it is too cold or too wet, mostly methane passes into the atmosphere and after a suitable time is oxidized to CO2.
Heating of the earth’s land surface and oceans facilitates the exposure and rise of hydrocarbons and reduces the oceans ability to absorb CO2, causing the buildup of CO2 in the atmosphere and the lag of CO2 levels behind temperature increase.
When the earth’s land surface and oceans cool, the rise of hydrocarbons to the surface slows and the cool oceans absorb more CO2 reducing atmospheric levels.

Janice Moore
July 27, 2014 10:29 am

I, too, also love classical music…. Bach… Beethoven…. Tchaikovsky… Chopin… and for this lovely music, Pachelbel:
“Canon” — London Symphony Orchestra.

(… rock ROCKS! …. and jazz is FUN! …. and folk is sweet and lovely…. and some bel canto is so beautiful….)
And 3 cheers for An-thon-y!
Happy Sunday, Ferdinand!
Janice
#(:))