From Frontiers
A team of researchers in the U.S. and Germany has measured the highest level of ultraviolet radiation ever recorded on the Earth’s surface. The extraordinary UV fluxes, observed in the Bolivian Andes only 1,500 miles from the equator, are far above those normally considered to be harmful to both terrestrial and aquatic life. The results are being published in the open-access journal Frontiers in Environmental Science.
“These record-setting levels were not measured in Antarctica, where ozone holes have been a recurring problem for decades,” says team leader Nathalie A. Cabrol of the SETI Institute and NASA Ames Research Center. “This is in the tropics, in an area where there are small towns and villages.”
The measurements were made in the southern hemisphere summer of 2003 and 2004, using instruments developed for the European Light Dosimeter Network (Eldonet). They were undertaken as Cabrol’s team was investigating high altitude Andean lakes as part of an astrobiology study of Mars-like environments. Dosimeters were deployed on the summit of the towering Licancabur volcano (altitude: 5,917 meters) and at nearby Laguna Blanca (altitude 4,340 meters). The combination of a midday sun near the zenith, as well as the high elevation of these sites, produces higher irradiance levels because of naturally low ozone in such locations. But these intensities of short-wavelength UV-B radiation (280 – 315 nm) are unprecedented.
“A UV index of 11 is considered extreme, and has reached up to 26 in nearby locations in recent years,” notes Cabrol. “But on December 29, 2003, we measured an index of 43. If you’re at a beach in the U.S., you might experience an index of 8 or 9 during the summer, intense enough to warrant protection. You simply do not want to be outside when the index reaches 30 or 40.”
The intense radiation coincided with other circumstances that may have increased the UV flux, including ozone depletion by increased aerosols from both seasonal storms and fires in the area. In addition, a large solar flare occurred just two weeks before the highest UV fluxes were registered. Ultraviolet spikes continued to occur – albeit at lower intensity – throughout the period of solar instability, and stopped thereafter. While the evidence linking the solar event to the record-breaking radiation is only circumstantial, particles from such flares are known to affect atmospheric chemistry and may have increased ozone depletion.
“While these events are not directly tied to climate change, they are sentinels of what could occur if ozone thins globally,” Cabrol says. “The thinner and more unstable the ozone, the more prone we will be to this kind of event.”
High UV-B exposure negatively affects the entire biosphere, not just humans. It damages DNA, affects photosynthesis, and decreases the viability of eggs and larvae. For these reasons, it is important to keep a close watch on UV flux levels.
“While this unsettling record might be the result of a ‘perfect storm’ of events, it could happen again,” says Cabrol, “because the factors that caused it are not rare. What we need is more monitoring of the ozone changes in these areas. These fluxes, which are comparable to those of early Mars, are occurring in a populated area.”
David Black, president and CEO of the SETI Institute, notes that “this is an excellent example of how astrobiology – which includes understanding the atmospheres of other planets – is germane to contemporary concerns here on Earth.”
Note to editors
Article title: Record Solar UV Irradiance in the Tropical Andes
DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2014.00019
Journal: Frontiers in Environmental Science
For a copy of the embargoed paper, please contact Gozde Zorlu: press@frontiersin.org
For online articles, please link to the paper which will become freely available at the following: http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fenvs.2014.00019/abstract
Willis writes “First off, the time scale for the ozone data only goes up to January 18th, while the UVB/UVA ratio has the same start date, but it goes all the way to November 4th.”
You can see a doted line in the “A” graph which is expanded in the “B” graph hence the difference in dates. The “B” graph is meant to be only a part of the “A” graph. Having said that, there are obvious problems with the scales…what date is “21/19” ?
lol
Guys, you are asuming that Brazil defeated Germany 3-2, but you are forgetting that the homogeneization procedure used works with past and also future games played in the surrounding 1500km, Which means that, although today we think that yesterday Brazil won 3-2, it is entirely possible that tomorrow we will realise that Germany actually suffered a much more ominous defeat, with Brazil winning 5-0.
http://www.aemet.es/es/eltiempo/observacion/radiacion/ultravioleta?datos=mapa
http://www.aemet.es/es/eltiempo/observacion/radiacion/ultravioleta?l=izana
http://www.aemet.es/es/eltiempo/observacion/radiacion/ultravioleta?l=izana&f=anual
Of all the animals man is the only one to go voluntary sunbathing on the worst moment of the day.
Hmmm…
Well, at least they didn’t derive their results from a computer game!
This happened during the latter part of a north pole Sudden Stratospheric Warming:
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/stratosphere/temperature/archive/02mb9065_2004.gif
which accompanies strong cooling in the tropical stratosphere, and you can see a brief temperature spike in there late Dec 2003:
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/stratosphere/temperature/archive/02mb2525_2004.gif
Obviously we need to ban CFCs.
John F. Hultquist says:
July 8, 2014 at 7:02 pm
I’m curious about the biosphere, photosynthesis, viability of eggs and larvae, and the people in the nearby villages –
—–
That high up, there’s not a lot in the way of biology to begin with.
The most dangerous reactors in the solar system is the one running all those solar panels…
“These record-setting levels were not measured in Antarctica, where ozone holes have been a recurring problem for decades,” says team leader Nathalie A. Cabrol of the SETI Institute and NASA Ames Research Center.
You guys obviously missed the link… a SETI researcher involved in this “research”? Obviously the reason for high UV levels has something to do with undocumented extraterrestrials (can’t call them aliens anymore)
““While these events are not directly tied to climate change, …”
This has a famous-last-words sound. Maybe solar phenomena ARE causes of GW and GC. Solar is definitely on stage the last number of years being vigorously debated. I guess the CAGW type of argument in the post CO2 era of climate science: “if it ain’t CO2, then what is it? is what is manifesting itself. The same things have been said about both: they are too small in effect. If we rule it out, what’s left? I know this is not acceptable in logic as a proof, but maybe it’s time to make a list of what it could be. I don’t think it can be a long list.
I agree with an engineer (forgotten who) who commented on the Dave Evans article, that there can be no question the heater is the sun and everything we do should be to examine all interactions that repel, convert, delay, store, release the incident energy we get. Having blacked out everything but CO2, mainstreamers seem to be having a hard time coming back to main act.
Who cares what the actual score was, the models predicted a Brazil win, and so, let it be done. The IPCC (Institute of Prevaricators Cause we Can) has issued a decree based on sound reanalysis of past games which have been adjusted to make up for known biases giving Brazil a 2.5 degree victory
ROM says:
“They actually went there into some darn inhospitable country and way up into the mountains at the end of the world”
Maybe they only just got back and that’s why the news is 10 years old.
Why fuss about the math and errors in dates on graphs for a study about an outlier event that took place [if the data is valid] TEN YEARS AGO?
Ulric Lyons says:
This happened during the latter part of a north pole Sudden Stratospheric Warming:
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/stratosphere/temperature/archive/02mb9065_2004.gif
which accompanies strong cooling in the tropical stratosphere, and you can see a brief temperature spike in there late Dec 2003:
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/stratosphere/temperature/archive/02mb2525_2004.gif
“A UV index of 11 is considered extreme, and has reached up to 26 in nearby locations in recent years,” notes Cabrol. “But on December 29, 2003, we measured an index of 43.”
Let’s see what happened in the stratosphere over the equator in December 2003.
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/stratosphere/strat-trop/gif_files/time_pres_TEMP_ANOM_ALL_EQ_2003.gif
“A UV index of 11 is considered extreme, and has reached up to 26 in nearby locations in recent years,” notes Cabrol. “But on December 29, 2003, we measured an index of 43.”
http://oi60.tinypic.com/8w0aid.jpg
http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/SolarCycle/Ap.gif
The take home message for AGW scientists: old data ambulance chasing (trolling old data for things that can be written up in new AGW research articles) results in more research funds. Bleeding it by tying it to human-induced catastrophic cancer causing look-what-could-happen climate affects puts it on the media lead headline.
They must be running out of new data to have to turn around and re-examine old data for anything that could be connected to AGW. This piece is so obviously a laughable example of that tactic it could serve as a late night joke monologue!
What attracted them to this particular spot in the first place. I guess it is the most social_ist place on the continent for one thing. Anyway, are they contending that only this spot is being radiated with UVB to such an extent? How do they know it’s unprecedented? What took so long to get the paper out? There are a lot of questions I would want answered before taking interest in the science.
“Greg from L.A. says:
July 8, 2014 at 9:39 pm
…Their dark skin pigmentation protects them from both UVA and UVB better than folks living in low UV flux environments….”
Better enough to neutralize the UV levels recorded? And what protects their eyeballs and retinas?
Judging by most of the comments sampled, those lacking in skin pigment feel confident that sneering will protect them and theirs. Better keep the kids indoors though, sneering takes time to master.
Once more this layman is lost. I read UV from the sun creates ozone. Ozone has a half life of around 30 minutes. So more UV is good surely!
i love the snark and snide comments on the thread.
So the ‘hole in the ozone layer’ is not unique?
JJ says:
July 8, 2014 at 9:31 pm
============================
ROTFL!…….made my day!
@ur momisugly Nylo et. al.
It was quietly published that, though it has been reported in the past that Germany and Brazil won the world cup, due to recalibration we are reinstating Italy (the 1938 champion) as the actual winner.
A “stop the press” story, that took 10 years to get out!
Could the Earth’s weakening magnetic field have anything to do with it?
http://news.yahoo.com/earths-magnetic-field-weakening-10-times-faster-now-121247349.html;_ylt=A0LEVxW_cr1TQnUAwbRXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTExNjdtbnJtBHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMgRjb2xvA2JmMQR2dGlkA1VJQzFfMQ–
Am I misreading this or what? This entire “research” being released is based on data that is 11 years old? And on data that was accumulated only for 2 years? Is there any purpose in this? But on an unrelated/related aspect, on July 5th, 2014, I went out in my back yard and decided that it was time to get a little sun tan time in. It was 2 pm, actually, and I put out the lounger, and placed my not exactly pasty body down to draw a little color from the Sun. I lay on my back for 10 minutes, rolled over and laid on my stomach for 12, and rolled back over on my back – bad shoulder doesn’t like to stay in the same position too long. As I lay back on my back I couldn’t help but notice that my chest and stomach were a light pink – a very big surprise since I usually am out for a couple of hours at this time before I start to catch a burn. After 10 more minutes I got up and went under cover as I was turning red. Phoenix, AZ isn’t exactly “high altitude” and I am totally mystified as to why I literally caught a sun burn on reasonably tanned skin in 20 minutes at 2 in the afternoon. Has anyone been measuring the UV levels of the current solar output?