Obama invokes 'tauntology' in discussing climate skeptics

Dave says:
June 15, 2014 at 6:00 am
Perhaps B Hussein doesn’t care about any of those issues listed above climate change.
—————————————————————
Make no mistake and I don’t doubt for a minute: They’re getting exactly what they want.
Maybe not as fast as they’d like so they have to settle for smaller bites.
but
They’re getting exactly what they want.
The true team members have to make sure the people believe in CAGW not if they consider it a priority.
As long as the people accept the science the government wanted when it was paid for then whatever the president and his agencies must do to save the planet is a good thing.
cn

Scarface says:
June 15, 2014 at 6:30 am
With so little to worry about, I would focus on climate too. No deficit, no unemployment, no poverty, no illegals, no atomic bomb in Iran, no caliphate in Iraq or Syria, no al qaida, no boko haram, no scandals and a booming economy.
Actually, it’s just next on the Conservative’s checklist provided in the article:
Jobs? More people not working than ever before. Check
Deficit? A trillion a year should do it. Check
Morals? Shown that the laws, and even the Constitution do not apply to him. Check
Healthcare? Obamacare ought to mess it up in short order. Check
Immigration? Let’s see them deal with a flood of kids. Check
Climate? Hmmm…lots of possibilities here.
By the way, anyone notice that the group labeled “Liberal” is the only one that puts Climate above Morals? Maybe that’s what happens when you’ve got to lie through your teeth to make your case.

It’s all those photus ops…
Evrybuddy say Cheese!

The following are the remarks delivered by OSTP Director John Holdren at the International Space Exploration Forum in January of this year.
“First, you should know that as someone who spent the first part of his professional career immersed in aerospace engineering and rocket science, I stand before you not just as President Obama’s science and technology advisor but as someone who is personally passionate about space exploration.
More important, you should know that the President shares that passion. I don’t think he was making mini solid-rocket motors out of his mother’s empty lipstick tubes as a kid, as I was. But I do know that he was inspired by the space program from a very young age and that he cares intensely today about the challenges and rewards of reaching beyond the confines of our planet.
And while the United States, like other nations, needs to temper its ambitions with budgetary realities…”
The following are the comments Tom Judd would like to make in regards to John Holdren’s remarks regurgitated directly above:
First, you should know that as someone who spent the first part of his professional career at a mid level, non managerial, job immersed in paying income taxes beyond a level sufficient to fund a home mortgage I stand before you not just as President Obama’s employer (as he relentlessly forgets all we voters are), and not just as one of his science, technology, history, business, economic, human relations (and all the myriad other specialties combined from the other vast swathe of his other voter) advisors, but as someone who is personally passionate about why his tax money finances Obama to utilize not one, but two jumbo jets to fly to Hawaii for Christmas when he has the audacity to tell me not to drive to work.
More important, you should know that because it’s not his money the President doesn’t share that passion at all. Now, unlike Obama’s science advisor I wasn’t making mini solid-rocket motors out of my mother’s empty lipstick tubes as a kid since I knew the proper use of an empty lipstick tube was to write ‘go home’ on the bathroom mirrors shortly before the lipstick tube was actually empty. (And the point of that was as a message for people who had overstayed their welcome.) And, unlike President Obama’s science advisor (who, thankfully at least knows the moon isn’t made out of cheese) I find it extraordinarily difficult to believe Obama was inspired by the space program from a very young age growing up in Indonesia (nor by his adolescent tutor in Hawaii, Franklin Davis), and that he cares intensely, or at all, about the challenges and rewards of reaching beyond the confines of our planet. Unless, of course, it can inflate his ego.
And while Obama, like other national leaders, needs to temper ‘his’ ambitions with budgetary realities can John Holdren not utterly insult our intelligence (I know that’s asking a lot) by insinuating that his administration actually has any intention whatsoever of doing so.
And, in closing, I would like to thank Mr. Anthony Watts, and his contributors, and moderators, for the profound service they continually, and in the complete absence of taxpayer funding, provide to us all.
Thank you very much.

The AP/ABC News report begins:

President Barack Obama said denying climate change is like arguing the moon is made of cheese, as he issued a call to action on global warming to Saturday’s graduates of the University of California, Irvine.

The irony being that intelligent critics of the kind of climate policies being pushed by Barack Obama believe that the moon was made from a major interplanetary collision and that the Earth’s climate is made, to a very large degree, by the resulting two-planet system, which may be unique in the known universe.
Well at least some intelligent policy sceptics think that, like Matt Ridley.

Transcript of UCI commencement speech 6-14-2014 by President Obama:
“(Various greetings, then) . . .one of the most significant long-term challenges that our country and our planet faces: the growing threat of a rapidly changing climate.
Now, this isn’t a policy speech. I understand it’s a commencement, and I already delivered a long climate address last summer. I remember because it was 95 degrees and my staff had me do it outside, and I was pouring with sweat — as a visual aid. (Laughter.) And since this is a very educated group, you already know the science. Burning fossil fuels release carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide traps heat. Levels of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere are higher than they’ve been in 800,000 years.
We know the trends. The 18 warmest years on record have all happened since you graduates were born. We know what we see with our own eyes. Out West, firefighters brave longer, harsher wildfire seasons; states have to budget for that. Mountain towns worry about what smaller snowpacks mean for tourism. Farmers and families at the bottom worry about what it will mean for their water. In cities like Norfolk and Miami, streets now flood frequently at high tide. Shrinking icecaps have National Geographic making the biggest change in its atlas since the Soviet Union broke apart.
So the question is not whether we need to act. The overwhelming judgment of science, accumulated and measured and reviewed over decades, has put that question to rest. BS The question is whether we have the will to act before it’s too late. For if we fail to protect the world we leave not just to my children, but to your children and your children’s children, we will fail one of our primary reasons for being on this world in the first place. And that is to leave the world a little bit better for the next generation.
Now, the good is you already know all this. UC Irvine set up the first Earth System Science Department in America. (Applause.) A UC Irvine professor-student team won the Nobel Prize for discovering that CFCs destroy the ozone layer. (Applause.) A UC Irvine glaciologist’s work led to one of last month’s report showing one of the world’s major ice sheets in irreversible retreat. Students and professors are in the field working to predict changing weather patterns, fire seasons, and water tables — working to understand how shifting seasons affect global ecosystems; to get zero-emission vehicles on the road faster; to help coastal communities adapt to rising seas. And when I challenge colleges to reduce their energy use to 20 percent by 2020, UC Irvine went ahead and did it last year. Done. (Applause.) So UC Irvine is ahead of the curve. All of you are ahead of the curve.
Your generation reminds me of something President Wilson once said. He said, “Sometimes people call me an idealist. Well, that is the way I know I am an American.” That’s who we are.
And if you need a reason to be optimistic about our future, then look around this stadium. Because today, in America, the largest single age group is 22 years ago. And you are going to do great things. And I want you to know that I’ve got your back — because one of the reasons I ran for this office was because I believed our dangerous addiction to foreign oil left our economy at risk and our planet in peril. So when I took office, we set out to use more clean energy and less dirty energy, and waste less energy overall.
And since then, we’ve doubled the distance our cars will go on a gallon of gas by the middle of the next decade. We’ve tripled the electricity we harness from the wind, generating enough last year to power every home in California. We’ve multiplied the electricity we generate from the sun 10 times over. And this state, California, is so far ahead of the rest of the country in solar, that earlier this year solar power met 18 percent of your total power demand one day. (Applause.)
The bottom line is, America produces more renewable energy than ever, more natural gas than anyone. And for the first time in nearly two decades, we produce more oil here at home than we buy from other countries. And these advances have created jobs and grown our economy, and helped cut our carbon pollution to levels not seen in about 20 years. Since 2006, no country on Earth has reduced its total carbon pollution by as much as the United States of America. (Applause.)
So that’s all reason for optimism. Here’s the challenge: We’ve got to do more. What we’re doing is not enough. And that’s why, a couple weeks ago, America proposed new standards to limit the amount of harmful carbon pollution that power plants can dump into the air. And we also have to realize, as hundreds of scientists declared last month, that climate change is no longer a distant threat, but “has moved firmly into the present.” That’s a quote. In some parts of the country, weather-related disasters like droughts, and fires, and storms, and floods are going to get harsher and they’re going to get costlier. And that’s why, today, I’m announcing a new $1 billion competitive fund to help communities prepare for the impacts of climate change and build more resilient infrastructure across the country. (Applause.)
So it’s a big problem. But progress, no matter how big the problem, is possible. That’s important to remember. Because no matter what you do in life, you’re going to run up against big problems — in your own personal life and in your communities and in your country. There’s going to be a stubborn status quo, and there are going to be people determined to stymie your efforts to bring about change. There are going to be people who say you can’t do something. There are going to be people who say you shouldn’t bother. I’ve got some experience in this myself. (Laughter.)
Now, part of what’s unique about climate change, though, is the nature of some of the opposition to action. It’s pretty rare that you’ll encounter somebody who says the problem you’re trying to solve simply doesn’t exist. When President Kennedy set us on a course for the moon, there were a number of people who made a serious case that it wouldn’t be worth it; it was going to be too expensive, it was going to be too hard, it would take too long. But nobody ignored the science. I don’t remember anybody saying that the moon wasn’t there or that it was made of cheese. (Laughter.)
And today’s Congress, though, is full of folks who stubbornly and automatically reject the scientific evidence about climate change. They will tell you it is a hoax, or a fad. One member of Congress actually says the world is cooling. There was one member of Congress who mentioned a theory involving “dinosaur flatulence” — which I won’t get into. (Laughter.)
Now, their view may be wrong — and a fairly serious threat to everybody’s future — but at least they have the brass to say what they actually think. There are some who also duck the question. They say — when they’re asked about climate change, they say, “Hey, look, I’m not a scientist.” And I’ll translate that for you. What that really means is, “I know that manmade climate change really is happening, but if I admit it, I’ll be run out of town by a radical fringe that thinks climate science is a liberal plot, so I’m not going to admit it.” (Applause.)
Now, I’m not a scientist either, but we’ve got some really good ones at NASA. I do know that the overwhelming majority of scientists who work on climate change, including some who once disputed the data, have put that debate to rest. The writer, Thomas Friedman, recently put it to me this way. He were talking, and he says, “Your kid is sick, you consult 100 doctors; 97 of them tell you to do this, three tell [you] to do that, and you want to go with the three?”
The fact is, this should not be a partisan issue. After all, it was Republicans who used to lead the way on new ideas to protect our environment. It was Teddy Roosevelt who first pushed for our magnificent national parks. It was Richard Nixon who signed the Clean Air Act and opened the EPA. George H.W. Bush — a wonderful man who at 90 just jumped out of a plane in a parachute — (laughter) — said that “human activities are changing the atmosphere in unexpected and unprecedented ways.” John McCain and other Republicans publicly supported free market-based cap-and-trade bills to slow carbon pollution just a few years ago — before the Tea Party decided it was a massive threat to freedom and liberty.
These days, unfortunately, nothing is happening. Even minor energy efficiency bills are killed on the Senate floor. And the reason is because people are thinking about politics instead of thinking about what’s good for the next generation. What’s the point of public office if you’re not going to use your power to help solve problems? (Applause.)
And part of the challenge is that the media doesn’t spend a lot of time covering climate change and letting average Americans know how it could impact our future. Now, the broadcast networks’ nightly newscasts spend just a few minutes a month covering climate issues. On cable, the debate is usually between political pundits, not scientists. When we introduced those new anti-pollution standards a couple weeks ago, the instant reaction from the Washington’s political press wasn’t about what it would mean for our planet; it was what would it mean for an election six months from now. And that kind of misses the point. Of course, they’re not scientists, either.
And I want to tell you all this not to discourage you. I’m telling you all this because I want to light a fire under you. As the generation getting shortchanged by inaction on this issue, I want all of you to understand you cannot accept that this is the way it has to be.
The climate change deniers suggest there’s still a debate over the science. There is not. The talking heads on cable news suggest public opinion is hopelessly deadlocked. It is not. Seven in ten Americans say global warming is a serious problem. Seven in ten say the federal government should limit pollution from our power plants. And of all the issues in a recent poll asking Americans where we think we can make a difference, protecting the environment came out on top. (Applause.)
So we’ve got public opinion potentially on our side. We can do this. We can make a difference. You can make a difference. And the sooner you do, the better — not just for our climate, but for our economy. There’s a reason that more than 700 businesses like Apple and Microsoft, and GM and Nike, Intel, Starbucks have declared that “tackling climate change is one of America’s greatest economic opportunities in the 21st century.” The country that seizes this opportunity first will lead the way. A low-carbon, clean energy economy can be an engine for growth and jobs for decades to come, and I want America to build that engine. Because if we do, others will follow. I want those jobs; I want those opportunities; I want those businesses right here in the United States of America. (Applause.)
Developing countries are using more and more energy, and tens of millions of people are entering the global middle class, and they want to buy cars and refrigerators. So if we don’t deal with this problem soon, we’re going to be overwhelmed. These nations have some of the fastest-rising levels of carbon pollution. They’re going to have to take action to meet this challenge. They’re more vulnerable to the effects of climate change than we are. They’ve got even more to lose. But they’re waiting to see what does America do. That’s what the world does. It waits to watch us act. And when we do, they move. And I’m convinced that on this issue, when America proves what’s possible, then they’re going to join us.
And America cannot meet this threat alone. Of course, the world cannot meet it without America. This is a fight that America must lead. So I’m going to keep doing my part for as long as I hold this office and as long as I’m a citizen once out of office. But we’re going to need you, the next generation, to finish the job.
We need scientists to design new fuels. We need farmers to help grow them. We need engineers to invent new technologies. We need entrepreneurs to sell those technologies. (Applause.) We need workers to operate assembly lines that hum with high-tech, zero-carbon components. We need builders to hammer into place the foundations for a clean energy age. We need diplomats and businessmen and women, and Peace Corps volunteers to help developing nations skip past the dirty phase of development and transition to sustainable sources of energy.
In other words, we need you. (Applause.) We need you. And if you believe, like I do, that something has to be done on this, then you’re going to have to speak out. You’re going to have to learn more about these issues. Even if you’re not like Jessica and an expert, you’re going to have to work on this. You’re going to have to push those of us in power to do what this American moment demands. You’ve got to educate your classmates, and colleagues, and family members and fellow citizens, and tell them what’s at stake. You’ve got to push back against the misinformation, and speak out for facts, and organize others around your vision for the future.
You need to invest in what helps, and divest from what harms. And you’ve got to remind everyone who represents you, at every level of government, that doing something about climate change is a prerequisite for your vote.
It’s no accident that when President Kennedy needed to convince the nation that sending Americans into space was a worthy goal, he went to a university. That’s where he started. Because a challenge as big as that, as costly as that, as difficult as that, requires a spirit of youth. It requires a spirit of adventure; a willingness to take risks. It requires optimism. It requires hope. That day, a man told us we’d go to the moon within a decade. And despite all the naysayers, somehow we knew as a nation that we’d build a spaceship and we’d meet that goal.
That’s because we’re Americans — and that’s what we do. Even when our political system is consumed by small things, we are a people called to do big things. And progress on climate change is a big thing. Progress won’t always be flashy; it will be measured in disasters averted, and lives saved, and a planet preserved — and days just like this one, 20 years from now, and 50 years from now, and 100 years from now. But can you imagine a more worthy goal — a more worthy legacy — than protecting the world we leave to our children?
So I ask your generation to help leave us that legacy. I ask you to believe in yourselves and in one another, and above all, when life gets you down or somebody tells you you can’t do something, to believe in something better.
There are people here who know what it means to dream. When Mohamad Abedi was a boy, the suffering he saw in refugee camps in Lebanon didn’t drive him into despair — it inspired him to become a doctor. And when he came to America, he discovered a passion for engineering. So here, at UC Irvine, he became a biomedical engineer to study the human brain. (Applause.) And Mohamad said, “Had I never come to the United States, I would have never had the ability to do the work that I’m doing.” He’s now going to CalTech to keep doing that work.
Cinthia Flores is the daughter of a single mom who worked as a seamstress and a housekeeper. (Applause.) The first in her family to graduate from high school. The first in her family to graduate from college. And in college, she says, “I learned about myself that I was good at advocating for others, and that I was argumentative — so maybe I should go to law school.” And, today, Cinthia is now the first in her family to graduate from law school. And she plans to advocate for the rights of workers like her mom. (Applause.) She says, “I have the great privilege and opportunity to answer the call of my community.” “The bottom line,” she says, “is being of service.”
On 9/11, Aaron Anderson was a sophomore in college. Several months later, he was in training for Army Special Forces. He fought in Afghanistan, and on February 28th, 2006, he was nearly killed by an IED. He endured dozens of surgeries to save his legs, months of recovery at Walter Reed. When he couldn’t physically return to active duty, he devoted his time to his brothers in arms, starting two businesses with fellow veterans, and a foundation to help fellow wounded Green Beret soldiers. And then he went back to school. And last December, he graduated summa cum laude from UC Irvine. And Aaron is here today, along with four soon-to-be commissioned ROTC cadets, and 65 other graduating veterans. And I would ask them to stand and be recognized for their service. (Applause.)
The point is, you know how to dream. And you know how to work for your dreams. And, yes, sometimes you may be “super underrated.” But usually it’s the underrated, the underdogs, the dreamers, the idealists, the fighters, the argumentative — those are the folks who do the biggest things.
And this generation — this 9/11 generation of soldiers; this new generation of scientists and advocates and entrepreneurs and altruists — you’re the antidote to cynicism. It doesn’t mean you’re not going to get down sometimes. You will. You’ll know disillusionment. You’ll experience doubt. People will disappoint you by their actions. But that can’t discourage you.
Cynicism has never won a war, or cured a disease, or started a business, or fed a young mind, or sent men into space. Cynicism is a choice. Hope is a better choice. (Applause.)
Hope is what gave young soldiers the courage to storm a beach and liberate people they never met.
Hope is what gave young students the strength to sit in and stand up and march for women’s rights, and civil rights, and voting rights, and gay rights, and immigration rights.
Hope is the belief, against all evidence to the contrary, that there are better days ahead, and that together we can build up a middle class, and reshape our immigration system, and shield our children from gun violence, and shelter future generations from the ravages of climate change.
Hope is the fact that, today, the single largest age group in America is 22 years old who are all just itching to reshape this country and reshape the world. And I cannot wait to see what you do tomorrow.
Congratulations. (Applause.) Thank you, Class of 2014. God bless you. God bless the United States of America. (Applause.).” — end transcript

The content of his speech reveals the content of his heart — and the lack of content in his head.
A MORE IMPORTANT POINT.
The left accuses the Republican Party of being taken over by ring-wing radicals. The reality is that the Democratic Party has been taken over by left-wing radicals.
Give it a moment’s thought and you will realize that the right-wing of the Republican Party advocates nothing that the Democratic Party of JFK would not have endorsed or was actually, back then, a part of the Democratic party platform.
What has happened to the Democratic Party? Left-wing radicals control it. The lunatics are running that asylum. JFK must be turning in his grave.
And they accuse the Republican Party of being run by radicals? That is a socialist trick. Accuse others of being what you yourself actually are.
Eugene WR Gallun

Mr. Obama, next time you give a speech to college students perhaps you can tell them about my recently graduated nephew who has a $100,000 student loan that he is paying back through his $10.00 an hour job at a burger joint. Then, Mr. president (the lower case ‘p’ is intentional), you can inform them that my nephew unfortunately started college after you entered the WH, then graduated, and began his career (flipping burgers) all during your sorry occupancy there. Finally, Mr. president, you can then educate those college students that, while the moon is not, indeed, made out of cheese, if they support your policies their brains may very well be.

That the fate of the world should be in the hands of California 22 year olds should scare the bejeesus out of everybody, including California 23 and 21 year olds.
I want, for a moment, to single out Obama’s alma mater, Harvard. Universities today, and most especially Ivy League schools, are turning out liberal class elitists (I know, they always have, that’s what they’re for) that, due largely to the failure of the overall North American educational system postwar, appear not to have any significant intellectual capacity beyond the high school classes they left. What they have, is classist arrogance, as if all of their post-secondary course work consisted of catechismic discussions of “how great we art” and how lucky we don’t have to belong to the class of ordinary folk that provided us the fiscal opportunity to be here in the first place.
It literally, is like they don’t learn anything else. I picked on Harvard, because of late, it seems to be the poster child of colleges that have produced slew of liberal arts majors completely devoid of self-awareness and an overabundance of narcissism, based laregely on nothing but the presumption of entitlement.
My viewpoint is tempered by my Canadian perspective: We’ve had an especially egregious run of Harvard sycophants (or is that psychophants?) kick around our political scene in the last few years, all of them to a man, presumptive self-entitled egomaniacs apparently devoid of any real understanding of how the world works for most people. Michael Ignatieff, returning saviour of Canada and wannabe Leader of the Free North, now exiled back to the hallowed halls, David Miller, former mayor of Toronto, established snob, who much preferred to vacation in Spain than spend his tax-paid salary in Ontario, and our former provincial premier Dalton McGuinty, while not of Harvard a priori (not sufficiently class-worthy, I guess), has retreated there in an attempt to escape answering questions on how he and his party might have substantially purloined the public treasury for political gain.
And for our neighbours to the south, America’s first “non-white” president, who’s disdain for just about everybody is palpable, and by liberal-friendly media accounts, would much rawther talk smack about the rabble, and instead cavort with pseudo-intellectuals and discuss art and philosophy,and about how droll and tedious the job of being president has become. He is yet another Harvard graduate who apparently doesn’t get it. Can’t get it. Is it the education, or is just old-fashioned/new-egalitarian snobism for the 21st century?
There are world-scale adjustments coming for western civilization. The unfortunate part is that in the absence of demonstrable reality-hardened true-intellectual leadership (of any stripe), it will be everyman for himself, and it isn’t going to be pretty, at all.