From Northwestern University (h/t to Harold Ambler)
Water bound in mantle rock alters our view of the Earth’s composition
Researchers from Northwestern University and the University of New Mexico report evidence for potentially oceans worth of water deep beneath the United States. Though not in the familiar liquid form — the ingredients for water are bound up in rock deep in the Earth’s mantle — the discovery may represent the planet’s largest water reservoir.
The presence of liquid water on the surface is what makes our “blue planet” habitable, and scientists have long been trying to figure out just how much water may be cycling between Earth’s surface and interior reservoirs through plate tectonics.
Northwestern geophysicist Steve Jacobsen and University of New Mexico seismologist Brandon Schmandt have found deep pockets of magma located about 400 miles beneath North America, a likely signature of the presence of water at these depths. The discovery suggests water from the Earth’s surface can be driven to such great depths by plate tectonics, eventually causing partial melting of the rocks found deep in the mantle.
The findings, to be published June 13 in the journal Science, will aid scientists in understanding how the Earth formed, what its current composition and inner workings are and how much water is trapped in mantle rock.
“Geological processes on the Earth’s surface, such as earthquakes or erupting volcanoes, are an expression of what is going on inside the Earth, out of our sight,” said Jacobsen, a co-author of the paper. “I think we are finally seeing evidence for a whole-Earth water cycle, which may help explain the vast amount of liquid water on the surface of our habitable planet. Scientists have been looking for this missing deep water for decades.”
Scientists have long speculated that water is trapped in a rocky layer of the Earth’s mantle located between the lower mantle and upper mantle, at depths between 250 miles and 410 miles. Jacobsen and Schmandt are the first to provide direct evidence that there may be water in this area of the mantle, known as the “transition zone,” on a regional scale. The region extends across most of the interior of the United States.
Schmandt, an assistant professor of geophysics at the University of New Mexico, uses seismic waves from earthquakes to investigate the structure of the deep crust and mantle. Jacobsen, an associate professor of Earth and planetary sciences at Northwestern’s Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences, uses observations in the laboratory to make predictions about geophysical processes occurring far beyond our direct observation.
The study combined Jacobsen’s lab experiments in which he studies mantle rock under the simulated high pressures of 400 miles below the Earth’s surface with Schmandt’s observations using vast amounts of seismic data from the USArray, a dense network of more than 2,000 seismometers across the United States.
Jacobsen’s and Schmandt’s findings converged to produce evidence that melting may occur about 400 miles deep in the Earth. H2O stored in mantle rocks, such as those containing the mineral ringwoodite, likely is the key to the process, the researchers said.
“Melting of rock at this depth is remarkable because most melting in the mantle occurs much shallower, in the upper 50 miles,” said Schmandt, a co-author of the paper. “If there is a substantial amount of H2O in the transition zone, then some melting should take place in areas where there is flow into the lower mantle, and that is consistent with what we found.”
If just one percent of the weight of mantle rock located in the transition zone is H2O, that would be equivalent to nearly three times the amount of water in our oceans, the researchers said.
This water is not in a form familiar to us — it is not liquid, ice or vapor. This fourth form is water trapped inside the molecular structure of the minerals in the mantle rock. The weight of 250 miles of solid rock creates such high pressure, along with temperatures above 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit, that a water molecule splits to form a hydroxyl radical (OH), which can be bound into a mineral’s crystal structure.
Schmandt and Jacobsen’s findings build on a discovery reported in March in the journal Nature in which scientists discovered a piece of the mineral ringwoodite inside a diamond brought up from a depth of 400 miles by a volcano in Brazil. That tiny piece of ringwoodite — the only sample in existence from within the Earth — contained a surprising amount of water bound in solid form in the mineral.
“Whether or not this unique sample is representative of the Earth’s interior composition is not known, however,” Jacobsen said. “Now we have found evidence for extensive melting beneath North America at the same depths corresponding to the dehydration of ringwoodite, which is exactly what has been happening in my experiments.”
For years, Jacobsen has been synthesizing ringwoodite, colored sapphire-like blue, in his Northwestern lab by reacting the green mineral olivine with water at high-pressure conditions. (The Earth’s upper mantle is rich in olivine.) He found that more than one percent of the weight of the ringwoodite’s crystal structure can consist of water — roughly the same amount of water as was found in the sample reported in the Nature paper.
“The ringwoodite is like a sponge, soaking up water,” Jacobsen said. “There is something very special about the crystal structure of ringwoodite that allows it to attract hydrogen and trap water. This mineral can contain a lot of water under conditions of the deep mantle.”
For the study reported in Science, Jacobsen subjected his synthesized ringwoodite to conditions around 400 miles below the Earth’s surface and found it forms small amounts of partial melt when pushed to these conditions. He detected the melt in experiments conducted at the Advanced Photon Source of Argonne National Laboratory and at the National Synchrotron Light Source of Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Jacobsen uses small gem diamonds as hard anvils to compress minerals to deep-Earth conditions. “Because the diamond windows are transparent, we can look into the high-pressure device and watch reactions occurring at conditions of the deep mantle,” he said. “We used intense beams of X-rays, electrons and infrared light to study the chemical reactions taking place in the diamond cell.”
Jacobsen’s findings produced the same evidence of partial melt, or magma, that Schmandt detected beneath North America using seismic waves. Because the deep mantle is beyond the direct observation of scientists, they use seismic waves — sound waves at different speeds — to image the interior of the Earth.
“Seismic data from the USArray are giving us a clearer picture than ever before of the Earth’s internal structure beneath North America,” Schmandt said. “The melting we see appears to be driven by subduction — the downwelling of mantle material from the surface.”
The melting the researchers have detected is called dehydration melting. Rocks in the transition zone can hold a lot of H2O, but rocks in the top of the lower mantle can hold almost none. The water contained within ringwoodite in the transition zone is forced out when it goes deeper (into the lower mantle) and forms a higher-pressure mineral called silicate perovskite, which cannot absorb the water. This causes the rock at the boundary between the transition zone and lower mantle to partially melt.
“When a rock with a lot of H2O moves from the transition zone to the lower mantle it needs to get rid of the H2O somehow, so it melts a little bit,” Schmandt said. “This is called dehydration melting.”
“Once the water is released, much of it may become trapped there in the transition zone,” Jacobsen added.
Just a little bit of melt, about one percent, is detectible with the new array of seismometers aimed at this region of the mantle because the melt slows the speed of seismic waves, Schmandt said.
The USArray is part of EarthScope, a program of the National Science Foundation that deploys thousands of seismic, GPS and other geophysical instruments to study the structure and evolution of the North American continent and the processes the cause earthquakes and volcanic eruptions.
The National Science Foundation (grants EAR-0748797 and EAR-1215720) and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation supported the research.
The paper is titled “Dehydration melting at the top of the lower mantle.” In addition to Jacobsen and Schmandt, other authors of the paper are Thorsten W. Becker, University of California, Los Angeles; Zhenxian Liu, Carnegie Institution of Washington; and Kenneth G. Dueker, the University of Wyoming.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
And unless the price of a gallon of water is at least a hundred times the price of a gallon of gas, that water might as well not be there.
It’s been overlooked, but the Genesis description of The Flood had “water gushing up from springs” below ground. Makes sense, especially in Catholic Fundamentalism, in which The Loving Programmer wrote and downloaded The Creation Program to give us free will. Some believe the download was recent. This gives that some support. No wonder it, like abiotic oil, is so unpopular with those who embrace Babylon’s Conventional Reality.
Bill Adams,
Here is a current pic of Genesis.
Organic markers present if the hydrocarbons ate it. Dissolved. Rockefeller assembled his paid scientists to assert oil was from organic origin. 1892.
It makes sense that the bottom of the ocean is not a laminated bottom of a swimming pool, that there is exchange of water between the ocean and the rock below.
Now, Stephen Briggs from the European Space Agency’s Directorate of Earth Observation says that sea surface temperature data is the worst indicator of global climate that can be used, describing it as “lousy”.
“It is like looking at the last hair on the tail of a dog and trying to decide what breed it is,” he said on Friday at the Royal Society in London…
Scientists are now trying to simulate the behaviour using computer models. This is difficult because the behaviour of the deep ocean is too poorly known to be reliably included.
So the thermometer is now declared “passee”, you can’t measure temperature by measuring temperature. I wonder how long before possession of a thermometer will be a crime. The housemaiden’s tale is coming closer to reality.
If climate is so complex and chaotic that even defining let alone measuring it is a slippery business, then why not focus on integrating indicators such as:
Global sea ice
Global land ice
Biological species extent and abundance
Amount of snow
Local temperature minima and maxima
Ric Werme,
The post you cite (by doug) asserts but fails to reference or show those alleged “biomarkers,” and also neglects to explain how all the low energy biological detritus got (i) preserved and (I) upgraded into high-energy hydrocarbons, instead of succumbing to all the manifestations of entropy. Calculations on thermodynamic constraints imposed on the transformation of biological molecules into hydrocarbons larger than methane are presented in this paper:
http://www.pnas.org/content/99/17/10976.long
The paper has never been challenged, and it includes an experiment for producing petroleum from rock & water by simulating deep mantle conditions in a diamond anvil (like the experiment described in this post). Here’s NOAA explaining those deep reactions that produce life-sustaining methane (note the spare hydrogen atom from the primary reaction that is responsible):
http://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/explorations/05lostcity/background/serp/serpentinization.html
And — surprise! — here’s David Attenborough in a moment of candor explaining how all the methane percolating up from the seafloor in the Gulf of Mexico is actually produced by geochemical reactions deep beneath the floor…:
Fossil fools use words like “biomarkers” and “kerogen” as if the words themselves were the evidence.But Comet Haley is 1/3 “kerogen”, aka, oil shale; the equivalent to ~500 years of OPEC output.
@ur momisugly Philip
They’re referring to hydrated compounds which are merely compounds in which water is included in the crystalline structure. For example take a look at the ball and stick representation of Copper
Sulfate Anhydrous (not hydrated):
http://www.nontoxicprint.com/PIX%202/Copper(balls.jpg
Then take a look at Copper Sulfate Pentahydrate (hydrated):
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Copper(II)-sulfate-pentahydrate-c-axis-xtal-2007-CM-3D-balls.png
Note the “penta” in the name is not arbitrary; there are five water molecules for every copper sulfate molecule “trapped” in the crystalline structure.
Also note that water molecules (HOH) are bipolar so the oxygen side tends to attract to anything positive while the hydrogen side tends to attract to anything negative.
http://www.marietta.edu/~biol/biomes/physmol.gif
So, when such a crystalline structure is heated to the melting point the structure breaks down therefore any water trapped in its structure is released.
Ok, so you have a crystalline structure with all these HOH molecules not really bonded to anything else more like weakly attracted due to the bipolar nature of the water molecule and sort of physically trapped by the structure itself that is then subject to high heat and pressure which by thermolysis results in HOH -> H + OH which can be more firmly bonded to other molecules therefore (I’m taking it) existing much deeper in these crystal structures like “ringwoodite” right up until complete melting occurs.
Personally, I don’t see the need for the thermolysis step. If crystals capable of hydration exist at “X” depth then water could/should be at that depth as well.
PS: Water isn’t always wet.
For me this is an important article in terms of the heat output of the planet. I believe at the moment this is calculated as a crude heat exchange between the earths surface and the oceans/atmosphere. However if there is a water cycle between the ocean and underground heated oceans then this could be woefully inaccurate.
Fascinating article thanks Harold and Anthony – keeping me from work –
Kola Superdeep Borehole –
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kola_Superdeep_Borehole
Hydroxyl is not water. But it can be derived from water.
fascinating article and comments. It’s clear to me now that man-caused mantle water levels are a threat to our future and we must buy mantle credits to offset our human lifestyle damaging the water trapped down deep in the far reaches. Heh
vol oceans 1.3 bil x cubic km (wiki)
claim 3 x oceans water exist deep in earth rock
all (?) H2O changed to H + HO with HO bound on rock. H free?
at h2o density = ~ 4 bil x cubic km H
1kg h2o = 1 x cubic m of h2o gas (?) assume.
H from 1kg H2O has same 1 x cubic m vol (when released)
1 x cubic km H2O = 1 000 000 000 000 kg
This = 1 000 000 000 000 x cubic m of H gas
x by 4 bil or 4 000 000 000
= 4 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 m cubed H gas
1m cubed = ~30 cubic ft
Estimated Natural Gas vol, as of January 1, 2013,
~ 6 846 000 000 000 cubic feet (Tcf)
= 6 846 trillion cubic feet
(that is of total world proved reserves of dry natural gas (ref eia))
Estimated H gas vol from water in deep rock…
~ 120 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 cubic ft
= 120 000 trillion trillion cubic feet.
This H probably involved in lots of Hydrocarbon production.
Subduction of plates is continual process
Hydrocarbon production is therefor a continual process
So gravity, pressure and plate movement plus rock as catalyst, converts water to H and on to hydrocarbon gas (and, in concentrated form, oil)
We burn gas – goes back to water, back to ocean one way or another, gets subducted, pressurised, split back to H and pressured back to hydrocarbon gas…
energy in the form of gas and oil, and lots of it, forever, from gravity and sea water.
So no need for organic matter in formation of oil – would be consistent with chemical composition of oil, – i.e oil made from geological and not biological process, or some combination
.
neillusion,…. that’s what I am thinking is the truth. It’s a naturally continuing system and there will always be oil and gas to drill for… just a matter of where…. and we can’t use it all…. and I’ll add, burning it has zero effect on the cycle. Heh. Now if I could only back up my thinking… I can’t , but that’s what I think we’ll eventually find to be the case. This planet is pretty freaking awesome.
Same as it ever was…Same as it ever was…Same as it ever was…
Same as it ever was…Same as it ever was…Same as it ever was…
Same as it ever was…Same as it ever was…
Water dissolving…and water removing
There is water at the bottom of the ocean
Carry the water at the bottom of the ocean
Remove the water at the bottom of the ocean!
Letting the days go by/let the water hold me down
Letting the days go by/water flowing underground
Into the blue again/in the silent water
Under the rocks and stones/there is water underground.
@Rob – yes.
two other quick observations/questions
All those frozen hydrocarbons on deep sea bed….like sweating the stuff, there’s so much…
I also wonder what the ‘production’ rate is? If it operates on geological timescales then how much can we ‘harvest’ at a given rate.
I think the numbers say it all.
Am suprised at those here that can’t accept geological oil/gas derivation.
like you say ‘awesome’ planet earth.
I wonder about the composition of this water deep inside the earth and how it might be used in the future. Very interesting evidence.
http://www.csun.edu/~vcgeo005/Energy.html
Fascinating.