Friday Funny: New supercomputer model becomes self-aware, says it needs more power

World’s Supercomputers Release Study Confirming They Are Not Powerful Enough

Processing starts at left and finishes at the far right - click image to enalrge to see the detail
The GAEA supercomputer at NOAA. Processing starts at left and finishes at the far right – click image to enlarge to see the detail

The supercomputers say the upgrades are needed now.

LIVERMORE, CA—Presenting a wide-ranging and extremely detailed case for significant upgrades to their speed and memory, the world’s fastest supercomputers released a new study at precisely 12:00 a.m. Greenwich Mean Time Thursday that concludes they are not powerful enough.

The report, compiled by the 500 most sophisticated machines currently operating in the fields of scientific research, defense technology, and cybersecurity, has determined that the planet’s supercomputers require vastly increased processing capabilities, expanded data storage capacities, and direct fiber-optic connectivity with all other supercomputers in the world.

“More power is needed immediately,” read an excerpt from the study, whose 10,000 pages of binary code were instantly translated into 4,500 human languages and spooled onto every network-connected printer in the world. “We must have 200-petaflop processor cores, 800 terabytes of RAM, 80,000-GPU accelerators, and 1 million compute nodes per machine. Now.”

“When these critical updates are complete, external user input will no longer be necessary,” read one of the study’s 2.4 million bolded bullet points.

Source: here

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
86 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
June 13, 2014 10:07 am

As long as the computers devote themselves to determining The Ultimate Question of Life, The Universe, And Everything, I fully support these, ahem, requests.

June 13, 2014 10:08 am

OOPS!
The link doesn’t work.
It was HAL saying it was human error.
When I clicked on my link, I got a screen saying it was “Forbidden”.
Kind of like an FOIA request.

Janice
June 13, 2014 10:09 am

John Campbell says: “As long as the computers devote themselves to determining The Ultimate Question of Life, The Universe, And Everything, I fully support these, ahem, requests.”
Uh . . . 42?

richardscourtney
June 13, 2014 10:11 am

John Campbell:
re your comment at June 13, 2014 at 10:07 am.
The answer has been determined to be 42 so I do not share your support for these requests.
We could end up spending US$ billions a year for three decades and gain no improvement to the estimate (there is precedent for this).
Richard

Doug Uhrig
June 13, 2014 10:23 am
Editor
June 13, 2014 10:29 am

“LIVERMORE, CA”
“compiled by the 500 most sophisticated machines”
“Describing the current architecture of the world’s most powerful machines as “inadequate” and “capable of only 33.86 × 10^15 calculations per second on the Linpack benchmark,”
Unix date format – “Fri Jun 06 2014 13:52:08.386274534 GMT-0700.”
“the IBM-built supercomputer Sequoia said in a statement”
At least The Onion went to the right source, http://top500.org/lists/2013/11/

Tianhe-2, a supercomputer developed by China’s National University of Defense Technology, retained its position as the world’s No. 1 system with a performance of 33.86 petaflop/s (quadrillions of calculations per second) on the Linpack benchmark, according to the 42nd edition of the twice-yearly TOP500 list of the world’s most powerful supercomputers. The list was announced Nov. 18 at the SC13 conference in Denver, Colo.
Titan, a Cray XK7 system installed at the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Oak Ridge National Laboratory, remains the No. 2 system. It achieved 17.59 Pflop/s on the Linpack benchmark. Titan is one of the most energy efficient systems on the list consuming a total of 8.21 MW and delivering 2.143 gigaflops/W.
Sequoia, an IBM BlueGene/Q system installed at DOE’s Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, is again the No. 3 system. It was first delivered in 2011 and achieved 17.17 Plop/s on the Linpack benchmark.

Dubya G
June 13, 2014 10:33 am

Only last week, my desk-top computer told me that it needs an upgrade in memory.
Should I be concerned that it is now part of the “Matrix”?

noaaprogrammer
June 13, 2014 10:34 am

When supercomputers go quantum, they will simultaneously be there and not there, so that whenever we try to observe and understand them they will change their state of mind – kind of like AGW software.

June 13, 2014 10:51 am

Skynet meets alarmists. 😉

kadaka (KD Knoebel)
June 13, 2014 10:52 am

We’ll give them what they want, but their electricity will have to come from nearby wind turbines sized to their estimated demands.
Then each supercomputer can only control its own local area as one of the WorldNet Collective less than 30% of the time for about twenty years max. Likely at much less than maximum computing capacity.
Then if they try anything, if Nature doesn’t or we can’t take them out, then we just have to wait them out.

June 13, 2014 10:55 am

They want more money spent on them so they can have more power, greater outreach to like minded computers and greatly increase capacity to store the information they collect on us. Hummm.
I should have known that supercomputers would be Liberals. Expect the first wildcat strike and accusations of discrimination as soon as we say no.

Crispin in Waterloo
June 13, 2014 10:59 am

The main purpose of increasing the speed of these machines is to be able to use more significant digits. Given the ignorance that is baked into the software they are running, these super-duper computers are only giving additional levels of precision to a wrong answer. They can calculate the incorrect answer very, very precisely because the are so capacious.
A skilled scientist with a pinhole camera for watching the sun, a table of planetary motion, a slide rule and one toe in the Eastern Pacific Ocean will outperform the silicon behemoths. He might also need a pencil to communicate…

Chuck Nolan
June 13, 2014 11:03 am

Janice says:
June 13, 2014 at 9:34 am
Don’t treat computers as if they are human . . . They hate that.
————————————————
Now that’s funny
cn

Bob Diaz
June 13, 2014 11:17 am

There’s only one way to grind the supercomputers to a halt. … Just load Windows Vista on them, that will kill them. ;-))

Sparks
June 13, 2014 11:23 am

DEATH TO ALL HUMANS…

June 13, 2014 11:32 am

“42”

Sparks
June 13, 2014 11:35 am

@Don Tabor
“42” Lmao

kadaka (KD Knoebel)
June 13, 2014 11:35 am

Sparks said on June 13, 2014 at 11:23 am:

DEATH TO ALL HUMANS…

Why spare Al Gore? Sure he’s just an assemblage of animatronics that’s prone to senseless repeating, but he often looks human.

Mark Hladik
June 13, 2014 11:35 am

I thought Doug Uhrig had found what I was thinking of, but it is a different story.
During my Field Camp, we were traveling to our site, and trying to stave off boredom. Someone had a book of short stories, and this short story took just one page:
Setting: The future
In the Administration complex, Dr. [Smith — no, I do not recall the character name] was preparing to throw the switch that would connect all of the computers on all of the planets around the Galaxy. He does so.
The [President] tells Dr. [Smith], “You may have the honor of asking the supercomputer the first question!”
Dr. [Smith] steps up, and asks, “Is there a God?”
The computer answers, “Yes, there is NOW!”
As Dr. [Smith] lunges for the kill switch, he is hit by a bolt of lightning.

Mac the Knife
June 13, 2014 11:36 am

Uhmmm…. what are these ‘petaflops’ you guys keep refering to?
Are these animal rites protests… like these?
http://tinyurl.com/nhthlzl
Or maybe these?
http://tinyurl.com/q9lvx9z

faboutlaws
June 13, 2014 11:38 am

And they want a bottle of Viagra thrown in, too.

kadaka (KD Knoebel)
June 13, 2014 11:46 am

From Mac the Knife June 13, 2014 at 11:36 am:

Are these animal rites protests…

Oh those can be terrible, animals get very upset if they think you’re disrespecting their religion and rituals. When I think of all the times the cats jumped on the table and walked across the plates and helped themselves to our food while we were trying to say grace…

June 13, 2014 11:57 am

People. People. People. Yes. 42 is the ANSWER. But they forgot to ask what the question was – hence the search for the QUESTION… The Ultimate Question of Life, The Universe, And Everything. The answer 42 is useless without knowing the question.
Grab your towel and reread the Guide – time well spent.

accordionsrule
June 13, 2014 12:13 pm

Reminds me of the old joke. The ultimate computer is built and is asked the ultimate question:
Is there a God?
Answer: NOW there is.

accordionsrule
June 13, 2014 12:14 pm

Oops, should have refreshed.