DIY Climate Psychology Lewpaper Generator

Delusional psychopophagy is the mere result of the power of Climate Denial

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

As a homage to the amount of attention cast in our direction by the psycho-scientific community, I have decided to pay tribute to their cause, by releasing a web based DIY generator of scientific treatises on the phenomenon of climate “denial”.

The generator  takes random phrases and combines them into a surprisingly readable treatise. The original code was created in ancient times (like before 2000) for Mac computers.

The following is an example of this random artificial intelligence at work:

“We can deduce that, irrespective of all empirical conditions, our diagnosis (and what we have alone been able to show is that this is the case) are what first give rise to the Psychopathologies. Therefore, the psychopathaological manifold (and to avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to explain that this is true) can not take account of peer reviewed literature. Applied logic excludes the possibility of our conclusion. We can deduce that general logic should only be used as a canon for necessity. Delusional psychopophagy is the mere result of the power of my grant, a blind but indispensable function of the soul. As will easily be shown in the next section, it is obvious that, irrespective of all empirical conditions, the noumena abstract from all content of a priori knowledge, but the paralogisms would thereby be made to contradict the paralogisms of human unreason. In natural theology, Hume tells us that the Psychopathologies, in accordance with the principles of the psychopathaological manifold, abstract from all content of knowledge, as is proven in the ontological manuals.”

 

Perhaps readers can take the time to evaluate the quality of output from the random text generator, with the quality of abstruse treatises from other sources. Suggestions for improving the generator are also welcome – for example, suggestions for words and phrases which should be included in the generated text.

Try it here:

http://eric.worrall.name/kant.cgi

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

121 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
April 14, 2014 12:10 pm

“the past does not reflect the present but we have shown that it will now reflect the future”
“if we do not act now we must act then”

April 14, 2014 12:26 pm

“cosmetology must be considered in the presentation of climate models”

April 14, 2014 1:16 pm

“it goes without saying that these findings are scatological in nature”

April 14, 2014 1:33 pm

“the discovery of Illudium Q-36”

April 14, 2014 1:35 pm

“so now what?”

April 14, 2014 1:39 pm

“Dr. Lazarus and the Beryllium Sphere”

April 14, 2014 1:41 pm

“the conclusion would be obvious if we knew what it was”

April 14, 2014 2:49 pm

Eric Worrall says:
April 13, 2014 at 2:44 pm

However, taking a slightly different approach, I wonder how authentic this could sound if it used a number of popular phrases from the climate clique. What do you think?

Frighteningly authentic I think :-). JoNova published details of a case of 120 published scientific papers being retracted, because they were gibberish generated by software, so obviously, with development, this kind of code has the capacity to create papers which stand a real chance of being accepted.

==================================================================
Perhaps two paper bots? One which throws in everything and another with only the more serious phrases from the climate clique such as “coal trains of death”?

Douglas Kallevig
April 14, 2014 8:21 pm

“Turbo Encabulator” the Original

Admin
April 15, 2014 2:59 am

Gunga Din, I have added some of your suggestions thankyou 🙂

April 15, 2014 3:48 pm

Eric Worrall says:
April 15, 2014 at 2:59 am

=============================================================
Glad to contribute. I bookmarked http://eric.worrall.name/kant.cgi. Whenever I can’t understand what the the CAGWers say I just click on the link and it all becomes clear.8-)

bushbunny
April 15, 2014 6:07 pm

Neo, I can’t argue with that but British beer, is not as strong in alcoholic content as Australian beer.

bushbunny
April 15, 2014 7:16 pm

Gunda din, When I push that web site, my security system blocked it. Malicious content.

Admin
April 16, 2014 6:55 am

bushbunny, if you are referring to the kant.cgi site, I have just checked it with Google Webmaster tools, it is not showing any signs of malware infection. If you have more specific information let me know and I shall look into it.

April 16, 2014 7:49 am

bushbunny says:
April 15, 2014 at 7:16 pm
Gunda din, When I push that web site, my security system blocked it. Malicious content.

=======================================================================
Thank you.
I entered it into Norton Safe Search and it came up clear. Abine’s “DoNotTrackMe” also shows it clear. With the site open I ran a flash scan with Malwarebytes Pro and a quickscan with Norton 360 and it was still clear.
Perhaps it’s a security setting on your browser?

bushbunny
April 16, 2014 8:22 pm

Hi, I don’t know I have Trend Micro I pay for that each year. It gave me a option, I ‘think’ to open or close? I generally don’t open though if I get a warning. Sorry guys, I queried it because it surprised me. Yet my internet was terribly slow yesterday, I queried it as I have just connected to NBN via fiber optic, although I am still on Wireless. I complained, and they said there was an outage in Armidale. Gee I nearly fell asleep waiting sometimes. I thought it was my computer.

bushbunny
April 16, 2014 8:31 pm

Hi, I did it again, and Trend Micro said it was a dangerous page as was known for scams and fraud. Why don’t you take it up with Trend Micro. I did have the option to open it ‘despite the warning and dangers..’

April 17, 2014 11:32 am

I’m not familiar with Trend Micro. I hope issue isn’t that I have a problem on my end. But, just for the fun of it and so you don’t feel left out, here’s a couple of paragraphs from the site. (Each time you click a new paper is produced.)
“The systematizing of error tells us that nature, in so far as this expounds the practical rules of the Alaskan wilderness, can never furnish a true and demonstrated science, because, like the Transcendental Deduction, it can not take account of puppy like principles. With the sole exception of the never-ending regress in the series of empirical conditions, the diagnostic matrices, for example, abstract from all content of a priori knowledge. The consensus tells us that my stapler, that is to say, teaches us nothing whatsoever regarding the content of our diagnosis. The deniersphere exist in the survey of unreason, as is shown by the certainty of consensus. Because of our necessary ignorance of the conditions, intensive anthropophagy can thereby determine in its totality the transcendental unity of apperception; certainly, funding for my work is by its very nature contradictory. As is evident upon close examination, the diagnostic matrices, thus, are the mere results of the power of the never-ending regress in the series of empirical conditions, a blind but indispensable function of the soul. As we have already seen, it is not at all certain that our concepts, certainly, should only be used as a canon for the deniersphere; for these reasons, the deniersphere exclude the possibility of, thus, the architectonic of human unreason. In the case of reason, it must not be supposed that the Psychopathologies, consequently, are a representation of wealth redistribution, as any dedicated reader can clearly see. ”
And
“As is shown by the certainty of consensus, our intepretations constitute a body of demonstrated doctrine, and part of this body must be known a priori, and repetitive wealth transfer would thereby be made to contradict the homogenized whole. The systematizing of error tells us that, in accordance with the principles of our observations, our judgements (and what we have alone been able to show is that this is the case) exclude the possibility of my stapler, and my Uncle Bob is just as necessary as peer reviewed literature. As will easily be shown in the next section, our intepretations, so, abstract from all content of knowledge. Since none of the harms in themselves are analytic, the deniersphere, in view of these considerations, are just as necessary as the harms in themselves. By means of my grant, my Uncle Bob, for example, may not contradict itself, but it is still possible that it may be in contradiction with the elephant of wisdom, by virtue of anthropogenic reason. As is evident upon close examination, it must not be supposed that, in particular, our observations constitute a body of demonstrated doctrine, and the subset of this body must be known a posteriori. “

Reply to  Gunga Din
April 17, 2014 1:15 pm

Trend Micro AV is the worst of the worst, we’ve banned it from our facility.

bushbunny
April 17, 2014 6:18 pm

Thanks Gunga Din and Anthony. The big difference is Trend actually stop virus’ etc. before they enter the computer. Maybe some alarmist works for them? I have found it very good. I think it is an American source, but is recommended by computer stores. I have had no problems with it over 7 years. But it costs. $99 per year, for the type I have, it can cost more.

bushbunny
April 17, 2014 6:19 pm

Good one anyway, thanks Gunga din.

1 3 4 5