With the 2014 Bloggies Awards coming up next weekend, I thought it would be good to offer our own award. Given what we’ve recently learned about the behind the scenes behavior of The University of Western Australia and Dr. Stephen Lewandowsky self inflicted car crash in handling valid ethics complaints, now dubbed “Lewgate”, I thought that he deserved to be nominated for some sort of award.
Therefore, I’m nominating him for this first annual ‘Climate Duplicitist of the Year’ award. However, to be fair, there are others that might be more worthy of such an award, so I am giving readers a chance to place nominations in comments. See below.
Source: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/duplicity
In 48 hours, the nominations will be tabulated, and the top 5 nominees will be presented for a vote in a subsequent post. If you feel Lewandowsky deserves the award as I have nominated him above, you can also list him with any other nominees you present.
Rules:
- Nominations are open for 48 hours and close at 6PM PDT Wednesday March 26th.
- Voting for the top four nominees (determined by number of nominations) will open Thursday March 27th at 9AM PDT
- Voting will close on Saturday March 29th at 9AM PDT
- The winner will be announced at 6PM PDT (9PM EST) on Sunday March 30th.
- Nominees must be living, real, persons that have had some statement, forecast, prediction, claim, or other utterance related to climate that is inherently duplicitous or misleading.
- Organizations, such as IPCC, NOAA, CRU etc. are also eligible to be nominated.
- Nominations must include a citation, URL, or excerpt that represents the reason for the nomination.
- You cannot nominate yourself or your organization.
- The winner will receive a gift (TBD) sent by US mail, illustrating their award with an inscription along with a permanent status in the awards page which will remain resident on WUWT and updated yearly. A press release will also be made.
- No wagering allowed.

I cast my vote on Chris Turney and “The Ship of Fools”!
I nominate Mr Tony Abbott, Prime Minister of Australia, who stated that climate science is crap, but who is now spending billions of dollars of taxpayer money on abating CO2 emissions.
You can’t get much more duplicitous about climate science than that.
As many have said before how do you choose when there are just so many possibilities, the “climate gate” emails would give a good list and then there are all those talking heads who have not bothered to look into what the climate is actually doing.
HELP
My head is spinning.
OH I give up….
Just give Micheal Mann a lifetime achievement award!!!!!!!!!!!
James Bull
Dame Julia Slingo – for her every year is an extreme year, again and again.
Peter Gleick
Peter Gleick is a MacArthur “Genius Award” recipient, a (forced to resign) chairman of the “Task Force on Ethics” at the American Geophysical Union, a (forced to resign) member of the National Center for Science Education, and current president of the Pacific Institute. He is also featured in a “documentary” film titled “Last Call at the Oasis.”
http://fakegate.org/
Fakegate
On February 20, 2012, Peter Gleick confessed to stealing documents from The Heartland Institute with the intent of exposing its funding sources and damaging its reputation. He also disseminated a fake “climate strategy memo” that he and other environmental activists on the left claim describes Heartland’s “secret strategy” to mislead the public about the true nature of climate change.
At first Gleick claimed he obtained the fake memo along with other documents from The Heartland Institute. Now he claims it came from an anonymous source before he stole the documents. Heartland has consistently and unambiguously said the memo is a forgery and was not produced by anyone associated with The Heartland Institute.
“Fakegate” is the title given to this scandal by the London Telegraph’s James Delingpole.
The Heartland Institute conducted an internal investigation that showed the memo was not authored by anyone at the organization. Two external, independent investigations — one by Protek International and one by Juola & Associates — found the same. Many others have also conducted excellent investigations into this matter.
I suggest an IgLew award too for those whose are too incompetent to be effective and shoot their cause in both feet. Dame Julia would be my candidate for that one.
For ’tis the sport to have the engineer
Hoist with his own petard: and ‘t shall go hard
But I will delve one yard below their mines,
And blow them at the moon:
Do you have an award for stupid? Mike watsisname who accused you of photoshopping NSIDC images deserves some kind of honourable mention in the stupidity or try hard category 🙂
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/07/07/watching-the-deniers-makes-hilarious-goof-while-accusing-wuwt-of-doctoring-nsidc-images/
Amusing as this light relief may be….and at the risk of being “Mr.Buzzkill”…..I really think this is a waste of time and effort and trivialises the antics of these people.
There are so many worthy contestants (involuntarily entered, to be sure) for this award that I hesitate to add more; but I must. Highest on my list (after Mr. Gore, of course), is President Obama; but closely following behind him is our own EPA, the Environmental Protection Agency, which resolutely pushes Global Warming as scientific while being confronted repeatedly by evidence to the contrary. As a result of EPA’s pushing, we have numerous stringent and nonsensical rules that can be added to at any time. I suppose it is possible for some of the people at EPA actually to believe what they say, but we all know that their reason for persisting in their doctrine is to control the rest of us (for our own good, of course). Do consider the EPA for this award, and give it all the publicity you can!
Dana Nucitelli.
He defamed and distortedLindzen.
He fabricated a projection for PR purposes.
I agree with Dr. John Ware in that there are so many worthy contestants, but I have to give the nod to Al Gore. He’s the tip of the spear of climate alarmism. If not for him, this nonsense would have died off a long time ago.
I think I would include Richard Muller who pretended to have been a skeptic, but is now a born again AGW believer.
John Cook, for his highly duplicitous 97% survey.
The central purpose of that ‘survey’ was simply to give advocates and media lackeys alike a seemingly overwhelming sound bite; something that at a single stroke could be used to convey the ‘consensus’ of ‘peer-reviewed climate scientists’ and thus shut down any further discussion.
Due to Cooks duplicity all that became available in an instantly deliverable, seemingly irrefutable one-liner. It has to be said that given the extent it has been used across almost all media it has been an outstanding success.
Lord Monckton has since destroyed the ‘survey’, exposing Cooks quite deliberate intent to deceive via obviously loaded questions and a deliberately biased screening process. That’s perfect duplicity territory. (Awarding him this prize would also go some way to righting his obvious deceit, too.)
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/09/23/skeptical-science-conspiracy-theorist-john-cook-runs-another-survey-trying-to-prove-that-false-97-of-climate-scientists-believe-in-global-warming-meme/
I nominate David “feel it in my bones” Cameron for:
“I agree with you that we are seeing more abnormal weather events. Colleagues across the House can argue about whether that is linked to climate change or not. I very much suspect that it is.”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-25656426
Surely Hanson, Monbiot and Pachauri should be in the rframe
Piltdown Mann
Cinderella/Longshot pick:
The Gaurdian’s Laurence Topham… aka Peanut Butter Milkshake Boy… aka Environmental Jesus.
“His suffering saved the Planet.”
Now mail me my prize.
The award letter should thoroughly document its claims. Sorry for the wet blanket. You won’t want to be a target of a libel suit. You might want to refresh your understanding of the law via a consultation with an attorney. I can see the appeal of getting this ready by April 1, but I think thoroughness is warranted.
Good idea. I see there is a new institute for the study of poor science in the bio-medical area (http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21598944-sloppy-researchers-beware-new-institute-has-you-its-sights-metaphysicians). I reckon something like that for climate science would also be an excellent idea, given the new-found importance of the area.
The title for the award is a bit cumbersome. I suggest an ‘Occam’s Broom Award’ for the most important deployment of that device in climate alarm campaigning. The device is described by Daniel C Dennett (2013) as follows:
‘The molecular biologist Sidney Brenner recently invented a delicious play on Occam’s Razor, introducing the new term Occam’s Broom, to describe the process in which inconvenient facts are whisked under the rug by intellectually dishonest champions of one theory or another…The practice is particularly insidious when used by propagandists who direct their efforts at the lay public …their carefully crafted accounts can be quite convincing simply because the lay reader can’t see what isn’t there.’
I give some examples from the climate arena here: http://climatelessons.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/occams-broom-and-stink-of-97-of-climate.html
John Cook – author of the 97% paper study and enabler of Lewandowsky.
Gore, Mann, Lewandowsky, it’s a warmacopia. Please also remember Peter Gleick wants it bad enough to commit a felony and Richard Muller who is doing his BEST.
I’ll confirm Kevin Trenberth. While he understands ENSO better than most climate scientists, he elects to obscure/misrepresent its long-term effects at every possible chance to keep the CAGW hypothesis alive.
I nominate David Cameron, the British Prime Minister. He is a most duplicitous, green worshipping toe rag.
I think the “Climate Duplicitist of the Year” award is a brilliant, wonderful idea. This should be great fun. I love the idea of responding to the name calling from the AGW advocates with a bit of smart humor.
Bill Nye the “science guy” gets my vote, for past participation in the Gore fraudulent CO2 greenhouse gas demonstration/experiment, and continued duplicity in the climate change debate:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/climate-fail-files/gore-and-bill-nye-fail-at-doing-a-simple-co2-experiment/
http://www.policymic.com/articles/84887/bill-nye-responds-to-7-real-arguments-made-by-climate-change-deniers
Many thanks Anthony 🙂
Joint award to
1. The entire green movement
2. Aided and abetted by the Mainstream Media