Climate confessions as SPAM (please send money)

People send me stuff. Today I got a true confessions style email with an emotional tear jerker, and a telling graph for which they claim credit, something we predicted would happen years ago. Never mind the tanked U.S. economy and the switch to natural gas thanks to shale gas fracking, no, the emissions reduction is all due to these tear jerking NGO spammers who want the U.S. back to 1950 levels, and even if that is somehow managed, you can bet they still won’t be happy,

============================================================

EDF

I have a climate confession. Recently, I’ve begun to question whether we can solve the climate crisis. 

[name redacted] —

I have a climate confession: Recently, I’ve begun to question whether we can solve the climate crisis.

Deep down in my darkest thoughts, from everything I know, have read, have been told by the scientists at EDF about the growing threat, and from witnessing the unrelenting stream of dopey climate denialism in Washington, I’ve found it increasingly difficult to maintain hope. The fear that we won’t avert climate catastrophe has taken hold. And I shudder at what that will mean.

It’s a terrible and sobering notion, maybe one you’ve shared in recent years.

As a parent of a 9-year old and a 7-year old—two sweet, beautiful children who mean everything to me—I often ask what more can I do? How are we going to fix this problem? And what kind of world am I going to leave to my kids?

Then, about a month ago, in a meeting to discuss EDF’s climate strategy, a colleague of mine presented this graphic:

please enable images!

I had an instant reaction. This chart tells a powerful story. Over the last few years, our work really has made a difference. We have reduced America’s carbon emissions. We have altered the course of history.

For the first time in a long time I began again to feel a sense of hope…to see a path forward.

And, after discussing with the Membership team, this chart has inspired this “Climate Changing” email series we’re launching today. Between now and Earth Day, we’ll share stories and information to help you understand where we are in the fight for climate solutions…where we need to be…and how we can get there, together.

This is a serious moment. The fight to avoid climate calamity confronts us with sobering realities. While we have made progress, we have a tremendous amount of work to do. And very little time in which to do it.

It won’t be easy. But, there is a path forward—and that’s important.

You are making a difference. And I want to extend my personal heartfelt thanks for standing strong with EDF. You are helping change America and the world.

Over the next few weeks, I hope the climate solutions we’ll share will help renew our shared belief that with determination and resolve, we can still solve the climate crisis.

Sam ParryWith gratitude and renewed hope,

Sam’s signature

Sam Parry

Director, Membership

P.S. Do you have a climate confession? Have you also felt doubt in recent years over our chance to solve the climate crisis? If so, I’d love to hear your story.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

85 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
March 20, 2014 1:19 pm

Richard Feyndman:
It doesn’t matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn’t matter how smart you are. If it doesn’t agree with experiment, it’s wrong.

March 20, 2014 1:23 pm

Sam, if you get a climate confession from Mann or Hansen, please let us know.

March 20, 2014 1:27 pm

TomRude says:
“The researchers used the HANDY model to analyze three different social scenarios: an egalitarian society with no elite class; an equitable society with workers and non-workers (students, retirees, disabled persons); and an unequal society with a robust class of elites.
Gotta love the artificial false choices they offer. Let’s not even get into the assumptions built into the model.

David Chamness
March 20, 2014 1:28 pm

So, when we look at the dramatic turnaround of US emissions, and add to that the reduction in EU emissions over the last 20 years, then look at the GLOBAL CO2 levels, as measured in Hawaii, can we see any effect, at all, from our reductions? If not, why not? Have we not been told that all of the increase in CO2 is manmade? And that the extra CO2 in the atmosphere is all ours? Did the growth in 3rd world CO2 emissions just happen to balance our reductions perfectly, just as it’s claimed that all natural warming stopped in 1947, and all of the warming since has been due to mankind’s burning of fossil fuels?

Bruce Cobb
March 20, 2014 1:45 pm

Are we dealing with a religion? Let’s see;
Soulful, poignant “confession”. check
Doubts and angst creeping in. check
Hopelessness and fear taking hold. check
Then, a revelation, or divine inspiration appears, in the form of a graph. check
The graph brings renewed hope and great joy. check
Salvation is regained, and a renewed vigor in evangelism takes hold. check
Hallelujah! And may the Gore be with you. Amen.

brent
March 20, 2014 2:04 pm

Wal-Mart Senior VP Chokes Up Talking Sustainability (Video)
Why We (EDF) Work With Walmart
http://judithcurry.com/2013/09/09/laframboises-new-book-on-the-ipcc/#comment-378275

rgbatduke
March 20, 2014 2:12 pm

So, when we look at the dramatic turnaround of US emissions, and add to that the reduction in EU emissions over the last 20 years, then look at the GLOBAL CO2 levels, as measured in Hawaii, can we see any effect, at all, from our reductions? If not, why not? Have we not been told that all of the increase in CO2 is manmade? And that the extra CO2 in the atmosphere is all ours? Did the growth in 3rd world CO2 emissions just happen to balance our reductions perfectly, just as it’s claimed that all natural warming stopped in 1947, and all of the warming since has been due to mankind’s burning of fossil fuels?
Excellent question, actually. If one visits a site that lists at least the party-line accepted carbon budgets over the last 60 years or so, though, there is no visible peak — it is an “almost” perfectly monotonic increasing function.
Which means, interestingly enough, that the “leveling” of the curve above was in fact miraculously canceled by increases elsewhere in the system. Or perhaps that the numbers at the site I found are cooked in some way to agree with Mauna Loa — as estimating things like this seem very likely prone to large errors.
rgb

rgbatduke
March 20, 2014 2:14 pm

Are we dealing with a religion? Let’s see;
Soulful, poignant “confession”. check
Doubts and angst creeping in. check
Hopelessness and fear taking hold. check
Then, a revelation, or divine inspiration appears, in the form of a graph. check
The graph brings renewed hope and great joy. check
Salvation is regained, and a renewed vigor in evangelism takes hold. check

All of which is intended to inspire us to send them a blank… check!
Check.

TomRude
March 20, 2014 2:19 pm

TonyG, yep… frightening.
Anthony, do you all recall how a Canadian newspaper published a letter of mea culpa on fracking from a supposed Calgary engineer… just to be debunked as a fake by Ezra Levant last fall?
“… Telegram newspaper in St. John’s published a column entitled “Some truth about fracking wouldn’t hurt,” written by an oil and gas engineer from Calgary named Syd Peters.
It was a devastating personal confession by a fracking industry insider who said he had spent 28 years polluting the environment across the U.S. and western Canada, and then “coercing landowners” and “silencing” towns to keep the industry’s dirty secrets. “This is what is coming to Newfoundland if fracking is allowed,” he wrote.
Except there is no oil and gas engineer from Calgary named Syd Peters. APEGA, Alberta’s association of professional engineers, has no record of him. He’s not in the Calgary phone book. His stories were fake, just like he is. After I raised these questions, the Telegram acknowledged they did not follow standard editorial procedures, and could not verify the author.
But the identity of “Syd” as an evil oilman was essential to the whole column. If anyone else — say, a professional environmental protester — had made the shocking allegations, he would have been asked for proof. By creating “Syd,” that credibility problem was solved. It was his personal confession.”

milodonharlani
March 20, 2014 2:25 pm

So is the author of the confession doing everything he or she can to promote fracking, since greater reliance on natural gas, along with the ongoing recession, is why US “carbon pollution” is down?
Apparently the author is also unaware of the benefit to plants, children & other living things of more abundant CO2 in the air.

Man Bearpig
March 20, 2014 2:28 pm

microsoft have a spam reporting tool that hooks in to outlook. when you get a spam you rightclick on the message and “report as spam” the more people that respond to tge same email message the more likely the spammer is of getting caught.

Man Bearpig
March 20, 2014 2:29 pm

… just search for microsoft spam report add in for outlook

March 20, 2014 2:30 pm

James Bradley: “I think everyone should send Sam their stories just for balance – I am certainly willing to share how the Australian Carbon Tax has destroyed our motor and allied manufacturing industry…”
The car manufacturers were planning their exit strategies years ago. Nothing to do with the carbon tax or minimum wage. I believe in evidence before politics. I hope you do!

Bart
March 20, 2014 2:31 pm

rgbatduke says:
March 20, 2014 at 2:12 pm
Rather overwhelmed by increases elsewhere. Check out how fast China, in particular, is accelerating its output.
Meanwhile, measured concentration continues rising at a steady rate…

March 20, 2014 2:41 pm

Bruce Cobb says: March 20, 2014 at 1:45 pm
Are we dealing with a religion? Let’s see;
Soulful, poignant “confession”. check
Doubts and angst creeping in. check
Hopelessness and fear taking hold. check
Then, a revelation, or divine inspiration appears, in the form of a graph. check
The graph brings renewed hope and great joy. check
Salvation is regained, and a renewed vigor in evangelism takes hold. check
Hallelujah! And may the Gore be with you. Amen.

You forgot the threat to those little souls, our children, for whom we can hope again as Salvation does indeed become possible (when funds are sent). But yes, absolutely, blatant memetic content to hook and push emotive hot-buttons just as religions do.

Ed, 'Mr' Jones
March 20, 2014 2:47 pm

Dear Spam Barry,
What “Climate Crisis” are you referring to?
You should seek Psychological help.
Yours,
Mr. Jones

March 20, 2014 2:52 pm

One lesson that age teaches you is that in any political debate, the first sign that the tide has turned, is when those who demanded solutions to a non existent problem begin taking credit for having solved it.

Ed, 'Mr' Jones
March 20, 2014 2:57 pm

Robin says:
March 20, 2014 at 12:32 pm
“We have altered the course of history.
Really? How precisely? So history is no longer about people?
It’s about carbon dioxide and spurious graphs?
The intellectual capacity of an amoeba”
Yes. Apparently the Semi-Omniscient Fool knows what the Course of History was going to be, had we not ‘altered’ it.

March 20, 2014 3:05 pm

With any luck, our coal exports to Europe will help combat global cooling. Global cooling is a far more dangerous possibility to mankind and the earth’s ecosystem stability than a +1.5deg C/century temperature rise.

DD More
March 20, 2014 3:16 pm

As a parent of a 9-year old and a 7-year old—two sweet, beautiful children who mean everything to me—I often ask what more can I do? How are we going to fix this problem? And what kind of world am I going to leave to my kids?
Since you are a money taking NGO, you are going to leave those tikes 17 trillion in debt, an energy plan similar to the UK which allowed +40,000 mostly elderly to die early (but is a good start to getting the world population down 50 to 90 percent) and trying to survive on 1/2 the energy used by people in the 1950’s.
Note the graft in in total CO2 produced and not adjusted for the 2x population growth to date.

mike
March 20, 2014 3:16 pm

Yeah, I have a confession. I used to think Gina McCarthy, the head of the EPA, really believed all that clap-trap she dispensed about saving the world for Gaia, and everything. I mean, I figured someone with her grim, humorless, mono-maniac, zealot-freak public persona just had to be a true-believer in the lefty, party-line, eco-flake hive-crapola she was always spouting. Boy was I wrong!
I’ve gotta tell yah–reading recently that Gina has been secretly using her EPA headquarters building as some sort of giant, diabolical, merde-express injection-device to shoot her raw, untreated, privileged-white-Philosopher-Queen, crawlin’-with-who-knows-what “poop” (sinker? floater?) into the Potomac River, has just destroyed my confidence in my ability to size people up!
It’s all just a game with these enviro types! I mean, like, it’s obvious that they just don’t give a “shit” about the environment–not really! Not to mention that I’m, like, totally creeped-out by this whole deal!

John Boles
March 20, 2014 3:19 pm

Yes if he is so worried about things like “carbon pollution” then Sam Parry should have fewer kids.

milodonharlani
March 20, 2014 3:21 pm

mike says:
March 20, 2014 at 3:16 pm
The depth & breadth of Progressive hypocrisy should never amaze anyone. The most extensive possible is the norm. Strictures are for thee, not for me in her case & for all of her ilk.

milodonharlani
March 20, 2014 3:24 pm

andywest2012 says:
March 20, 2014 at 2:41 pm
Instead of papal indulgences to spring souls from purgatory, the CACA Inquisition offers tax credits to carbon sinners. What a racket!

March 20, 2014 3:26 pm

Sam Parry: Living proof the Three Stooges had kids.

Verified by MonsterInsights