From the Virginia Institute of Marine Science and the department of unverifiable forecasts in our lifetime comes this model based projection.
Researchers say Ross Sea will reverse current trend, be largely ice free in summer by 2100
Antarctica’s Ross Sea is one of the few polar regions where summer sea-ice coverage has increased during the last few decades, bucking a global trend of drastic declines in summer sea ice across the Arctic Ocean and in two adjacent embayments of the Southern Ocean around Antarctica.
Now, a modeling study led by Professor Walker Smith of the Virginia Institute of Marine Science suggests that the Ross Sea’s recent observed increase in summer sea-ice cover is likely short-lived, with the area projected to lose more than half its summer sea ice by 2050 and more than three quarters by 2100.
These changes, says Smith, will significantly impact marine life in what is one of the world’s most productive and unspoiled marine ecosystems, where rich blooms of phytoplankton feed krill, fish, and higher predators such as whales, penguins, and seals.
VIMS professor Walker Smith in Antarctica.
Smith, who has been conducting ship-based fieldwork in the Ross Sea since the 1980s, collaborated on the study with colleagues at Old Dominion University. Their paper, “The effects of changing winds and temperatures on the oceanography of the Ross Sea in the 21st century,” appears in the Feb. 26 issue of Geophysical Research Letters. Smith’s co-authors are Mike Dinniman, Eileen Hofmann, and John Klinck.
Smith says “The Ross Sea is critically important in regulating the production of Antarctica’s sea ice overall and is biologically very productive, which makes changes in its physical environment of global concern. Our study predicts that it will soon reverse its present trend and experience major drops in ice cover in summer, which, along with decreased mixing of the vertical column, will extend the season of phytoplankton growth. These changes will substantially alter the area’s pristine food web.”
Researchers attribute the observed increase in summertime sea ice in the Ross Sea—where the number of days with ice cover has grown by more two months over the past three decades—to a complex interplay of factors, including changes in wind speed, precipitation, salinity, ocean currents, and air and water temperature.
But global climate models agree that air temperatures in Antarctica will increase substantially in the coming decades, with corresponding changes in the speed and direction of winds and ocean currents. When Smith and his colleagues fed these global projections into a high-resolution computer model of air-sea-ice dynamics in the Ross Sea, they saw a drastic reduction in the extent and duration of summer sea ice.
The modeled summer sea ice concentrations decreased by 56% by 2050 and 78% by 2100. The ice-free season also grew much longer, with the mean day of retreat in 2100 occurring 11 days earlier and the advance occurring 16 days later than now.
Also changed was the duration and depth of the “shallow mixed layer,” the zone where most phytoplankton live. “Our model projects that the shallow mixed layer will persist for about a week longer in 2050, and almost three weeks longer in 2100 than now,” says Smith. “The depth of the shallow mixed layer will also decrease significantly, with its bottom 12% shallower in 2050, and 44% shallower in 2100 than now.”
The extent and duration of ice cover in the Ross Sea depends on a complex interplay of factors, including changes in wind speed, precipitation, salinity, ocean currents, and air and water temperature.
For Smith, these changes in ice, atmosphere, and ocean dynamics portend major changes in the Antarctic food web. On the bright side, the decrease in ice cover will bring more light to surface waters, while a more persistent and shallower mixed layer will concentrate phytoplankton and nutrients in this sunlit zone. These changes will combine to encourage phytoplankton growth, particularly for single-celled organisms called diatoms, with ripples of added energy potentially moving up the food web.
But, Smith warns, the drop in ice cover will negatively affect several other important species that are ice-dependent, including crystal krill and Antarctic silverfish. A decrease in krill would be particularly troublesome, as these are the major food source for the Ross Sea’s top predators—minke whales, Adélie and Emperor penguins, and crabeater seals.
Overall, says Smith, “our results suggest that phytoplankton production will increase and become more diatomaceous. Other components of the Ross Sea food web will likely be severely disrupted, creating significant but unpredictable impacts on the ocean’s most pristine ecosystem.”
The authors were supported by the National Science Foundation grants ANT-0944254, ANT-0838948 and OCE-0927797.
==============================================================
For the most current data on Antarctic sea ice, see the WUWT Sea Ice Reference Page: http://wattsupwiththat.com/reference-pages/sea-ice-page/
Oh, and it looks like he may need to call in the ice breakers in to get that ship unlocked from the ice.
[snip off topic, not relevant -mod]
Explain the polar see-saw.
ferdberple says:
February 27, 2014 at 10:05 pm
Explain the polar see-saw.
————
“Study projects big thaw for Antarctic sea ice”
Not see-saw, thee-thaw.
Climatology professor goes into a bar.
– Vodka on the rocks, and be quick before my hot model melts the ice.
The bartender serves the drink with a condescending look
– dream on sir
Every one talks about the heating effect of sun on the polar seas. Nobody mentions the properties of sea water during the polar winter. Ice has high albedo! How effective is this during the polar winter? The ice surface can cool to many degrees BELOW zero Celsius. Radiative cooling effect of ice is low. Sea water on the other hand will freeze and turn to ice at around -2C only if left in peace. On the other hand if the sea water is churned up by wind storms the sea surface temperature can reach several degrees ABOVE zero. Use the S-B formula to calculate the radiative energy leaving say a million square kilometres of sea surface at say 275K as opposed to that amount of ice surface at 258K over a period of about four months during the polar winter. This energy is leaving from the SEA. I think you will find it accounts for the ‘missing heat’.
How is it that the alarmist scientists can find no possible natural explanation for any warming and ergo the warming must be nearly all man made, but they have absolutely no difficulty finding hundreds of natural causes for cooling which counteracts this amazingly mysterious warming.
“global climate models agree that air temperatures in Antarctica will increase substantially in the coming decades”. Do the models all get together in one room and pat each other on the back?
“But It’s turtles…. ALLLLLLL the ways down…
The turtle story is cute, but when “scientists” basically replace turtles with models, it’s get’s a bit tedious; especially since my taxes help pay for that vile tasting turtle soup…
The Antarctic Ice Extent looks to have just hit its annual minimum yesterday, and still stands at about 2 standard deviations (+620,000 KM^2) above the 34-yr mean…
It’ll be interesting to see what new turtle CAGW acolytes come up with to explain this year’s record-high minimum Antarctic ice extent.
On a somewhat related topic, I noticed an interesting phenomenon this year in the Arctic. When record breaking cold air swept down from the Arctic to cover huge portions of the US, DMI Arctic anomalies spiked up +15C at the same time. Accordingly, with the warmer than normal Arctic temps this winter, less Arctic Sea Ice formed this winter.
When the Arctic Sea Ice starts to melt, I expect the Arctic Sea Ice anomaly to be quite large this year. The warmunistas will, of course, blame the smaller than normal Arctic Sea Ice Extent on Global Warming and conveniently forget about the bitter cold in the US, which at least contributed to the lower than normal Arctic ice formation.
Consensually modeled suggestions disguised as science. A crystal ball is an instrument of utmost precision compared to that…..
First, you program a computer model with what you believe should happen. It then spits out data that confirm your beliefs. You write a paper based on your results and get recognized for doing ground-breaking research. Then you apply for a another grant to do it again. Is this the way today’s science works?
Why are these 100 year projections funded? They have no value. It’s a huge guess what will happen and no one will even be around to see if it works out that way.
Here’s my prediction: everyone reading this blog right now will be dead by 2100. Now isn’t that scary? Shouldn’t we be doing something about it? Instead we worry there might not be ice in 2100 somewhere hardly anyone even visits because it’s too cold.
Just what is he talking about? The Ross Sea is always largely ice-free in summer and has been ever since the Ross expedition discovered the place in the 1840’s. How else does he think Scott, Shackleton, Amundsen etc reached the coast there (and just about nowhere else)? They didn’t have icebreakers a hundred years ago.
“… a modeling study led by Professor Walker Smith…”
Oh. Another model. That’s all right then.
Can somebody please explain to me when it was that observation and good ole’ hard data became redundant in science?
@Londo
I nominate you for the WUWT comment hall of fame. Computer models predict that the WUWT hall of fame will eventually be awesome. 🙂
But we need to study it more to be sure…
1. markstoval says:
February 27, 2014 at 2:47 pm
We need a log of research funding to study ways to midigate the effects of these airborn porkers!
That would be pork choppers.
anybody can say anything about the future if you will not be around to see if is is true what bull s..t you have been get real
‘be largely ice free in summer by 2100’ and if it’s not I will be long retired or died so I cannot be pulled up for claiming such BS . Now isn’t ‘useful’
Back in the 90’s Global Warmists gave safe 70 to 80 year projections, gaining confidence they reduced the timeframe to 30 to 50 years, once the governments climbed on board, money started flowing and the arrogance grew the projection timeframe began falling rapidly to the short term which unfortunately could be checked. After the disasterous forecasts of the last decade they have now started to expand their forecasts to the long term again. Can’t be checked.
Back in biblical times people who made predictions were called ‘prophets’ as opposed to some now days that are called ‘climate scientists.’
If a prophet was wrong only once… once…. he was taken outside the city and stoned.
It’s not so much that I think these AGW prophets need to be stoned, but I really would like to stop throwing money at them.
I better stop now.
So I think I’ve got this straight…
“I’ve made many predictions before, and they were all wrong. I realize that the population didn’t die off, England is still here, people there aren’t starving, India is, in fact, doing quite well…BUTTTTTTT….THIS time, I used other models, which have always been wrong, to figure out the amount of warming involved, which they’ve never been able to do, and used that as input to my own untested and unproven model, and it clearly shows that we’re all in dire straights. Oh…and I’ll need some more money to refine things a bit more.”
Is that about it? And not only do people still give this asshat airtime…they give him more MONEY. OUR money.
As has been said above…
Oooga in, Chucka out.
Jim
“It’ll grow back; it’ll grow back; God and the cold will bring it back”
“knr says:
February 28, 2014 at 1:23 am
‘be largely ice free in summer by 2100′ and if it’s not I will be long retired or died so I cannot be pulled up for claiming such BS . Now isn’t ‘useful’”
Actually, that obviously doesn’t really matter. He’s still alive during the time frame that all of his other predictions failed, and no one seems to care. No one is holding him accountable for any of these failed predictions, which is no surprise, as there’s really no accountability in this scam anyway.
People can be wrong over and over and over…but the politicians will still continue to redistribute “funds” to them.
Jim
Brett Keane says:
February 27, 2014 at 8:48 pm
His model would never predict it, but my data tells me that SH sea ice has turned the corner and grown since yesterday.
====================
SAMURAI says:
February 27, 2014 at 10:48 pm
The Antarctic Ice Extent looks to have just hit its annual minimum yesterday, and still stands at about 2 standard deviations (+620,000 KM^2) above the 34-yr mean…
=====================
I agree with both the above comments and,according to a bit of analysis I’ve done on the Cryosphere numbers, the mean date for Antarctic sea ice extent is 25 February. Having said that, I would counsel caution. At either pole and at minimum or maximum extents, the measurements do often fluctuate for some time before any definitive trait becomes apparent.
Also
stargazer says:
February 28, 2014 at 1:32 am
It’s not so much that I think these AGW prophets need to be stoned …
====================
Judging by some of their remarks, they’re permanently stoned (not that I’m necessarily condemning them for that 😉 ).