From the Virginia Institute of Marine Science and the department of unverifiable forecasts in our lifetime comes this model based projection.
Researchers say Ross Sea will reverse current trend, be largely ice free in summer by 2100
Antarctica’s Ross Sea is one of the few polar regions where summer sea-ice coverage has increased during the last few decades, bucking a global trend of drastic declines in summer sea ice across the Arctic Ocean and in two adjacent embayments of the Southern Ocean around Antarctica.
Now, a modeling study led by Professor Walker Smith of the Virginia Institute of Marine Science suggests that the Ross Sea’s recent observed increase in summer sea-ice cover is likely short-lived, with the area projected to lose more than half its summer sea ice by 2050 and more than three quarters by 2100.
These changes, says Smith, will significantly impact marine life in what is one of the world’s most productive and unspoiled marine ecosystems, where rich blooms of phytoplankton feed krill, fish, and higher predators such as whales, penguins, and seals.
VIMS professor Walker Smith in Antarctica.
Smith, who has been conducting ship-based fieldwork in the Ross Sea since the 1980s, collaborated on the study with colleagues at Old Dominion University. Their paper, “The effects of changing winds and temperatures on the oceanography of the Ross Sea in the 21st century,” appears in the Feb. 26 issue of Geophysical Research Letters. Smith’s co-authors are Mike Dinniman, Eileen Hofmann, and John Klinck.
Smith says “The Ross Sea is critically important in regulating the production of Antarctica’s sea ice overall and is biologically very productive, which makes changes in its physical environment of global concern. Our study predicts that it will soon reverse its present trend and experience major drops in ice cover in summer, which, along with decreased mixing of the vertical column, will extend the season of phytoplankton growth. These changes will substantially alter the area’s pristine food web.”
Researchers attribute the observed increase in summertime sea ice in the Ross Sea—where the number of days with ice cover has grown by more two months over the past three decades—to a complex interplay of factors, including changes in wind speed, precipitation, salinity, ocean currents, and air and water temperature.
But global climate models agree that air temperatures in Antarctica will increase substantially in the coming decades, with corresponding changes in the speed and direction of winds and ocean currents. When Smith and his colleagues fed these global projections into a high-resolution computer model of air-sea-ice dynamics in the Ross Sea, they saw a drastic reduction in the extent and duration of summer sea ice.
The modeled summer sea ice concentrations decreased by 56% by 2050 and 78% by 2100. The ice-free season also grew much longer, with the mean day of retreat in 2100 occurring 11 days earlier and the advance occurring 16 days later than now.
Also changed was the duration and depth of the “shallow mixed layer,” the zone where most phytoplankton live. “Our model projects that the shallow mixed layer will persist for about a week longer in 2050, and almost three weeks longer in 2100 than now,” says Smith. “The depth of the shallow mixed layer will also decrease significantly, with its bottom 12% shallower in 2050, and 44% shallower in 2100 than now.”
The extent and duration of ice cover in the Ross Sea depends on a complex interplay of factors, including changes in wind speed, precipitation, salinity, ocean currents, and air and water temperature.
For Smith, these changes in ice, atmosphere, and ocean dynamics portend major changes in the Antarctic food web. On the bright side, the decrease in ice cover will bring more light to surface waters, while a more persistent and shallower mixed layer will concentrate phytoplankton and nutrients in this sunlit zone. These changes will combine to encourage phytoplankton growth, particularly for single-celled organisms called diatoms, with ripples of added energy potentially moving up the food web.
But, Smith warns, the drop in ice cover will negatively affect several other important species that are ice-dependent, including crystal krill and Antarctic silverfish. A decrease in krill would be particularly troublesome, as these are the major food source for the Ross Sea’s top predators—minke whales, Adélie and Emperor penguins, and crabeater seals.
Overall, says Smith, “our results suggest that phytoplankton production will increase and become more diatomaceous. Other components of the Ross Sea food web will likely be severely disrupted, creating significant but unpredictable impacts on the ocean’s most pristine ecosystem.”
The authors were supported by the National Science Foundation grants ANT-0944254, ANT-0838948 and OCE-0927797.
==============================================================
For the most current data on Antarctic sea ice, see the WUWT Sea Ice Reference Page: http://wattsupwiththat.com/reference-pages/sea-ice-page/
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
“……global climate models agree that air temperatures in Antarctica will increase substantially in the coming decades, …………………………. When Smith and his colleagues fed these global projections into a high-resolution computer model of air-sea-ice dynamics….”
GIGO
The authors were supported by the National Science Foundation grants… what else is new.
Now, a modeling study led by Professor Walker Smith…
————
*YAWN*
“But global climate models agree that air temperatures in Antarctica will increase substantially in the coming decades, with corresponding changes in the speed and direction of winds and ocean currents.” Truly zombie science. It’s always “the climate models agree/show” and in this study, it happens 37 to 87 years from now when no one will be there to hold these partisan frauds accountable.
National Science Foundations
Grants need to be renewed.
Complex models, but still unable to duplicate the real world.
Model predictions after most sceptics are safely in their boxes.
BS likelihood factor: >97%.
Gravy train science.
I’m waiting for the Headline “Climate Model Proved Right”
I have a prediction for 2100. I predict I’ll be dead by then.
“Now, a modeling study led by Professor Walker Smith of the Virginia Institute of Marine Science suggests …
I have a model right here on this computer that suggests that pigs will fly with ease by the year 2100. We need a log of research funding to study ways to midigate the effects of these airborn porkers!
Oh my.
‘But global climate models agree that air temperatures in Antarctica will increase substantially in the coming decades’…
….while actual measurement of air temperature probably won’t given that is what has happened so far. And ‘climate scientists’ will get stuck in the ice that according to the models won’t be there. I’m not sure I would have the cheek to draw a salary and then produce this sort of stuff.
“Study projects big thaw for Antarctic sea ice”
Well, they’ve been wrong for the last 30 years on this one, so maybe, statistically, they’ll luck out and win one.
Reminds me of a common scam…
Send different stock picks to 10 different people.
One will pick will undoubtedly hit big.
Use this to convince this one person that you can do it all the time, and all they need to do to be rich is to entrust you with all of their money… Tadaaaaa!
are these the same models that cannot recreate historical climate? So lets take junk models and see what predictions we can come up with so that the co2 Munch Scream can be kept going? sept 2013 was supposed to be the last month of sea ice in the arctic?
OT
Very strong Geomagnetic storm started in the last hour (22 GMT)
http://flux.phys.uit.no/cgi-bin/plotgeodata.cgi?Last24&site=tro2a&
http://www.n3kl.org/sun/images/noaa_kp_3d.gif
Northern lights seen as far south as Norfolk, England
OK, take a Barbie and stuff her in a Chatty Cathy. The result is reality, right?
Models in models.
The authors use historical temperatures and winds to verify their model. They then accept projected temperature increases of about 1.66 and 2.5 degrees C through 2050 and 2100 respectively to make their projections.
So the model may be quite reasonable, but its forecasts depend entirely on the assumed increases in Antarctic temperatures and wind shifts. Those changes remain entirely absent thus far.
“The Ross Sea is critically important in regulating the production of Antarctica’s sea ice overall…”
Ascribing human attributes to the freezing process or likening it to a factory is not very helpful, and gives a false impression of some natural intention and is emotive.
The arctic, which is demonstrably reducing in extent over the record, shows no significant change in the melt season. I show the date of maximum ice in the arctic is coming earlier by 4.5 days per century, but this is offset by the summer minimum also coming earlier by 4.0 days per century. The total melt season is only increasing 0.5 days per century.
Yet this study of the Ross Sea suggests an increase in the melt season by nearly a month?
I pray that “booster spice” is found soon, so these idiots are alive when the predictions are falsified.
One crucial factor here is the regime of the immense Ross Ice Shelf (not to be confused with “sea ice”), and its future is still very much “up in the air”.
Another apocalyptic prediction that can only be tested after the authors’ projected retirement date – not that accuracy matters at all.
Paul Ehrlich made the apparently serious mistake of making predictions for the relatively short term future. He was shown to be demonstrably wrong on more things than nearly any other human being in history – yet he still enjoys rock star status with the alarmist crowd.
The scarier, the better – don’t sweat the facts.
Seems to me that a longer growth season for phytoplankton would be well received by the locals, but then I’m not a krill either. I prefer cheeseburgers.
The supplemental material notes that the 2046-2050 temperature increase is 1.66C plus or minus 2.58. So if there is cooling over the next 40 years, he’s still spot on. I wonder if he’d be open to a decadal bet; run the model for the endpoint delta T’s at 10, 20, 30 and 40 years based on the central values. I’ll kick in $50 per decade to see if he hits his marks. Think he’ll take me up on it?
At some point there will be enough motivation to start auditing these NSF grants on behalf of the taxpayers who are forced to pay for this drek.
Studies like this demonstrate just cause for suspending funding pending proof of competancy.
Are they EVER going to make a projection / prediction that can be verified in their own lifetime (or, preferably, career) so they have to face the results?
Joe says:
February 27, 2014 at 3:18 pm
Are they EVER going to make a projection / prediction that can be verified in their own lifetime (or, preferably, career) so they have to face the results?
Hansen did. Their memories are so short it doesn’t seem to matter.
Joe says:
February 27, 2014 at 3:18 pm
Are they EVER going to make a projection / prediction that can be verified in their own lifetime (or, preferably, career) so they have to face the results?
===================================================
They would loose their doomsayers license if they did that.
And?
Everyone on this thread will be dead by 2100 so what is the point to this study?