Volcanoes, including Mount Hood in the US, can quickly become active
Magma stored for thousands of years can erupt in as little as two months
New research results suggest that magma sitting 4-5 kilometers beneath the surface of Oregon’s Mount Hood has been stored in near-solid conditions for thousands of years.
The time it takes to liquefy and potentially erupt, however, is surprisingly short–perhaps as little as a couple of months.
The key to an eruption, geoscientists say, is to elevate the temperature of the rock to more than 750 degrees Celsius, which can happen when hot magma from deep within the Earth’s crust rises to the surface.
It was the mixing of hot liquid lava with cooler solid magma that triggered Mount Hood’s last two eruptions about 220 and 1,500 years ago, said Adam Kent, an Oregon State University (OSU) geologist and co-author of a paper reporting the new findings.
Results of the research, which was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), are in this week’s journal Nature.
“These scientists have used a clever new approach to timing the inner workings of Mount Hood, an important step in assessing volcanic hazards in the Cascades,” said Sonia Esperanca, a program director in NSF’s Division of Earth Sciences.
“If the temperature of the rock is too cold, the magma is like peanut butter in a refrigerator,” Kent said. “It isn’t very mobile.
“For Mount Hood, the threshold seems to be about 750 degrees (C)–if it warms up just 50 to 75 degrees above that, it greatly decreases the viscosity of the magma and makes it easier to mobilize.”
The scientists are interested in the temperature at which magma resides in the crust, since it’s likely to have important influence over the timing and types of eruptions that could occur.
The hotter magma from deeper down warms the cooler magma stored at a 4-5 kilometer depth, making it possible for both magmas to mix and be transported to the surface to produce an eruption.
The good news, Kent said, is that Mount Hood’s eruptions are not particularly violent. Instead of exploding, the magma tends to ooze out the top of the peak.
A previous study by Kent and OSU researcher Alison Koleszar found that the mixing of the two magma sources, which have different compositions, is both a trigger to an eruption and a constraining factor on how violent it can be.
“What happens when they mix is what happens when you squeeze a tube of toothpaste in the middle,” said Kent. “Some comes out the top, but in the case of Mount Hood it doesn’t blow the mountain to pieces.”
The study involved scientists at OSU and the University of California, Davis. The results are important, they say, because little was known about the physical conditions of magma storage and what it takes to mobilize that magma.
Kent and UC-Davis colleague Kari Cooper, also a co-author of the Nature paper, set out to discover whether they could determine how long Mount Hood’s magma chamber has been there, and in what condition.
When Mount Hood’s magma first rose up through the crust into its present-day chamber, it cooled and formed crystals.
The researchers were able to document the age of the crystals by the rate of decay of naturally occurring radioactive elements. However, the growth of the crystals is also dictated by temperature: if the rock is too cold, they don’t grow as fast.
The combination of the crystals’ age and apparent growth rate provides a geologic fingerprint for determining the approximate threshold for making the near-solid rock viscous enough to cause an eruption.
“What we found was that the magma has been stored beneath Mount Hood for at least 20,000 years–and probably more like 100,000 years,” Kent said.
“During the time it’s been there, it’s been in cold storage–like peanut butter in the fridge–a minimum of 88 percent of the time, and likely more than 99 percent of the time.”
Although hot magma from below can quickly mobilize the magma chamber at 4-5 kilometers below the surface, most of the time magma is held under conditions that make it difficult for it to erupt.
“What’s encouraging is that modern technology should be able to detect when the magma is beginning to liquefy or mobilize,” Kent said, “and that may give us warning of a potential eruption.
“Monitoring gases and seismic waves, and studying ground deformation through GPS, are a few of the techniques that could tell us that things are warming.”
The researchers hope to apply these techniques to other, larger volcanoes to see if they can determine the potential for shifting from cold storage to potential eruption–a development that might bring scientists a step closer to being able to forecast volcanic activity.
-NSF-
Ric Werme, thank you for putting my mind at ease. All other volcanoes are largely local disasters, not global ones. So, the volcano lesson for today is … don’t worry, be happy.
Here you you go, chaps. Amuse yourselves with a little light reading about genetic bottlenecks.
It’s only Wikipedia, although some for the references are useful!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toba_catastrophe_theory
http://phys.org/news/2013-05-volcanic-winter-toba-super-eruption.html
http://www.geo.mtu.edu/~raman/papers/RoseTobaFallGeology.pdf
Ric Werme says:
February 24, 2014 at 6:55 pm
The USGS isn’t too concerned. I can still find a document I read years ago.
The report reffed at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2007/1071/ says in small part about the caldera forming eruptions:
“From the line of reasoning outlined here, the probability of a fourth large caldera-forming event at Yellowstone can be considered to be less than 1 in a million,”
Actually I think the USGS may have slipped up here. If the supervolcano has erupted three times in the past, with gaps of very roughly 774 000 and 646 000 years between them, I think there is a reasonable supposition that there could be another eruption within 1M years after the last eruption – other things being equal. Put what level you may like on a “reasonable supposition” but I would suggest at least 1:2. I think that the USGS would have been right if they had stated:
“the probability of a fourth large caldera-forming event at Yellowstone WITHIN THE NEXT 10 YEARS can be considered to be less than 1 in a million,”
“For Mount Hood, the threshold seems to be about 750 degrees (C)–if it warms up just 50 to 75 degrees above that, it greatly decreases the viscosity of the magma and makes it easier to mobilize.”
Yeh, the melting point of the rock. I’m sorry but this is another load of wishful thinking. How have the measured the age of the magma? How have they shown that it just sits there for 10s of thousands of years. This looks like an attempt to get some funding for more measuring stations
One thing I don’t see them mentioning in this report is the importance of water content. Perhaps it is counter intuitive to realise that magma as hot rock can contain large amounts of water until you see it being released as steam during an eruption. The presence of extra water can change the chemical properties, and therefore the physical properties of magma. Maybe what they have been measuring is not just due to the increase in temperature caused by new magma, but an increase in water content.
Poas Volcano Erupts In Costa Rica
http://weaselzippers.us/176576-poas-volcano-erupts-in-costa-rica/