Volcanoes, including Mount Hood in the US, can quickly become active
![]()

Magma stored for thousands of years can erupt in as little as two months
New research results suggest that magma sitting 4-5 kilometers beneath the surface of Oregon’s Mount Hood has been stored in near-solid conditions for thousands of years.
The time it takes to liquefy and potentially erupt, however, is surprisingly short–perhaps as little as a couple of months.
The key to an eruption, geoscientists say, is to elevate the temperature of the rock to more than 750 degrees Celsius, which can happen when hot magma from deep within the Earth’s crust rises to the surface.
It was the mixing of hot liquid lava with cooler solid magma that triggered Mount Hood’s last two eruptions about 220 and 1,500 years ago, said Adam Kent, an Oregon State University (OSU) geologist and co-author of a paper reporting the new findings.
Results of the research, which was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), are in this week’s journal Nature.
“These scientists have used a clever new approach to timing the inner workings of Mount Hood, an important step in assessing volcanic hazards in the Cascades,” said Sonia Esperanca, a program director in NSF’s Division of Earth Sciences.
“If the temperature of the rock is too cold, the magma is like peanut butter in a refrigerator,” Kent said. “It isn’t very mobile.
“For Mount Hood, the threshold seems to be about 750 degrees (C)–if it warms up just 50 to 75 degrees above that, it greatly decreases the viscosity of the magma and makes it easier to mobilize.”
The scientists are interested in the temperature at which magma resides in the crust, since it’s likely to have important influence over the timing and types of eruptions that could occur.
The hotter magma from deeper down warms the cooler magma stored at a 4-5 kilometer depth, making it possible for both magmas to mix and be transported to the surface to produce an eruption.
The good news, Kent said, is that Mount Hood’s eruptions are not particularly violent. Instead of exploding, the magma tends to ooze out the top of the peak.
A previous study by Kent and OSU researcher Alison Koleszar found that the mixing of the two magma sources, which have different compositions, is both a trigger to an eruption and a constraining factor on how violent it can be.
“What happens when they mix is what happens when you squeeze a tube of toothpaste in the middle,” said Kent. “Some comes out the top, but in the case of Mount Hood it doesn’t blow the mountain to pieces.”
The study involved scientists at OSU and the University of California, Davis. The results are important, they say, because little was known about the physical conditions of magma storage and what it takes to mobilize that magma.
Kent and UC-Davis colleague Kari Cooper, also a co-author of the Nature paper, set out to discover whether they could determine how long Mount Hood’s magma chamber has been there, and in what condition.
When Mount Hood’s magma first rose up through the crust into its present-day chamber, it cooled and formed crystals.
The researchers were able to document the age of the crystals by the rate of decay of naturally occurring radioactive elements. However, the growth of the crystals is also dictated by temperature: if the rock is too cold, they don’t grow as fast.
The combination of the crystals’ age and apparent growth rate provides a geologic fingerprint for determining the approximate threshold for making the near-solid rock viscous enough to cause an eruption.
“What we found was that the magma has been stored beneath Mount Hood for at least 20,000 years–and probably more like 100,000 years,” Kent said.
“During the time it’s been there, it’s been in cold storage–like peanut butter in the fridge–a minimum of 88 percent of the time, and likely more than 99 percent of the time.”
Although hot magma from below can quickly mobilize the magma chamber at 4-5 kilometers below the surface, most of the time magma is held under conditions that make it difficult for it to erupt.
“What’s encouraging is that modern technology should be able to detect when the magma is beginning to liquefy or mobilize,” Kent said, “and that may give us warning of a potential eruption.
“Monitoring gases and seismic waves, and studying ground deformation through GPS, are a few of the techniques that could tell us that things are warming.”
The researchers hope to apply these techniques to other, larger volcanoes to see if they can determine the potential for shifting from cold storage to potential eruption–a development that might bring scientists a step closer to being able to forecast volcanic activity.
-NSF-
Sorry, o.t. but this might be worth a separate post, and not sure how to advise directly
Seems the Supreme Court is closely divided on Obama’s climate change regulations.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/02/24/us-usa-court-climate-idUSBREA1N06Q20140224
Ah well, as my late father, a sagacious man, used to say he didn’t mind living next to an extinct volcano but he was very unhappy about being too close to a supposedly dormant one. Wise words.
Kindest Regards
“What we found was that the magma has been stored beneath Mount Hood for at least 20,000 years–and probably more like 100,000 years,” Kent said.
…wait, don’t you realize what this means???
If it blows now, CLEARLY it was because of Global Warming! After all, all those years it didn’t blow BEFORE Global Warming; therefore it MUST be Global Warming which done did it.
pokerguy says:
February 24, 2014 at 1:09 pm
—————————————–
Thanks for the heads up on that.
@ur momisugly DS…I wonder if cooling would have the potential to increase volcanic and earthquake activity by causing crustal shrinkage?
Is this new information? Seems to me like it comes from the “Things We Already Know” department.
How can they blame volcanoes on CO2 and then tax us for it?
This will be the new question at the IPCC…
We actually observed that timeline in action at Mt. St. Helens (60 miles NNW of Mt. Hood) in early 1980. But, like A. Jones’ late father, do not want to be here when Mt. Rainier (100 miles N of Mt. Hood) next decides to let loose. We live 40 miles north of Mt. Rainier, and it’s a spectacular view, but it can be sobering to contemplate the energy beneath the peak.
Emails show that EPA Region 2 Administrator Judith Enck gave advice to environmental activists, including securing government funding, getting meetings with high-level officials and attending events.
http://dailycaller.com/2014/02/24/emails-another-top-epa-official-used-private-email-account-to-aid-environmentalists/
“What we found was that the magma has been stored beneath Mount Hood for at least 20,000 years–and probably more like 100,000 years,” Kent said.
At least he’s honest about the fuzziness of ‘paleo’-anything.
Michael Mann would probably have told us that the magma had been stored for 20,178 years…eight months 11 days 4 hoursand 23 minutes!
I was just reading about it at Erik Klemetti’s blog here:
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2014/02/ephemeral-nature-magma-prior-eruption/
Toward the end of his posting is a note about a potentially very dangerous caldera producing supervolcano that has been injecting new magma recently. It is Laguna del Maule in Chile and he posts a link to a previous article that is well worth reading. These things can apparently “go off” rather quickly.
Forget Mt. Hood, it’s Yellowstone and Long Valley calderas that matter the most. Maybe it’s time to do some soil sampling and lake bed sediment studies of past super eruptions reaching DC.
“What happens when they mix is what happens when you sqeeze a tube of tooth paste in the middle”…..”some comes out the top, but in the case of Mount Hood it doesn’t blow the mountain to pieces.”
Is this supposed to be science? In what way is the mixing of magmas analogous to toothpaste tubes….let alone squeezing them in the middle.
I’d like to test this hypothesis but I’m stuck here in North Queensland so if anyone is going past Mount Hood, would you give it a squeeze for me? (Preferably in the middle)
Think of all the cooling aerosols…
But …, wait a minute. Aren’t there people living close to dormant volcanoes…
This is actually somewhat scary.
I have read that Mt. Rainier (don’t remember sources) could blow with enough force to destroy not only Seattle, but possibly even Portland and Vancouver BC. A frightening prospect, indeed.
This is also a mostly dormant seismic area that has apparently produced magnitude 9 or even greater earthquakes (comparable to the New Madrid quakes in what is now Missouri’s “boot heel” that shook with sufficient force to kill people by slamming them to the ground).
It’s been only a matter of centuries since Earth has somewhere experienced a natural disaster on this scale. One wonders if we are overdue for another.
Mt Hood, and Mt Rainier are probably not to be worried about – likelihood of plenty of warning, all same Mt St Helens. But consider the (Yosemite?) (Yellowstone National Park?) which has been described as a supervolcano ready to blow at a moment’s notice. I saw one of those “Today be a bit worried, tomorrow the end of the world as we know it” TV films with the supervolcano ready to blow, doing so, and the cloud of ash crossing the USA to delete all life even as far as Washington DC (perhaps they had it in for politicians).
But also spare a prayer for Australia. Australia has been moving north for some 30 – 40 M years over a hot spot, leaving lava flows and mountains on the east coast from Queensland to the south. Where I live, Banora Point, is on the outer edge of one of the world’s largest calderas – I think it is about number 5 or 6, in diameter. It blew about 25 M years ago. Luckily for me, as Australia has moved north, the hot spot is now roughly under the southern edge of Port Philip – near Geelong – as if Geelong has not had enough to cope with with closures of factories, etc. Would make a mess of Melbourne and bung up the entrance to its port!
“It was the mixing of hot liquid lava with cooler solid magma that triggered Mount Hood’s last two eruptions about 220 and 1,500 years ago”
=================
OK, as a geologist, I have to nit pick.
Cooler solid magma ? By definition, magma is NOT a solid. I know they are trying to dumb this down for the general public, but that is technically incorrect. What they should have said was the cooler high viscosity magma – clearly this is what they meant from the rest of the article but not what they said
Currently active/erupting volcanoes list-
http://www.volcanodiscovery.com/erupting_volcanoes.html
The actual headline from the Reuters article:
Justices question Obama climate change regulations
Hi from Oz. Has anyone noticed that active volcanoes seem to erupt in cycles, and some seem to be in sync? Is there any research on this – for example whether these cycles are related to sunspot activity? Just askin…
Jeff L says:
February 24, 2014 at 3:18 pm”
Yep, when you look at Erik’s site (noted by Crosspatch above) there is much better analysis and comments (e.g. Boris Behnke) on what is going on. Pity that Reuters & co. think that “the masses” are so scientifically illiterate that they (er, we) need their dumbed-down explanations. On the other hand, maybe that’s why they expect us to swallow the CAGW lie….
Although Yellowstone and Long Valley are often mentioned, I’m more worried about Iceland, which has a couple of larger volcanos that are a tad overdue (Laki? and another…).
The cynic in me says grabs some marshmallows and a gas mask and hope for the best…..
The realist says “more data, more data, more data”…..
(The cynic in me can’t type very well, either….I meant grab some marshmallows…)
BoyfromTottenham,
Interesting observation you made. I mentioned to a family member following the tsunami that struck Fukushima that the east coast of japan was on or near the ring of fire and that we should get ready for more volcano/earthquake events around the pacific rim. My comment was off-hand and based on only common knowledge… not data.
I wonder if your idea about coincident volcano activity being from a common influence has merit.
But, but… volcanoes will save us from global warming.
http://www.ibtimes.com/global-warming-hiatus-caused-volcanoes-cooling-effect-study-says-eruptions-slow-global-temperature
Let it blow, let it blow, let it blow….
I must confess that I would be in awe of the spectacle of a huge volcanic eruption. Would love to see it. This all provided that nobody gets hurt, which is unlikely. Oh Well. I guess I’ll pass on it then.
This is almost as contradictory as an IPCC report.
They state the Magma has been solidified for thousands of years, then it has erupted twice in the last 1500 years the last time only 220 years ago?
Therefore the last time it was very molten was 220 years ago.
To talk about its age and the crystaline structure they would need a core sample from 4-5 Kms down. Good luck with finding a drill team.
One day some one will tell the real causes of what creates volcanoes, it lays in the same maths
used for the triggering of nuclear weapons. Harmonics, or as Willis would say numerology, but the bomb works.