Study: Volcanoes contribute to recent warming ‘hiatus’

Study: Volcanoes contribute to recent warming ‘hiatus’
Shown here is Cleveland Volcano, one of the most active volcanoes in the Aleutian Islands, off the Alaska mainland. Image: NASA

Researchers find models must account for volcanic eruptions to accurately predict climate change.

From:MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change

By the late 1990s, scientists had observed more than two decades of rapid global warming, and expected the warming trend to continue. Instead, despite continuing increases in greenhouse gas emissions, the Earth’s surface temperatures have remained nearly flat for the last 15 years. The International Panel on Climate Change verified this recent warming “hiatus” in its latest report.

Researchers around the globe have been working to understand this puzzle — looking at heat going into the oceans, changes in wind patterns, and other factors to explain why temperatures have stayed nearly stable, while greenhouse gas concentrations have continued to rise. In a study published today in Nature Geoscience, a team of scientists from MIT and elsewhere around the U.S. report that volcanic eruptions have contributed to this recent cooling, and that most climate models have not accurately accounted for the effects of volcanic activity.

“This is the most comprehensive observational evaluation of the role of volcanic activity on climate in the early part of the 21st century,” says co-author Susan Solomon, the Ellen Swallow Richards Professor of Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Science at MIT. “We assess the contributions of volcanoes on temperatures in the troposphere — the lowest layer of the atmosphere — and find they’ve certainly played some role in keeping the Earth cooler.”

There are many components of the Earth’s climate system that can increase or decrease the temperature of the globe. For example, while greenhouse gases cause warming, some types of small particles, known as aerosols, cause cooling. When volcanoes erupt explosively enough, they enhance these aerosols — a phenomenon referred to as “volcanic forcing.”

“The recent slowdown in observed surface and tropospheric warming is a fascinating detective story,” says Ben Santer, the lead author of the study and a climate scientist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. “There is not a single culprit, as some scientists have claimed. Multiple factors are implicated. The real scientific challenge is to obtain hard quantitative estimates of the contributions of each of these factors to the so-called slowdown.”

The researchers verified the cooling phenomenon by performing two different statistical tests to determine whether recent volcanic eruptions have cooling effects that can be distinguished from the intrinsic variability of the climate. The team found evidence for significant correlations between volcanic aerosol observations and satellite-based estimates of both tropospheric temperature and sunlight reflected by the particles off the top of the atmosphere.

“What’s exciting in this work was that we could detect the influence of the volcanic aerosols in new ways. Using satellite observations confirmed the fact that the volcanic particles reflected a significant amount of the sun’s energy out to space, and of course losing energy means cooling — and the tropospheric temperatures show that too,” explains Solomon, who is also a researcher with MIT’s Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change. “There are still uncertainties in exactly how big the effects are, so there is more work to do.”

Alan Robock, a professor of environmental sciences at Rutgers University and a leading expert on the impacts of volcanic eruptions on climate, says these findings are an important part of the larger climate picture. “This paper reminds us that there are multiple causes of climate change, both natural and anthropogenic, and that we need to consider all of them when interpreting past climate and predicting future climate.”

“Since none of the standard scenarios for evaluating future global warming include volcanic eruptions,” Robock adds, “this paper will help us quantify the impacts of future large and small eruptions when they happen, and thus better interpret the role of humans in causing climate change.”

This research was led by a team at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and builds upon work Solomon conducted in 2011, finding that aerosols in an upper layer of the atmosphere — the stratosphere — are persistently variable and must be included in climate models to accurately depict climate changes.

The research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy.

h/t to Roger Sowell

For reference, here is the associated paper; (h/t Greg)

http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/ngeo2098.html

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

182 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
February 25, 2014 10:04 am

Here is a great link to recent photos of the 2/14 explosion at Mt Kelud, Wired had the link along with a post on the event…http://www.oysteinlundandersen.com/Volcanoes/Kelud/Kelud-Volcano-Indonesia-February-2014.html

February 25, 2014 12:32 pm

To: Fredinand Engelbeen
I may not be so wrong after all. The article below from a researcher at Berkeley Earth, which I had not previously seen, stresses exactly the same point I was making – that EPA regulations on sulphur emissions have warmed the climate.
http://www.yaleclimatemediaforum.org/2008/06/common-climate-misconceptions-why-reducing-sulfate-aerosol-emissions-complicates-efforts-to-moderate-climate-change

george e. conant
February 25, 2014 5:39 pm

So, I have questions. How is it that aerosols and green house gasses can just hang in the atmosphere and not fall out due to , I don’t know , gravity? I understand that the atmosphere is not homogenous, it is stratisfied due to respective atomic and molecular weights of various gasses and compounds where they occur in the atmosphere. So does CO2 collect in a layer above the troposphere? Or does it fall out over time? My point is that there must be a quantifiable analogue for gasses heavier than oxygen-nitrogen air mix to measure the rate of fall-out against the rate of emission? Thus CO2 can not just stay “up-there”.

February 25, 2014 9:06 pm

george e. conant says:
February 25, 2014 at 5:39 pm
Thus CO2 can not just stay “up-there”.
Yes, it can. Gases do not follow the rules of buoyancy like objects in water. The only gas molecules that are not more or less distributed evenly throughout the atmosphere are water vapour molecules and that is because they condense into liquid droplets in clouds. But even then, clouds can hang around for a long time until the drops get too large.

February 26, 2014 1:35 am

Allan M.R. MacRae correction of :February 24, 2014 at 2:55 am
From a previous post – note the coldest CET in the Dalton was 1814, one year BEFORE Tambora.

February 28, 2014 2:36 am

The cooling effect of sulfur aerosols – is important for the 1 – 2, up to 4 years.
How (very little) important?
“For example, when GCMs are used to best fit the 20 th century warming, they give a global temperature drop of about 0.4-0.5°C during the great eruption of Krakatoa.”
“Apparently, the global temperature decrease following these major eruptions is very modest, just over 0.1°C […], and barely overcoming the natural climate variations.”
“(Note that the large drop in 1981 took place a few months before El Chichón’s eruption).”
(Nir Shaviv – http://www.sciencebits.com/FittingElephants)
Stratospheric volcanic eruptions most likely, however, can significantly (?) warming climate.
Even small concentrations of sulfur aerosols can strongly and permanently reduce the level of stratospheric ozone for many years – have a significant impact on tropospheric clouds.
Let’s look at this figures of volcanic activity:
(http://www.skepticalscience.com/images/volcano_20th_century.gif, http://www.sciencebits.com/files/pictures/climate/volc/20thCenturyWithVolc.jpg)
For NH both strong warming 193? -4? and current (197? – 200?), preceded by a very high stratospheric volcanic activity – destroying ozone in the stratosphere.
Look at this figure: (http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/rate-of-change-of-global-average-temperature-1850-2007-in-oc-per-decade-2/image_preview) – period of rapid cooling (the Europe) 195? – 196?, was preceded by long period of exceptional peace of tectonic (an increase of ozone in the stratosphere, exceeded the hypothetical “the border” for initiating the rapid the cooling process – abrupt increase in global cloud cover?).

1 6 7 8