What is El Niño Taimasa?

From the University of Hawaii ‑ SOEST, something I’ve never heard of before. Note the photo.

This shows flat-top Porites coral on a shallow reef near American Samoa. Coral heads are fully submerged under normal conditions. During El Niño Taimasa, tops of large flat coral on the reef are exposed to air at low tide. Credit: Image courtesy of the National Park of American Samoa.

During very strong El Niño events, sea level drops abruptly in the tropical western Pacific and tides remain below normal for up to a year in the South Pacific, especially around Samoa.

The Samoans call the wet stench of coral die-offs arising from the low sea levels “taimasa” (pronounced [kai’ ma’sa]). Studying the climate effects of this particular variation of El Niño and how it may change in the future is a team of scientists at the International Pacific Research Center, University of Hawai’i at Mānoa and at the University of New South Wales, Australia.

Two El Niño Taimasa events have occurred in recent history: 1982/83 and 1997/98. El Niño Taimasa differs from other strong El Niño events, such as those in 1986/87 and 2009/10, according to Matthew Widlansky, postdoctoral fellow at the International Pacific Research Center, who spearheaded the study.

“We noticed from tide gauge measurements that toward the end of these very strong El Niño events, when sea levels around Guam quickly returned to normal, that tide gauges near Samoa actually continued to drop,” recalls Widlansky.

During such strong El Niño, moreover, the summer rain band over Samoa, called the South Pacific Convergence Zone, collapses toward the equator. These shifts in rainfall cause droughts south of Samoa and sometimes trigger more tropical cyclones to the east near Tahiti.

Using statistical procedures to tease apart the causes of the sea-level seesaw between the North and South Pacific, the scientists found that it is associated with the well-known southward shift of weak trade winds during the termination of El Niño, which in turn is associated with the development of the summer rain band.

Looking into the future with the help of computer climate models, the scientists are now studying how El Niño Taimasa will change with further warming of the planet. Their analyses show, moreover, that sea-level drops could be predictable seasons ahead, which may help island communities prepare for the next El Niño Taimasa.

###

At Ocean Sciences 2014:

PROJECTIONS OF EXTREME SEA LEVEL VARIABILITY DUE TO EL NIÑO TAIMASA, Oral presentation Session #:079 Rising Sea Level: Contributions and Future Projections; Date: 2/26/2014; Time: 12:00; Location: 313 B; http://www.sgmeet.com/osm2014/viewabstract.asp?AbstractID=15569

Widlansky, M.J., A. Timmermann, S. McGregor, M.F. Stuecker, and W. Cai, 2014: An interhemispheric tropical sea level seesaw due to El Niño Taimasa. J. Climate, 27 (3), 1070-1081, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00276.1.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

41 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lance Wallace
February 20, 2014 7:45 am

“taimasa” (pronounced [kai’ ma’sa])
Is this right?

jlurtz
February 20, 2014 7:57 am

I forget: is sea level up down or down up?

kenin
February 20, 2014 8:01 am

What contrast!
I’m looking out the window at 32F and a hvy overcast, waiting for a cold cluster of thunderstorms to move in and a photo of beautiful coral shows up on the screen, (sigh)
Clearly I have nothing to add to this…

Don Newkirk
February 20, 2014 8:02 am

Yes, in colloquial Samoan, /t/ has shifted to [k], as it had earlier in Hawaiian.
en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/Samoan_language#consonants

alex
February 20, 2014 8:06 am

They can predict Taimasa “seasons before”???
Does it mean, presently no Taimasa is at the horizon?

John West
February 20, 2014 8:06 am

“Looking into the future”
So, they have a crystal ball? They are not looking into the future. They are projecting into the future based on what they know which is unavoidably incomplete; the $64M question is how complete or incomplete is their knowledge.

February 20, 2014 8:07 am

University of New South Wales. Is this not Ship-of-Fools University? That kind of help they probably don’t need. Note how wonderfully the coral adapts to this phenomenon. Surely this adaptability is “greater than previously thought” given all the ink given to the fragility of ‘Class Anthozoa of phylum Cnidaria’. Perhaps something missed by the researchers is that this well-developed flat top suggests a similar magnitude of each event. If not, it should be possible to core the coral and see if layers of new growth are discernible above earlier Taimasa levels. Such a record (probably incomplete) would be the key to evaluating how much things may have changed, especially if they can be dated. Ditto on Guam to see how regular the oscillation is.

February 20, 2014 8:09 am

‘They are projecting into the future based on what they know which is unavoidably incomplete; ”
otherwise known as science
REPLY: or astrology – Anthony

John Tillman
February 20, 2014 8:16 am

Don Newkirk says:
February 20, 2014 at 8:02 am
Interchangeable in some Pacific NW coastal Indian languages, ie Tillamook & Killamook.

February 20, 2014 8:17 am

Interestingly, with the last Ice Age, sea levels dropped ~120 metres. This likely means that at the time the ice began to melt, corals around the world were flat topped. Drillling into major coral deposits should hit this level and it should be identifiable by coral debris and then ‘lifts’ of coral growth, probably with increasing interval thicknesses.

tchannon
February 20, 2014 8:19 am

It would be so nice and interesting if only these people dealt with what is, the history they have uncovered. For the rest put a bung in it.
Climatology is part of geography and geography tends to deal with history. Get them back to that, poorly paid too, do it for the enjoyment.

milodonharlani
February 20, 2014 8:20 am

Steven Mosher says:
February 20, 2014 at 8:09 am
So the 97% consensus that human activities are 90% responsible for 95% likely to be catastrophic climate change since 1900/1945/1977 (take your pick) is not in fact settled science?
Good to know. Please alert Jim, Gavin, Phil & Mike. Thanks.

Taphonomic
February 20, 2014 8:28 am

Is this a result of the “sloshing”? (or is there a more technical term for it?)

jayhd
February 20, 2014 8:33 am

“Looking into the future with the help of computer climate models, the scientists are now studying how El Niño Taimasa will change with further warming of the planet.”
Are they also studying how things will change with the cooling of the planet?

February 20, 2014 8:36 am

“….the scientists are now studying how El Niño Taimasa will change with further warming of the planet. Their analyses show, moreover, that sea-level drops could be predictable seasons ahead, which may help island communities prepare for the next El Niño Taimasa.”
OK, so that’s got next years grant money sorted out, now what do they actually find?
If they’ve managed to ‘tease out ‘ some periodic signals that could be interesting. More attention needs to be give to understanding periodic fluctuations and their drivers in order to separate out any long term signal.
Sadly as presented here this tells us nothing except the fact that they have a priori assumptions about how it will change in the future based on GCM models that don’t work.

Mike M
February 20, 2014 8:37 am

More data: http://www.bom.gov.au/oceanography/projects/spslcmp/data/monthly.shtml
According to SKS – it’s the change in wind direction/strength. (Which of course to Cook isn’t possible in the Arctic to explain temperature and ice changes …..)

RayG
February 20, 2014 8:38 am

Hmmm, “taimasa?” Sounds kinda sushi to me.
On to the authors. All list “modeling” in there CVs. There isn’t a statistician among the lot. To quote Bob Dylan, “When will they ever learn?”

Billy Liar
February 20, 2014 8:40 am

It must be awful for these scientists based in Hawaii to have to go snorkelling around the South Pacific looking for flat-topped corals. It will be a miracle if they are to forecast El Niños years ahead – Jim Hansen couldn’t do it.

Editor
February 20, 2014 8:53 am

From the abstract of the Widlansky et al presentation:
“Whereas future sea levels are likely to gradually rise, recent modeling evidence suggests that the frequency of strong El Niño events (which alter local trade winds and sea level) is very likely to increase with greenhouse warming.”
Didn’t we recently see a paper that predicted that we were going into a permanent La Nina dominant phase because of greenhouse warming.
Regardless, there are no climate models that simulate ENSO properly, so the prediction is hooey. Hooey, I say.

michael hart
February 20, 2014 8:58 am

I hope I’ll be forgiven for not moving to the edge of my chair in excitement. When I see some meaningful quantitative predictions proved correct, I may may change my mind.

O. Olson
February 20, 2014 9:02 am

We regularly respell or even outright change place names in American English. Rome for Roma, Gothenburg for Göteborg for example. So if the name of this place is pronounced KAImasa, why not just spell it that way from now on? Or does that just make to much sense?

Latitude
February 20, 2014 9:10 am

coral are odd creatures….they can’t take a one degree rise in water temps…
….but they can be dried out and exposed to sun and rain
http://media-1.web.britannica.com/eb-media/00/65300-004-C334446B.jpg

CRS, DrPH
February 20, 2014 9:12 am

The corals want to be up in the air….that way, they can escape ocean acidification.

wws
February 20, 2014 9:18 am

I prefer El Niño Tiramisu myself. Quite tasty!

February 20, 2014 9:24 am

This is not rocket science. When you have strong trade winds, it blows water into the western Pacific and the sea level is a bit higher than it is in the eastern Pacific along the coast of South America. We also get some additional sea level as the water temperature in this “western Pacific warm pool” rises and the water expands. When you have an exceptionally strong El Nino, the trade winds can even reverse direction. This blows water out of the western Pacific and reduces sea levels there as that water “sloshes” back across the equatorial region and the water temperatures in the far western Pacific cool off causing an additional drop in levels. Why would they be surprised? Note: During the Holocene Optimum, sea levels were about 2m higher in the western Pacific than they are now.