Global climate trend since Nov. 16, 1978: +0.14 C per decade
January temperatures (preliminary)
Global composite temp.: +0.29 C (about 0.52 degrees Fahrenheit) above 30-year average for January.
Northern Hemisphere: +0.39 C (about 0.70 degrees Fahrenheit) above 30-year average for January.
Southern Hemisphere: +0.20 C (about 0.36 degrees Fahrenheit) above 30-year average for January.
Tropics: -0.03 C (about 0.05 degrees Fahrenheit) below 30-year average for January.
December temperatures (revised):
Global Composite: +0.27 C above 30-year average
Northern Hemisphere: +0.27 C above 30-year average
Southern Hemisphere: +0.26 C above 30-year average
Tropics: +0.06 C above 30-year average
(All temperature anomalies are based on a 30-year average (1981-2010) for the month reported.)
Notes on data released Feb. 6, 2014:
Compared to seasonal norms, the coldest place on Earth in January was the upper peninsula of Michigan near Iron River, where temperatures were as much as 3.86 C (about 6.95 degrees Fahrenheit) cooler than seasonal norms, according to Dr. John Christy, a professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville. This was part of a large area of cooler than normal temperatures that covered most of the eastern U.S. and Canada in January, stretching from just south of Hudson Bay through the Gulf of Mexico.
Generally, however, Earth’s atmosphere was warmer than normal in January, with the warmest spot over northeastern Greenland by the Arctic Ocean. Atmospheric temperatures there averaged 6.24 C (just over 11.2 degrees Fahrenheit) warmer than seasonal norms for January.
Archived color maps of local temperature anomalies are available on-line at:
http://nsstc.uah.edu/climate/
As part of an ongoing joint project between UAHuntsville, NOAA and NASA, Christy and Dr. Roy Spencer, an ESSC principal scientist, use data gathered by advanced microwave sounding units on NOAA and NASA satellites to get accurate temperature readings for almost all regions of the Earth. This includes remote desert, ocean and rain forest areas where reliable climate data are not otherwise available.
The satellite-based instruments measure the temperature of the atmosphere from the surface up to an altitude of about eight kilometers above sea level. Once the monthly temperature data is collected and processed, it is placed in a “public” computer file for immediate access by atmospheric scientists in the U.S. and abroad.
Neither Christy nor Spencer receives any research support or funding from oil, coal or industrial companies or organizations, or from any private or special interest groups. All of their climate research funding comes from federal and state grants or contracts.
— 30 —
=============================================================
Dr. Roy Spencer writes:
UAH Global Temperature Update for January 2014: +0.29 deg. C
February 5th, 2014
The Version 5.6 global average lower tropospheric temperature (LT) anomaly for January, 2014 is +0.29 deg. C, little changed from December (click for full size version):
The global, hemispheric, and tropical LT anomalies from the 30-year (1981-2010) average for the last 13 months are:
YR MON GLOBAL NH SH TROPICS
2013 1 +0.497 +0.517 +0.478 +0.386
2013 2 +0.203 +0.372 +0.033 +0.195
2013 3 +0.200 +0.333 +0.067 +0.243
2013 4 +0.114 +0.128 +0.101 +0.165
2013 5 +0.082 +0.180 -0.015 +0.112
2013 6 +0.295 +0.335 +0.255 +0.220
2013 7 +0.173 +0.134 +0.211 +0.074
2013 8 +0.158 +0.111 +0.206 +0.009
2013 9 +0.365 +0.339 +0.390 +0.190
2013 10 +0.290 +0.331 +0.249 +0.031
2013 11 +0.193 +0.160 +0.226 +0.020
2013 12 +0.266 +0.272 +0.260 +0.057
2014 1 +0.291 +0.386 +0.196 -0.027
The global image for January should be available in the next day or so here.
Popular monthly data files (these might take a few days to update):
uahncdc_lt_5.6.txt (Lower Troposphere)
uahncdc_mt_5.6.txt (Mid-Troposphere)
uahncdc_ls_5.6.txt (Lower Stratosphere)
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
And as I always do on these threads…for those interested, the following is a link to the very preliminary sea surface temperature update for January 2014:
http://bobtisdale.wordpress.com/2014/01/27/very-preliminary-january-2014-sea-surface-temperature-sst-update/
Why 79 as a starting point? It is one of the coldest winters on record…….back then quacks were screaming about globaloneycooling and the need to act now. There has been a temp decline since 1890 and btw climate is also very local. There is no globaloneycllimate (see thermodynamics).
Down here in Florida, the tourists were hopping mad; we had freezing weather and frost as far south as West Palm Beach. Temps were as low as the mid-30s here in Fort Lauderdale.
The map shows a cool anomaly over the UK, however the UK has not had below normal temps. Is this where we see the difference between lower troposphere and surface temps?
If the current trends stay stable for another 15 years and 30 year average is shifted to reflect this then the anomalies would approach zero. To say there is a pause of global warming for the last 15 years is to say that the anomaly would be zero today given that shorter base average. A day to day anomaly could be deemed weather. How long a period does the base have to extend to define climate?
Ferdinand (@StFerdinandIII) says:
February 6, 2014 at 2:47 pm
Why 79 as a starting point?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Because that is when the satellite was launched.
A bit of the history behind it is HERE
Our observations of the Stephenson screen the past 7 days (where normals are +2 day, -4 night time) have gone from -1.5 daytime to -8 daytime, and -7 night time now -14.5 night time. Is this abnormal? Not at all. We have seen these polar outbreaks where we live for the past 25 years EVERY year. As an ex farmer these were the most dreaded times all year, we needed to start pruning vines and trees (time management on a large farm) and after pruning if there was an outbreak of damaging cold you couldn’t glue the trees together so damage could be up to 80%. And the later the cold outbreak, the worse the damage became It seems to me that trees etc become less and less able to stand the cold as winter drags on (sort of antifreeze breaking down in a car after time ) and a “false spring” made it even worse,
Thanks A. The UAH – Lower Troposphere Global Temperature Report map for January 2014 is not yet available from http://nsstc.uah.edu/climate/
I guess that pretty much explains this.
http://www.natice.noaa.gov/pub/special/great_lakes/2014/charts/composite_west/wl140206color.jpg
Lake Superior pretty much >90% ice.
I think the headline should have been: Global Temperature Report January 2014 Upper Michigan [had the] ‘coldest’ [anomaly] on the globe in January
Michigan and Wisconsin have had the coldest winter since records began in the 1890’s. Our area on the 45th parallel has already exceeded the annual average snowfall (over 140″), and I shovelled every inch of it. We’ve had no snow meltdowns at all – highly unusual.
Piers Corbyn’s forecasts for the US have been spot on the entire winter through January, including the polar vortex induced weather. As he said on his blog today at WeatherAction: “The Wrath of Winter is upon us -driven by the increasingly wild Jet Stream as the world accelerates deeper into a new Mini-Ice-Age”
I cannot emphasize enough the importance of understanding the very real dangerous weather ahead, as Piers says. You doubters of his out there don’t have a leg to stand on. So many others who understand the cooling cycle like Don Easterbrook know we’re in for it, like it or not. The fools in government thought they could use the CO2 fairy tale to dictate energy policy, but mother nature is having none of it. Solar-Lunar action dictates the weather and climate, not CO2.
We haven’t seen anything like this since the late 70’s. Can’t wait for summer, if we have one. I just hope we have a decent growing season, ’cause I want to eat fresh tomatoes out of our garden again… Counting the days ’til the next solar max… whenever that is… Interested in the solar weather connection? See “The Sunspot Mystery” at http://youtu.be/v3frXY_rG8c and find out.
You bet your bippy it’s cold up here in the UP. I’m in IronWOOD, about 60 miles west of Iron RIVER (there’s yet another Iron up here, Iron MOUNTAIN). All the Irons reflect the history of iron deposits and iron mining that, along with logging and copper mining, built this region (Marquette, Michigan is still a significant iron mining area).
The cold is punishing the deer herd here, killing many and making them even more susceptible to predation by our numerous timber wolves. Getting a diesel tractor started is tough sledding. We’ve had weeks now where the daily maximum is single digits and night is subzero. Add to that a “propane crisis” where the fuel, normally selling for about $1.99 a gallon, has zoomed into the stratosphere, up to as much as $5.99/gallon (my last purchase was $5.49 on the minimum amount, 150 gallons). We may have some of our less well-off folk losing their houses to the cold, or possibly, their lives.
Let’s get this straight: COLD is a killer. The Global Warming fanatics are dangerous lunatics who should be locked away. A degree or two of actual warming would benefit damn near everyone, but I suspect that is not in the cards. The joker in the deck may be a cooling episode that is, in fact, catastrophic, at least to elderly and low-income people.
JimF – you can thank the folks down in IA for the propane prices.
The corn came in wet and they used so much propane to dry the stuff that it created a shortage.
Another unintended consequence of used food for fuel…
I spent a great deal of time in Eastern Upper Michigan last month and it WAS bloody cold.
@ur momisugly A C Osborn says:
Sorry, NH = +0.386
Does not match reality.
Thanks–my sentiments exactly. I still say (yes, I know you’re tired of hearing it) that there is something wrong with the satellite data (not saying it was intentional at all–but malfunctioning or miscalculating–something) My reality says its trending cool much more than we see in the reports–soo many cold records, too many dead and dying, too many places with “the coldest since…”
Maybe the data appear wrong because past data was adjusted? So it makes the satellite-based instruments measure from the wrong base?
Re: Day By Day & AC Osborn
Look at the map. In the NH it is obvious that the yellows and oranges out number the areas that are blue.
I spent the month in Chi-beria, and it was one of the coldest, snowiest, January’s we have had, since 78 and 79. I guess Alaska deserves a break, every 20 years or so. But I am counting the days until Spring.
“DavidS says:
February 6, 2014 at 3:32 pm
The map shows a cool anomaly over the UK, however the UK has not had below normal temps. Is this where we see the difference between lower troposphere and surface temps?”
Odd – The satellite lower troposphere data for the UK shows 0.5 to 1.5 degrees below normal. The Met Office mean temperature anomaly against 1981-2010 shows 0.5 to 1.5 degrees above normal for most of the UK. http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/summaries/anomacts . I haven’t got an explanation for the difference
Jeez, I hope not. That would be really illiterate. ‘Coldest compared to normal’, maybe.
We have lived in the Iron River- Crystal Falls area for almost 32 years and this year has been our coldest extended period during the winter without a day when we were above 25 degrees F
There is no way in hell that this image is accurate. You have the arctic circle warmer than smoking hot Australia.
oops. Anomaly. I see it now. Sorry.
So far 2014 is off to a lower start than 2013. Not good for The Pause ™
I live & grew up in Iron River & it was COLD for sure! Dats da U.P. for ya! After 22 years of living here you learn to adapt. Now I completely understand why my heating bill for the month of January was so high!
I have lived in the U.P. for nearly 51 years (Bessemer and now Ironwood). This is the coldest winter we have had. It was -12 in my back yard at 8:30 this morning, the sun was shining and not much wind. I was out tossing a ball for my dog without my jacket on. It actually felt pretty good.
RE: RoyMc says:
February 7, 2014 at 10:43 am
That is odd how your MET map shows warm where the Satellite map shows cold. My stab at an answer is that the MET map shows temperatures at ground level, and the Satellite map, in showing the “lower troposphere,” shows the ground level and also some air above that level. (I do notice the MET map shows higher parts of Scotland as being below normal, in January.)
It has been amazing to watch the British Isles be hit by gale after gale. I’ve joked the Icelandic Low should be renamed the Britannic Low, this winter. It is as if the pattern has been trying to get into a negative AO- negative NAO pattern (where the Atlantic storms go south into the Mediterranean,) but only can get half of the way there.
In the negative AO- negative NAO pattern the wicked cold air in Siberia backs west and you get your coldest east winds. Last January the Siberian air made it to Norway, but seemed to have trouble crossing the North Sea. However it may have seeped across at slightly higher levels. (A friend “across the Pond” alerted me to his first snowfall, in January.) It may have cooled the “lower troposphere” without getting all the way down to ground level.
That is my stab at explaining why the MET map differs from the Satellite map.