KXL was AWOL from SOTU – along with real energy, job, economic and revenue solutions
Guest essay by Paul Driessen
President Obama frequently says he wants to turn the economy around, put America back to work, produce more energy, improve public safety, and open new markets to goods stamped “Made in the USA.” In his State of the Union address he said, if congressional inaction continues, “I will act on my own to slash bureaucracy and streamline the permitting process for key projects, so we can get more construction workers on the job as fast as possible.”
Unfortunately, like Arafat, he never misses an opportunity to miss an opportunity to do all these things.
Most Americans are no longer fooled by empty hope and change hype. In December only 74,000 jobs were created (many of them low-paying part-time seasonal positions), while 374,000 more people gave up looking for work. Not surprisingly, recent polls have found that three-quarters of Americans say the country still appears to be in a recession, two-thirds don’t trust the President to make the right decisions for the country, and barely 30% say the nation is “heading in the right direction.”
The President needs to use his pen and phone to free our energy, economy and entrepreneurial instincts. But ANWR, OCS, HF, KXL and other solutions were AWOL from the SOTU. They were sacrificed on the CO2 and CMGW altar, by the POTUS, EPA, DOI and DOE, in obeisance to the EDF, NRDC, other environmentalist pressure groups, and assorted unelected, unaccountable, unconstitutional autocrats.
(Don’t you love Washington-speak – from the land of acronyms, that pricey patch of real estate on the banks of the Potomac River, bordered by reality and places where people actually work to earn a living, despite presidents and hordes of legislators and regulators doing their level best to make that difficult. For those whose Wash-speak is as bad as their Spanish and German, translations are provided below.)*
Our nation is blessed with vast energy, metallic, mineral, forest and other resources, waiting to be tapped. But they are locked up in favor of crony-capitalist, eco-unfriendly, land-hungry, subsidy-dependent, nigh-useless pseudo-alternatives that are dearly beloved by utopian environmentalists – and by politicians hungry for campaign contributions from businesses that they repay with billions in other people’s money, taken from taxpayers at the point of an IRS gun to prop up renewable energy schemes.
Our hydrocarbon wealth especially offers amazing benefits: improved human safety, health, welfare and living standards, in a more stable world, with new sources of jobs, wealth and income equality. Not tapping these resources is contrary to Obama’s promises and our national interest. It is immoral.
Of all the opportunities arrayed before him, the 1,179-mile Alberta to Texas Keystone XL pipeline (KXL) is the most “shovel ready.” Indeed, it awaits merely a presidential phone call or signature, to slash bureaucratic red tape, streamline the permitting process, and create construction and manufacturing jobs. Some 40,000 jobs in fact – more than half as many as were created nationwide last December.
As I have pointed out before (here, here, here and here), there are compelling reasons why the President should end this interminable six-years-and-counting dilatory KXL review process – right now.
Jobs. KXL would create an estimated 20,000 construction jobs; another 10,000 in factories that make the steel, pipelines, valves, cement and equipment needed to build the pipeline; thousands more in hotel, restaurant and other support industries; and still more jobs in the Canadian, North Dakota and other oil fields whose output would be transported by the pipeline to refineries and petrochemical plants where still more workers would be employed. With Mr. Obama and his EPA waging war on communities and states that mine and use coal, these jobs are even more important to blue-collar workers in Middle America.
Revenue. States along the pipeline route would receive $5 billion in new property tax revenues, and still more in workers’ income tax payments. Federal coffers would also realize hefty gains.
Safety. Right now most of the oil from Canada’s oil sands and North Dakota’s Bakken shale deposits moves by railroad and truck fuel tanks, often through populated areas. Truck and rail accidents have forced towns to evacuate and even killed 50 people in Lac-Megantic, Quebec. Corporate executives and federal regulators are working to improve tanker designs and reroute traffic. But even despite occasional accidents, pipelines have a much better safety record. KXL would be built with state-of-the-art pipe, valves and other components, to the latest design, manufacturing, construction and inspection specifications. It has been configured to avoid population centers, sensitive wildlife areas and the Ogallala Aquifer.
Resource conservation and energy needs. Building Keystone will help ensure that vast petroleum resources can be efficiently utilized to meet consumer needs. In conjunction with other pipelines, it will greatly reduce the need to flare (burn and waste) natural gas that is a byproduct of oil production in Bakken shale country. The pipelines will also help get propane and natural gas to places that need these fuels. Recent pipeline problems, plus unusually high demands for propane to convert corn to ethanol, created soaring prices and shortages amid one of the nastiest North American cold spells in decades.
KXL will also enable state and private lands to continue contributing to America’s hydrocarbon renaissance. That is especially important in the face of congressional and Obama Administration refusals to open more federal onshore and offshore oil and gas prospects in Alaska and the Lower 48 States.
US-Canadian relations. The endless dithering over KXL has frayed relations between Canada and the United States. It has compelled the Canadians to take decisive steps toward building new pipelines from the Alberta oil sands fields to Superior, Wisconsin … and to Canada’s west coast, for shipment to Asia’s growing economies. Further delays will not reduce oil sands development – only the oil’s destination.
Climate change. In his SOTU speech, President Obama informed us that “climate change is a fact.” Well, duh. It’s been a fact since Earth was formed. The only pertinent issues are these: Are humans causing imminent, unprecedented climate change disasters? And can we control Earth’s climate, by drastically curtailing hydrocarbon use, slashing living standards and switching to renewables?
No evidence supports either proposition. Moreover, oil sands production would add a minuscule 0.06% to US greenhouse gas emissions, a tiny fraction of that amount to global carbon dioxide emissions, and an undetectable 0.00002 deg F (0.00001 C) per year to useless computer-model scenarios for global warming.
A January 24 letter spearheaded by Senator John Hoeven (R-ND) and signed by all 45 Republican Senators notes many of these points and requests that President Obama permit KXL pipeline construction “as soon as possible.” Several Democrats told Hoeven privately that they support his effort and Keystone, but are nervous about challenging the President or Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid publicly.
On January 31, the State Department reaffirmed its previous conclusions that KXL is unlikely to noticeably increase demand for Canadian oil sands or global emissions of carbon dioxide. With reelection behind him, the President has “greater flexibility” and doesn’t need to kowtow to his radical green base. By picking up his pen and phone, cutting off another year-long study of whether Keystone is “in the national interest,” and approving the pipeline, he could satisfy independents and his union base. He’d even reduce CO2 emissions, which State says would be 28-42% higher if Canada’s oil is shipped via train or truck, instead of through the pipeline.
Democrats are urging unemployed workers to lobby Republicans for extended benefits. They should instead lobby Democrats and the President to do what’s right for America: create the jobs they promised, by approving Keystone – along with drilling, fracking, mining, and reduced taxes and regulations.
America is waiting. Will there finally be real hope and change? Or just more hype and empty rhetoric?
_____________
Paul Driessen is senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org) and author of Eco-Imperialism: Green power – Black death.
* Acronym translator: Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Outer Continental Shelf, hydraulic fracturing, Keystone XL pipeline, absent without leave, State of the Union, carbon dioxide, catastrophic manmade global warming, President of the United States, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of the Interior, Department of Energy, Environmental Defense Fund, Natural Resources Defense Council.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
General P. Malaise says:
More likely facist, into which both China and Russia have evolved, to large degree and the USA is well on its way. Free enterprise with thugs running the show.
Ha!
Hope and change has morphed into “stop, drop, and roll” for the POTUS!
😜
Big Labor is so mad at Obama’s ObamaCare betrayal, Obama may just accidentally do what’s right and while trying to placate them. (http://finance.townhall.com/columnists/bobbeauprez/2014/02/03/wapo-labor-union-officials-say-obama-betrayed-them-in-healthcare-rollout-n1788655)
Then again, Obama doesn’t have to worry about reelection and as long as he can play king through executive action, he may not care about the mid-term elections this year.
What’s going to win? Politics or ideology?
Another major impediment to building the Keystone is the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad, which handles 700,000 barrels/day. Guess who doesn’t want to lose that kind of business? His initials are Warren Buffet. He bought the railroad for $0.89 on the dollar several years ago.
General P. Malaise says: @ur momisugly February 3, 2014 at 8:37 am
the current administration in the USA is a cabal of marxists….
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Please read E. M. Smith’s “Evil Socialism” vs “Evil Capitalism” and America’s Ruling Class
You need to get past the Dog and Pony show that the MSM is putting on for the masses.
Peter Miller says: @ur momisugly February 3, 2014 at 9:11 am
if you were being kind and you wanted to sum up Obama in one simple phrase, this might be it…
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I really liked the comment that certain substances that shall remain nameless, cause short term memory loss and may interfere with transfer from short-term to long-term storage. Obama admits use in high school and college,
The actual effects are still very controversial.
Gail Combs says:
February 3, 2014 at 10:42 am
General P. Malaise says: @ur momisugly February 3, 2014 at 8:37 am
the current administration in the USA is a cabal of marxists….
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Please read E. M. Smith’s “Evil Socialism” vs “Evil Capitalism” and America’s Ruling Class
You need to get past the Dog and Pony show that the MSM is putting on for the masses.
_____________
bears repeating
Jim G says:
February 3, 2014 at 9:55 am
General P. Malaise says:
More likely facist, into which both China and Russia have evolved, to large degree and the USA is well on its way. Free enterprise with thugs running the show.
I don’t consider there to be much difference between fascist and communists. the end result is the same dictatorships. admittedly nicer uniforms.
my point is that we waste our energy addressing a subject ….oh look a squirrel !
Gail Combs says:
February 3, 2014 at 10:42 am
General P. Malaise says: @ur momisugly February 3, 2014 at 8:37 am
the current administration in the USA is a cabal of marxists….
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Please read E. M. Smith’s “Evil Socialism” vs “Evil Capitalism” and America’s Ruling Class
You need to get past the Dog and Pony show that the MSM is putting on for the masses.
this is another straw man. GE and Monsanto are not capitalists without the prefix CRONY..
there is a difference between capitalism and socialism and the difference is huge. please do not confuse crony capitalism with free enterprise. Most of corporate america is of the crony capitalism type which is the same as socialism/fascism/communism.
stop letting the marxists / socialists define the language.
“It really has nothing to do with keeping the oil in the ground, that is just the angle they are USING to trick uninformed people into supporting them. ”
Crosspatch, I agree 100% with what you say. this. When I say the environmentalists think the oil will stay in the ground, I am talking about foot soldiers, not the crony capitalists who will be helped by the cancellation of the pipeline.
Crosspatch has most of it. However, in addition to Burlington Northern and Tom Steyer, who’s firmly invested in the Kinder-Morgan rival pipeline project, there’s at least two other groups who don’t want Keystone XL to go through.
The first is Saudi Arabia. Any increased access to Canadian oil means larger access to global markets. That means the world oil price will tend to stagnate compared to if KXL is not built. Saudi Arabia functions as the source of last resort, regulating its output to maintain a world oil price. If additional Canadian crude enters the market this will eventually translate into lower Saudi production.
It’s hardly surprising the Saudis are opposed to the Canadian oil sands. They’ve been opposed to it for years, particularly given that Canada is not and never has been an OPEC member.
The second group quietly flying under the radar is the US domestic oil industry itself. Particularly those companies involved in shale oil. Alberta oil sands crude is cheaper to extract and upgrade than shale oil is to extract and upgrade. Hence, any additional Canadian crude coming on the market will diminish whatever demand there is for US domestic shale oil production.
Since the only obstacles to additonal Canadian crude entering the US is a pipeline, then the pipeline must be stopped.
The other aspect of Canadian crude is Northern Gateway. All of the above groups want that one built because again it will be a lower cost oil source entering the global market in this case directly. However, the US government has no jurisdiction in Canada. So that’s why the various foundations are pouring a river of money into buyng up all the Canadian domestic opposition they can find among aboriginal and environmental groups.
During municipal elections two years ago, the single largest campaign contributor to the current mayor of Vancouver was the Tides Foundation.
These are some of the reasons why Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver famously labelled environmental opposition to Northern Gateway as hostile and foreign-funded.
Obama isn’t being indecisive – he’s making a decision by not making a decision, since the KXL can’t be built without his signoff. He has no intention of allowing the KXL to go forward, and the only recourse would seem to be for the states involved to approve their portions separately and then connect them. Congress isn’t about to challenge him, especially not with gauleiter Reid in charge in the Senate (unless the Republicans simply declare that Reid has no authority and proceed accordingly). The EPA would of course challenge the states’ moves, but they could be physically stopped from doing anything about it.
It’s also a mistake to think that Obama’s actions that destroy jobs or prevent them from being created represent mere negligence on his part. As a committed doctrinaire Marxist, he intends to destroy the middle class – the bourgeois class enemy – and reduce as much of the population to impoverished servitude. The loss of jobs is not incidental but is an integral part of his plan for “transforming the United States>’
There is no question that the EPA’s agenda, and the agendas of der Fuehrer’s two key advisers, Holdren and Podesta, is to deconstruct the US’s energy infrastructure. Not just coal, but oil and natural gas as well. These are fanatics who cannot be reached by facts or reasoned argument
Although many arguments sound true to me here, I get pained by mentioning “income equality” as a reason to favor likes of USA’s Republican party.
I see USA becoming *more* big-corporation-favoring, along with weaknesses of the Democratic party, and these are major reasons why USA has had mostly positive inflation-adjusted per-capita GDP growth even from 1999 to now, but pay raises past inflation seem to be generally reserved to the top 20% largely ever since Reagan took office. Working class wages had their best gains since then during Clinton’s 2nd term, largely coinciding with low deficit after a tax hike to taxation levels close to what Reagan considered acceptable.
Not that I favor anywhere near all Democrat-party ideals, but I see the Republicans getting pushy in ways and to extents that they are *not* working for common good. When the wealthiest get richer and wealthier, even after inflation, while the nation gets poorer and less-wealthy, I see big trouble.
And did not ordinary middle class people used to be job-creating business starters? Why should newly in recent years largely only the top 1% be “job creators”? Why should one end of the political spectrum support such a situation? Now that the “job creator class” has enjoyed years of getting richer while most others are treading water or still sinking, why is the “job creator class” slow to create jobs? Did not Reagan say that a rising tide lifts all boats?
Or, should WUWT be a place more for discussion of atmospheric and oceanic stuff and data thereof, as opposed to stuff that is more of a matter of right-vs.-left politics and related political-economics stuff like most of this whole thread has been?
klem says:
February 3, 2014 at 3:09 am
This guy has had 2 years to make a decision about a lousy pipeline, and he still can’t decide. He has to be the most indecisive President ever. No wonder Obama garners so little respect.
BTW, the Keystone pipeline has been delivering oil to Illinois for 3 years now. Obama’s back yard. And he hasn’t said a word.
***********************
It is now my understanding now that Blow Hard of Omaha has purchased a pipeline company that needs to expand to transport Canadian oil, the pipeline will go through.
Nothing like have a railroad and pipeline to make money….