KXL was AWOL from SOTU – along with real energy, job, economic and revenue solutions
Guest essay by Paul Driessen
President Obama frequently says he wants to turn the economy around, put America back to work, produce more energy, improve public safety, and open new markets to goods stamped “Made in the USA.” In his State of the Union address he said, if congressional inaction continues, “I will act on my own to slash bureaucracy and streamline the permitting process for key projects, so we can get more construction workers on the job as fast as possible.”
Unfortunately, like Arafat, he never misses an opportunity to miss an opportunity to do all these things.
Most Americans are no longer fooled by empty hope and change hype. In December only 74,000 jobs were created (many of them low-paying part-time seasonal positions), while 374,000 more people gave up looking for work. Not surprisingly, recent polls have found that three-quarters of Americans say the country still appears to be in a recession, two-thirds don’t trust the President to make the right decisions for the country, and barely 30% say the nation is “heading in the right direction.”
The President needs to use his pen and phone to free our energy, economy and entrepreneurial instincts. But ANWR, OCS, HF, KXL and other solutions were AWOL from the SOTU. They were sacrificed on the CO2 and CMGW altar, by the POTUS, EPA, DOI and DOE, in obeisance to the EDF, NRDC, other environmentalist pressure groups, and assorted unelected, unaccountable, unconstitutional autocrats.
(Don’t you love Washington-speak – from the land of acronyms, that pricey patch of real estate on the banks of the Potomac River, bordered by reality and places where people actually work to earn a living, despite presidents and hordes of legislators and regulators doing their level best to make that difficult. For those whose Wash-speak is as bad as their Spanish and German, translations are provided below.)*
Our nation is blessed with vast energy, metallic, mineral, forest and other resources, waiting to be tapped. But they are locked up in favor of crony-capitalist, eco-unfriendly, land-hungry, subsidy-dependent, nigh-useless pseudo-alternatives that are dearly beloved by utopian environmentalists – and by politicians hungry for campaign contributions from businesses that they repay with billions in other people’s money, taken from taxpayers at the point of an IRS gun to prop up renewable energy schemes.
Our hydrocarbon wealth especially offers amazing benefits: improved human safety, health, welfare and living standards, in a more stable world, with new sources of jobs, wealth and income equality. Not tapping these resources is contrary to Obama’s promises and our national interest. It is immoral.
Of all the opportunities arrayed before him, the 1,179-mile Alberta to Texas Keystone XL pipeline (KXL) is the most “shovel ready.” Indeed, it awaits merely a presidential phone call or signature, to slash bureaucratic red tape, streamline the permitting process, and create construction and manufacturing jobs. Some 40,000 jobs in fact – more than half as many as were created nationwide last December.
As I have pointed out before (here, here, here and here), there are compelling reasons why the President should end this interminable six-years-and-counting dilatory KXL review process – right now.
Jobs. KXL would create an estimated 20,000 construction jobs; another 10,000 in factories that make the steel, pipelines, valves, cement and equipment needed to build the pipeline; thousands more in hotel, restaurant and other support industries; and still more jobs in the Canadian, North Dakota and other oil fields whose output would be transported by the pipeline to refineries and petrochemical plants where still more workers would be employed. With Mr. Obama and his EPA waging war on communities and states that mine and use coal, these jobs are even more important to blue-collar workers in Middle America.
Revenue. States along the pipeline route would receive $5 billion in new property tax revenues, and still more in workers’ income tax payments. Federal coffers would also realize hefty gains.
Safety. Right now most of the oil from Canada’s oil sands and North Dakota’s Bakken shale deposits moves by railroad and truck fuel tanks, often through populated areas. Truck and rail accidents have forced towns to evacuate and even killed 50 people in Lac-Megantic, Quebec. Corporate executives and federal regulators are working to improve tanker designs and reroute traffic. But even despite occasional accidents, pipelines have a much better safety record. KXL would be built with state-of-the-art pipe, valves and other components, to the latest design, manufacturing, construction and inspection specifications. It has been configured to avoid population centers, sensitive wildlife areas and the Ogallala Aquifer.
Resource conservation and energy needs. Building Keystone will help ensure that vast petroleum resources can be efficiently utilized to meet consumer needs. In conjunction with other pipelines, it will greatly reduce the need to flare (burn and waste) natural gas that is a byproduct of oil production in Bakken shale country. The pipelines will also help get propane and natural gas to places that need these fuels. Recent pipeline problems, plus unusually high demands for propane to convert corn to ethanol, created soaring prices and shortages amid one of the nastiest North American cold spells in decades.
KXL will also enable state and private lands to continue contributing to America’s hydrocarbon renaissance. That is especially important in the face of congressional and Obama Administration refusals to open more federal onshore and offshore oil and gas prospects in Alaska and the Lower 48 States.
US-Canadian relations. The endless dithering over KXL has frayed relations between Canada and the United States. It has compelled the Canadians to take decisive steps toward building new pipelines from the Alberta oil sands fields to Superior, Wisconsin … and to Canada’s west coast, for shipment to Asia’s growing economies. Further delays will not reduce oil sands development – only the oil’s destination.
Climate change. In his SOTU speech, President Obama informed us that “climate change is a fact.” Well, duh. It’s been a fact since Earth was formed. The only pertinent issues are these: Are humans causing imminent, unprecedented climate change disasters? And can we control Earth’s climate, by drastically curtailing hydrocarbon use, slashing living standards and switching to renewables?
No evidence supports either proposition. Moreover, oil sands production would add a minuscule 0.06% to US greenhouse gas emissions, a tiny fraction of that amount to global carbon dioxide emissions, and an undetectable 0.00002 deg F (0.00001 C) per year to useless computer-model scenarios for global warming.
A January 24 letter spearheaded by Senator John Hoeven (R-ND) and signed by all 45 Republican Senators notes many of these points and requests that President Obama permit KXL pipeline construction “as soon as possible.” Several Democrats told Hoeven privately that they support his effort and Keystone, but are nervous about challenging the President or Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid publicly.
On January 31, the State Department reaffirmed its previous conclusions that KXL is unlikely to noticeably increase demand for Canadian oil sands or global emissions of carbon dioxide. With reelection behind him, the President has “greater flexibility” and doesn’t need to kowtow to his radical green base. By picking up his pen and phone, cutting off another year-long study of whether Keystone is “in the national interest,” and approving the pipeline, he could satisfy independents and his union base. He’d even reduce CO2 emissions, which State says would be 28-42% higher if Canada’s oil is shipped via train or truck, instead of through the pipeline.
Democrats are urging unemployed workers to lobby Republicans for extended benefits. They should instead lobby Democrats and the President to do what’s right for America: create the jobs they promised, by approving Keystone – along with drilling, fracking, mining, and reduced taxes and regulations.
America is waiting. Will there finally be real hope and change? Or just more hype and empty rhetoric?
_____________
Paul Driessen is senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org) and author of Eco-Imperialism: Green power – Black death.
* Acronym translator: Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Outer Continental Shelf, hydraulic fracturing, Keystone XL pipeline, absent without leave, State of the Union, carbon dioxide, catastrophic manmade global warming, President of the United States, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of the Interior, Department of Energy, Environmental Defense Fund, Natural Resources Defense Council.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Failure is the goal.
Paul Driessen says:
“Most Americans are no longer fooled by empty hope and change hype.”
___________________
I see no evidence that your assertion, if true, would matter in the least.
. . . Build the Keystone pipeline, already!
Hmmm … Valerie Jarrett must not approve …
Google search return:
Valerie Jarrett
1. Lawyer
2. Valerie Bowman Jarrett is a Senior Advisor to the President of the United States and Assistant to the President for Public Liaison and Intergovernmental Affairs in the Obama administration. She is a Chicago lawyer, businesswoman, and civic leader.
Born: November 14, 1956 (age 57), Shiraz, Iran.
Shiraz, Iran – The fifth most populous city of Iran and the capital of Fars Province.
.
Primer on Valerie Jarrett, the literal ‘power’ behind the throne (esp. for those outside the US not normally privy to the inside workings of ‘american politics’ in this administration):
The Truth About Valerie Jarrett, Mystery Woman of the White House
The close adviser and friend of the Obamas is one of DC’s most powerful people—but what exactly does she do?
One take-away:
.
A number of years ago the small company I work in had an opportunity to invest and build a business in the US similar one we run in Canada. I thought it was a good business opportunity. There was a definite demand. There was an identified, un-served customer base who were willing to commit. There was a clear path to building a multi-million dollar business employing about 5 people full time and growing with the business. There were venture capital partners ready to sign on.
Even though there was encouragement from local business development agencies, my bosses viewed the overall US business scene was too hostile a regulatory environment for anybody but the largest corporations(like TransCanada) to play in.
Obviously, we didn’t do the deal. I was very disappointed but, in the long term, I have to agree now that they were right.
Too bad.
The REAL, demonstrated, ‘impediment to progress’: Valerie Jarrett. The following was excerpted from an American Thinker piece and puts it succinctly:
Bolding above is mine.
.
It will create that many jobs, but for how long? No construction jobs are permanent. Get this project done and you have to find another job.
I find the counts of numbers of jobs a rather nebulous activity producing numbers that are worthless. I have done it as a part of the paperwork to qualify projects for stimulus grants. The 5 jobs created for a project that will take 3 months, count the same as the 20 jobs "created" by a project that lasted 2 years, but it adds together to 25 jobs created in grant-speak. If the pipeline creates 5,000 jobs at its southern end, and those are done before the northern end is started,the 5,000 jobs at the northern end are "new" and it is said that 10,000 jobs are created.
Certainly the pipeline will positively affect employment, the number of jobs created is not the way to measure that effect.
Keystone is not going to add to either “global warming,” “carbon pollution” or real pollution because if we don’t build Keystone, the oil is still going to be extracted. Not building the pipeline is not going to stop the Canadians from selling the oil.
However, not building Keystone will contribute to pollution because if we don’t buy the oil, somebody else will. Whose refineries are cleaner, our’s or China’s?
Not building Keystone also contributes to pollution because transporting the oil by rail is more likely to spill oil. Also, using rail is less safe for transport.
@Chris4692 says: (February 3, 2014 at 7:13 am)
Of course politicians and political advocates almost always exaggerate the benefits or dangers of whatever they are for or against.
But keep in mind, we’re talking real jobs in real industry, not fake stimulus jobs. So yes, it probably won’t be as good as the most optimist numbers from supporters and once it’s built, there will be fewer jobs. But Hoover Dam still requires people to maintain it. The power station at the dam needs continual maintenance and upgrades. Likewise, after the pipeline is built, it will need maintenance, inspections, upgrades, etc.
Surely anybody who believes that government spending has a multiplier (and I’m not saying you believe this) must also believe the same benefits occur when private enterprise or individuals spend money as well.
Hope and Change = Hype and Cringe.
As indicated, or implied in his writings he has no intent to do any of these things. Unless of course he completely controls his empire. But only after he destroys capitalism.
@_Jim says: (February 3, 2014 at 7:10 am)
Forget Valarie Jarrett — How many of those things does Obama understand?
Considering that pretty high ranking Democratic Party PR people are behind much of the anti-Keystone propaganda, I don’t see how Obama can bring himself to approve it without alienating a good portion of his party.
“President Obama frequently says he wants to turn the economy around, put America back to work, produce more energy, improve public safety, and open new markets to goods stamped “Made in the USA.””
Well, sure he may have said those things,
but we have to wait for his Press Secretary to tell us what he really meant.
🙂
“The years passed, mankind became stupider at a frightening rate. Some had high hopes the genetic engineering would correct this trend in evolution, but sadly the greatest minds and resources where focused on conquering hair loss and prolonging erections.” Idiocracy
Besides, Keystone oil doesn’t have any electrolytes.
What really aggravates me is that the environmentalists have this insane belief that cancelling the pipeline will keep that oil in the ground. That oil is coming out of the ground. The only question is whether it will flow in a pipeline that goes south to the US, or west to the Pacific.
The first quota presidency is also a puppet presidency for party interests and advocacy check list. I suppose party priorities are always there for any President, but they are just more noticeable in the absence of leadership and common sense policy from the center. The middle class is the main victim here, despite verbiage to the contrary.
It really has nothing to do with keeping the oil in the ground, that is just the angle they are USING to trick uninformed people into supporting them. This is about money. Two very large Democrat megadonors would be severely negatively impacted if this pipeline goes in. First of all, Warren Buffett’s railroad is moving the oil from both the Canadian tar sands and the Bakken field. If this pipeline goes in, he loses money. Then there is a billionaire named Tom Steyer who has a large investment interest in a pipeline that would carry tar sands crude to the west coast of Canada. If the Keystone pipeline isn’t built, he stands to make a substantial windfall as the oil gets shipped over “his” pipeline instead of the Keystone pipeline.
From Steyer’s recent remarks, he appears to be getting a bit desperate.
http://business.financialpost.com/2014/02/03/keystone-foe-billionaire-tom-steyer-calls-for-review-of-defective-pipeline-report/?__lsa=8601-9fd6
the current administration in the USa is a cabal of marxists. using logic or reason doesn’t work. They intend to destroy the country and may in fact already succeeded.
the very same goes for the entire climate change argument. it isn’t about the climate it is about control. until the conservatives start pointing out that these people are communists and stop trying to reason with them the better.
the best is not to engage them but to point out that they are in fact communists and that they intend to diminish the USA and create another communist state.
http://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/home-page/
more soylent green! says:
February 3, 2014 at 7:30 am
The stimulus projects I worked on were all real jobs in real industry as well. Those water plants also have to be operated and the streets maintained going forward. However, those projects would have proceeded and the money spent on those projects would have been spent whether there was a stimulus program or not. The only difference the stimulus program made was in how the project was financed. That is another topic.
The applicable point is: whether the project is constructed with private funds or public, the number of jobs created is an imprecise number. However that number is produced it is meaningless without also stating how long those jobs will last, however that is rarely stated. It would be better to state how many man-years of labor would be involved, though even that has a problems in making the estimate. The monetary impact on the economy, whether dollars, pounds, marks, pesos or euros, is a far better measure of the effect of the project than is the number of jobs created.
I wouldn’t be surprised if Obama approves the pipeline. Where are the enviros going to go? To the Republicans? No, they will just have to suck it up.
Keystone has many incentives that the President can use, including patronage and lots more tax income. Most importantly, Keystone does not conflict with Obama’s Plan.
Doesn’t matter/an immaterial issue (although your point is well taken, and I think we all know the answer); “O” safely resides within a protective ‘bubble’ devoid of conflicting ideas or discordant (disagreeing or incongruous) thought, a bubble created and enforced by the Valerie Jarrett … the real obstacle here, from practical standpoint, is Jarrett, the O’s gatekeeper. Jarrett, with her twisted ideas of the ‘how the world works’ was actually elected, twice.I might add.
Reiterating from above:
“an incompatible point of view” I assume means, and includes, actual reality.
It has been said that “progress depends on the unreasonable man” – a George Bernard Shaw quote as shown fully below:
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man [or woman, in the case of Valerie Jarrett].
I submit to you that Jarrett and Obama are trying mightily to adapt (change) the world to ‘themselves’ (i.e. form it in the image they perceive it should be based on their ‘warped’/deluded/un-informed/mis-formed experience, knowledge and ‘learning’ baseline).
.
Boy, this is a very good article!
That paragraph bears repeating without the acronyms:
“The President needs to use his pen and phone to free our energy, economy and entrepreneurial instincts. But the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Outer Continental Shelf, hydraulic fracturing, Keystone XL pipeline and other solutions were Absence without Leave from the State of the Union. They were sacrificed on the carbon dioxide (CO2) and catastrophic manmade global warming altar, by the President of the United States, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of the Interior, and Department of Energy, in obeisance to the Environmental Defense Fund, Natural Resources Defense Council other environmentalist pressure groups, and assorted unelected, unaccountable, unconstitutional autocrats.”
If you showed that original paragraph with the acronyms to the average American, they won’t know what the hell you’re talking about.
I hate acronyms, and think that’s one of the main reasons I didn’t do real well while I was in the military (as a LTJG in the Navy) It’s one of the reasons friends don’t understand climate science reality, or the climate debate.
I plan not to use acronyms at all in any of my future posts. Especially on Facebook.
NOTE: LTJG = Lieutenant (junior grade)
if you were being kind and you wanted to sum up Obama in one simple phrase, this might be it:
“He cannot see a fence without sitting on it.”
Obama’s “Year of Action” in 2014 will be similar to his “Recovery Summer” in the election year of 2010. It will consist of big talk and little action. He’ll try to do nothing that he thinks might hurt Democratic election chances in the House and Senate. That means he’ll continue to sit on the fence when it comes to the Keystone Pipeline and try to make both sides think he’s leaning in their direction. Sure, he’ll sign a few executive orders and throw in a lot of talk about equality and taxing the rich to gin up the base, but 2014 will end up being another year of inaction on the economy. Should he succeed again in fooling enough people with his talk to regain the House and keep the Senate, 2015 will be his Year of Action. That will be when he cancels Keystone and implements carbon taxes. Hopefully, the Obamacare debacle will wake enough people out of their hypnotic slumber to throw a monkey wrench into his plans. But I fear that they will fall back to sleep before the election gets here.