US Tornado Count So Low That It's Invaded The Legend…

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) – Storm Prediction Center – Click the pic to view at source

Image Credit: NOAA – Storm Prediction Center

By WUWT Regular Just The Facts

US Tornadoes are currently on pace for a record low annual tornado count, which has penetrated deep into the legend in the graph above and is relevant globally, as the US represents about 75 percent of the world’s recorded tornadoes. Last week I pointed out that the Atlantic Hurricane Season was the Quietest in 45 Years and the week before that I showed that Antarctic Sea Ice Didn’t Get The Memo That It Was Supposed To Melt. It is amazing how easy alarmist scare forecasts/predictions  can be falsified with readily available data, e.g. from TheHill.com:

“Former Vice President Al Gore lamented on Tuesday that scientists “won’t let us yet” link tornadoes to climate change.

Gore alluded to last month’s devastating twister in Moore, Okla., saying that shoddy historical statistics are preventing a connection between ‘these record-breaking tornadoes and the climate crisis.'”

“Gore said there’s a political interest in determining climate change causes extreme weather. He said lawmakers cannot address the root of disasters without first making a connection between emissions, climate change and extreme weather.

Failing to acknowledge that connection will imperil future relief efforts as disasters grow more frequent and expensive, Gore said.”

“Insurance agencies and climate activists contend the government will be increasingly on the hook for disaster cleanup as a result of climate change. They say storms are growing fiercer, subjecting more areas to disaster-related damage that private insurers are hesitant to cover.”

“Making a connection between emissions, climate change and extreme weather”? “Storms are growing fiercer”? Where? Perhaps buried in the rest of the Tornado data?:

US Tornadoes Daily Count and Running Annual Trend

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) – Storm Prediction Center – Click the pic to view at source

US Strong to Violent Tornadoes (EF3-EF5*) – Annual Count 1950 to Present

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) – National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) – Click the pic to view at source

US Tornadoes (EF1-EF5*) – Annual Count 1950 to Present

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) – National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) – Click the pic to view at source

US Inflation Adjusted Annual Tornado Trend and Percentile Ranks

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) – Storm Prediction Center- Click the pic to view at source

That doesn’t appear very “fierce”. In fact the Inflation Adjusted Annual Tornado count appears to be 100 tornadoes below the Minimum through Nov. 02. Of note tornado counts are Inflation Adjusted;

“because the increase in tornado reports over the last 54 years is almost entirely due to secular trends such as population increase, increased tornado awareness, and more robust and advanced reporting networks. NOAA – Storm Prediction Center

However, even if there hasn’t been an increase in tornadoes due to “Global Warming”, “Climate Change”, Global Climate Disruption”, Global Weirding, or whatever it’s called today, there apparently is still reason to worry, at least according to USA Today:

“Deadly and destructive thunderstorms — and the violent tornadoes they produce — are forecast to see a “robust” increase across parts of the U.S. in upcoming decades because of climate change, says a new, first-of-its-kind study published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.”

“The study is one of the first that’s found such a link between climate change and severe storms. Most previous research has been inconclusive.”

“Diffenbaugh’s study co-authors were Martin Scherer of Stanford and Robert Trapp of Purdue University. The research team used a group of complex climate computer models to look at how the atmosphere will react to global warming.”

Here’s the Diffenbaugh paper “Robust increases in severe thunderstorm environments in response to greenhouse forcing“, the abstract states that:

Severe thunderstorms are one of the primary causes of catastrophic loss in the United States. However, the response of such storms to elevated greenhouse forcing has remained highly uncertain. We use an ensemble of global climate model experiments to probe the severe thunderstorm response. We find that this ensemble exhibits robust increases in the occurrence of severe thunderstorm environments over the eastern United States. In addition, the simulated changes in the atmospheric environment indicate an increase in the number of days supportive of the spectrum of convective hazards, with the suggestion of a possible increase in the number of days supportive of tornadic storms.

“Simulated changes in the atmospheric environment” provide “the suggestion of a possible increase in the number of days supportive of tornadic storms”? Translated, assuming that the atmosphere gets a lot warmer, which shows no signs of doing, then we guess that there will be more tornadoes, though the warming in the second half of the 20th century does not appear to have has this effect.

The data shows no increase in tornado counts or strength. Claims about increasing or more dangerous Tornadoes are unfounded.

There is not yet a WUWT Tornado Reference Page, but the WUWT “Extreme Weather” Page offers graphs and graphics on an array of “Extreme Weather” events including Tornadoes, and the WUWT Tornado Reference Page is under development. If you have any suggested graphs or graphics for inclusion in the WUWT Tornado Reference Page, please post them in comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

73 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
November 3, 2013 10:32 pm

typo: “Well, both use …”

November 3, 2013 10:32 pm

_Jim says:
November 3, 2013 at 10:20 pm
Good luck with getting enough detailed data to track the process that closely, if you chose to do the research yourself let me know how it works out for ya!

November 3, 2013 11:31 pm

Thanks for the data links I may revisit the idea of updating my tornado info pages, have been busy adding Australia and Canada info to my maps pages. The searchable by zip code data for Canada and Australia is in a 4 digit code where the US is 5 digit zip code, and the program does not handle both combined. So the developer is still working on setting up just the 48 contiguous states, has maps ready for out to some time in 2018, but the last upgrade to the server software causes an upload glitch and it fails to load, so I am waiting.

November 4, 2013 2:52 am

_Jim [November 3, 2013 at 8:59 pm] says:
… score points for proper use of a contraction, Blade: “Three strikes you’re out.”

Right you are. My bad!

DirkH
November 4, 2013 3:42 am

Bob Greene says:
November 3, 2013 at 9:35 pm
“As for all the jabs at Gore. He appears to be a climate evangelist for the money and he has done very well. Can anyone seriously believe he is out to save the planet?”
No; not even the libs; but they’re willing to pretend he is if it helps their goals.
Inside they slowly crack though.

Bill Marsh
Editor
November 4, 2013 4:49 am

“Making a connection between emissions, climate change and extreme weather”? “Storms are growing fiercer”? Where? Perhaps buried in the rest of the Tornado data?:
No, silly. Hiding in the deep oceans along with the missing heat.

Bill Marsh
Editor
November 4, 2013 4:56 am

Blade: “So if the climate kooks don’t cry uncle this year, they never will.”
They never will. They have far too much invested in this to ever say, “Oh well, I guess we were wrong. Continue on with your lives as you wish to live them.” They seek control & power, they don’t seek truth. It was never about truth.

November 4, 2013 6:10 am

Reblogged this on gottadobetterthanthis and commented:
We took a severe hit in our area, but we all know tornadoes are simply a part of life in this area. Overall, things are staying the same. Weather is not getting worse. I doubt it’s getting better, but it is rather obvious it is not getting worse.

Rob Crawford
November 4, 2013 7:04 am

If the tornadoes are hiding in the oceans with the heat, are they gathering up sharks?

beng
November 4, 2013 7:22 am

That midwest effect came downstream to the mid-Appalachians resulting in few thunderstorms this warm season. And not a drop of Atlantic tropical moisture. Despite that (and some timely Aug rain), the local crops looked no worse than average.

Chris R.
November 4, 2013 7:53 am

To Rober Bissett:
Appreciated your “sciencey” rant in the spirit of many extreme Green
individuals. Well done humor.

November 4, 2013 10:21 am

We need an historical track of deaths, injuries and normalized damages. The warmists want to go back to the “better” times: we should be able to tell them the cost in lives as well in damages they equate with better times.

Colin
November 4, 2013 10:40 am

Robert Bissett says:
November 3, 2013 at 4:08 pm
“Which brings me to tornadoes. By actual sciencey estimate, 97% of all tomatoes target the US of A” . Maybe, just maybe, the US of A has 97% of the tracking technology to actually record tornadoes. If a tornado hits somewhere in the comperable region of Africa – would it be recorded by a television station helicopter? Or flashed on millions of tv screens within minutes of it hitting something? I’m doing you a favour and assuming you meant tornadoes not tomatoes. On the other hand – if you meant tomatoes then we are really in for climate weirding. I patent “climate weirding” as it would cover sharknado, targetting tomatoes and just weird things.

November 4, 2013 11:09 am

Robert Bissett says November 3, 2013 at 4:08 pm
“Which brings me to tornadoes. By actual sciencey estimate, 97% of all tomatoes target the US of A” .
Colin says November 4, 2013 at 10:40 am
Maybe, just maybe, the US of A has 97% of the tracking technology to actually record tornadoes.

Let’s not proceed headlong at too great a rate of pace and overlook the physics/meteorological processes that make these things possible at greater than average ‘rates’ per unit land surface (withstanding simple water and land ‘spouts’ as well as cold-air funnel formation).
“Tornado study” and the realization the US was a “test bed” came long before RADAR was used in an organized fashion as it is used to today to detect tornadoes.
There is a reason Tetsuya “Theodore” or “Ted” Fujita immigrated to the US to study tornadoes, the communications and weather observing network in the US (as well as the higher occurrence of tornadoes) allowed detailed study of the conditions that precipitate the weather conditions conducive to the formation of tornadoes.
A TRIBUTE (and some history about tornado research) TO DR. TED FUJITA
http://www.stormtrack.org/library/people/fujita.htm
.

anthropic
November 4, 2013 1:12 pm

Sorry, guys, but our friend Al Gore has already got the tomato outbreak covered in his latest film, Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs.

mockmook
November 4, 2013 1:56 pm

Creating a model is not the same thing as doing a “study”.
Creating a model is throwing out a SWAG and calling it data.

Micha Elyi
November 4, 2013 3:02 pm

Obama doesn’t understand his powers. Instead of slowing the rise of the seas, he slowed the rise of the tornadoes and hurricanes.

anthropic
Reply to  Micha Elyi
November 4, 2013 10:24 pm

Didn’t he promise that if you liked your extreme weather, you could keep it?
PERIOD.

D.J. Hawkins
November 4, 2013 4:19 pm

anthropic says:
November 4, 2013 at 1:12 pm
Sorry, guys, but our friend Al Gore has already got the tomato outbreak covered in his latest film, Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs.

Surely you mean “Cloudy with a Chance of Meatheads”?

KeithB
Editor
November 6, 2013 10:59 pm

The wrong types of tornados perhaps?

Nick
November 18, 2013 6:19 am

So what do you say now about the lack of Tornados? People who deny climate change are so keen to prove that it does not exist. But you’ve done a great disservice to the people who are now experiencing the effects of more severe weather patterns both in the US, the Philippines and elsewhere..The time to act was decades ago – but people like you have kept the argument going that everything’s just fine and there’s no need to make any changes to our rampant consumerism. There was probably someone like you on Easter Island when they cut down the last tree saying its fine, its what we’ve always done what difference will it make..

November 18, 2013 8:57 am

Nick’s notion is interesting. He seems to say
That the presence of any tornadoes today
Which have happened just like this for thousands of years
Confirm all his “never in history!” fears
With temperatures dropping, the threat becomes real
That people like Nick who don’t think, they just feel
Will react to the changes that these cycles bring
And somehow, in their minds, confirm everything
===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle