Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach
Lesotho (pronounced “Leh – soo – too”), is a mountain fortress of a country, totally surrounded by South Africa. The people there, the Basotho (pronounced “Bah – soo – too), are tough as nails, and you’d have to be. It’s high desert country, cold in the winter, not much water. The Basotho are fiercely independent.
Back in the early days, they fought off the Boers who tried to take their land. The Boers then drove them off of the fertile lowlands and into the arid mountains. So their King cut a deal with the British Queen Victoria for the country to be a British Protectorate … very clever, one of the few parts of Africa that was never conquered and was never a colony of anybody. These days, curiously, most of the time the country is populated by old folks, and women and kids—the only real employment for hundreds of miles around are the mines of South Africa … including the coal mines. So the men are all at work in South Africa, and the country runs on the money that the miners send home.
Of a wintry morning in Maseru, the capital, there’s a haze across the city from the thousands and thousands of coal fires. By and large, these fires are warming poor women’s shacks and shanties, and cooking what passes for their kids’ breakfasts. They burn coal because it’s what they have. There are no forests, so they can’t burn wood. There are no great herds of cattle, so they can’t burn dung.
And as a result, Maseru mornings have that curious acrid smell that only comes from coal, and the haze that comes from coal burnt in leaky stoves and open three-stone fires.
I bring up this image of dirt-poor people in a dirt-poor country to provide a clear context for the New York Times report of the latest lethal IPCC recommendation, which they describe as follows:
To stand the best chance of keeping the planetary warming below an internationally agreed target of 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit (2 degrees Celsius) above the level of preindustrial times, the panel found, no more than one trillion metric tons of carbon can be burned and the resulting gas released into the atmosphere.
Just over half that amount has already been emitted since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, and at the rate energy consumption is growing, the trillionth ton will be released somewhere around 2040, according to calculations by Myles R. Allen, a scientist at the University of Oxford and one of the authors of the new report. More than three trillion tons of carbon are still left in the ground as fossil fuels. SOURCE
First, the “internationally agreed target” of 2°C? I don’t recall any international agreement on that, except perhaps among attendees at one of the IPCC’s annual moribund quackathons held in Rio or somewhere.
But lets look instead at the important issue, the numbers that they give for carbon. They say we’ve burnt a half-trillion tonnes, and that we should stop when we’ve burned another half trillion tonnes, and leave the other two-and-a-half trillion tons of fossil fuels in the ground. Leave it in the ground … the mind boggles. Never happen.
So in a scant few decades, the women of Maseru are supposed to just stop burning coal? And do what? Burn their furniture? They could pull up the floorboards and burn them … if they had floors …
Dont’cha love these guys? Don’t they understand that their policies KILL PEOPLE! I apologize for shouting, but they seem to be congenitally blind to the results of their actions, so perhaps their ears still work. Do they have a plan in hand for fueling Maseru, and a thousand other Maseru’s around the world? Wind won’t do it. Sun won’t do it. So in a couple decades … what?
Here’s what they avert their eyes from.
Artificially increasing energy prices for any reason harms, impoverishes, and kills the poor.
Yes, kills. People die from the cold. If the women of Maseru have to pay more for coal, they have less money to pay for food. So they will buy a bit less coal and a bit less food, and somewhere in there, in the hidden part that far too many people don’t want to think about, kids are dying. It’s already happening. The World Bank and the US are currently refusing to fund coal-fired power plants around the world … rich people refusing cheap energy to poor people, on my planet that is disgusting and criminal behavior.
Can’t say much more than that without excessively angrifying my blood, thinking about rich 1%ers like the IPCC conclave and Myles R. Allen trying to make all fossil fuels more expensive, and blithely ignoring the lethal consequences of their actions. So I’ll leave it there, but spread the word.
Expensive energy kills poor people.
Best to all,
w.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Photo Source
@richardscourtney
>I write to support your comment at September 27, 2013 at 5:51 pm. You say
>>Coal is an important and inexpensive fuel and there is no reason not to promote vastly improved coal burning products which reduce smoke virtually to zero as is presently being done in Ulaanbaatar.
Thanks. Some of the best work on coal is or has been done in the WB/ADB/MCC/UB City projects in Ulaanbaatar – and for good reason. The situation is critical.
>Yes, when I was working at the UK’s Coal Research Establishment (CRE) we invented and developed the downdraft stoves which consume their own smoke.
I did the same in UB from 2007 and immediately demonstrated that the problem is not the fuel (wet lignite) but the wood stoves that are used to burn it. The DD stoves were much cleaner than an modern power station. At present there is no DD stove included in the rollout of subsidized improved stoves which are mostly TLUD’s. The required minimum performance (smoke) improvement is 90% in order to be included in the choice offered. Subsidy is large (>90%) with one ticket per homestead. City pollution last winder was Distribution of such stoves is a useful and cheap interim measure for reduced pollution and increased health until rural areas can be connected to a grid supply.
It is unlikely that any alternative to domestic coal combustion exists in the next 30 years in Ulaanbaatar. The problem is not the fuel, it is the devices used to burn it. It is somewhat like putting diesel into a gasoline engine. Much smoke results from the incompatibility.
>Indeed, CRE developed one design of downdraft stove for use by nomads. It can cook an entire sheep once a year and is transportable by horse.
Would you please link me to that project and yourself either by link here or private post via the mods?
>Incidentally, the Mongolians did not pay for the first stoves and I think that bill is still owed to UK government who obtained all of CRE’s assets when CRE was closed in 1995.
That money is gone! However if there is something to implement, I will see that it is given some attention. A stove design course will be established at the Mongolia University of Science and Technology, attached to the SEET Laboratory (which tests and rates performance). The good stoves are all producing zero PM emissions from sometime after ignition and the best of the best can strip all ambient PM out of the air that goes into them, while burning lignite. These are world class devices.
Expensive energy isn’t the biggest problem of Lesotho.
Their biggest problem is HIV followed by corruption: http://en.africatime.com/lesotho/articles/corruption-lesothos-worst-enemy-after-aids
richardscourtney:
“And I think it is a bad idea to sequester CO2 (i.e. plant food) from the environment.”
Yeah I agree, I don’t think it actually needs to occur anyway, since I don’t believe that dangerous climate change will occur AGW.
You say it is ‘economically ridiculous’ to extract it during coal power production. But how about this idea, just to appease the alarmists.
Outback Australia has an abundance of uranium resources (the largest deposit in the world is in South Australia at Olympic Dam), in a politically and tectonically stable environment. You build large scale nuclear power plants to provide the energy required to extract C02 from air, using billions of $$$ re-redirected from keeping the IPCC going. The c02 forms limestone which is laid out flat in a polygon 1000x1000km wide by 500m high across the barren Australian desert, and you re-name it The IPCC Plateau. You cover it with weathering resistant material. Wella, you have removed vast amounts of c02 from the air, and created thousands of green jobs. Better than the end of the world with just a few people scraping a living in Iceland or somewhere. (Which I don’t believe, but we may never get rid of those who do).
People not only freeze to death in the UK because they can’t afford to heat their homes, they also suffer from malnutrition because, when energy costs go up, so do the costs of everything that moves on energy – including food.
And meanwhile that Marie Antoinette in the White House, with her 30-person entourage that follows her everywhere, and her $100 million vacation, and her gardens on the White House lawn, says “let them eat arugula!”
Steven Mosher says:
September 27, 2013 at 12:53 pm
the links were provided to make more information accessible for people who want to read.
Im not endorsing it, just linking…
#####
Steven, I was being somewhat cheeky with my post. Somewhat. I believe the renewable solutions for developing nations are simply a form of economic Imperialism. It will saddle those countries with too much debt that will ultimately be exchanged for control of resources at cut-rate prices to meet obligations. The salvation for these nations is access to cheap energy not elitist technologies from the Western world.
Forget the third world. In the UK winter deaths are up by about 50% thanks to the green energy levies.