British fracking protestor Prajna has it all figured out. Tom Wilson interviewed this guy at the fracking protest in Balcombe England. A cartoon from Josh follows.

Prajna
Have you protested before on energy issues?
Prajna: “Well, no. But I’ve designed a few energy things. I’ve designed an internal combustion engine that only has two moving parts, which is far too efficient to produce, otherwise oil companies would kill me.
I’ve had some top engineers working on it. My great uncle designed a perpetual motion machine. But he was busy looking for something that would insulate between magnets in order to produce it. Well actually I’ve had a look at the design since. I looked into buoyancy. I did all the maths on buoyancy.
It never seems to quite work, does it?
Prajna: “Well, this is the thing. It does work. It balances perfectly.”
Are you against the extraction of all fossil fuels in the UK?
Prajna: “Do you know, it would be a wonderful start if they just stopped suppressing free energy and starting encouraging it. But they’re not about that.”
Read the rest of the brilliant set of interviews here: I met the fracking protesters
Josh also has an excellent cartoon on fracking here
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
are these the same people?……..
I have to admit, I sent this missive to Caroline Lucas (Green Party MP for Brighton), to open her eyes to the environmental devastation that she and her party have been ignoring for years:
I suppose I could have added more, but I wanted to keep the message short.
Originally posted this on Bishop Hill, where at least one person liked it.
Beyond satire.
Same sort of people at the “Line 9” pipeline protests in Hamilton, Ontario:
http://youtu.be/ArIV6XOmDHU
An internal combustion engine with only two moving parts?
Hmmm….A lump of iron serving as a piston in the combustion chamber to generate electricity as it moves across a magnetic field? Moving part number 2: a check valve of sorts for the fuel flow?
I wonder how often “Prajna” moves his parts?
…I’ve designed an internal combustion engine that only has two moving parts…
We already have an internal combustion engine with only ONE moving part. Frank Whittle invented it during the 1920s. We call it the ‘Jet Engine’…
Shorter version that PaulH posted
http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/video/featured/news/868018287001/preview-ezra-crashes-an-anti-oil-protest/2608755189001
It would be funny if it wasn’t so dangerous. As somebody said in comments somewhere else, in 1984/5 the police were roaming the country stopping flying pickets to enable businesses to continue to operate. Today, the exact opposite appears to be the norm. What went wrong? One answer to that question is the lack of balance.
Human high intelligence in action…..or not, as the case may be!
Guinevere is Eric Idle. Regan could be Michael Palin. Karl Marx in the first picture needs crutches now? Poor fella.
I got that beat. A turbine is an internal combustion engine with one moving part.
What a coincidence. My favorite perpetual motion machine is driven by buoyancy also.
The rotor is a chain of accurately formed buoyant spheres (e.g., ping pong balls) glued to fibers 1/2 ball diameter long. The stator chamber has an opening, at its lowest part, lined by a vertical cylinder of just ball clearing diameter that is low friction and three ball diameters long – through which the chain of balls is passed. See that two balls are always in the cylinder preventing flow. The chain is passed from the cylinder valve, up through the working liquid (buoyancy), over the side of chamber (on a wheel if you will), hanging down the side of the chamber (gravity normal force), and freely looping up into the cylinder valve.
The weight plus buoyancy should be sufficient to keep the chain in motion. Sadly it is not. I was in high school when I discovered why.
Someone check his instant coffee powder. Please.
Kurt in Switzerland
They vote.
As soon as people start talking about working perpetual motion machines I stop listening…
I’ve debated “free energy” advocates many times before. Many seem to hold two conflicting beliefs at once: (1) The laws of thermodynamics hold. (2) If you’re really clever, you can confuse Mother Nature enough that she gives up extra energy.
Must be a psychological term for this phenomenon.
Rhoda R says:
August 21, 2013 at 2:18 pm
They vote.
=================
That’s the truly scary part…
Dodgy Geezer says (August 21, 2013 at 2:00 pm ): …”Frank Whittle invented it during the 1920s. We call it the ‘Jet Engine’…”
‘Ram Jet’ if I remember correctly.. and as OldWeirdHarold says (August 21, 2013 at 2:12 pm): “…I got that beat. A turbine is an internal combustion engine with one moving part.”
That seems to cover the cases for both zero and one moving part. I’m a bit dubious about Prajna’s design with two though.
Annie says:
August 21, 2013 at 2:06 pm
Human high intelligence in action…..or not, as the case may be!
see there are your two moving parts
I’ll venture a guess on his college major: environmental studies, sociology or psychology. Presently, living in mom’s basement, unemployed and on the dole.
Wonder where he got the double wide folding chair…
Saw this on Bishop Hill. I laughed.
Then I felt guilty.
These people are not reaching their potential… but they are still people.
Prajna, for example, appears to have been damaged somehow. Maybe it was his lifestyle choice (dope). Maybe it was bad luck.
But I felt bad for laughing at him.
Anytime I’ve seen coverage of environmental protesters here in Oregon the same type of folks as those in England show up. Totally clueless about everything but convinced they know the “TRUTH”.
“Rhoda R says:
August 21, 2013 at 2:18 pm
They vote.”
Worse than that Rhoda – they breed.
:0/
UK Only Green MP Caroline Lucas arrested