Remember this Associated Press before and after image that purportedly showed the North Pole turning into a lake due to “global warming”?
This was the day Brad Johnson of “Forecast the Facts” (a political group affiliated with the Center for American Progress and paid to harass TV weathercasters and meteorologists who don’t share their melting world view) made himself look like the complete idiot we know him to be. Observe the propaganda they sent around:
Note that WUWT published on why this imagery has no scientific merit, and the principal scientist issued a statement saying that it wasn’t anything out of the ordinary.
Even AP saw they’d screwed up and issued a retraction:
Title : ELIMINATION North Pole Lake
Caption : EDITORS, PHOTO EDITORS, AND PHOTO LIBRARIANS – PLEASE ELIMINATE AP PHOTO NY109 THAT WAS SENT ON SATURDAY, JULY 27, 2013. THE CAPTION INACCURATELY STATED THAT ‘THE SHALLOW MELTWATER LAKE IS OCCURRING DUE TO AN UNUSUALLY WARM PERIOD.’ IN FACT, THE WATER ACCUMULATES IN THIS WAY EVERY SUMMER. IN ADDITION, THE IMAGES DO NOT NECESSARILY SHOW CONDITIONS AT THE NORTH POLE, BECAUSE THE WEATHER BUOY CARRYING THE CAMERA USED BY THE NORTH POLE ENVIRONMENTAL OBSERVATORY HAS DRIFTED HUNDREDS OF MILES FROM ITS ORIGINAL POSITION, WHICH WAS A FEW DOZEN MILES FROM THE POLE- This frame grab provided by NOAA shows images from the wide-angle camera trained on a weather buoy maintained by the North Pole Environmental Observatory at the North Pole. The top image is a June 7, 2013 frame grab. The bottom image is a July 25, 2013 frame grab. (AP Photo/NOAA)
Source: http://foto.agerpres.ro/index.php?i=7147048
Will Brad Johnson and “Forecast the Facts” issue a retraction? Doubtful, because to do so would highlight their own stupidity disguised as paid agenda.


Master of Space and Thyme says:

August 10, 2013 at 1:31 pm
August 10, 2013 at 1:31 pm
You seem to have missed this quote from Commander …..
“It marked a stark contrast to the enveloping pack whose pressure ridges rimming the polynya extended as much as 40 feet BENEATH THE SURFACE”
No I haven’t missed it. However you seem to be a bit confused about what a pressure ridge is.
Here is a description of a pressure ridge:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pressure_ridge_%28ice%29_Formation_Drawing.svg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pressure_ridge_%28ice%29
and here at the surface:
You will see these are similar to the one in your photo – seen from above not under the water.
Now you may also know that ice is almost same density as water, 9/10 of the ice lies under the water. To have 2 meters above the water it should be the equivalent of 18 meters below.
You seem to have missed this quote from Commander …..
“It marked a stark contrast to the enveloping pack whose pressure ridges rimming the polynya extended as much as 40 feet BENEATH THE SURFACE”
No I haven’t missed it. However you seem to be confused about what “pressure ridge” is. tty explained also above:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/08/10/follow-up-the-bogus-north-pole-becomes-a-lake-story/#comment-1386522
Here is a description of a pressure ridge:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pressure_ridge_%28ice%29_Formation_Drawing.svg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pressure_ridge_%28ice%29
and here at the surface:
You will see these are similar to the one in your photo – seen from above not under the water.
Now you may also know that ice is almost same density as water, 9/10 of the ice lies under the water. To have 2 meters above the water it should be the equivalent of 18 meters below.
It appears that the genuine “lakes” at the North Pole have increased in size and area. MODIS Terra caught a peek through the clouds this morning.
http://tinyurl.com/k9tan67
Navy HYCOM shows significant areas north of 85 with 50 percent concentration.
http://tinyurl.com/n4qmcb6
This melt seasons third cyclone is winding down but significant positive temperature anomalies
over the Beaufort, CAA and ESS are forecast to last for a few more days.
http://tinyurl.com/m5eok6d
The extremely warm air blowing over the Beaufort and ESS has caused significant flash melt in the five days this cyclone has been spinning at the North Pole.
http://tinyurl.com/kl974ay
http://tinyurl.com/6666bx
Hit and run science reporting is going to really have to gear up from this point on as the AMO is in serious (obvious) cyclical decline now, and joins PDO temp cycle, South Atlantic sea temps, and solar cycle. Try reporting on single melt drops if you can find any as these macro cycles join to erase prior warming cycles.
goldminor says:
August 10, 2013 at 11:45 am
Several days ago, I noticed an effort to explain this photo snafu at msnbc. Their take was that the water had now ‘drained’ through cracks in the ice. That does not make sense to me. How would fresh melt water drain into the heavier sea water that underlies the ice? It looks to me like the ‘lake’ water simply refroze.
Not possible, at the maximum of the melt pond the stake in the foreground of the picture was completely immersed in water. A day later all the water was gone and the stake was now ~0.75m above the ice, clearly the melt water had drained away.
May already be posted…but worth repeating;
http://www.climatechangedispatch.com/home-2/11509-associated-press-retracts-global-warming-north-pole-photo.html
Ian L. McQueen says:
August 10, 2013 at 8:53 am
Hi Ian,
Nope, I couldn’t find a way to post either (without joining, and I just couldn’t bring myself to do that!).
A shambles.
Regards,
Arfur
Well, one of the two pole cams fell over a while back (a blizzard gust got to it?). It is now completely buried in a drift. The other camera, the one that shows the massive instrument station and snow depth stakes is still in good order. It depicts ongoing accumulation and drifting. Only the tallest two stakes are still visible. Maybe the whole set up will get buried soon.
Re:Ian George says:
August 10, 2013 at 4:43 am
Watched the video – wonder how many doom and gloomers did? The surface melt was present for a very small proportion of the total video. However, now that the story is out about the “major North Pole melt” this will be used over and over again to “prove” whatever climate process is occurring this week. Anybody see a retraction is any local papers that carried the lake pictures? I didn’t. Only by my regular reading of WUWT have I learned that AP acknowledges they were mistaken. As most media outlets are in the CAGW camp, this retraction will be put aside “due to lack of space”. But thanks Anthony once again.
Master of Space and Thyme says:
August 10, 2013 at 12:14 pm
…
July 29
http://psc.apl.washington.edu/northpole/NPEO2013/WEBCAM2/ARCHIVE/npeo_cam2_20130729011616.jpg
Those pressure ridges in the distance indicate very substantial ice thickness.
@Piper Paul (11:18PM, 8/10), LAUGH-OUT-LOUD, I thought, essentially (you were much more creative) the same thing. “Are those their real names? Naaaa.” Thanks for sharing the funny Monty Python video. #[:)]
James At 48 says:
August 12, 2013 at 11:51 am
Well, one of the two pole cams fell over a while back (a blizzard gust got to it?).
Actually a polar bear got to it!
http://psc.apl.washington.edu/northpole/NPEO2013/WEBCAM2/ARCHIVE/npeo_cam2_20130809185837.jpg
It is now completely buried in a drift. The other camera, the one that shows the massive instrument station and snow depth stakes is still in good order. It depicts ongoing accumulation and drifting. Only the tallest two stakes are still visible. Maybe the whole set up will get buried soon.
The three missing stakes fell down early on Aug 10th, the snow fall/drift only amounts to a couple of inches.
http://psc.apl.washington.edu/northpole/NPEO2013/WEBCAM2/ARCHIVE/npeo_cam2_20130810064739.jpg
Six hours before:
http://psc.apl.washington.edu/northpole/NPEO2013/WEBCAM2/ARCHIVE/npeo_cam2_20130809185837.jpg
Rather than be buried, soon it will be floating in the ocean (or recovered by PSC).
This was copied from a 1998 eye-witness report on Curry’s SHEBA ice mission – where they spent about a year actually locked-in within the ice pack, drifting along with through the high Arctic.
Notice the extreme effect of very localized water vapor influence through open leads, and – more importantly and germainly to this discussion/argument about open water “lakes” on top of the Arctic Ice – notice how the leads and polynnas around her icebreaker kept forming and re-freezing. Also, see the influence on albedo: reflection from above the cloud cover was more important than the dark – BUT REFROZEN!!! – ice below the clouds.