Newsbytes: Polar Bear Population Growing Despite Declining Sea Ice

Great News! But Where Is The News Coverage?

polarbear_billboard

From The GWPF and Dr. Benny Peiser

Exciting news about polar bears in eastern Canada: a new the peer-reviewed paper concludes that despite sea ice having declined since the 1970s, polar bear numbers in Davis Strait have not only increased to a greater density than other seasonal-ice subpopulations, but it may now have reached its ‘carrying capacity.’ This is great news. But where is the shouting from the roof-tops? This peer-reviewed paper was published February 19, 2013. No press release was issued that I could find and consequently, there was no news coverage. Funny, that. –Susan Crockford, Polar Bear Science, 10 June 2013

 

One of the interesting aspects of the current temperature standstill is that it persists despite several El Ninos and La Ninas. Since 2006 the influence of these events has been more pronounced in satellite data; El Ninos in 2007 and 2009-10, La Ninas in 2008, 2010–2012. These events have increased the ‘noise’ of the global temperature data in recent years. Removing this noise is tricky, but without it there is a hint, just a hint, that sans El Nino/La Nina effects and volcanic dips, the global temperature might be reducing. As usual, five more years of data will be fascinating to analyse. –David Whitehouse, The Global Warming Policy Foundation, 11 June 2013

Prof. Murry Salby, climate scientist at Macquarie University of Sydney, made a presentation in Hamburg on April 18th as part of a European tour. Prof. Salby is author of the textbook Physics of the Atmosphere and Climate (Cambridge University Press) and Fundamentals of Atmospheric Physics (Academic Press) and is renowned worldwide as an astrophysicist. He recently caused excitement with new findings on the relationship of the 12C- and 13C isotopes and the development of CO2-concentration. From the findings he concluded that the anthropogenic emissions only had a slight impact on the global CO2-concentrations. They are mainly a consequence of temperature changes. This relationship is known up to now only from the warming phases after the last ice ages. Prof. Salby extends this relationship to our current climate development. —Die kalte Sonne, 8 June 2013

I did a quick post yesterday on the May numbers on RSS [satellite data], which fell sharply to 0.139C. The RSS figures are anomalies from the 1979-98 baseline, and I pointed out that, against a baseline of 1981-2010, current temperatures are now only 0.039C higher. I also mentioned that the 1981-2010 average had been artificially depressed by the two eruptions, El Chichon in 1982 and Pinatubo in 1991. Take the two volcanoes out of the equation, and it is clear that there is nothing unusual about current temperatures. –Paul Homewood, Not a Lot Of People Know That, 8 June 2013

When the Little Ice Age caused widespread crop failures, mass starvation, and disease in populated Europe some centuries ago, the enlightened ones blamed the climate-related misery and misfortune on the black magic of sorcerers and witches – who were promptly tried and burned at the stake. In other cultures, people performed rain-dances, human sacrifices, or other bizarre rituals, all in a futile attempt to appease the weather gods. Of course the victims of these rituals were often political opponents. Today nothing has changed apparently, as Der Spiegel poignantly demonstrates with its latest online round of hysterics titled Flood Drama in Germany: We’re to Blame! by Jakob Augstein. According to Augstein, today’s German flooding is a result of man’s sins against the climate. Climate deniers are mostly to blame for the “Katastrophe“.Pierre Goselin, No Tricks Zone, 11 June 2013

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

60 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
johnmarshall
June 11, 2013 7:48 am

Must be plenty of seals then.

Latitude
June 11, 2013 7:50 am

Kill the bears……save the seals
…just a few years ago, it was all about the seals

Ryan
June 11, 2013 7:52 am

There is tons of news coverage. What does the study say about the value of K longterm?

mkwrk2
June 11, 2013 8:00 am

As far as I remember, North Magnetic Pole is moving same direction-East Canada and further in Russian tundra.

Mike Bromley the Kurd near the Green Line
June 11, 2013 8:08 am

Sorcerers and witches, huh? Funny, that. Nowadays it’s deniers and republicans.

arthur4563
June 11, 2013 8:13 am

I have yet to find a global warmist prediction or claim which isn’t either misleading, flat out wrong, or 180 degrees wrong. Practically every global warmist is a brainless liar.

Gary
June 11, 2013 8:17 am

Doesn’t matter what the real numbers are. The agenda is what matters and reports will be made to support it whether they are true or not. An otherwise intelligent scientist and self-proclaimed skeptic, Phil Plait, is so bought-into the meme that he can’t evaluate this kind of data (see http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2013/06/11/climate_change_denial_zombies_ams_president_marshall_shepherd_talks_global.html for example). It’s both pitiful and funny at the same time.

Chris B
June 11, 2013 8:19 am

Maybe not despite, but rather because of declining Sea Ice?

MattN
June 11, 2013 8:21 am

None of this is at all surprising to us, mainly because we’re the only ones paying any attention…

Frank K.
June 11, 2013 8:22 am

In the CAGW universe, instead of the truth, we get fantasy pieces like this:
“Where will the polar bears go as the Arctic ice melts under their feet”
Posted by KIKE CALVO of Photographer; Expert at National Geographic Expeditions on May 30, 2013
http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/05/30/where-will-the-polar-bears-go-as-the-arctic-ice-melts-under-their-feet/

June 11, 2013 8:31 am

This exhibit currently at the McAuliffe-Shepard Discovery center in Concord N.H. claims that polar bear populations are decreasing. I hate having to tell my son that not everything at science centers are true. http://www.starhop.com/press-room/special-exhibitions.aspx

Alan the Brit
June 11, 2013 8:37 am

Does that mean “America’s” Polar Bear populations no longer requires protected status? That’s if the very few around Alaska actually constitute a “population”! Humppff! Rent seekers the flaming lot of them!

DesertYote
June 11, 2013 8:44 am

Ryan says:
June 11, 2013 at 7:52 am
There is tons of news coverage. What does the study say about the value of K longterm?
###
Were? If you supply 15 unique links to stories in popular literature you might prove your point. Otherwise your just blowing smoke. The only reason I was aware of this study is that I follow the literature. Carnivore biology is one of my areas of study.
BTW, I bet you don’t know how K is calculated for carnivores. You obviously don’t know what it means. or how it is used. You showed this by asking such a stupid question in an attempt to distract and confuse while trying to look as if you know something. You really are a one trick pony, just like the rest of your fellow travelers.

Eustace Cranch
June 11, 2013 8:49 am

Certain contrarian commenters here are fond of dropping cryptic statements and questions, but not so hot at supporting them with data. Information content = 0.

Ryan
June 11, 2013 9:11 am

“BTW, I bet you don’t know how K is calculated for carnivores. You obviously don’t know what it means. or how it is used. You showed this by asking such a stupid question…”
It’s one the questions suggested by the authors. You wouldn’t know it from Anthony’s summary, but the authors actually said that the current depression in growth rate is probably a result of reaching capacity OR declining sea ice. Also, that billboard he posted is pure garbage.

DesertYote
June 11, 2013 9:16 am

I tend to discount Polar Bear studies of the Hudson Bay sub populations for a host of reasons, but this study is of the far more significant Davis Straight sub population.

June 11, 2013 9:16 am

Trevor –
Obviously what your son saw wasn’t a “science center,” it was a branch office of the Ministry of Truth.

Bruce Cobb
June 11, 2013 9:42 am

Impossible. I heard they were dropping like flies: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxis7Y1ikIQ
OK, maybe not flies, but like, well dead poley bears thrown from planes.

john robertson
June 11, 2013 9:47 am

, one of the problems when assuming everyone else is stupid, is that is what you become.
I need you to interpret this article ?
As for tons of news coverage, of the amazing success of polar bears to adapt to a non problem.
Please cite away.

Chris B
June 11, 2013 9:50 am

Eustace Cranch says:
June 11, 2013 at 8:49 am
Certain contrarian commenters here are fond of dropping cryptic statements and questions, but not so hot at supporting them with data. Information content = 0.
___________________
Data please.

TRM
June 11, 2013 10:27 am

Climate doesn’t kill polar bears, guns do. 5 times more bears in 40 years since we stopped shooting them. Sounds like a good idea that worked. Kudos to those who got that one through. Think about what would happen to the bears if we kept shooting them but preserved their environment from melting (like we could if we wanted to anyway).

June 11, 2013 10:49 am

Polar Bear Population Growing Despite Declining Sea Ice – and that’s not happening either!

Mike jarosz
June 11, 2013 11:09 am

TRM says:
June 11, 2013 at 10:27 am
“Climate doesn’t kill polar bears, guns do. 5 times more bears in 40 years since we stopped shooting them.”
Concur. The best way to be a REAL CONSERVATIONIST is to become as efficient as possible, both with our energy use and our land use. That will do more to protect the wild critters and the trees more than any tree hugger plan. CAGW is scam to redistribute wealth and nothing more. If Gore touched it stinks.

Jon
June 11, 2013 11:11 am

There are estimated to be more than 5 million harp seals off Eastern Canada … if you add to this the populations of ringed seal, hooded seal and bearded seal, then no wonder the bears are doing so good!

Ryan
June 11, 2013 11:18 am

“I need you to interpret this article ?”
Just the parts that the blogs are leaving out, as mentioned above.

1 2 3