More 'ice free Arctic' claims – we've heard it all before

From the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, something we’ve heard before. For example this claim from 2008. Gotta love the use of props to show how climate tipping points work:

NASA: Arctic Ocean Could be Mostly Ice Free in 2013

Apr 4, 2008

“The sea ice is decreasing faster than all the models predicted,” says Jay Zwally, the ice satellite project scientist at NASA Goddard, “We not only have the warming of the atmosphere, we have a warming of the ocean that is affecting this. It has been surprising to everybody, this decrease in area. This is a marked departure, and this is suggesting to us that maybe we are getting at this tipping point.”

Ice-free Arctic may be in our future, say UMass-Amherst, international researchers

AMHERST, Mass., USA; COLOGNE, Germany; MAGADAN, Russia – Analyses of the longest continental sediment core ever collected in the Arctic, recently completed by an international team led by Julie Brigham-Grette of the University of Massachusetts Amherst, provide “absolutely new knowledge” of Arctic climate from 2.2 to 3.6 million years ago.

“While existing geologic records from the Arctic contain important hints about this time period, what we are presenting is the most continuous archive of information about past climate change from the entire Arctic borderlands. As if reading a detective novel, we can go back in time and reconstruct how the Arctic evolved with only a few pages missing here and there,” says Brigham-Grette.

Results of analyses that provide “an exceptional window into environmental dynamics” never before possible were published this week in Science and have “major implications for understanding how the Arctic transitioned from a forested landscape without ice sheets to the ice- and snow-covered land we know today,” she adds.

Their data come from analyzing sediment cores collected in the winter of 2009 from ice-covered Lake El’gygytgyn, the oldest deep lake in the northeast Russian Arctic, located 100 km north of the Arctic Circle. “Lake E” was formed 3.6 million years ago when a meteorite, perhaps a kilometer in diameter, hit the Earth and blasted out an 11-mile (18 km) wide crater. It has been collecting sediment layers ever since. Luckily for geoscientists, it lies in one of the few Arctic areas not eroded by continental ice sheets during ice ages, so a thick, continuous sediment record was left remarkably undisturbed. Cores from Lake E reach back in geologic time nearly 25 times farther than Greenland ice cores that span only the past 140,000 years.

“One of our major findings is that the Arctic was very warm in the middle Pliocene and Early Pleistocene [~ 3.6 to 2.2 million years ago] when others have suggested atmospheric CO2 was not much higher than levels we see today. This could tell us where we are going in the near future. In other words, the Earth system response to small changes in carbon dioxide is bigger than suggested by earlier climate models,” the authors state.

Important to the story are the fossil pollen found in the core, including Douglas fir and hemlock. These allow the reconstruction of vegetation around the lake in the past, which in turn paints a picture of past temperatures and precipitation.

Another significant finding is documentation of sustained warmth in the Middle Pliocene, with summer temperatures of about 59 to 61 degrees F [15 to 16 degrees C], about 14.4 degrees F [8 degrees C] warmer than today, and regional precipitation three times higher. “We show that this exceptional warmth well north of the Arctic Circle occurred throughout both warm and cold orbital cycles and coincides with a long interval of 1.2 million years when other researchers have shown the West Antarctic Ice Sheet did not exist,” Brigham-Grette notes. Hence both poles share some common history, but the pace of change differed.

Her co-authors, Martin Melles of the University of Cologne and Pavel Minyuk of Russia’s Northeast Interdisciplinary Scientific Research Institute, Magadan, led research teams on the project. Robert DeConto, also at UMass Amherst, led climate modeling efforts. These data were compared with ecosystem reconstructions performed by collaborators at universities of Berlin and Cologne.

The Lake E cores provide a terrestrial perspective on the stepped pacing of several portions of the climate system through the transition from a warm, forested Arctic to the first occurrence of land ice, Brigham-Grette says, and the eventual onset of major glacial/interglacial cycles. “It is very impressive that summer temperatures during warm intervals even as late as 2.2 million years ago were always warmer than in our pre-Industrial reconstructions.”

Minyuk notes that they also observed a major drop in Arctic precipitation at around the same time large Northern Hemispheric ice sheets first expanded and ocean conditions changed in the North Pacific. This has major implications for understanding both what drove the onset of the ice ages

The sediment core also reveals that even during the first major “cold snap” to show up in the record 3.3 Million years ago, temperatures in the western Arctic were similar to recent averages of the past 12,000 years. “Most importantly, conditions were not ‘glacial,’ raising new questions as to the timing of the first appearance of ice sheets in the Northern Hemisphere,” the authors add.

This week’s paper is the second article published in Science by these authors using data from the Lake E project. Their first, in July 2012, covered the period from the present to 2.8 million years ago, while the current work addresses the record from 2.2 to 3.6 million years ago. Melles says, “This latest paper completes our goal of providing an overview of new knowledge of the evolution of Arctic change across the western borderlands back to 3.6 million years and places this record into a global context with comparisons to records in the Pacific, the Atlantic and Antarctica.”

The new Lake E paleoclimate reconstructions and climate modeling are consistent with estimates made by other research groups that support the idea that Earth’s climate sensitivity to CO2 may well be higher than suggested by the 2007 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

###

The International Lake El’gygytgyn Drilling Project was funded by the International Continental Drilling Program (ICDP), the U.S. National Science Foundation’s Division of Earth Sciences and Office of Polar Programs, the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research, Alfred Wegener Institute, GeoForschungsZentrum-Potsdam, the Russian Academy of Sciences Far East Branch, the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and the Austrian Ministry for Science and Research.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
71 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ed Zuiderwijk
May 10, 2013 12:37 am

“In other words, the Earth system response to small changes in carbon dioxide is bigger than suggested by earlier climate models,” the authors state”
Group think in action. Alternatively one can conclude that:
“Evidently carbon dioxide is not an important factor in regulating the climate”.
Now apply Occam’s razor.

Greg Goodman
May 10, 2013 1:55 am

from paper’s conclusion: “Mechanistic explanations for observed trends in temperature and precipitation have yet to be determined but imply high sensitivity to CO2 forcing. ”
Sheesh, if they have yet to be determined they don’t imply ANYTHING.
They only ‘imply’ high sensitivity to CO2 if you ASSUME a priori that CO2 is the major determining factor of global temperature.
As usual, the basic observational science reported seems good but gets spun into some AGW fairytale that has zero basis in the reported results.
Sadly this is now par for the course in the once “prestigious” Science journal.

Greg Goodman
May 10, 2013 2:17 am

There has been significant change in arctic ice area over the last 35 years. So if we are about to see a catastrophic collapse, tipping point etc. we should be able to see some significant acceleration in ice area.
So let’s plot acceleration ice arctic ice area:
http://climategrog.wordpress.com/?attachment_id=216
What this reveals is strong oscillatory pattern but no visible acceleration or deceleration overall .
Much of the pattern, including the 2007 event can be described by a two year periodicity modulated by a 12.8 cycle.
No tipping points there.

Wamron
May 10, 2013 5:15 am

So why is Russia expanding its ice-breaker fleet with new, nuclear powered ships, immense vessels at immense expense?

David
May 10, 2013 6:07 am

What is interesting, is that we are now a few years down the line from when these fatuous predictions were made – so now we can see just how fatuous they were..
David Viner of the UK’s Met Office in 2002: ‘Children just aren’t going to know what snow is..’
Cue the worst winter (2012/13) in the UK for 50 years…
This feature: ‘Arctic could be ice-free in 2013..’
About as averagely iced up as you could reasonably expect…
And so it goes on…

May 10, 2013 12:05 pm

David says:
May 10, 2013 at 6:07 am
What is interesting, is that we are now a few years down the line from when these fatuous predictions were made – so now we can see just how fatuous they were..
David Viner of the UK’s Met Office in 2002: ‘Children just aren’t going to know what snow is..’
Cue the worst winter (2012/13) in the UK for 50 years…
This feature: ‘Arctic could be ice-free in 2013..’
About as averagely iced up as you could reasonably expect…

Hardly average (-1.5 sds), a good chance of surpassing last year’s record minimum.

Kajajuk
May 10, 2013 8:34 pm

norah4you
May 11, 2013 12:49 am

There exist a gap in knowledge but there isn’t any climate threats.
How anyone can belive that a vulcano on one of Hawaii’s islands can be used to correct CO2-values, goes beyond comprehension. EVERY Vulcano active or dead day out and day in gives CO2 to the atmosphere in high doses. Variable doses due to internal pressure in any given vulcano as well as variable doses from Earth quakes adds to CO2 in atmosphere due to tectonic plates movements/interactions/collisions etc.

Reich.Eschhaus
May 11, 2013 11:22 am

@Eric Worrall
I am sure you just made a simple error or a type. But I can’t let it stand uncorrected:
“where was the Russia plate 3m years ago?
3m years x 1cm / year = 300Km – so not that big a change.”
3000000 cm = 30000 m = only 30 km
It could of course be that the Russia plate moved somewhat faster.

May 11, 2013 4:58 pm

Kajajuk,
Interesting video. But misleading, because global ice extent is unchanged from it’s long term average. Also misleading because Antarctic ice cover is kept at the same number, when in fact it has been steadily rising.

philincalifornia
May 11, 2013 5:11 pm

Phil. says:
May 10, 2013 at 12:05 pm
Hardly average (-1.5 sds), a good chance of surpassing last year’s record minimum.
—————————————————————–
But, but, but …..
In December 2008, Al Gore said the Arctic would be ice-free in 5 years ….
Hmmmmm 8 + 5 = ……. time to run a model.
So what’s the spectroscopist’s explanation for Antarctica again ??

Reich.Eschhaus
May 11, 2013 5:22 pm


May 11, 2013 at 4:58 pm
“Kajajuk,
Interesting video. But misleading, because global ice extent is unchanged from it’s long term average. Also misleading because Antarctic ice cover is kept at the same number, when in fact it has been steadily rising.”
What’s misleading? In the video the words ‘Arctic sea ice volume‘ are displayed quite clearly. In addition, Zwally was talking about the arctic as well.

May 11, 2013 6:09 pm

philincalifornia says:
May 11, 2013 at 5:11 pm
Phil. says:
May 10, 2013 at 12:05 pm
Hardly average (-1.5 sds), a good chance of surpassing last year’s record minimum.
—————————————————————–
But, but, but …..
In December 2008, Al Gore said the Arctic would be ice-free in 5 years ….

Actually he didn’t, his speech was frequently misquoted though! Even so it could still happen this fall, but very likely within the next couple of years.

RACookPE1978
Editor
May 11, 2013 6:26 pm

wayne Job says:
May 9, 2013 at 4:30 pm

Some studies I have seen long ago suggested that the arctic is much warmer and drier during ice ages. Comparing their cores to the time line of the last inter-glacials may be more appropriate than CO2 comparisons. If a link is discovered a warming arctic maybe a precursor to the start of some serious cold.

Not surprising: At 80 north latitude, the edge of today’s ice coverage in the Arctic, there is not enough direct sunshine to heat the ocean’s water at today’s minimum sea ice extents date of mid-September. In fact, at that time of year, so much extra heat is lost from radiation, evaporation, and conduction into the Arctic air that, the more sea ice is lost from today’s levels of 3-5 to 4.5 million km square, the colder the Arctic ocean gets.
Arctic sea ice “amplification” (or positive feedback from open Arctic waters heating up) is a propagandistic myth that does not stand up to the math.
On the other hand, the more the Antarctic sea ice expands – from today’s Antarctic sea extend of 15 million km square at 61 south latitude – the more solar energy IS reflected and the colder the earth DOES gets.
The CAGW community is dead wrong in their mythology. Again.

Mervyn
May 11, 2013 11:12 pm

Let me say this … there is no doubt the man-made global alarmist camp, which has the backing of governments and scientific institutions etc etc etc, continue to have the upper hand in the climate change debate. Therefore, the global warming science that suits them is all they care about.
Because “climate change” – dangerous man-made global warming – is an agenda driven by politics rather than science, sadly, the science is now all but irrelevant. All the errors and scandals associated with the IPCC, its reports, etc etc etc, have not caused the global warming establishment to even bat an eye lid with concern. They’ve continued with a business as usual attitude. The “new scientific method” adopted by alarmist climate scientists is to take their hypotheses, and rather than search for the data that contradicts the hypotheses so as to improve and refine them, they just cherry-pick the data that supports the hypotheses and overlook the rest of the data.
You see, it’s the political truth that matters, not scientific truth.
I cannot comprehend how anyone could be concerned about the incredibly insignificant contribution to the total greenhouse heat effect from human activities, which amounts to about 0.12 of 1% of the overall greenhouse heat effect. It is so small, even if all human activity ceased immediately, there would be no discernible effect on the climate.
How can it possibly be true that such an insignificant contribution to the greenhouse heat effect by human activity is responsible for all these so called “man-made extreme weather events”?
How can it be possible that that such an insignificant contribution to the greenhouse heat effect by human activity is now responsible for climate change.
Yet this is what the global warming alarmist establishment is saying based on all the alarmist claims about today’s weather events and climate.

David Cage
May 12, 2013 1:32 am

Why do they keep quoting the minimum value of ice when the years that the north west passage was successfully crossed the levels were also very low and this was at very obvious recurring intervals.

philincalifornia
May 12, 2013 6:21 am

Phil. says:
May 11, 2013 at 6:09 pm
philincalifornia says:
—————————————————————–
But, but, but …..
In December 2008, Al Gore said the Arctic would be ice-free in 5 years ….
Actually he didn’t, his speech was frequently misquoted though!
———————————
Yes he did, and you know it.
You only made that comment because you know the speech in question has been removed from Youtube to save further embarrassment. Sometime in the first two weeks of December, 2008, probably December 13th at a German museum, with dinosaur skeleton in the background.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/12/14/gore-entire-north-polar-ice-cap-will-be-gone-in-5-years/

May 13, 2013 6:13 am

philincalifornia says:
May 12, 2013 at 6:21 am
Phil. says:
May 11, 2013 at 6:09 pm
philincalifornia says:
—————————————————————–
But, but, but …..
In December 2008, Al Gore said the Arctic would be ice-free in 5 years ….
Actually he didn’t, his speech was frequently misquoted though!
———————————
Yes he did, and you know it.

Actually I know that he did not say that, I actually listened to that youtube and although it was poor quality it was clear that he did not say “entire north polar ice cap will be gone in 5 years”, near as I could tell it was “may” not “will”. I posted this at the time.
You only made that comment because you know the speech in question has been removed from Youtube to save further embarrassment.
The account no longer exists, not embarrassing.
Sometime in the first two weeks of December, 2008, probably December 13th at a German museum, with dinosaur skeleton in the background.
Yes that’s the one.

Kajajuk
May 13, 2013 7:16 pm

dbstealey says:
May 11, 2013 at 4:58 pm
————————————
That ‘s very comforting, thanks.

May 13, 2013 9:06 pm

Kajajuk,
You are welcome.
If you look here, you will see that the current sea ice total is right at the 35-year global sea ice average [the red line at the bottom of the chart].
It is true that the Arctic is losing ice. But that is offset by the gain in Antarctic ice. And thus, the last cherry-picked climate alarm — declining Arctic ice — is deconstructed. Nothing either unusual or unprecedented is happening. The climate fluctuates, that’s all. And of course, CO2 has nothing to do with it, or the Antarctic would also be losing ice. It isn’t.

Kajajuk
May 14, 2013 6:33 pm

Without a satellite of my own, i am reliant on released findings…
“Meanwhile, measurements from the Grace satellites confirm that Antarctica is losing mass. Isabella Velicogna of JPL and the University of California, Irvine, uses Grace data to weigh the Antarctic ice sheet from space. Her work shows that the ice sheet is not only losing mass, but it is losing mass at an accelerating rate”
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/20100108_Is_Antarctica_Melting.html
And so it is comforting to be told there is nothing to worry about, and that the opposite is true.