Guest post by Michael Palmer
The North Sea is the shelf sea between Great Britain in the West and continental Europe in the East and South. It has strong tidal movements, and is prone to storm surges that occur when northwesterly winds whip the sea against the continental coast. The most severe surges tend to arise when storms combine with spring tides, during which the sun, moon and earth are all lined up to maximize the gravitational pull on the water. The coastal people have long fought and laboured to protect their lives and their land from the elements. Their history should be of interest to anyone worrying about the best way to adapt to “climate change” or “extreme weather”.
I first encountered the North Sea in 1971, when my parents took all of their six children to spend the summer with relatives on the small North Frisian island of Pellworm. This island is located in the Wadden Sea, off the west coast of Schleswig-Holstein, Germany’s northernmost province.
Map of the North Sea and adjoining countries (left), and blow-up of Pellworm and its surroundings.
The Wadden Sea is an area of coastal shelf so shallow that the sea floor becomes exposed during every tide of ebb. For several hours, the sea retreats by some 10 kilometers or more, and it then becomes possible to walk across the mudflats from one island to the next. Such walks might be a little scary and sometimes outright dangerous, for the next island may be hours away; the mudflats can turn from firm to swampy quite abruptly, and into some areas, one should not venture without a local guide. However, these walks were also fun; one could catch little fish, crabs and other creatures that were trapped in little pools and puddles left behind by the retreating water.
A walk across the Wadden Sea (ripped off from someone’s blog). Original soundtrack and smell not available, but both can easily be recreated using a plumber’s helper and a clogged lavatory.
But what I found even more fascinating were the shards and bricks, the teeth and bones, upon which we occasionally stumbled several kilometers from the shore. I learned that these were the remnants of settlements whose inhabitants had perished in a great flood in 1634, and that an earlier flood had taken even more lives and land in 1362. Indeed, these two floods had been only the locally most devastating ones in a long series of storm tides. My father then told us that only nine years earlier, in 1962, a storm tide had killed more than 300 people in the city of Hamburg, where he then used to live and study, and that he had helped to collect the drenched bodies in the aftermath.
Above: Historical map of Pellworm and its surroundings. This map was drawn in 1652, that is, shortly after the great flood from 1634. The island named “Nortstrandt”, in the center of the image, is no more; the larger of its two remnants, on the left, now forms the island of Pellworm. The areas that surround the islands, shaded with criss-crossed lines, are the mudflats of the Wadden Sea; they presumably were solid ground prior to the great flood of 1362.
These stories of danger and disaster formed a stark contrast to the serene summer landscape, with sheep grazing and dozing right next to gentle waves. However, that the threat was real was plain from the aspect of the coastline fortifications. The entire island of Pellworm, and the continental shoreline as well, were protected by a dike seven meters high. Grass-covered, it had a fairly shallow profile towards the sea, although more steep close to the crown. On the island, this dike had just barely withstood the flood of 1962, and improvements were already underway; in some places, the dike had been elevated another one or two meters and also been given an even shallower and more regular profile, so as to minimize the impact of the onrushing storm waves. Indeed, these new dikes would prove their worth in the even higher flood of 1976; all failures in that flood occured in segments where this modernization had not yet been completed.
Modern sea dike on Pellworm (left, source), and historical illustration of a sea dike (source). The very shallow profile of the modern dike minimizes the impact of onrushing storm waves; it also belies the height of the structure, which approaches 10 m. In the photograph, it is ebb tide, and the sea has receded beyond the horizon.
The shoreline was also decorated with breakwaters built from wooden poles and brushwood, which served to slow the tidal movement, promote the deposition of sand and mud, and ultimately reclaim land from the Wadden sea. The process of land reclamation could be seen in its various stages. Saltwort settled on freshly risen banks and aided in their further growth and stabilization. Drainage trenches were dug, and the excavated mud used to further elevate the banks in between, which then became overgrown with grass; the trenches eventually became filled in by further mud deposition to form a continuous area of elevated marsh land. In many places, reclaimed marshes had been surrounded with new sea dikes and turned into farm land.
A little further behind the new sea dike, older dikes were still visible; and the older they were, the lower, steeper and less adequate they seemed. Yet, even these older dikes were still being maintained, and where roads cut through them, wooden barriers were on hand with which to close the gaps in emergencies. Moreover, these dikes were hundreds of years old, and considering that they had been erected by hand, they actually were quite impressive in their own right.
From all this, it was quite clear that coastal protection was, and for a long time had been, taken very seriously. This is also illustrated by historical records, which show how even since the middle ages, dike construction has deeply affected the lives of the hardy Frisians who have been living along the sea shore throughout written history. In those early days, Frisian men were supposed not to travel any further from their homes than allowed them to return the same day, so that they might be ready to defend their land both from the floods and the “heathens” (that is, the Vikings). Every landowner was assigned a stretch of dike for maintenance, in proportion to the size of his land; and an elected Deichgraf (literally, “dike earl”) made sure that this maintenance was properly performed. If a landowner failed to maintain his dike, his property was forfeited and fell to the next person willing to assume those duties; if a person wantonly or negligently caused damage to the dike, their limbs or lives were forfeited as well.
While dike construction and maintenance was initially a local concern, it gradually came to be organized on a larger scale. The observation that dikes time and again failed before the floods, as well as increasing centralization of political power, likely both contributed to this development. Only with this larger scale organization did it become possible to tackle the enclosure of newly reclaimed marshland. Such a project had to be completed in one summer, since the new dike had to be completed before the onset of the next stormy winter season. For one historical construction project, which was carried out about 400 years ago, it has been estimated that more than 500 men toiled for 7 months, 6 days per week, and 14 hours per day, to move 500,000 cubic meters of soil for the erection of 6 kilometers of new dike. (This was hard work. The black, alluvial soil of the marsh land is exceptionally dense and heavy; teams of four Belgian horses used to be put before a single plow share on this soil.) Once the earthwork had been completed, the new dike had to be covered with sods of turf, which were fastened to the soil with rye straw; the straw was poked into the soil with several hundred stitches on each square meter.
The engineers who oversaw such projects came very often from the Netherlands. Holland is even more crucially dependent on its coastal defences, since so much of it lies below regular sea level, and the Dutch have always been the acknowledged pioneers and masters of the trade. Indeed, the modern coastal dikes and bulwarks of Holland, from the Zuiderzee works to the Eastern Scheldt dam, are not just impressive but downright magnificent. Bulwarks have been built across the many river arms of the Rhine delta, so as to prevent the surging sea water from pressing into the rivers and flooding the settlements upstream. (Indeed, this is what happened in Hamburg in 1962; that city is 50 km upstream from the estuary of the Elbe river and had not been considered in grave danger from the North Sea storm tides.) Construction of these bulwarks was begun after a disastrous flood in 1953, which broke through the dikes in 89 places and killed more than 1500 people in the country.
Maybe some reader from Holland will find it worth their time to pitch in with a more thorough and substantial description of Dutch coastal management than I could give.
While the floods of 1953 and 1962 claimed approximately 2500 casualties—apart from Holland, England and Belgium were also significantly affected in 1953—the highest flood on record, at least as far as the German coast is concerned, actually occurred in 1976. Nevertheless, damage was minor; clearly, the new construction that had been motivated by those to recent floods worked as planned to protect the coast and its people. With even further enhancements having been made since, nowadays even exceptionally strong storm surges have become uneventful and barely even make the national news anymore.
When I first came from Germany to North America, I was struck by the absence, or near absence, of coastal defences in New York and many other places. How could people have been so imprudent? It may simply have arisen as a consequence of immigration—most immigrants to those places probably came from landlocked places in Europe, and therefore lacked the sense of danger that has become second nature to the indigenous people of the North Sea coast.
So is there a moral to this story? Maybe this one: When confronted with rising seas, don’t belabor “extreme weather”—instead, get in touch with some Dutch engineers ASAP.
Thanks for reading.
Michael Palmer
Department of Chemistry
University of Waterloo
Waterloo, Ontario
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Or move to someplace like Calgary, where the issue is not to be found.
Defense lawyers on call?
Seems to me this has a lot to do with pressure on land, Germany is an old country whereas America is recent and huge. Definitely odd when you find a country behaving very differently from what you thought was normal.
Yes, the ruins of old Arthedain will long be washed away.
More like impudent, the funny thing is that we fix these problems with money printed on German presses.
The problem is that hominids of this era, on the NA continent, at the very least, do not have such tribal memories. They might very well have to experience it for themselves. One might perhaps be statistically more solvent quoting Sirocko, et al, 2005, “A late Eemian aridity pulse in central Europe during the last glacial inception”, nature, vol. 436, 11 August 2005, doi:10.1038/nature03905, pp 833-836:
“Investigating the processes that led to the end of the last interglacial period is relevant for understanding how our ongoing interglacial will end, which has been a matter of much debate…
“The onset of the LEAP occurred within less than two decades, demonstrating the existence of a sharp threshold, which must be near 416 Wm2, which is the 65oN July insolation for 118 kyr BP (ref. 9). This value is only slightly below today’s value of 428 Wm2. Insolation will remain at this level slightly above the inception for the next 4,000 years before it then increases again.”
But that is more than 140 characters methinks (Fail)………
In Canada and the U.S., should winter snowfalls become more frequent and deeper, inland flooding in the northern states of the midwest wlll aslo become more frequent. In Minot and Fargo North Dakota, the “dikes” are formed from many sandbags, filled and put in place by students and many volunteers.
“Kiel Canal has been sadly neglected over the past two decades. I’m pleased that I was able to fight for the necessary funding for the fifth lock chamber in Brunsbüttel and that the public tender is now under way. The next step is to submit a time schedule and plan of measures for Kiel Canal as a whole.”
http://www.dredgingtoday.com/2013/04/11/germany-to-strengthen-maritime-economy/
If I had time I would look for parallels between economic decline and neglect of great infrastructure. That Europe’s ‘great powerhouse’ has let the Kiel Canal fall into disrepair (it is the world’s busiest by far) tells a sorry tale. And as for shutting down its nuclear industry, you can only wonder at the process of decay.
Steve, living in Germany I can tell you the problem is not money, it is misinformed “Green” politics. “Green” propagandists, their misinformation and sometimes outright untruths to young people are the cause of the shut down of nuclear, and the prevention of the building of new ‘normal’ power stations. They also want to increase taxes to 49% to fund “ecological renewal” – whatever that means – and there are fools who will still vote for them, mainly young, professional and well educated, but totally lacking any grasp of reality.
I have the perfect solution. Round up all “Greens” and make them live in the areas prone to extreme weather on a regular basis. No “mod con”, just the tools our forefathers used to defend themselves. How “Green” is that?
The Germans will need more coastal protection since they are building more evil Coal power stations, which as we know will cause the sea level to rise by 50 meters or more [/sarc].
Sorry for the frivolous comment, but after a couple of hours reading the latest AGW dribble on the web, it is difficult to be serious.
Thanks Michael Palmer for a really interesting read. One of the many things I like about WUWT is the occasional “off the beaten” path article that is nevertheless of considerable relevance to the central issue of climate change.
“noaaprogrammer” wrote (April 28, 2013 at 9:11 pm):
In Canada and the U.S., should winter snowfalls become more frequent and deeper, inland flooding in the northern states of the midwest wlll aslo become more frequent. In Minot and Fargo North Dakota, the “dikes” are formed from many sandbags, filled and put in place by students and many volunteers.
It is important to note that Minot and Fargo are on the Red River, which has the unusual characteristic (for a Northern Hemisphere river) of flowing north, where it eventually drains into Manitoba, Canada’s Lake Winnipeg. If southern North Dakota warms up earlier than usual and/or more rapidly than usual in the spring, large volumes of melt water will begin their journey downriver (i.e., north) while the lower reaches of the river in northern North Dakota and southern Manitoba are still frozen.
When spring comes earlier than usual and/or warmer than usual to southern North Dakota, the risk of flooding is greatly increased along the length of the Red River. This is true whether or not there’s been higher-than-usual snowfall. (Of course, adding more snow can make a bad situation worse.)
What happens to the water collected from heavy rain? Do they have (huge) pumping systems?
Presumably there must be duplicates.
To peter melia: During low water gates are opened to let water flow to sea.
Nice story! I am living near the Dutch border, not far from where the water did come with the 1953 flood disaster. I have some remembrances of it with water everywhere and on a distance a few roofs and a church tower above it. The Dutch and Belgians indeed learned from it and reinforced the dikes for a once in 1000 years spring tide storm surge. Mostly by shortening the necessary protection by closing several waterways with open dams that can be closed at storm surges. That are the delta works, which are very impressive to see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_Works
With the engineering knowledge built up by these works, Dutch engineers now are helping Bangladesh to built their defences against hurricanes and river flooding and they advised New Orleans after Katrina. If the latter will do something with that advice, that is another question…
I have always some grin if somebody warns for the influence of global warming on a “dangerous” increase in sea level: the lowest point in The Netherlands is some 12 meter below average sea level. A firm NW storm at spring tide adds some 10-12 meters to that. Why would one be afraid of some 0.5 meter extra from sea level in the next 100 years? Time enough to increase dike height with a few meters if necessary at all…
Great story. The sheer height and volume of seawater involved in these tidal and storm surges certainly puts the whimpering about possible sea level rises of a metre or two over many years into perspective.
Can anyone give an update on what has been happening to reinforce New Orleans post Katrina?
In his “Origins of the British”, Dr Stephen Oppenheimer traces the resettlement of England, which began approximately 10k YP, at a time when there was no North Sea or Irish Sea. English ancestors were able to walk from Portugal to Ireland without every stepping on current Spain, France or England. His book traces the genetic migrations in response to geologic changes. The Flandrian Transgression, app 6k YP caused massive rise in sea level world wide and created the islands of Ireland and the UK.
In his exhaustive work “Underworld”, Graham Hancock pursues the origins of civilization beyond the current meme, 7k YP Mesopotamia myth with proof of coastal cities repeatedly inundated by rising seas since the start of the Holocene. The Seven Pagodas, at Mahabalipuram, off the eastern coast of India, show stone temples in stages down to 440 ft below current sea level. Such submerged coastal settlements exist world wide, as do local origin, biblical type flood myths.
Only human hubris allows you to think that humans did then, or do now, or will in the future control sea level. The Holocene extinction saw the loss of 45 species of very large mammals from North America, including mammoths, mastodons, 900 pound saber toothed tigers and 400 pound dire wolves. Also extinct was the Clovis man, who had migrated from Europe. This migration was likely by foot and small boats, along the then continuous North Atlantic ice shelf. It is over-funded government hubris to blame Earth changes on a single parameter, benign, three atom gas. It is folly to let cloistered Climatologists dictate the conditions of Earth changes.
After being berated by a warmist for not caring about the plight of the poor in countries like Bangladesh, I confused him completely by explaining why that country, far from being washed into the sea, was actually growing at a steady rate. Even if sea level rises, a bit ingenuity and investment would mean that instead of continuing to expand outwards it could grow upwards and stay ahead of the threat.
Britain beefed up its North Sea defences – eventually – after the 1953 floods. One key element was The Thames Barrier, first in a state to be used in the 1982/1983 flood season. It was closed against what turned out to be a modest surge in January/February 1983. Due to fairly generous allowance for sea level rise/sinking of land* in SE England, it is currently expected to serve without major modification to the end of this century.
*Tectonic plate recovery after thawing (and therefore removal of loading) of last ice sheets on North England & Scotland.
Colonial,
Actually Minot, ND straddles the Souris or Mouse River just down stream of the junction of the Des Lacs and Souris in Burlington, ND both of which (towns and rivers) are prone to flooding for the reasons you provided. The Souris in this area is now inadequately diked, but maps from the 1800s show areas that are now developed as river bottom hay meadows and park land, which is what it should have remained, but people needed to live close to the transportation artery provided by the Burlington Northern Railroad. Unfortunately the city fathers didn’t have the foresight to hire BN’s Engineers to protect low lying areas.
The Gray Monk says:
April 28, 2013 at 11:20 pm
I hear you Mr Monk. My inlaws live in Kiel. They are stunned by the news that the canal would have to be closed to certain categories of ship for some time. It is the lifeblood/pride and joy of that corner of Germany.
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/repairs-force-sudden-closure-of-vital-german-kiel-canal-shipping-lane-a-887759.html
But even then I can’t convince them of the folly of the wind turbines that increasinly pollute the skyline and drain money away from truly useful infrastructure. They have some notion that they are generating energy to power BMW in Munich.
There is some hope though as one or two of the family teenagers show a fliker of rebellion.
The tidal bulge pulls on the moon, decreasing the speed of its orbit and causing it to drift farther away.
Ferdinand Engelbeen: April 29, 2013 at 1:06 am
“Time enough to increase dike height with a few meters…”
who is going to pay that?
maarten says:
April 29, 2013 at 4:41 am
who is going to pay that?
The inhabitants, as good as they have paid the Delta works which are already in use. I have given my fair share, by working in The Netherlands for some 34 years and paying taxes there…
BTW, the new plans for this and next century of the Delta Commission were based on exaggerated “projections” of the future sea level rise (several meters) from PIK, the notorious Potsdam Institute für Klimafolgenforschung, with Schellnhuber (advisor of Angela Merkel on climate change) and Rahmstorf as most visible exponents. The exaggerations were disputed by another German Institute (Geesthacht), where Hans von Storch is the main leading person.
The report for the Delta Commission also was prepared under high influence of the concrete manufacturers, which have some interest in the results…
Kevin M: I recall learning that the tidal bulge is always a bit ahead of the Moon (because the Earth rotates faster than the Moon orbits), and thus the gravitational tug of the tidal bulge accelerates the Moon, which acceleration causes the Moon to move further from the Earth thereby preserving net angular momentum within the system.
***
When I first came from Germany to North America, I was struck by the absence, or near absence, of coastal defences in New York and many other places. How could people have been so imprudent?
***
Seems people have regressed. The Jamestown, VA settlers from England knew to go well inland from the sea and find a protected, defensible, well-above water-level location for their settlement.