Guest post by WUWT regular Caleb Shaw
I am always seizing upon things people tell me, parking the statements in my memory, and only years later learning they are untrue. It is not merely urban myths, (such as the myth about crocodiles living in the sewers of New York,) which I must discard, but all sorts of tidbits of history and quotes by famous people.
Of course, until I stand corrected, I am a purveyor of misinformation. I hate to admit it. After all, I love Truth, and do my best to be honest. However there is no filter you can clamp on your brain, as you wander through life, which automatically screens the false from the True. If you are eager to learn and ask many questions, your openness and honesty can also make you naïve and gullible, and you ingest all sorts of balderdash. After you have ingested this crud, the best (and sometimes only) way to be rid of it is through embarrassment. It is rough on the old ego, but, having something you honor as “fact” publically proven to be claptrap, and cringing in the consequential embarrassment, is a way to the beauty of Truth.
In my experience, (after roughly 56,257 of these embarrassments,) you eventually start to develop an ear for Truth, and also to recognize balderdash when you hear it. One thing that I often used to say is, “Harry Truman once said, ‘The only thing new under the sun is the history you haven’t read.’” Recently I had the sense this quote didn’t quite ring true. After all, the atomic bomb definitely was a new thing, when Harry Truman used it.
After searching, I found that Truman died in 1972, and the first reference to him saying that quote was in a book about him published in 1974. Not that the writer fabricated the statement, but Truman may have been quoting Mark Twain, for I found an even earlier reference attributed to Mark Twain. (As I recall, it was in a Washington financial journal from the 1940’s.) However, to further confuse matters, I could find no evidence Mark Twain himself had ever actually written what was attributed to him.
Mark Twain’s attitude towards history was more relaxed, and a little cynical, more along the lines of his famous quote, “Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable.” He was well aware people bend the truth when telling a tale, and felt history was no different. In fact, if he had actually written the quote, it likely would have been, “The only new thing under the sun is the history you haven’t yet invented.”
We all like to be knowledgeable, and to strut with authority, even in situations when we perhaps should be more humble. Sometimes it simply fattens our already fat heads, to think we are smart and the other person is not so smart.
Mark Twain tells a tale of meeting a person on a steamboat who had no idea he had ever captained a steamboat, and instead mistook him, (due to his clothing,) as a rube from the east. This person then began explaining to Twain how a steamboat worked, making up absurd and outlandish facts, and Twain simply nodded, as if he was extremely gullible. After the fellow was done he walked down the deck, and Twain later saw him helplessly leaning on a rail, convulsed with laughter. The prankster felt it was the funniest thing that he was so smart, and the rube from the east was so stupid, or he felt that way until the actual captain of that steamboat came down the deck and loudly hailed Mark Twain, speaking to him as one steamboat captain to another steamboat captain. Then the joker abruptly didn’t feel so smart. He suddenly realized he’d been speaking absurd and outlandish untruths to a person who knew exactly how absurd and outlandish his statements were, and who was in fact smarter. The humor then escaped the prankster, and he stopped collapsing in laughter, and instead slouched about with a garlic face.
I know how that man felt. However it is not Mark Twain who puts me in my place. It is life. However I try not to wear the garlic face. Life is too short.
Recently life played one of its jokes on me, involving my skills as a forecaster.
I too like to be knowledgeable, and to strut with authority, and in this case I simply noted that the first half of our New Hampshire winter had been quite open, and the second half very snowy.
When the winter is open there is no blanket of snow to insulate our earth, and it can freeze as solid as permafrost down to a depth of five feet. (Such rock-like earth should have a name. It can’t be “permafrost” because it isn’t permanent. Perhaps it should be called “tempafrost?”)
In any case, this rock-like layer of earth keeps water from draining downwards, and being absorbed into the earth beneath, in the manner a summer rain is absorbed. The water instead pools atop the rock-like layer, turning the upper soil to mire, and making a messy situation called “Mud Season.”
During the time before the rock-like layer melts, and water can again drain downwards, we can have terrible floods in New Hampshire. A warm spring rain falling on, and melting, a deep snow cover can create a foot or two of water, which cannot drain down into the earth, (even if the water table is low in a drought,) and instead must run off into the brooks, steams and rivers.
The worst-case scenario occurred in the spring of 1936, when two warm and drenching rains fell on a deep snow pack. The man-made flood control reservoirs had not been built yet, and the natural flood control reservoirs, (namely beaver dams,) were greatly reduced because beavers had not yet made their amazing come-back, (after their population was reduced to nearly zero by the fashion for beaver top-hats, such as the one Abraham Lincoln wore.) The tremendous 1936 spring freshet likely will never be matched.
Fortunately both natural and man-made flood control reservoirs were in place a decade ago, when a different worst-case scenario occurred. In this case the ground had frozen deeply, perhaps as deeply as five feet, and only the top four feet had thawed when the warm, drenching rains came. In this particular situation we had four feet of drenched earth on top of a sleek and slippery foot of frozen earth, and all of a sudden we were having California mudslides in New Hampshire. In Milford, New Hampshire an entire grove of sixty-foot-tall white pines slid down a hill and blocked Route 101, a major cross-New Hampshire highway. To this day one cannot drive to Greenville on “Greenville Road,” from New Ipswich, New Hampshire, because the southern shoulder of that road collapsed into the Greenville Millpond during those rains.
Knowing all this, I noted this winter that heavy snows followed our “open winter,” which had frozen our soil deeply. The snows included a couple of “NESIS” storms. Because our east-facing slopes do a very good job of gathering snow from east winds, we twice had more than three feet of snow laying on the level, and even as these depths shrank it made a gritty snowpack which contained a great deal of water. I knew what one drenching and warm spring southeaster might do.
I’m not exactly sure why I didn’t go into Alarmist mode. Knowing what I knew, I surely should have run about like Chicken Little. I didn’t. I would like to think I didn’t because I was old and wise, however it was likely due to the fact I was preoccupied by doing my taxes, and also had a bad case of the sniffles.
In any case what has happened is something I haven’t ever seen before. After a period where it seemed we got the worst of every storm, we have entered a period that is the opposite.
Every storm misses us.
I suppose you could call it a “drought,” but it’s hard to call it that, when the streams are brimming and there are no plants in my garden to wilt. The only thing that has shriveled is the snow.
Roughly a week ago, out on my pasture, the back of a plastic version of an “Adirondack Chair” was totally covered by snow, (and the top of that chair is over three feet tall.) Today I shifted that chair three feet to the left, in an inch of corn snow, and sat down on it, in glorious sunshine and amazingly dry air.
The air pouring over us had low humidity even when it was over Canadian snows and was ten degrees (F). Warm that air to near fifty, and it has Arizona dryness. What then happens is that our snowpack does not melt. It “sublimates.”
Sublimation is a mysterious process wherein a solid doesn’t need to melt before it evaporates. The only time you see sublimation, in ordinary life, is if you boyishly put a snowball in your freezer, (so you can throw a snowball in July,) but then see that snowball shrink in your freezer, despite the fact your freezer is never above freezing. It happens because you have a “frost-free” freezer, (old-fashioned freezers had a problem with frost,) and your freezer’s frost-free option utilizes sublimation.
I have just lived through roughly a week of a frost-free New Hampshire. I’ve headed out in the morning, planning to scrape the windshield of my car, but morning after morning there has been no frost on the windshield, despite the temperatures being down nearly 20 (F.)
Just as a snowball can shrink in your freezer, our snowpack is shrinking. It is also melting, and streams are brimming, but not to the degree I would expect. In fact my expectations, and predictions, are all wrong.
This is a spring I have never seen before. Over three feet of snow are quietly and all but apologetically vanishing before my eyes. There’s hardly even a mud season, and at times the dry wind whips up a cloud of dust from the drive, or litters a crisp shower of brown leaves from the snowless south-facing side of my farm’s pasture to the still-snowy north-facing side.
I often say, “Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst,” but in this case my preparations make me look like a bit of a dope. However to become garlic faced about looking like a dope would be foolish. It would be like building a bomb shelter, and then being disappointed there wasn’t a nuclear war.
Sometimes it is good to be wrong. I gaze about at the golden sunshine, breath deeply the dry, Canadian air, and don’t feel all that bad that all my past experience hasn’t amounted to a hill of beans.
But isn’t that the definition of spring? Something you have never seen before?
I think so. Spring is never, “The same old spring.”
When you have been sick, and again become well, it is never “the same old wellness.”
Even in the case of a womanizing rake, who is forever ditching fine girls he should be loyal to for his next fling, what he is forever seeking (and never finding) is not “the same old lady.”
When a bitter and cold night ends with the dawn, it is not the “same old dawn.”
Every day holds the promise of something fresh and new. And, if we truly value what is fresh and new, what value has that which is tired and old? This brings me back to the fact we all like to be knowledgeable, and to strut with authority.
Think twice about it. Face to face with springtime, could anything be more stupid?
To be truly knowledgeable is to be omniscient. IE: God. God is the only one omniscient. He has nothing left to know.
However we mere mortals have lots to learn. We should leap from bed thirsty to learn more. As much as we like to share what we already know with others, we should never rest content with that little, fanning the feeble fire of our ego, when we could instead venture forward into the sunrises and healing and springtime and new love of Truth.
The alternative is stagnation. It is to pretend you know it all, when you don’t.
It is to say, “The science is settled.” Science is never settled, unless and until you are God.
Science is never settled, unless and until you are God.
The first two below are on topic. The rest are fun to read anyway.
In the beginning, God created Weatherman and endowed him with just
enough ability to almost always incorrectly guess what tomorrow’s
weather would be. Then, taking a rib and a map pointer from
Weatherman, He created Weatherwoman, whose powers of climate-related prophesy were not much better, but she was more perky, and thus more fun to watch.
Despite satellites, sophisticated computer programs and masters degree
university courses in the science/voodoo of weather predicting, there
continues to be a somewhat ironic aspect to weather prognostication.
It’s almost as if God wants to emphasize that no matter how
smarty-pants humans become, He still has control over the Xbox weather
generator.
Verily, Weatherman and Weatherwoman mysteriously evolved into one
generic life form called “meteorologist,” a designation curiously
unrelated to meteors. (Well, maybe not completely. An early
meteorologist, upon seeing a meteor the size of Madagascar smash into
the Earth near the Yucatan Peninsula 60 million years ago, correctly
predicted “partly scattered dinosaurs and a 55 percent chance of an
ice age. Overcoat and umbrella recommended.”)
Apparently, the main reason for the creation of the term
“meteorologist” was to render all weathermen, weatherwomen and
weatherperson jokes and witticisms null and void. (Bob Dylan, for
instance, never said, “You don’t need a meteorologist to know which
way the wind blows.”)
It was the spotty track record of weather predictions that led to an
entire genre of jokes about those who attempted to predict the
weather, such as, “A weatherman and weatherwoman walk into a train.
They didn’t see that coming either.”
The last truly funny weatherman jokes came from comedian George
Carlin’s “Hippy Dippy Weatherman,” who reported “Tonight’s forecast:
Dark. With continued dark until partly scattered light in the morning.
We see that overnight our low was 35. The high was 215 degrees. That
was during a fire at the weather bureau.” You’ll note that the
venerable Carlin, though he continues to perform despite being 127
years old, has never had to update that bit.
I don’t know how today’s new fridge/freezer specifically accomplish this task, but my +30 yr old Ward’s Signature series as a matter of fact during a “defrost cycle” _melts_ the _ice_ that collects on (literally: “freezes onto in a conformal manner”) the *evaporator* (cooling) coils. The ‘melting’ is accomplished via heating elements in close proximity to (in intimate contact with) the evaporator coil.
(Mechanical compressor-based refrigeration basically uses these four items in this order: Compressor, Condenser coil, and in the ‘cold box’ area: an Expansion valve and then the Evaporator coil. The evap coil output is routed back to the compressor inlet.)
The defrost cycle was (used to be) done on a timed basis about once a day, but I have been invoking the ‘defrost’ cycle manually for better than 5 years now once a week since the defrost timer failed … the defrost cycle result is always a ‘dribble’ of water from the evap coil into the “water collection pan” (or tray) that rests in the very bottom area of the refrigerator frame below the fridge/freezer ‘cold box’.
The “water” that dribbles out was once *vapor* in the ‘cold box’ of the fridge whether it arrived there via apples or carrots in the crisper or comprised ice cubes in the freezer section or existed in the very air that entered when I opened the freezer or fridge doors to grab the ice cream or the milk jug.
.
‘Such rock-like earth should have a name. It can’t be “permafrost” because it isn’t permanent. Perhaps it should be called “tempafrost?”’
—
I think the technical term would be “rotten permafrost”.
Assumes facts not in evidence; (1) the dew point may have been too low to allow formation of dew or frost in the first place (‘dry’ conditions IOW), (2) it may have been overcast WHICH also inhibits dew/frost formation owing to inhibited radiative cooling to an exposed night sky, (3) sufficient wind could have been present offsetting the radiative cooling below the dew point (which would have then lead to dew/frost formation).
I think that covers it. </very dry humor>
.
Adam says:
April 5, 2013 at 6:11 pm
___________
Howdy Adam,
You could just consider these threads as open threads, or whatever, or you could just go fish.
Entertaining read Caleb, but very frustrating too – I kept expecting that somehow along the line the story was going to segue into something science related. Anthony & mods & authors, these types of posts could really use an up front warning/disclaimer that they are for enjoyment and aren’t directly tied into science.
Caleb, create a third category in your mind “Possible, but not proven.” Stash everything there until verified such that you can move it into either “proven” or “false.” That’ll save you a lot of embarrassment.
By the way, KevinK says: April 5, 2013 at 7:14 pm is absolutely correct – when we firebombed Tokyo and other Japanese cities, it was with full intent to start massive fires, and the further they spread, the better. That was the hell of war back then. If a nation went to war, their citizens were fair game, and you tried to do the most damage possible with every attack. If enough citizens were hurt, starved, or displaced, etc., then they would stop fighting and prevail on their government to end the war. After all, they are responsible for their government, was the thinking (with some merit). So those bombs were specifically designed for that purpose – creating massive fires that would spread as far as possible and damage as much as possible. Far more people died from the firebombing of Japan than from the nuclear bombs.
Dresden was similarly firebombed, with massive loss of life also. See: http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/firebombing-of-dresden
Since then, firebombing has been outlawed by international agreement/laws of war.
Anthony, for whatever my input is worth, I really do hope that you’ll consider adding an up front note to posts like this, letting us know that they are literary in nature rather than more heavily vested in science issues… that way we can enjoy the read without being frustrated to not discover some science by the end, or choose to move on to the next post as one sees fit at the time.
Ahhhh, Sublimation… this is what we experience every winter in Colorado. It is amazing to see snow evaporate within a day or two after a heavy snow fall…. not much ground water or run off….but you can definitely see and measure the moisture in the air during and after the sublimation process. We kiss it good bye… realizing that it wasn’t ours to keep….and hope that the plains get enough moisture for spring planting & summer growth.
After WWII my dad finished college and attended medical school, graduating in 1952. He said that one of the medical professors told his class that within a decade they would discover that 50% of what they had been taught in med school would no longer be true – and there was no way to know which 50% was incorrect.
I would remind Caleb of the “image and likeness” clause in the Bible as it relates to how mankind was created in relation to (WRT) God, e.g. Gen 1:27–28, Gen 5:1–3 and Gen 9:6.
To that end, I would proffer that we can know a great deal, but, in some manner, way, shape or form we will be limited. Those ‘glimpses’ of knowledge or insights may also (do) come at some price (expenditure) of energy or time as it relates to study of a subject and of course the non-recoverable ‘time’ spent in that endeavor or pursuit of ‘knowing’ (knowledge).
Furthermore, we have no inherent limitation in that area, in other words, we are not restricted from knowing, we just have ‘human’ limits since we are finite vs being “infinite” (this is self evident or a ‘tautology’).
.
I can only reiterate, the most literate scientists on the planet.
”Do you realize what this means? It means that this damn thing doesn’t work at all ”
Doc Brown in Back to the Future
Adam says:
April 5, 2013 at 6:11 pm
Someone once said something about opinions and facts. It seems opinions are not facts and you are stuck with the latter while the former you can adjust as the situation warrants.
You ought to be aware of this phrase: “Commentary on puzzling things in life, . . . ”
You can find this statement at the top of all WUWT postings in the headline banner. It sounds ‘fact like’ to me, rather than ‘opinion like’, but I have been known to be mistaken. I have been reading WUWT since Sept. 2008 and do not find Caleb’s post odd in the context of the many posts I have read here. I think it is interesting. That, of course, is an opinion.
While not as evocative of pleasant memories as an Adirondack chair, one metric of mine about the spring melt is the sump in our basement. Ordinarily sumps are where water goes to drain. In New Hampshire, they seem to be what water comes out of to flood the basement.
Ordinarily I set up the sump pump early in March and it can spend weeks pumping water into the sewer drain. Some years I’ll set up a siphon with a garden hose and run down the hill close to Main St. This year the water in the sump hasn’t gotten more than a few inches high, way short of the limit switch for stopping the sump, let alone starting it.
Kinda nice having a quiet melt season, especially without being in drought conditions.
OTOH, given the persistent cold until the last week or so, I won’t be surprised if it snows in May.
John F. Hultquist says:
April 5, 2013 at 9:48 pm
One of my metrics for reading WUWT posts is “If it’s from New Hampshire, it’s bound to be interesting – to me.” Well, except for my posts, which are from New Hampshire. For those, I find the comments interesting, especially ones from New Hampshire. 🙂
A quibble – you say “I think it is interesting” is an opinion. I argue that it is a fact that you found it interesting, albeit one that only you can verify.
Caleb-
I got a kick out of the sentence: “In any case what has happened was something I haven’t ever seen before.”
Living in Vermont, you lived for a long time before you saw snow sublimate. However, if you had grown up Albuquerque, New Mexico, where I first encountered snow (as a college student, having grown up in Miami, FL), you would expect snow to behave that way. Snow in Albuquerque never turns to slush, it just disappears. The low humidity guarantees it.
Maybe we need a new un-atributable quote: “All climate is local.”
Caleb-
I got a kick out of the sentence: “In any case what has happened was something I haven’t ever seen before.”
Living in Vermont, you lived for a long time before you saw snow sublimate. However, if you had grown up Albuquerque, New Mexico, where I first encountered snow (as a college student, having grown up in Miami, FL), you would expect snow to behave that way. Snow in Albuquerque never turns to slush, it just disappears. The low humidity guarantees it.
Maybe we need a new un-attributable quote: “All climate is local.”
“There is no new thing under the sun” was Ecclesiastes
Some people have commented about this and some of Willis’s posting not being about the general topic of climate science and out of place in this blog. Myself with this blog and others, I have a hard time trying to keep up with the reams of articles and information. I was supposed to do my taxes tonight but now it is sack time, taxes not done.
I am a steamer by trade and I find an article like this along with Willis’s allows me to blow off steam. This evening I first popped over to Icecap, started to raise a head of steam. I then moved over to Jo Nova’s site, pressure increasing, into the upper range. Gave fellow Canadian Donna Laframboise’s blog a read, well that Suzuki dude got my pressure tickling the safeties (safeties ready to pop). Finished off my evening reading Caleb’s contribution, pressure dropped into normal operating range. Can now calmly head for bed.
” However to become garlic faced about looking like a dope would be foolish. It would be like building a bomb shelter, and then being disappointed there wasn’t a nuclear war.
Sometimes it is good to be wrong. ”
Interesting contrast to warmists’ attitude.
They live in fear of terrible climate change. But when it doesn’t happen they do into denial and try to carry on shouting “it’s worse than we thought”.
Initially changes did give rise for concern and scientists were right to sound the alarm. However, the vast majority of the envro movement now clearly does not want the threat of global warming to disappear before we allow them to dictate policy.
Are storm drains part of the sewage system in New York?
More at NBC News and New York Times.
PS
Apparently it was a spectacled caiman crocodile.
Thanks Caleb, for a great read! About your remark;
“When the winter is open there is no blanket of snow to insulate our earth, and it can freeze as solid as permafrost down to a depth of five feet. (Such rock-like earth should have a name. It can’t be “permafrost” because it isn’t permanent. Perhaps it should be called “tempafrost?”)”
In Norway this is called “barfrost”, which perhaps can be translated into something like “bare frost” or “naked frost” in English, when the plants sorely miss their comforting blanket of snow.
Thanks Caleb and Anthony. A change of pace is welcome by most, if not all.
This post may not be directly “about science” but I learned a few things I didn’t know from it and for that I’m grateful. The comments that followed, some of them about science, others about history and the remainder about life in general, added a lot more, so I for one thank Anthony. Why, though, is it a sad fact that the warmist blogs don’t seem able to generate civilised and knowledgeable comment and discussion like this?
Actually, in the Twain story, the other pilot DID recognize him after a while as he talked. The pilot told Clements that he carried on with his tall tale to see what he was up to, pretending to be a rube when he was well-known as a pilot.