From the National Science Foundation, another bit of Speculative Science™ note the caveat in bold, which is all they need for a headline that screams certainty:
This sudden release of gases into the atmosphere may have created intense global warming, and acidification of the oceans, which ultimately killed off thousands of plant and animal species.
See below for the alternate scenario based on the same press release.
Press Release 13-046
Before Dinosaurs’ Era, Volcanic Eruptions Triggered Mass Extinction
![]()
Increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide, global warming, ocean acidification killed 76 percent of species on Earth
Back to the future? Ancient rocks in Hartford Basin, Conn., offer a look into geologic time.
|
March 21, 2013
More than 200 million years ago, a massive extinction decimated 76 percent of marine and terrestrial species, marking the end of the Triassic period and the onset of the Jurassic.
The event cleared the way for dinosaurs to dominate Earth for the next 135 million years, taking over ecological niches formerly occupied by other marine and terrestrial species.
It’s not clear what caused the end-Triassic extinction, although most scientists agree on a likely scenario.
Over a relatively short time period, massive volcanic eruptions from a large region known as the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (CAMP) spewed forth huge amounts of lava and gas, including carbon dioxide, sulfur and methane.
This sudden release of gases into the atmosphere may have created intense global warming, and acidification of the oceans, which ultimately killed off thousands of plant and animal species.
Now, researchers at MIT, Columbia University and other institutions have determined that these eruptions occurred precisely when the extinction began, providing strong evidence that volcanic activity did indeed trigger the end-Triassic extinction.
Results of the research, funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), are published this week in the journal Science.
“These scientists have come close to confirming something we had only guessed at: that the mass extinction of this ancient time was indeed related to a series of volcanic eruptions,” says Lisa Boush, program director in NSF’s Division of Earth Sciences.
“The effort is also the result of the EARTHTIME initiative, an NSF-sponsored project that’s developing an improved geologic time scale for scientists to interpret Earth’s history.”
The scientists determined the age of basaltic lavas and other features found along the East Coast of the United States, as well as in Morocco–now-disparate regions that, 200 million years ago, were part of the supercontinent Pangaea.
The rift that ultimately separated these landmasses was also the site of CAMP’s volcanic activity.
Today, the geology of both regions includes igneous rocks from the CAMP eruptions as well as sedimentary rocks that accumulated in an enormous lake. The researchers used a combination of techniques to date the rocks and to pinpoint CAMP’s beginning and duration.
From its measurements, they reconstructed the region’s volcanic activity 201 million years ago, discovering that the eruption of magma–along with carbon dioxide, sulfur and methane–occurred in repeated bursts over a period of 40,000 years, a short span in geologic time.
“This extinction happened at a geological instant in time,” says Sam Bowring, a geologist at MIT. “There’s no question the extinction occurred at the same time as the first eruption.”
In addition to Bowring, the paper’s co-authors are Terrence Blackburn and Noah McLean of MIT; Paul Olsen and Dennis Kent of Columbia; John Puffer of Rutgers University; Greg McHone, an independent researcher from New Brunswick, N.J.; E. Troy Rasbury of Stony Brook University; and Mohammed Et-Touhami of the Université Mohammed Premier (Mohammed Premier University) Oujda, Morocco.
Blackburn is the paper’s lead author.
More than a coincidence
The end-Triassic extinction is one of five major mass extinctions in the last 540 million years of Earth’s history.
For several of these events, scientists have noted that large igneous provinces, which provide evidence of widespread volcanic activity, arose at about the same time.
But, as Bowring points out, “just because they happen to approximately coincide doesn’t mean there’s cause and effect.”
For example, while massive lava flows overlapped with the extinction that wiped out the dinosaurs, scientists have linked that extinction to an asteroid collision.
“If you want to make the case that an eruption caused an extinction, you have to be able to show at the highest possible precision that the eruption and the extinction occurred at exactly the same time,” Bowring says.
For the time of the end-Triassic, Bowring says that researchers have dated volcanic activity to right around the time fossils disappear from the geologic record, providing evidence that CAMP may have triggered the extinction.
But these estimates have a margin of error of one to two million years. “A million years is forever when you’re trying to make that link,” Bowring says.
For example, it’s thought that CAMP emitted a total of more than two million cubic kilometers of lava.
If that amount of lava were spewed over a period of one to two million years, it wouldn’t have the same effect as if it were emitted over tens of thousands of years.
“The timescale over which the eruption occurred has a big effect,” Bowring says.
Tilting toward extinction
To determine how long the volcanic eruptions lasted, the group combined two dating techniques: astrochronology and geochronology.
The former is a technique that links sedimentary layers in rocks to changes in the tilt of the Earth.
For decades, scientists have observed that the Earth’s orientation changes in regular cycles as a result of gravitational forces exerted by neighboring planets.
The Earth’s axis tilts at regular cycles, returning to its original tilt every 26,000 years. Such orbital variations change the amount of solar radiation reaching the Earth’s surface, which in turn has an effect on the planet’s climate, known as Milankovich cycles.
This cyclical change in climate can be seen in the types of sediments deposited in the Earth’s crust.
Scientists can determine a rock’s age by first identifying cyclical variations in deposition of sediments in quiet bodies of water, such as deep oceans or large lakes.
A cycle of sediment corresponds with a cycle of the Earth’s tilt, established as a known period of years.
By seeing where a rock lies in those sedimentary layers, scientists can get a good idea of how old it is. To obtain precise estimates, researchers have developed mathematical models to determine the Earth’s tilt over millions of years.
Bowring says the technique is good for directly dating rocks up to 35 million years old, but beyond that, it’s unclear how reliable the technique is.
He and colleagues used astrochronology to estimate the age of the sedimentary rocks, then tested those estimates against high-precision dates from 200-million-year-old rocks in North America and Morocco.
The geologists broke apart rock samples to isolate tiny crystals known as zircons, which they analyzed to determine the ratio of uranium to lead.
The technique enabled the team to date the rocks to within approximately 30,000 years–a precise measurement in geologic terms.
Taken together, the geochronology and astrochronology techniques gave the geologists precise estimates for the onset of volcanism 200 million years ago.
The techniques revealed three bursts of magmatic activity over 40,000 years–a short period of time during which massive amounts of carbon dioxide and other gas emissions may have drastically altered Earth’s climate.
While the evidence is the strongest thus far for linking volcanic activity with the end-Triassic extinction, Bowring says that more work can be done.
“The CAMP province extends from Nova Scotia all the way to Brazil and West Africa,” he says. “I’m dying to know whether those are exactly the same age.”
-NSF-
=============================================================
I can play this game, using their paragraph:
This sudden release of gases into the atmosphere may have created intense global warming, and acidification of the oceans, which ultimately killed off thousands of plant and animal species.
Change a couple of words, and we have a whole new plausible scenario:
This sudden release of ash, soot, and stratospheric aerosols (like SO2) into the atmosphere may have created intense global cooling, due to blocked sunlight, which ultimately killed off thousands of plant and animal species.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Back to the future? Ancient rocks in Hartford Basin, Conn., offer a look into geologic time.
SteveP: The modern sense of the word decimate dates from approx 1663. See the second answer to the question asked. ref: http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/11070/decimate-has-it-been-used-in-the-classic-sense-in-modern-writing
SteveP: see also: http://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2012/09/does-decimate-mean-destroy-one-tenth/
greymouser70 says:
March 25, 2013 at 2:28 pm, 2:34 pm
The problem I have with this usage is that there are better, more precise, and clearly unambiguous words meaning to destroy, or exterminate, but only one word meaning to reduce by 1/10th.
At least we used to have such a word, but now decimate is used as a synonym for devastate or annihilate, which is clearly at odds with its original sense. (‘Several comments to this effect after greymouser70’s 2nd link, above)
Unfortunately, in language the mob rules, with the blind leading the blind, and the ignoramuses often triumphant, as the gigabyte pronunciation question illustrates.
I learned the word in Latin class a long time ago (but well after 1600.) I have it on the good authority of my long-ago Jesuit instructors that decimare is a valid Latin transitive verb meaning to decimate,(remove, kill, or punish 1/10th), a harsh disciplinary measure practiced by the Roman Army commanders of the day, and recorded by historians Livy, Polybius, and Plutarch.
I’m sorry, but 40,000 years is not an instant in time. LOTS can happen over that time period. And, how in the heck can you find the exact extinction time frame? And if your confidence interval is 2 million years, then how real close to PROOF POSITIVE can you be?
@Steve P: Your Jesuit instructors may very well be right, but the following shows that decimate also has other meanings coincident with your preferred choice, viz: (my bold)
Definitions
American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
v. To destroy or kill a large part of (a group).
v. Usage Problem To inflict great destruction or damage on: The fawns decimated my rose bushes.
v. Usage Problem To reduce markedly in amount: a profligate heir who decimated his trust fund.
v. To select by lot and kill one in every ten of.
Century Dictionary and Cyclopedia
To take the tenth part of or from; tithe.
To select by lot and put to death every tenth man of: as, to decimate a captured army or a body of prisoners or mutineers (a barbarity occasionally practised in antiquity).
Loosely, to destroy a great but indefinite number or proportion of: as, the inhabitants were decimated by fever; the troops were decimated by the enemy’s fire.
Wiktionary
v. Roman history To kill one man chosen by lot out of every ten in a legion or other military group.
v. To reduce anything by one in ten, or ten percent.
v. historical To exact a tithe, or tax of 10 percent.
v. To reduce to one-tenth.
v. To severely reduce; to destroy almost completely.
v. computer graphics To replace a high-resolution model with one of lower resolution but acceptably similar appearance.
GNU Webster’s 1913
v. To take the tenth part of; to tithe.
v. To select by lot and punish with death every tenth man of.
v. To destroy a considerable part of
WordNet 3.0
v. kill in large numbers
v. kill one in every ten, as of mutineers in Roman armies
Etymologies
From Latin decimare “to take the tenth (decimus) part of “anything”, in particular referring to the levying and payment of tithe and also the practice of capital punishment applied to one man at random (by lot) out of every ten in a legion; compare quintate. (Wiktionary)
Latin decimāre, decimāt-, to punish every tenth person, from decimus, tenth, from decem, ten; see dekm̥ in Indo-European roots. (American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition)
To all the pedants on this issue. Let’s just agree to disagree on this. Yes the original meaning is valid but let us not get locked into arguing about a point most people could care less about. You all are engaging in what is referred to as an Etymological Fallacy. Language evolves and meanings change. This is an ongoing process.
Commenting on the article and not the comments 7;-> I have to point out that according to studies cited by Ian Plimer in his opus, “Heaven and Earth”, the extinction referred to in the article was anything but as abrupt as they seem to paint it. Does anyone really think that 76% of all the species that existed at that point expired on the spot? Or even during the 40,000 years of eruptions as the CAMP expanded and the Atlantic Basin formed? The evidence is that the extinction event lasted for 20 MILLION YEARS.
It think I ought to point out that Geologists tend to think in very long terms when it comes to time, so when Sam Bowring says, “This extinction happened at a geological instant in time. There’s no question the extinction occurred at the same time as the first eruption,” he’s not really saying they all gave a gasp and expired. There are scientists who, using this as a yardstick, believe we are in the midst of an extinction event right now (staring homo sapiens, for all we know…but if we’ve still got 19 million years to go, or like dinosaurs, perhaps 134 or so more, I guess I’m ok with that).
But I do think that claiming such precision regarding an event that happened over the course of between 40,000 and 20,000,000 years (“There’s no question…”) is just a wee bit over-confident.